TRP.RED: Home | Blogs - Forums.RED: ALL | TheRedPill | RedPillWomen | AskTRP | thankTRP | OffTopic
Hot New Old TopControversial
Login or Register
258
- Hide Preview | 78 Comments | submitted 4 months ago by 810809 [Post Locked]

I was looking through my FB today and once again one of my (post-wall) female acquintances posts another article on a classic topic: "Why are "smart" and "gorgeous" women single!? Here's why"! https://thepowerofsilence.co/why-are-so-many-smart-and-attractive-women-still-rolling-solo/?fbclid=IwAR1qKtnAyY1ElVfl2YvO5xYscC_wguRLBoVt7v3qrErUTgtqSmGWZSOJtfU

Followed of course by other cackling aging hens in the social circle joining in with the equally bog standard repetition of the same reply: "That is so true! That is so me!" Well, I find click-bait shit like this hilarious to dissect since it's just preaching to their own choir. It is just about affirmation based on a lie noone believes, not even themselves; but serves as a nice little comfort-booster for these aging post-wall single hens. They all know the lie, they won't do anything about the real issue: they just want to hear the pretty lie from someone else so it "feels" more real... for a little while. Well, let's start with comedy!

Have you ever wondered why so many smart and gorgeous women are single? They are not high maintenance, but down-to-earth, sociable, and caring. So why are they still rolling solo?

I have, in fact, never wondered no. I don't really see the post-wall SMP as filled to the brim of "smart" and "gorgeous" single women. I definitely rarely see a woman of this group show these amazing attributes they say they posess. "Sociable" is nothing but reframing their active and frequest attention-whoring. "Caring" is a split between virtue-signaling i.e. caring about their kids which is true but also the only people she will truly care about - and showing skin-deep sympathy/pity to the poor losers she comes across that are dumb enough to show how beta or even omega they are.

Well, they’re single not because they think too highly of themselves or consider themselves to be superior to the rest, but because they have a hard time finding guys worthy of their love and respect.

Do I even have to point out the ridiculous contradictions? They don't think too highly of themselves, but noone is worthy? Cool.

It’s not that they are afraid of heartache, failure, or repeating past mistakes. Or that they’re only interested in pursuing their career goals and climbing up the social ladder.

They are not afraid, that is actually true. See women know the "mistake" while they are performing the "mistake": it is just another rewrite of the feminine imperative of alphafucks-betabucks. They know they tried snagging a proper Alpha while they were young and they knew they had no real reason to be snagged. They knew each one had a high risk of bedding multiple women at once and never settling down with them. They simply took the chance, often got knocked up: and just like my female FB-friend are now post wall single mothers. They knowingly took a risk and know the Alpha option is simply not feasible anymore, they're not afraid of repeating past mistakes indeed: they just know they don't have the assets and means to do so anymore.

No. It’s their intellectual abilities and high self-esteem that prevents them from getting into a relationship with someone just for the sake of it.

Down-to earth eh? So down-to-earth that a regular guy on their SMV level won't do of course. So... down-to-earth.

A super smart and attractive woman doesn’t want to waste her time and energy on a guy who can’t keep up with her in all aspects of life. Being with someone who lacks confidence and feelings of affection, and who doesn’t bother to commit is out of the question.

And here we get to the first reframing of how their female imperative is failing them in todays highly connected modern society and economy where said imperative is just too obvious by now. These women are so fulfilled and secure and don't need no man has been the narrative of this article, yet now all of a sudden not having a man commit... is an issue? The way women rewrite and reframe their thoughts and wants is just always filled with contradictions. I am stepping ahead of myself and making a bit of segue here. Here's the real issue for so many women today (including those on TRPW): they all know the alpha-option is no longer available but the options remaining are impossible to accept. They want commitment, but do not want it from some beta-bucks (especially if they are indeed successful women there is simply no pressing need). Then there are the men who are neither-nor Alpha/Beta but nowadays just don't see the point of commiting to a post-wall (often single mother) cackling hen that is too full of herself.

