The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
TheRedPill Sidebar
Welcome to The Red Pill
The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
Original Reddit Red Pill sub (quarantine bypass) that contains the full original sidebar
The Rules & Glossary
You are REQUIRED to read these before posting. Ignorance of the rules is not an excuse.
Endorsed Contributors: Respect The Tag
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms (2015)
Here to troll? Here's a Glossary of Shaming Tactics, try to be creative and avoid these. We know you won't, that's why you're easy to spot.
The Red Pill Network
Official Fail Safe Forums (Currently Locked)
New Here?
New here? Read the following threads and the Theory Reading below. Read before participating:
Confessions of a Reformed Incel
Theory Reading
Relationships, the Red Pill, and you
Women, the most responsible teenager in the house
On Value and the Value of Women
Powertalk and other Language Categories
References
Everything you need to know about Shit Tests
Comprehensive Guide to Shit Tests
Goals - A beginners guide on how to attain them
One Key Step to Not Giving a Fuck
Links to the Manosphere
Subreddit By Flair
Red Pill Subreddits
/r/TheRedPill
/r/RedPillWomen
/r/askTRP
/r/RedPillParenting
/r/thankTRP
/r/becomeaman
/r/altTRP
/r/GEOTRP
/r/TRPOffTopic
The Archives
Special Thanks
/u/CrazyHorseInvincible
/u/bsutansalt
/u/EpicLevelCheater
/u/Halitenina
/u/SlyGradient
/u/TheRedPike
/u/RedForEducation
/u/RedShifter99
/u/LegendOfTheFrontier
/u/MachiavellianRed
/u/RedSovereign
/u/OldMuckyTerrahawk
/u/Aerobus
/u/RedAsteroid
/u/CrimsonPerspective
/u/RedGoldSaint
/u/GaiusScaevolus
/u/SoftHarem
/u/-Anteros-
[deleted]
MattyAnon Admin 5y ago
First paragraph: Google finds it's really men who are underpaid
The rest of the article: How tough women have it
Chadster113 5y ago
How dare you try and mock women's struggle in the workplace
Mattcwu 5y ago
Don't worry, those pesky facts won't get in the way of the NYTimes telling you what your opinion is.
KeffirLime 5y ago
It's a pity the lefts constant portrayal of false women suffrage is reaching government institutions, and worse wasting government resources only to find false flags.
The women are so entitled and delusional that they actually sued Google for paying them more.
russian_nigger 5y ago
suffrage doesn't mean what you think it means
MattyAnon Admin 5y ago
What do they expect the damages payout to look like here!?
warlordchad 5y ago
Yeah, I was just reading that and I was going to say the same thing. It's kind of unbelievable how the authors could write this and the editors could approve it without owning the blatant bias they are presenting. Or maybe the writers came to the editors and they were like: no, no, no--this will never do.
Who knows, but it's incredibly damaging to our society that people can't accept the truth when the face it if it doesn't fit their preconceived notion of what's going on.
MattyAnon Admin 5y ago
This is the nature of our gynocentric society. Men's problems are only relevant as an excuse to talk about the myth of female oppression.
Actually I think they're trying to prop up our society as it now exists.
The whole economic foundation of our society relies on betas getting married, working hard and putting their money into mortgages and looking after single mothers so the government doesn't have to.
If men stop doing this by waking up and seeing the truth.... I don't believe society will collapse. But it will look very very different and much worse for women.
LukesLikeIt 5y ago
It’s about teaching people to see the truth and then disregard it. That is what they’re doing now
archaic-guy 5y ago
The editors job is to keep the work of the writers in line with the newspaper ideology , as a writers if you go against it you get fired or not hired in first place
We are just victims of the Media Imperative
KeffirLime 5y ago
The state of modern journalism is in shambles. Seems all news stations have a political affiliation, very few I'd reliably trust.
Orbiter45 5y ago
80% of consumer spending is done by females.
It took a while for it to sink in, if females are out spending men by 4 to 1, of course our popular culture, (and news media,) is going to tailor its virtue signaling for them.
riot2100 5y ago
You’ve looked hard if you can find even one source that you can trust. The amount of skepticism I have to use while reading basic news now is atrocious. However, there is a benefit: that skepticism has positively bled into other societal interpretations (recognizing the upside down clown world around us).
KeffirLime 5y ago
This has simply exposed their unethical practices. Makes you wonder what they were feeding us when we weren't asking as many questions.
If anything damage to their credibility will only harm mass medias influence over larger portions of the population.
