This realization helped my game a lot, although I admit it was also very dissapointing to realize this. Girls are fucking losers. Pretty girls even more.
Granted, most guys are losers as well. But that's not the main subject now.
What do I actually mean with girls being losers and why is it important to internalize this thought? If you take a look at the daily life of an average pretty girl (8+, 20-29 y/o) any selfrespecting man would be repulsed by the amount of time they waste on mindless bullshit. Bingewatching Netflix series, spending hours on social media, reading Vogue, .... Activities that are in no way improving themselves or anything around them.
Most men actually also lead a similar lifestyle, which IMHO is even worse.
Inherently there is nothing with this lifestyle IF (and only IF) you are where you want to be. You have no things to work on, no more passions to pursue, no more money to make, no gym you need to attend, no mental issues you should work on, etc.
Which honestly rarely is the case.
Most pretty girls (8+) have nothing going for them, except their looks. They never learned to think for themselves, they have no problem solving skills, they have no ambition, they have no personality, no originality, etc.
Then the few girls that actually do have something going for them often are one-trick ponies. I have dated some girls that were publicly highly regarded in what they were doing (singing, modeling, cooking). Still I was utterly surprised when I discovered that again it was all they had next to their beauty.
Is this a bad thing? Absolutely not. I adore beautiful girls. I like their feminine energy, their naivety, their carelessness. I'm not looking to discuss Quantum Mechanics or the Jungian interpretation of religion with girls. Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side.
So why then this important to realize?
From a pragmatic point of view, this realization will increase your success with women, while also increasing your pleasure while interacting with them. Pretty women are attracted to men with options. To men that don't make them or any other girl their priority. That are selective with spending time. That have a goal and live with a purpose.
So. Realizing that pretty girls are nothing more then pretty girls, will:
a) take them of the pedestal, which increases your chances of fucking them
b) make you realize that one pretty girl you fucked is not that special, there are a lot of girls that can offer you the same
c) prevent you from spending too much time on a girl
d) it will make you less possessive. If you enjoy a waterslide, and then some other dude goes of the slide after you, do you cry? Does him going of the slide decrease your experience? Same with pretty girls, fucking them is a nice experience. Nothing more, nothing less. They're not your possessions.
Again apart from giving you more peace of mind, this mindset will actually ease up attracting them in the first place.
emptythatcup 6y ago
I assume if you are only surrounded by unproductive, unmotivated except nice looking girls whose sole focus is their looks, then it's easy to come to this conclusion that girls are shallow. but this can pretty much apply to both genders, it's not that girls are shallow, it's the people you surrounded yourself with, that you interact mostly with, makes you come to this conclusion. my point being that if you find yourself seeing nothing worthy of most girls other than their looks, maybe you should consider surround yourself with different groups of people. and of course, doing this is not an easy thing, you need to improve yourself first, heighten your socio-economic level, before you can get into that high-functioning group of people. that's if that's what want, to see behind your current limitation, to not be bored by the low-valued people you now are confined to.
[deleted] 6y ago
It looks like you are surrounded by idiots and you've become one as well.
enkae7317 6y ago
I know a girl who does basically nothing all day but watch TV dramas, go on facebook/instagram, and play with her dog.
She's a solid 8+.
It's quite hilarious if you think about it.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Most of the guys i know at least have a hobby or field of interest, while the girls entire lives revolve around stupid memes, instagram pics, tv shows, etc. No skills, no goals, no interest in knowledge or learning, just 'ooh, drag race is on' or 'aaron paul had a baby'.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
I don't disagree, but what makes you so amazing, "L0wD0g"?
You're good at making reddit posts.....?
Hugh_Munghous 6y ago
I’m always blown away by the fact that women never really seem to have any hobbies. Granted not all men have hobbies, but it seems like most do. When you ask a woman what she likes doing (watching movies, hanging out with friends, going out, etc.) you rarely get anything that resembles an actual cultivated interest. Though sometimes if you’re lucky you get some bullshit answer like “photography,” i.e. taking pictures of tree leaves.
punkrockfishboy 6y ago
The average woman is a ditz. Pretty girls are mostly for fucking.