That's the thing: more and more men are seeking information and knowledge to compare and corroborate their experiences with other mens experiences, which oh so often leads them to TRP. Why do you think Reddit censored everything TRP? It's so obvious I got a chuckle from it once the news broke, was wondering how long it would take and now we have an answer. See that's the funny thing, women don't want to understand why even your regular decent guy that is not a Beta pushover or slacker/slob is not making an effort and seeking commitment. They don't want to understand that their own lack/disability of offering any sort of emotional connection, effort and commitment (or possibility thereof) is exactly what they don't want men to A: know B: admit to themselves. They have fought for so long to win every battle on the SMP for a century now that they can't and don't want to believe they are losing the war because of it. They cannot accept a world where they are equally responsible (and socioeconomically equal) for making relationships work or even start for that matter. They want all the benefits of giving in to the female imperative with absolutely none of the drawbacks and backlash post-wall should their mating strategy fail them.

This is something that goes for TRPW as well, they are not in any way better or unicorns. They simply understand and admit the female imperative and what the issues are today if they give in to it completely. They simply strive to avoid and/or negate the trappings of it (high N-count being the most obvious) but at the same time the only thing they seek to change is how to morph themselves into a potential wife that can land a very high quality man: an Alpha. All you perfectly fine, decent, well-groomed, socially competent and financially secure men would be OK but.... there is the same problem that I mentioned earlier. They offer no effort or real commitment to you: they just want it. They want you to display affection, commitment, romance, etc. of an Alpha (don't necessarily have to be one) for what will be a boring prudish sex-life that will wane as soon as you are dumb enough to put a ring on it. I see so many guys on TRPW act like TRP women are unicorns that "get it". Yeah they get it alright, but the fact you are expecting respectful and equal relationships in terms of commitment and attraction is what is doing you in. That is not what TRPW is about: it is just a cynical, smart take on what the issues of the modern SMP are and how to deal with them. They are no better than non RP women in terms of what you can get/are allowed to expect from a relationship with them. You are still expected to put on a full Alpha courtship to then just get the same old Betabucks.

I will stop here, I have had enough fun writing down my thoughts and besides it's getting long-winded. If you think what I have to say is of any value let me know, I might want to go through each point on that list in a part 2 for some more fun. Likewise, let me know what parts are bullshit or just plain stupid. Thank you.

[-] AlexDr0ps 228 Points 4 months ago

It's almost like these articles are designed to be exactly what single women want to hear so they can get the most clicks and make money

[-] 5937539859582754 37 Points 4 months ago

All the special interests have a lot to lose if the feminist movement falls off in favour for TRP movement.

[-] grumpieroldman 48 Points 4 months ago

TRP supports feminism.
TRP produces lots of fuckable men willing to fuck outside of marriage.
Normalization of casual sex was a primary societal goal of feminism.

For all the talk about frame, the essence of TRP is the answer to the question, "What is the best a man can do in a woman's world?" not "How do we restore order?"

[-] Omnibrad 25 Points 4 months ago

Women are perfectly fine if the cocks on the carousel improve in quality, so long as the price of admission remains just exist. There is no more social nor economic cost for riding.

[-] Econquest2 9 Points 4 months ago

you're wrong though. just exist, and don't eat so much.

[-] the_calibre_cat 4 Points 4 months ago

eh, plenty of dudes will plow a hill

[-] 810809 6 Points 4 months ago

LOL that is a great way of putting it. And if just exist doesn't cut it anymore: find hamster texts like the one I linked: Häägen Dazs for the soul.

[-] freshoutofgravitas 1 Point 4 months ago

Haagen hags for the soul. Love it.

[-] Unrealenting 4 Points 4 months ago

Indeed. The dissolution of marriage and traditional relationship hierarchy has forced women to also compete for a male's power and attention. In the past, marriage was a great deal for women who were married off to powerful, intelligent, and resilient men, it was incredibly valuable and beneficial to women back in a time when only such men could and would survive (this is still true for the inuits, for example, who live in incredibly harsh conditions that require incredible unfetterment to survive). However, now that marriage is completely off the table essentially as a contract to a sexual relationship with a woman, women are often finding themselves in a somewhat desperate situation where they begin to realize that they simply aren't marriage material to the type of men that their hypergamy strives for and refuses to compromise over due to genetic programming through selective pressures over time. This has created a similar instance for men as well unable to compete and refine themselves into potent predators and providers. Cue this generation of "nice girls" and "incels", which is the , relative to today's society, obsolete genetic material that was unfortunately not weeded out of the gene pool prior due to the comfort we've afforded to individuals through the contract of marriage.