ChrimsonChin988 5y ago
???????????
O wait, I forgot 3rd wave equality means men and women are equal but women just a little more equal than men, my bad.
[deleted] 5y ago
Just the fact that feminism is derived from the word “feminine” is all the proof you need that it’s a joke.
Let’s start a movement called Christianism that fights for religious equality.
Let’s start a movement called whiteism that fights for racial equality.
PS2Errol 5y ago
lol! Equality actually means women getting much more. Only then will true equality have been reached.
aDrunkenWhaler 5y ago
Oh, but you left out the best part:
Which basically means making salaries the same is not ok, because women have it harder, so they should be paid more, for equity and equality.
ChrimsonChin988 5y ago
It's too funny.. Later on they start talking about 'leveling' I had never even heard of the term before, but the point basically is that because women are paid equal to men for the same position, the problem is no longer the pay but the position, so they argue they were 'underhired' and are overqualified for their current position (basically arguing they still don't get paid enough for what they're 'worth').
I swear this is why you should never ever give in to a womans demands... Once you give them 1 finger they take your whole fucking arm. They're never satisfied and will always test how far they can take theie bullshit.
HatefulTwerp 5y ago
Me neither. It's commie gobbledegook that doesn't deserve any space in my brain.
snowie42 5y ago
As I read that my mind was blown. They just don’t want to figure out that women are not oppressed.
majaka1234 5y ago
That's why they have "internalised misogyny" and "structural oppression" to fall back on.
These are things you can't prove or disprove but they'll happily throw out some anecdote about how they've all experienced the above and therefore that somehow invalidates the facts and figures and reality which points out the complete opposite.
Literally living in fucking bizzaro world.
AlexDr0ps 5y ago
Lol women in the STEM field absolutely crush. Zero competition and now workplace 'equality'.
MisplacedSanityP 5y ago
What ideological dribble. “The facts contradict the subjective experience of women.” Yup, the facts always contradict leftist ideologues who believe in ridiculous notions such as the patriarchy or rape culture.
[deleted] 5y ago
[--removed--]
throwlaca 5y ago
Yeah that often happens, that's why it's subjective and not objective.
magx01 5y ago
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. The day men started taking that seriously was the first day of the end of the world.
PS2Errol 5y ago
Hamsters going a million miles a hour.
Philhelm 5y ago
Jussie Smollett might not have been lynched, but people have been lynched so he's raising awareness for an important issue.
mrust 5y ago
Facts do contradict the subjective experience of women.
​
As a consequence, the subjective experience of women should be discounted to align with reality.
SelfUnmadeMan 5y ago
"As a consequence, reality should be discounted to align with the subjective experience of women."
FTFY
Several_Broccoli 5y ago
The article is basically: “men aren’t being paid fairly but uhhh here’s why that’s good”
KeffirLime 5y ago
NYT is a peddler of leftist ideology, hence this is simply an advertisement to their zombie followers as to how far left the company has gone(after the previous leftist allegations against them).
Vikingcel 5y ago
Wage gap is real, just not in the way you thought.
Fulp_Piction 5y ago
But it's not.
The problem with the wage gap is the concept itself. Just looking at the numbers and saying 'x sub-group is underpaid' is lazy and misrepresentative. We need to look at the factors behind it. The market rewards assertive negotiation and job-hopping with more money. Usually women arent good at this and as such get rewarded (with money) less.
Imo, it's much more likely that we've bred a generation of faggotboys who can't keep their options open and demand to be payed what they're worth. Fuck that "men have problem too" noise.
CainPrice 5y ago
So apparently, if you conduct an objective test and don't find discrimination against women, you did the wrong test and need to keep looking for other things to test until you find discrimination.
The trick to equality is deciding on the outcome you want to prove before you look at the facts. How else would you know what kind of things to test or how to present your facts?
majaka1234 5y ago
They did this in Australia. Turns out the wage gap and hiring gap also existed there too... In favour of women.
You bet your arse they buried that report and went on damage control.
Auvergnat 5y ago
Reminds me of attending a presentation by a feminist scientist once. The problem was that in the context of grading submitted research proposals for potential funding, it had been observed that proposals led by men were better graded. It was decided to anonymise the research proposals submitted to the panel to get rid of the awful discrimination. Unfortunately, the results did not change... Men-led proposals were still judged better on average. The scientist was absolutely puzzled at this and was begging for suggestions from the audience to explain how could the discrimination endure after this change... She could not fathom any alternative hypothesis. And this was not even social science here, but full-blown STEM. That's the day I lost faith in scientists.