HandsomeCub 6y ago
This means no relationship security. You cannot depend on women like things you own. You can depend on yourself, because you own yourself. This prescribes seeing women as auxillary to your life, like a dessert you can live without if need be. Most importantly, us men and our male sexuality dont get to be possessed, if we are to play by the same rules.
This feels very MGTOW. Awesome post!
laughingandgrief 6y ago
And the truth reveals itself.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
I've never met a woman with an ounce of intellectual curiosity. They simply don't give a fuck. If they ever seem interested in something it is usually more of a social proof type thing.
tolerantman 6y ago
The ugly girls have even less personality than the pretty girls, ugly girls join together on mobs composed of only ugly girls and they all think the same and do the same stupid shit, and are always bitter and angry about everything.
mocket_ran 6y ago
I know a girl sb9 that is a model and has 170k followers on instagram. She does absolutely nothing to better herself in anyway..in fact she stays up late most nights watching movies and drinking, sleeps in all day, doesn't exercise or work out..is just lucky to have the face and body she has. Personality boring....but men fall at her feet and treat her like a goddess. I agree with your point..she is a loser. At some point once she has fallen from the tree of the desired she will grab some beta bucks branch on her way down and likely be taken care of the rest of her life...still being a looser. As you said, don't worship it, slay it when you can and just move the fuck on. They aren't unicorns..just pretty horses.
lacinyc 6y ago
I don’t know, this isn’t something I necessarily agree with. Granted I’ve met girls who get by on looks and looks alone, but I know plenty of girls who are attractive and still hugely productive in other aspects of their life - and not just by virtue of said looks, but also intellectually. It all depends on the social circles you reside in.
LouisSeaGays 6y ago
The fact you gaf makes you the biggest loser of them all.
MeltFaceDude 6y ago
You ain't ever getting laid, virgin.
diMT-13 6y ago
Mate I think it’s a strange loophole you’re manipulating yourself into. If all you want is casual sex, then do make sure that you keep someone intellectually stimulating because otherwise, well, you are who you surround yourself with, and this is no jokes. You also seem to have a strange relationship with what accounts as the perfect female for you, by seemingly despising and thinking as inferior the very type you seem to lust after, a conflict which, if left unchecked, may lead to problems down the line. Thirdly, your knowledge is sourly limited, by I don’t know what interaction. I’ve seen loads of pretty females with actual personalities, but then again you don’t seem to be interested in those.
CommunistFesto 6y ago
Wow. This boosted my confidence a whole lot! XD
chazthundergut 6y ago
Girls may be losers, but even the most uninteresting woman is capable of bearing children.
So they have intrinsic value.
Men have little intrinsic value. All the value that a man has comes from what he has done and what he is capable of doing.
So men should stop worrying about how women are losers and focus on rising to nature's challenge. Sort your life out. Face your demons. Lift. Kill it in your career. Ace every class. Find something that ignites your passion and pursue it seriously. Build a social circle of men you respect. Take ownership of your life. Become a leader, starting with yourself
Chicks are plenty cool. Tits, ass, and a pretty smile. The smell of her hair, the softness of her skin. The way her head tilts back as she laughs. The look in her eye when she surrenders to you completely. She's already good. It's up to you to become better than her.
[deleted] 6y ago
Yea. It's a lot harder to be a decent man than to be a decent girl that's where discipline and wisdom comes into play
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
zealanderx 6y ago
Yeah that's no joke-
Like OP says, "MOST" women are this way...
But this confirms OP has never had a 9/10 or 10/10- These women exist, he's never even been close.
Every woman I have taken seriously was hot and also a stone cold killer... whatever it is, smarts, wits, dance, yoga, health, diet, art... I dunno... there are women with passion out there.