[-] lukkassu 1 Point 4 months ago

"Nice girls"?

Please clarify.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] HumanSockPuppet 9 Points 4 months ago

Mods, a point for this guy here.

[-] zyqkvx 7 Points 4 months ago

Normalization of casual sex was a primary societal goal of feminism.

Normalizing for women, and incubating shame for men.

[-] Imperator_Red 3 Points 4 months ago

No...TRP does not support feminism. Feminism happened, sexual mores were loosened, and then TRP, and the rest of the manosphere, were created as a response by men searching for answers of what to do in the new social order.

Edit: I guess you are basically saying that in a tongue in cheek manner.

[-] grumpieroldman 1 Point 3 months ago

I am 100% dead-serious.
TRP is pussy-whipped - you are good little feminist boy-toys.

What are you going to do when you hit the wall?
Men don't hit "the wall"? Might not hit it as hard but if they didn't hit the wall then it would be all +50 yo men setting records at the Olympics.

How exactly are you rejecting hypergamy by fucking a bunch of sluts?
What do you suppose would happen if those sluts suddenly found themselves unable to find any boy-toy to fuck and-also no one was willing to date nor wed them? (They would kill themselves.)

[-] Imperator_Red 1 Point 3 months ago

I hate when you realize that you’ve been conversing with a mentally ill person on the internet.

[-] [deleted] 3 Points 4 months ago

This is comment is fucking gold.

[-] gbdoragnic 1 Point 4 months ago

> For all the talk about frame, the essence of TRP is the answer to the question, "What is the best a man can do in a women's world?"

​

\^Some deep shit right there

​

[-] riot2100 13 Points 4 months ago

That’s exactly how they are designed. Whenever I try and explain to people that this is where societal problems are being inflamed, or how this is the mechanism of capitalism, I get responses of disgust from the people who choose to remain in their world of monetized depression. I love how our economy runs and the opportunity for success but that doesn’t mean anyone should shroud themselves from how it truly works.

One response was “people aren’t really that greedy”. It’s not even a refusal of reality, it’s that they can’t even see it. 90% of our society is in the allegorical cave being used as forced labor.

[-] zyqkvx 6 Points 4 months ago

Act like others, think what you like <----- so hard to do

monetized depression. Great term. noted.

One response was “people aren’t really that greedy”. It’s not even a refusal of reality, it’s that they can’t even see it.

I run in to people like this all over. It feels like "invasion of the body snatchers", as if people with common sense are being replaced with guileless people who somehow work, and function with not a care in the world. Are they going to have their asses handed to them later in life or get all the way to the end? The latter seems obscene. Mr Magoo had a great life(?).

[-] itsjustsimon- 2 Points 4 months ago

Oh yeah, because in North Korea news are much more truthful without any bias right? Capitalism, you sure? You're reading too much politics, dude.

&#x200B;

People just read and watch things that are in alignment with their preexisting beliefs because it gives them validation. And the one who has attention, controls the narrative ( & resources). And in all honesty, TRP is guilty of that too.

[-] riot2100 8 Points 4 months ago

In all honest, TRP is guilty of that too.

Agreed. Having a constant awareness even of one’s own bias is imperative to navigate the shit storm that is today’s ideologies. If someone is reading this and doesn’t read anything, including TRP, with a skeptical mind, they’re doing it wrong.

The difference in North Korea’s “news”, if you could even call it that, is that the incentive to censor is to keep their people down by force. Here in the US it’s monetary incentive that plays a part in keeping people apart of a dual status quo that subsists off of discourse. That’s why today’s articles consist of clickbait and mostly fluff that seems like normal to someone who doesn’t know how to point out the actual details from the shit. If it didn’t make money, a news company wouldn’t be doing it. It’s also why Russia’s interference was so effective despite it not seeming like much. It helped to polarize and allow said dual narrative to prosper all the more.