INNASKILLZ2K18 5y ago
I am gob-smacked. Like...seriously, wtf?
PS2Errol 5y ago
Hamsters going a light speed.
CainPrice 5y ago
It's just the nature of the beast. Society has decided on the outcome that is correct. At that point, the facts need to be sliced and diced and rearranged in a manner that supports the outcome.
In many fields, content submitted by men and women was completely anonymized. The people receiving it had no idea who the candidates were. When men overwhelmingly do better in blind, anonymous review processes, they just come up with new theories. Like women being systemically taught the wrong way to produce content growing up and content reviewers being systemically taught to be biased toward the male way of preparing content.
Any time men turn out better than women in any area (that women are interested in participating in), it doesn't matter how fair and blind and anonymous and unbiased the system is. If women don't win, then that alone is evidence of bias.
ozenmacher 5y ago
The insidious part of any of these "debates" is that, when evidence refutes the assertion (that women are underpaid and underrepresented), the next "logical" argument is that this inequality (that, oops, some women are actually overcompensated) is actually OK because it makes right for decades of wrong doing when women were oppressed by the male patriarchy. In our current feelz before realz gynocentric society, the debate stops there or else you are a misogynistic pig.
AutoModerator 5y ago
Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.
Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
J_St0rm 5y ago
Rest of the article: women not paid the same based on similar qualifications. Had because qualifications are only one variable in the pay equation!
TheEarlobe 5y ago
Can someone explain to me why the media hates white men and capitalism and loves women, minorities and socialism?
I mean ffs it was like this even 10 years ago. What the fuck happened?
Humidsummer14 5y ago
Not just white men. They hate asian men too.
majaka1234 5y ago
Outrage culture and businesses bending over backwards became a thing because of the vocal minority retards who don't have jobs or any life responsibilities so have time to dox people and spend all day moaning on Twitter about how they aren't given a CEO position because they have a vagina.
As these companies waste resources aquiescing they'll be outpaced by smarter companies who don't play this game.
Once those smarter anti-woke brigades affect the bottom line of the companies like Google then shareholders will start to kick the shit.
Like we've just seen with all those poor buzzfeed reporters who got fired and are currently learning to code.
magx01 5y ago
Women entered the workforce and starting voting. Que nanny state bullshit and socialistic ideas becoming pervasive.
WaspOnAWall 5y ago
Ideology.
More precisely : a stupid ideology, but attractive to certain types of people, started disseminating from feminist activist courses in universities, and propagated to the media, silicon valley, big corporations and leftist political circles. Internet obviously played a major role by accelerating the exchange of ideas.
The fraction of people who believe in this ideology is actually small, but they are fairly vocal and have a certain measure of success in imposing their way through intimidation and propaganda.
Philhelm 5y ago
Because white, capitalist men are the most likely to stand against tyranny, so they must be ground down into dust.
CensorThis111 5y ago
Because capitalism, like most systems of government, can only be powerful if the peasantry is weak. Easiest way to make the peasantry weak is to have it fight itself. Easiest way to divide peasantry is by gender.
Women can be easily programmed/seduced into being tyrants, while white males can be programmed/forced into being cucks.
It's just the path of least resistance for the societal engineers. We can change that by growing the fuck up. Don't be seduced, don't be forced. Put cooperation above competition.
SilkTouchm 5y ago
Capitalism is not a "system of government" what the fuck? pure capitalism is the complete lack of a government.
RepostGhostCst2Cst 5y ago
It's ok. We're coming for their Olympic medals
TheRedPillMonkey 5y ago
Even bluepilled white knights know that women never know what they want and always change their mind.
The idea that women as a collective would actually know what they want and never change their mind is laughable.
But I think the good news here is the men running Google, and in the valley and the world, have got to be getting over this shit.
They think "let's remove this awful pay gap and treat women the same and life will be sunshine and rainbows and we'll be praised for equality. " They change the pay gap to favor women, and boom, still not nearly enough. Still too much discrimination. Still the same amount of anger. No acknowledgement of things getting "better".
It almost as if women scream inequality as soon as they do a shit job to mask the fact that they actually suck at their job, and will always scream it.
But I think men in general are getting over this shit.
TheImpossible1 5y ago
Can people here not use Google services? It would make a difference.
AllahHatesFags 5y ago
Propaganda piece seems to celebrate men being paid less, upset that Google gave these men raises, then proceeds to complain that women have it worse and the the women must still be underpaid because they must be overqualified and offers nothing at all to support this supposition. NYT is a rag.