BetaBitchBoy69 6y ago
fuck man you haven’t seen loser until you’ve seen my ex lmfaooooo
ioncehadsexinapool 6y ago
Yeah, oddly enough I can game any “dumb” girl. Even if she’s hot. But if she’s with it mentally and smart, especially career driven, it kind of throws me for a loop and oddly I seem to want her more.
It’s like I get a rush from fucking them because I dominated a smart person. Shits weird man I’m sure some freud shit could explain it. I hope I’m not alone but saying this on trp is like asking a bunch of nfl players who their favorite impressionist painter is.
ThrowFader 6y ago
Whenever I meet a girl who seems to be able to potentially challenge my intellect (rare) I immediately shit test her.
If she passes I get attracted heavy. But I won't catch a oneitis over it.
Smart girls really are more attractive.
I like danger, and play, and smart women are the most....
ioncehadsexinapool 6y ago
Same, check my reply to the other guy that replied to what you did.
[deleted] 6y ago
I feel the exact opposite. If I'm gaming on a smart woman, especially one with a good career, I'm most at ease. But I'm also 38 and am pretty much at the top of my profession. I'm also in a field that all the, "I love to travel" types find fascinating (urban design and planning). Escalate to a walk around the city that includes me spitting some knowledge about city form and architecture, and they are putty in my hands. I've literally never once done this and not closed the deal. I don't think it would work on a dumb girl.
ioncehadsexinapool 6y ago
Good point. My last plate I stupidly got oneitis for is an urban planner. She’s in the “aight” category, as Patrice would say (ugly, aight, & fine vs 1-10) maybe even ugly to some. She’s a huge dork.
I’m gonna get shit on for this but I really do get oneitis for a girl with a good personality that’s dorky & cute vs a 10 that’s a box of rocks, or even normal. I’m so weak for the former type it’s not even funny. The whole “treating her like a child” comes natural to me for normies and dummies, probably cause I can’t connect with them. You know as I’m typing this out I’m starting to figure myself out.
Dummies even if they’re hot, I only connect with them on a physical level so there’s no feels. If I can connect on a level higher than that, then I feel like that’s a prerequisite for feels. Hm.
[deleted] 6y ago
I don’t think there’s any reason to give you shit for that. You like what you like. I’m all about the nerdy, curvy girls. Not giant dorks and not giant fat girls. Just cute girls who like geeky stuff and are capable of carrying on a decent conversation.
Lizzle372 6y ago
Because you deem her more valuable. Who wants to lose something of good quality?
tibikush2012 6y ago
"Hell, if a girl could intellectually challenge me I'm pretty sure there would be close to no attraction from my side."
Why is that? It is much more satisfying having an intelligent AND pretty plate/GF.... What the hell am I suppose to do with her between sex sessions if she is an empty jar?
Why are you not attracted to intelligent girls? I have an opinion why but I don't want to insult
L0wD0g 6y ago
In women rationality is inversely correlated with beauty and femininity. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy women when they passively speak about something. But in between sex sessions, as you mentioned, I am not looking for a heated debate or lecture tbh. So in the end it's all good. It just forces you not to spend too much time with them.
Jikira 6y ago
What?!?! Am I reading this straight? You complain about women being losers, yet you admit you only like hanging out with loser girls. I think you should have entitled your post "Why I date loser girls?"
L0wD0g 6y ago
Because they are hot. For fucks sake learn how to read.
Hot girls have no personality. Which is great for fucking. But it also prevents oneitis. Oneitis is projecting qualities on a hot girl she does not have.
In general. Lel.
Stolles 6y ago
So you only hang around hot girls cause of the sex, you don't want to talk to them about anything meaningful and then complain that girls are losers? I'm seeing a pretty giant disconnect here. I don't care about how many women you supposedly slept with or even had a casual conversation with (unlikely) you don't have the life experience or statistics to make such a generalization.