I’d encourage anyone reading this to read more politics to practice weeding out the good and the bad, the bias and the facts. Find the details that aren’t subjective, then one can be aware of how this business works. No one can incite change unless they understand how the system works. If more people were educated to practice skepticism, the divide today would either be smaller or not even exist.

[-] zyqkvx 6 Points 4 months ago

An aside..

The amount of propaganda and psychological manipulation in North Korea is nothing compared to the US, and the rest of the world. The US probably has 2000x more propaganda.

[-] itsjustsimon- 5 Points 4 months ago

Yeah, you read this on the internet? I’m from former socialist state and please for the love of god, if you haven’t experience this in real life, just shut the fuck up...

[-] zyqkvx -6 Point 4 months ago

You lost my vote. If I saw you dieing on the side of the road I'd drink tea.

[-] Nicolas0631 1 Point 4 months ago

But he is right, I discussed with a friend of mine, a girl from Romania, she explained how communism was when she was young... There no chance she'll even vote for them, you can be sure. I also visited countries that still officially communist and discussed with the locals... Now they get the worst of both world, a dictatorship communism that act like the worst capitalist with heavy corruption and no right to even criticize the government if you don't want to "disapear".

US citizen are spoiled and don't even see it lol.

&#x200B;

[-] zyqkvx 1 Point 4 months ago

I don't think the people slamming me understand my context. I'm saying North Korea has essentially one TV channel, one newspaper, and one billboard (not literally but close) propagandizing the same few messages: Kim Jung Un is great, N. Korea is great, and pure citizens love the country and Un [cowards don't]. It's the ultimate gaslight. The US on the other hand, people are inundated by thousands of streams of propaganda. Each newspaper, tv show, commercial, billboard, (on and on) has their own agenda. The amount of psychology (NASA level thought) that goes in to manipulating Americans about the most trivial things is obscene. I like to think of myself as someone who has never been been influenced by a salesman in my life, and that's nearly true, and for the most part the same with propaganda in general. But wait. After drinking Coke Zero for 10 years because I like the taste I find out that Coke Zero was designed to be marketed to men.

[-] Nicolas0631 1 Point 4 months ago

You were really thinking they wanted to sell it to cows ?

But what is your point ? This is how it work in a sane place. If one want to convince other he tries to find something that please them and advertise it. That's marketing, but actually it is more general than that.

That exactly like seducing a woman too. You could go without any strategy, refuse to learn anything or you could try to use a proven method that work. Make sense.

But you don't ever force anybody. This will work for women that are interrested to begin with and that like the guy that do it. If the woman don't want any relation/sex, or she doesn't like this type of man or she is just in a hurry, this will not work. You don't force her, you don't brainwash her. You do your best to convince her but she can leave at anytime.

The same for the Coke Zero. Myself from time to time I drink some because I want a soda and it is one of the few available with no calories. That's about it. They provide a great service and I pay for it. Many think that the fake sugar they use is dangerous and don't want to drink it. Fine for them. Some don't like the taste. Fine again.

If you ask, most of the time I prefer fruit juice, and I buy much more of that, because I think it is better for me. Coca Cola is even selling some under the brand Tropicana. But I tend to take another brand because I prefer their taste. And all is fine.

What is not fine is forcing people or killing them when they don't agree.

[-] zyqkvx 1 Point 4 months ago

I'm saying as much as a science I have made it to be unsuggestable, I know I've been suggestable to all kinds of things that fly under my radar. I don't think it's a coincidence 'I like' Coke Zero (marketed to men) better than Diet Coke (favored by women)

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] gbdoragnic 1 Point 4 months ago

What do suggest though, people are naturally self serving , as they should be,

[-] Atheist_Utopia 8 Points 4 months ago

It's not just single mom articles. Every insta-sluts' post is filled with this circle jerk commentary.

[-] DependentScientist 1 Point 4 months ago

I was helping a friend who wanted to start a business and was looking for some financial investment.

