bla bla bla save the women from themselves bla bla bla. Nauseating. When will society start treating women as adults who can make their own decisions without a big bad male coercing them?

Donating sperm in English motorway toilets got George Michael arrested.

Thousands of years from now , historians are going to look at the genome in the UK and think this man was some sort of modern Khan.

Guy fathers 800 kids with willing and consenting women and he's an irresponsible perv.

Thousands of women have kids with unknown fathers to get access to welfare benefits and they are strong independent women.

My hat is off to this guy for not only beating the system but also making it his bitch.

I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but this guy is a fucking genius. I always desired to have a massive number of kids like he does. This is pure motivation.

this is the ultimate agree and amplify

I thought woman were all like "my body my choice". I guess that rule goes out the window if another woman is involved. Obviously she hates this guy because he's doing the same job as her, just way cheaper. Her argument is weak, all the risks you take by using this guy for his sperm are the same as having sex with anyone.

Sounds like the artificial insemination industry is gearing up the agitprop to ease the passage of legislation it's drafting to protect its sordid little racket.

From the article:

Laura Witjens says women should think more carefully before using unregulated donors

Wow, she better be careful, that's awful close to slut shaming! Hahaha, anyway TRP says you should have interesting hobbies.

Sexual harassment or rape? There is no way you can look at what he's doing, regardless of what you believe, and see that as rape...

What would you bet all these women are married and got his sperm just to be able to a baby on their current husband or boyfriend?

But critics say while it's not illegal, using unregulated donors puts women at risk of sexual diseases, hereditary disorders and men interested in "no strings" unprotected sex.

Note the underlying sentiment in this paragraph, it doesn't say "women putting themselves at risk", actually it completely ignores women having any responsibility for their own actions at all. It simply states that if this happens (implying if we allow this to happen), then women are being put at risk (the consequenses are somehow our responsibility), as if something is missing here. As if there's an expectation that there should be some sort of entity in place here protecting women from their own actions. What is actually being said in this paragraph, is that it's your job to take a stand and protect women, subliminal messaging at it's finest.

It even says "men interested in no strings unprotected sex" in the same sentence, completely ignoring the fact that sex has nothing to do with actual sperm donating and artificial insemination. But never mind that, who has time for common sense when we have a golden opportunity here to shame men amirite? The article just had to get that in there too, just to remind you that no strings unprotected sex is an all around bad thing, and men looking for it are evil creatures and are putting all women everywhere "at risk".

Not to mention when that woman starts analyzing this critically she starts her sentence with "But if you strip it down to bare facts..bla bla bla". Ooohhh, stripping it down to bare facts now are we? When it's about a man we're suddenly just gonna look at the facts and be super critical huh?...

How many times do you see this pattern if it involves a woman? How often are rape accusations "stripped down to bare facts"? How often are any womans actions looked upon with this level of criticism in the media? They carefully examine this guy and his motivations and conclude that he is scum and a creep, but do they ever examine any woman and her motivations under a microscope like this? No they don't, because if they did they would expose how degenerate some of their actions really are.

Let that sink in for a moment, this is the narrative, women really don't have to take responsibility for their own actions and that's not even an overstatement.

The truth is present in this article for all to see:

Very few women are eligible for artificial insemination on the NHS as the criteria are very strict. Private licensed clinics cost between £500 and £1,000 for each cycle of treatment. Men are allowed to father no more than 10 children. Mr Watson charges £50 for his services - the "magic potion pot" - and most of his clients find him on Facebook.

No forms, minimal cost, total anonymity. It's no wonder the post-wall private sperm bank bitch quoted later on loathes him, he's destroying her monopoly with better service at lower cost.

When I was in my late 20's/early 30's, I thought of donating. I figured I could help out some folks (No, seriously. My boys swam very well), maybe get a couple-bucks for wanking into a cup.

My LTR at the time was aghast. Aghast, I tell you. She came up with BS reasons, shaming me on this-that-the-other, moral reasons here, what about kids coming back to find you there, child support, blah, blah, blah.

Now I understand she didn't want any other woman to share in my DNA. Someone else could get my great genes with no commitment, and she couldn't have that.

Joke was on her in the end, though. I 'donated' my sperm to as many women as I could. Was much better the old fashioned way.

Does he boff them or what? Turkey baster?