Peoples experience really comes from who they CHOOSE to surround themselves with. I feel you need to improve in that area, look for vain but pretty girls because all you care about is getting your dick wet, then that is literally all you're going to find, don't bitch about it.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
L0wD0g 6y ago
Not true. Do you think girls want all the mental issues they cope with? Do you think they want their attention-addiction? Do you think they want to be vulnerable to manipulation? They are not where they want to be, but life does not force them to work on theirselves, like it does with men.
tolerantman 6y ago
Women in western countries are exactly where they want to be, because nowhere else they have as much freedom as here, so yeah, they'd rather have the "mental issues" whoring around with Chads than being a housewife.
WholesomeAwesome 6y ago
Lol whenever I hear of mental issues slutting around, I lol so hard.
yeah right mental issues spinning plates. mental issues. what a joke
letterboyink 6y ago
Curious if you could expand that last part
ioncehadsexinapool 6y ago
Women see their pussy as currency for resources. Men see their resources as currency for pussy
WalterEArmstrong 6y ago
And if the divorce courts weren't raping men's bank accounts at break neck speed that wouldn't be a bad thing. It worked for thousands of years.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Metalgear222 6y ago
Yep. One of those is worth little to nothing, one of those is worth endless hours of blood, sweat, and tears. Funny how things got to be this bad. Enjoy the decline boys
somebullshitrp 6y ago
To expand upon this:
Women are born with everything they need, and only have to do minor upkeep on their assets (don't get fat).
Men are born with nothing (unless you win the genetic lottery) and must build their assets and constantly maintain them.
So, to summarize the OP: pain, suffering, and struggle build character, but since women don't have to go through that as men do, they are typically bereft of any kind of character.
test0314 6y ago
Women age 40+ have to go thru the pain, suffering, and struggle for the rest of their lives.
daremeboy 6y ago
Not if they properly cash in on their young eggs and lock down a provider before they hit the wall.
[deleted]
IntensePancakes 6y ago
This post reeks of someone who has never been successful enough to be in an environment composed of other truly successful people, which gasp includes women as well, and they're not one-trick ponies.
I work at a top management consulting firm, and my colleagues (both male and female) are both extremely knowledgeable and interested in the world and its various intellectual disciplines, as well as being extremely successful at a young age.
Are there patterns and tendencies among women to be interested in, on average, less-intellectual topics than men? Sure. But does that mean that all successful, intelligent women are "one trick ponies"? Absolutely not. If you truly believe that then you are a legitimate idiot.
Also, dear lord, have you ever actually had a conversation with a real human being? Nobody fucking discusses Quantum Mechanics in common conversation unless you're a physicist, or you're an edgy neckbeard "I am very smart" type who has no idea what the fuck he's talking about, which I would argue, is even worse than a girl who only watches netflix and goes shopping.
You, sir, are the loser.
[deleted]
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.
But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.
[deleted]
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.
But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.
[deleted]
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.
But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.
redd_reality 6y ago
Only because in your nievity you compare women to male standards of success.
By that logic, you're an ugly fucking ogre. I mean, compared to the vast majority of women, it's true. So am I, even despite my chiseled jaw line.
The bitter beta loves to criticize women regarding them as inferior males in intellect, strength, integrity and honor. And while this is true, generally, it points to one MASSIVE flaw the bitter beta might want to take note of asap.
Before you can truly game women, game society and game other men, you have to actually apply TRP. TRP is an objective lens. You must view women for what and who they are, you must view beta men for what and who they are and (arguably) most importantly, you must view alpha men for what and who they are.
Beta men, women and alpha men are not comparable to one another. Clearly all three live by and are judged by different standards.
So stop hating on women for not being alpha men. Believe me, you wouldn't want women to be alpha men, because they would be extremely masculine and use your beta ass as a punching bag - kind of how every single movie produced frames every female character in 2018; but I digress.
A more productive pursuit would be hating on yourself for not being an alpha man, but that wouldn't be a very good post, would it?