I mentioned some red flags and he pushed back that “ya, but that doesn’t apply to him, because XYZ excuse.”

Tough love: No one thinks it applies to them because of [reasons].”

[-] RiskyRewarder 1 Point 4 months ago

Naw, that can't be it. They are onto something. Lulz

[-] zyqkvx 1 Point 4 months ago

But the women who write them are not marketing gurus. They are just writing what they want to believe about themselves, but change 'me' to 'smart attractive women' so they can skip looking like a complete ass.

[-] CensorThis111 94 Points 4 months ago

Well, they’re single not because they think too highly of themselves or consider themselves to be superior to the rest, but because they have a hard time finding guys worthy of their love and respect.

When a hamster writes a thesis.

[-] Arednor13 13 Points 4 months ago

This was the best part of this whole post. “Not because explicitly x, because implicitly x”. I wonder if there is an actual logical system that differentiates between explicit truth and implicit truth.

[-] awalt_cupcake 2 Points 4 months ago

It's the kind of system that favors appearances over admission. The same kind that also favors victim over responsibility.

If she considered herself superior, she has to take responsibility that she has an ego problem. This would also be admission; telling the world about her ego in direct-talk.
But its not her fault if she has the hardest time in the world finding a someone who is worth their amazing love and due respect. Now she appears to be virtuous and valuable.

[-] OracleofFl 5 Points 4 months ago

Their situation of being single is purely their own choice. There are studly guys with big pectorals, strong jawlines and big bank accounts just lining up around the block with diamond rings in their hands ready to marry them and carry them off on their white horses, but no...these guys are just not worthy of their love and respect so they would just prefer to remain single.

[-] JcHgvr 2 Points 4 months ago

Say what you want about the hamster, but the ability to rationalize things with such ease and efficiency is pretty amazing from a guys perspective.

[-] omega_dawg93 40 Points 4 months ago

these types of articles should all end with the following statement:

"the search has gotten too hard... so here's the address to the local sperm bank."

most of these women have lost their femininity and think that educational degrees***,*** fashion, and make-up can replace it.

  1. men are attracted to femininity. period.
  2. the 'good' men are most probably with the 'good' (read 'feminine') women; they don't need Ph.D's and corporate titles to get men and understand how little that shit means to men.
  3. why are you alone... read #1 & #2.

... always complaining about men... always looking for one.

[-] warlordchad 32 Points 4 months ago

The true mind-fuck of it all is that women facing the wall desperately want marriage and commitment from an alpha, but will then immediately turn around and try to make him a beta, thereby less attractive year by year to the point she’s going to cheat and/or want a divorce.

Seriously, there’s no good reason for a man to get married these days. None. I’m in my late 30’s and my date tomorrow is a 21 year old HB 8. Maybe... maybe when you’re in your 50’s or 60’s and you just don’t want to deal with the shit and grind of game—maybe then it’s worth it, but the question these women should be asking themselves is what are they willing to offer a guy? Are they going to fuck his brains out every night, treat him with care and compassion, keep themselves in shape, show him devotion and love so long as he upholds his end of the bargain?

For most of them the answer is no. They want a man like they want a purse—an accessory to the pottery barn life they’re trying to portray on Insta.

[-] grewapair 9 Points 4 months ago

I'm 57, and there is even less of a reason to marry when you get to my age because the need for sex goes way down. Imagine marrying a woman who refuses sex. That's what marriage is like once your sex drive goes.

[-] Pooddit 3 Points 4 months ago

But sex is her only leverage. If you don't even want sex, then she will have to hamster pretty hard to get any attention at all.

[-] MattyAnon 8 Points 4 months ago

but will then immediately turn around and try to make him a beta, thereby less attractive year by year to the point she’s going to cheat and/or want a divorce.

To keep him around she has to make him less attractive. Hence convince him to be a good little beta so that other women won't fuck him. But then she herself isn't attracted either, so she branch swings....

But this works for her because she gets those beta bucks and she doesn't branch swing until she's got a better option lined up. The deal is shitty for everyone, but it serves her resource-acquisition aims perfectly.