Can someone set me up a facebook page

What the fuck? If it was a eugenics thing I would understand, but who would want to bring so many kids into this shitty world.

That guy is homely. In the US he couldnt pay women to let him do this. Location is everything.

I'm confused, was he fucking all these women or just syringing it into them?

R-selected human behavior at its quintessence.

Actually, since Child Support is split between all of a person's children, it's probably not worth it for any of the individual women to claim it, since it would be literal pennies.

Edit: Also, the article claims that children sired through sperm donation are ineligible for Child Support anyway, so he might be able to use that, too.

He must have been reasonably intelligent to find a bizarre niche in the modern sexual market wherein sperm actually is valuable.

I'm impressed with the guy, but there's no way I could have a single child without having him raised well and in my community. I wouldn't donate sperm unless it was to close friends or to the wives of my male family members.

I think this guy is doing men in general a service. If it wasn't for him 800+ men could be sperm jacked and hit with child support.

This is just the beginning if men get even more birth control options. Women will be going crazy with baby rabies you can bank on it. He might even be able to up his rate with all the demand.

I bet he just did it for the fathers day presents. He would need to have a skip bin out the front of his house. $20 present per kid x 800 kids. All tax free!!

haha this guy is a fucking boss

Good Englishman keeping the English people in the fight. You can see the hunger of tea and global domination in his eyes...

Meh, within 3 generations your genes are pretty much randomized anyways. Think about it - for every breeding only 50% of your genes can get in.... so you've got pretty fine odds.

The problem is that humans think in terms of family names, and blood lines, and inheritance. We think in very personal terms, but evolution doesn't. Evolution is just looking for what gene clusters co-operate and work best together; whether they came from you, or somone with that same gene complex - evolution don't give a fuck. Evolution works on the species and gene level. Not on the level of the family line, as families breed with other lines almost every single time.

But with an unlicensed donor a woman can ask for child support at any time - and the man could claim paternity.

Not necessarily. There was a court case I believe in Australia, where a woman tried suing for child support from an donor she found online, but lost because they didn't do the physical deed but just got his sperm in a jar.

Yikes...800 kids from unknown single moms...15 years down the line those 800 kids have greater chances of sibling incest...worst part of it is more in-breeding=more crazy...gives me shivers already

Might be world record holder

He still has a decent amount of work left to catch up with Genghis Khan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_the_most_children

I wonder what this will have on the genepool.

Kind of like how like 12% or something (too lazy to google) of people in asia are related to Genghis Khan.

This guy is #winning evolution

Yeah I'm sure he could be rinsed with child support. But after you have X number of children you will never be able to pay anyway.

Wow, that's incredible.

Like in having a secret, and not wanting to be found out for it, so you share it with everyone so no one can hold it against you...

This guy is giving me a purpose.

[deleted]

I'm not in favour of single motherhood because of the well known reasons. So I don't like this.

In a thousand years his genes will have dominated all of ours. Regardless of what you think of him, he is winning at evolution on a global scale.

2 of his kids are going to meet someday.... and fuck.

Think of all the goodies he gets on fathers day!

You know what the worst part of the article was besides single skanks getting pregnant? The fact that they say the cost is prohibitive and they quote the high end at 1000 pounds which is about 1500 US for each cycle of treatment.

Even if it takes 10 cycles who the fuck plans to bring a child into the world if they can't afford 15 grand? Like holy shit a child can cost you more than that in their first year!

So many levels of fail.

Pretty clever. Good luck making him pay child support at this point.

The dumbest thing about doing this is that the women can claim child support at any moment, and the paternity test will show him being the baby's daddy.

This guy is literally my hero. I have been doing all the sperm bank hoop jumping shit and its a pain in the pass.

I am going to do it. I am going to start a facebook page and do what this guy does.

Even if I only get a few that would still be awesome.

I would request the girls have a little red dot tattooed on the kids heel so they could identify each other and avoid one of my bastards knocking up one of my bastets.

"But critics say while it's not illegal, using unregulated donors puts women at risk of sexual diseases, hereditary disorders and men interested in "no strings" unprotected sex"

Because women are never interested in no strings sex! Night clubs, Tinder etc are nothing but a cockfest

Which is why men should not date single mothers. You may end up raising his children.

Sounds like a lot of boys are about to grow up with single mothers...

Women have no shame. No shame at all. This is just the beginning of crazy...