Seriously, there’s no good reason for a man to get married these days.

Damn straight. It's a stupid idea for men - worse treatment, more condemnation from society, nothing is ever good enough, vastly less freedom, hugely expensive.... and worse sex. With the same woman every time.

Women are more grateful for your company when it's by your choice rather than legally obliged.

Maybe... maybe when you’re in your 50’s or 60’s and you just don’t want to deal with the shit and grind of game—maybe then it’s worth it

But it's not easier. It's harder to keep a woman happy when you have no choices than when you do.

Women are happy I turn up. When I dated exclusively they weren't happy with anything, ever. Monogamy makes things harder, not easier.

what are they willing to offer a guy? Are they going to fuck his brains out every night, treat him with care and compassion, keep themselves in shape, show him devotion and love so long as he upholds his end of the bargain?

I think we know the answer to that. Male commitment directly leads to women getting fat and entitled.

[-] PhonyAndroid 24 Points 4 months ago

When men complain about dating problems: "How can i make women want me?"

&#x200B;

When women complain about dating problems: "I am amazing, why don't (The top 1% of) men want me?!"

[-] Lipophobicity 23 Points 4 months ago

"A lot of guys feel intimidated by smart and attractive women"

If guys liked their women dumb and ugly, this subreddit wouldn't exist.

[-] PhonyAndroid 8 Points 4 months ago

That argument is, and has always been the, "Nice guys finish last" of women.

[-] grewapair 15 Points 4 months ago

You've missed the point. Women don't need to settle any more, just for the sake of money. They can be more choosy.

A land whale can decide that either she gets a stud or remains single. In the past, that wasn't an option, so she'd drop further and further down the SMV scale until she found someone to support her. Our society now gives her the luxury of choice. She can sett or not, but she isn't forced to do so.

So if you aren't an SMV 10, you're wasting your time. Even the land whales are willing to walk.

[-] insertcredit2 1 Point 4 months ago

And yet stats show that men simply are't committing. Women love to lie but their lives they'll tell you how their boyfriend drives X or lives X or how many guys she's seeing. 90% are spinning her and 10% are orbiters. Never listen to what women say watch what they do.

[-] beginner_ 8 Points 4 months ago

They want all the benefits of giving in to the female imperative with absolutely none of the drawbacks and backlash post-wall should their mating strategy fail them.

If they have off-spring from a high value man and she can provide for it, their mating strategy actually succeed strictly biologically speaking. She might not be happy alone she might slowly get insane because of being alone but nature/evolution/genes doesn't care about her happiness, the genes care about getting proliferated which they achieved.

[-] askmrcia 8 Points 4 months ago

Well, they’re single not because they think too highly of themselves or consider themselves to be superior to the rest, but because they have a hard time finding guys worthy of their love and respect.

Ummmm what? Isn't that a contradiction? Especially with the word "worthy".

[-] MattyAnon 2 Points 4 months ago

Yes, but they have to spin everything to me men's fault while flattering their female readers.

[-] Terdmuffin 8 Points 4 months ago
  1. They don’t tolerate bullsh*t.

Hell yeah! This is not surprising at all.

Not surprising? No shit it shouldn't be surprising because the author came up with the list! How would she be surprised by it??

[-] UnluckyPenguin 7 Points 4 months ago

Enjoyed most of your review. thought it was well written, but you seem angry since you picked such an easy target. For future reference, real-life (like not on a computer) experiences are preferred.

I see so many guys on TRPW act like TRP women are unicorns that "get it". Yeah they get it alright, but the fact you are expecting respectful and equal relationships in terms of commitment and attraction is what is doing you in. That is not what TRPW is about: it is just a cynical, smart take on what the issues of the modern SMP are and how to deal with them. They are no better than non RP women in terms of what you can get/are allowed to expect from a relationship with them.

I've never been over to TRPW, but the way you describe it leads me to believe that women aren't learning how they 'should' be acting for their TRP man (i.e. Happy King = Happy Kingdom) - Instead they are learning how to exploit men (betas) in the most efficient ways possible while ignoring pointing out contradictions in women's or men's speech (like you did).

I know several redpill women in real life, and what makes them that way has more to do with the leading man in their life rather than who they (consciously) decided to be. In my understanding, RPW are the ideal candidates for someone here - cooks, cleans, submits to whatever the guy wants, etc.

However, honestly I think women explicitly coming out with their own 'redpill' movement would be awesome (as opposed to the manipulation tactics that is feminism). In true matrix-like redpill form, they wake up in today's reality where they realize that betas are easy to string along, guys like fit girls just as much as vice versa - and that marriage can only benefit the woman, so women should strive for it, among a long list of other realities that ugly women normally encounter that hot women don't.

...Rather than their current imagination of reality, which the article that you read is a good example.

[-] XiaoGene 5 Points 4 months ago

You took an idea of "Post-wall women are protecting their face and psyche out of justified fear" and developed it to easy yet so coherent read.

Host, you write like an angry Rollo. Great job, man.

[-] WhiteGhosts 5 Points 4 months ago

articles like that are filled with shit and only serve insecure people.

[-] SKRedPill 3 Points 4 months ago

Media's a load of horseshit. Some of the people you find there are FUBAR...

[-] MattyAnon 3 Points 4 months ago

Have you ever wondered why so many smart and gorgeous women are single? They are not high maintenance, but down-to-earth, sociable, and caring. So why are they still rolling solo?

Girl clicks, reads, smiles to herself about how super special awesome she is and how everything wrong with her life is men's fault as usual, clicks ad, author gets paid. End of story. Lessons learned: none.

[-] the_calibre_cat 3 Points 4 months ago

Why do you think Reddit censored everything TRP?

Literally just came back here after a long while. I don't even know if I necessarily agree with everything TRP, I just know that I need it to regain what I once had.

And seeing these "Quarantined" stickers on everything is just pathetic. Reddit is spectacularly weak. There's literally "Quarantined" stickers on the comments I leave here in my user overview, and at the top of the Red Pill is a little banner that says "This subreddit is quarantined. Click here to go home."

Home. As if I'm not a fucking adult that knows where he is and what he's looking for. For fuck's sake.

[-] SnowMonkeyCracker 2 Points 4 months ago

A super smart and attractive woman doesn’t want to waste her time and energy on a guy who can’t keep up with her in all aspects of life.

Notice the hypergamy in that statement. Women bond up the SMV ladder. You must, at a minimum, have the same SMV ("keep up") with the woman in question.

Of course, the inverse must also be true. If the desired man equals or exceeds her demands, that must mean she falls short of him in some areas. But that is okay because that is how the game works.

[-] orangebudd 2 Points 4 months ago

It's all about justifiying her own believes, the read it feel "better"and go on with looking for the unicorn.

I had to look her up, and found she's got 150 post of this babbeling nonsence.

[-] Jaereth 2 Points 4 months ago

Have you ever wondered why so many smart and gorgeous women are single? They are not high maintenance, but down-to-earth, sociable, and caring. So why are they still rolling solo?

Imagine this, you can devote almost all of your time to improving yourself, improving your career and doing what you genuinely enjoy, then when you feel like satisfying your sex drive, you can drive to certain places in your city and it's a literal buffet of the most attractive, high value partners you could imagine, you take your pick, go get fucked, and then resume with your awesome life.

This is literally all the women you are describing do. They are just like any high value guy who has his shit together on his own. Guarantee you most of those women are probably spinning plates of their own.

[-] MegaPendoo 1 Point 4 months ago

This hit home. I was out on saturday night with some friends and their friends of friends.

One misery boo said... Your really good looking, why are you single? Then she tried to hook me up with one of her friends 'K' who was not present. I asked who is K? She said 'you have met her.' If she was hot I would have remembered her, but I kept this thought to myself.

Misery boo showed me a picture of her friend on fb. She said 'K' is mid 30's, has her own money and all she wants is a 'nice guy'...but she is fiesty.

Red flag. In my head I was tempted to ask..'Why would I date a angry fatty?'.

Misery boo kept going on about how her friend is great, and just wants a nice guy. She can't figure out why she is single. Then spent the next 30mins trying to set up a date. I kept declining without a reason. It drove her even more mad.

[-] pohlrich 1 Point 4 months ago

Well thats what happens when theres massive band wagon jumping and opposition by women signing petitions to stop men learning how to relate to women and be the men women want. Demonizing men for any effort to learn how to woo women and sweep them into a relationship. Of course men need to be born with that ability not learn it.

[-] MCFiletMignon 1 Point 4 months ago

gorgeous

for when you can't call yourself hot anymore

[-] Imperator_Red 1 Point 4 months ago

Never understood why TRP women is a thing. It's good PR I guess.

[-] civilizedfrog 1 Point 4 months ago

This article will be the reason why she remains single in her 40's as well.

[-] faustian_talos 1 Point 4 months ago

Society is structured is such a way today that women get security and stability in life without a man. That is what they think anyway.

They will change their opinion when they are alone at their deathbed with all the money they made completely alone..

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] AutoModerator 0 Points 4 months ago

Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[-] MrShoeguy -4 Point 4 months ago

Let's not lose sight of the fact that red pill women are still better (deserve more happiness) than other women. If they're being honest about everything they have the right to aim for any level of alpha they choose.

[-] DrMrJrSr 6 Points 4 months ago

"Deserve"
"The right"

Excuse me? Are you doing what I think you're doing?

[-] SuperCrazy07 -5 Point 4 months ago

You seem angry.

I think the author makes valid points. The article is a bit wordy, but she’s basically saying that women with careers don’t want/need a beta and can’t get an alpha. It’s true. I know single women like this.

Just don’t be a loser and this will have no impact on you.

[-] 810809 8 Points 4 months ago

I am. I am not sure what point you are trying to make? I do if I put words in your mouth though, which is not fair. To be specific you are actually trying to say I am in the anger phase, i.e. an anger based on self-pity and childish rage that the illusion isn't true. I am somewhat angry indeed: because I am judgmental and disgusted by what I see. I can write equal amounts of sarcastic vitriol for fun regarding men and their/our hamstering. However a lot of feminists have me covered there, you'd probably be surprised in how many feminist points I agree with considering I love TRP.

Just don’t be a loser and this will have no impact on you.

Alright, it doesn't? This was not about me, but using this silly little clickbait article that is just a comfort-booster for women to convey some of my thoughts on womens contribution (and any lack of responsibility) to the modern SMP in a musing way. The reason I am replying to you is that this indirect accusation of the anger phase seems to be an oft repeated kneejerk reaction on TRP. It is if no value, it adds little. I am not trying to put you down, I hope you don't read my reply as such but why I think it's a TRP trope by now that shifts any focus from discussion on the topic.

Anyway, the article makes many good points... if you disregard the fact that if it did it would have no need to exist. It is that constant contradiction I mentioned: if women are so fulfilled they don't need no man: why are they lamenting they "can't" get one? Well, my answer is in my musing which to summarise is: they can but won't stomach making an effort in todays highly damaged SMP. The perfectly decent, well mannered, socially competent and self-sufficient man won't make an effort anymore. The article is at its core the lamentation of this fact but reframed as something that is out of their control and not of their genders doing: why it's the mens fault they are so scared and intimidated! It's the men, always the men! The common theme in all these articles is how little to no culpability women acknowledge: but they are aware of it subconsioucly which is why we see these hamster texts.

Catch my drift?

[-] MysterManager 7 Points 4 months ago

They’re not afraid to be single mothers and pave the path to their happiness on their own.

This is poison though, statistically single mothers are producing the dregs of society. One of the worst things to happen to the US was for women to lose the stigma that was once attached to single motherhood. It isn’t brave or noble to deny a child a father figure, it is down right stupid and the chances of that child growing up to be a worthless ass or even worse a criminal is exponentially higher.

[-] johnpayne10 4 Points 4 months ago

Black communities. Keep them miserable, dependent on government and you have a intact voter base.

[-] DrMrJrSr 2 Points 4 months ago

Just don’t be a loser and this will have no impact on you.

You should know by now how close that sounds to JBY.