Another more productive pursuit would be to write a post criticizing women for not living up to feminine standards, as that is their imperative.
BetaBitchBoy69 6y ago
lmao “dispite my chisled jawline” smh ????♂️
Usemi5325 6y ago
Read the post next time instead of the headline, OP addressed that one should not view women the same as one would view men.
[deleted]
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
This is not a debate forum. If you wish to have an argument with what we do here, there's a different group for that. It's even neutrally-modded.
But if you are not personally here to play, get off the field.
zombi-roboto 6y ago
I have recently been wondering the same thing.
TinfoilHat: Is TRP being provocateur'd?
[deleted]
C_Till 6y ago
I didn't think that RP could get any sillier....but here is a post saying girls are losers. Bravo
[deleted]
nomorelulu 6y ago
Yeah this is brutal. Just sounds bitter and stupid.
[deleted] 6y ago
Agree. This guy probably got cucked or something
[deleted]
kaane 6y ago
Do you realize how many offers do these women get daily ? Especially the beautiful ones. You wouldn't believe. Trust me.
When everything is handed to you on a silver plate, you will not find the motivation to get out and educate yourself. Do something better for you and for the world around you.
This is pretty normal if you ask me. The women are meant to be giving birth to the children and keep feeding them until they grow up. They don't have to be rocket scientists.
If this bothers you, well, there is nothing you can do about it. Remember, a man has to build himself from the ground up.
antariusz 6y ago
This is profound, and applies to men also.
Complacency is the enemy.
Success breeds complacency.
I work out harder when I’m not getting laid. I focus all of my time and effort into being disciplined. When I want something, I have to strive for it.
Flying_Wingback 6y ago
"Women are born, men are built"
[deleted] 6y ago
A woman simply is, but a man must become - Camille Paglia
BewareTheOldMan 6y ago
Quote of the week...and on Monday at that.
SoulTheorist 6y ago
That is so fucking true. God damn I love this thread
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
kaane 6y ago
In another words,
Men cannot make himself without suffering, for he is both the marble and the sculptor
Lambdal7 6y ago
I know several really hot girls, banging body, c cups, cute face.
It's actually not that much. Every couple of weeks maybe they get asked for their number, every 2 months on a date.
This isn't the case for bimbo-like women. Yes, if you wear a lot of makeup and dress sexy, you get asked out more, but if you're a hot girl, but wear normal clothes, then not so much.
It becomes even less if the girl is educated and has a career, because then, guys with lower education and l career, don't dare to ask her out.
FindTheBus 6y ago
Bullshit. Not only are you undercounting the approaches they get, but you're not counting all the approaches guys throw where they think they're subtle. The cop pulling a girl over and giving a warning for a violation she didn't even do. The boss. The club owner inviting her to his loft for an afterparty. Etc.
Lambdal7 6y ago
Yes, but it's only every couple of weeks that they get asked for the number, including subtle beta approaches.
[deleted]
ghosts_of_me 6y ago
Nice anecdote bro. Now ask them to show you their inbox on their profile on the sugar daddy sites.
g1114 6y ago
I just can't believe that, and wouldn't believe cute girls that told me that. Maybe in the 90s, but with dating apps, these girls can line up a solid guy every night of the week, for many weeks straight if she's efficient enough. And there are plenty of non-bimbos are on dating apps
I do agree with your final point though, only because women won't date down in their opinion. Hot females in med school got it bad, but only because they themselves won't date dudes 'beneath' them, which is like 90% of dudes in that case.
Lambdal7 6y ago
Yes they could, but the quality of guys on dating apps is abysmally low and yhey get bombarded by messages, leading most of them to delete the app straight away again.
The ones that love attention stay on the apps, the ones that dont bother leave.
L0wD0g 6y ago
Shitonya_Johnson 6y ago
that's a shitty thing if true.. smart girls turn me on.. It means that they have more than their pussy to get ahead in life... maybe a smart girl is less of a loser... They are in my opinion
DayGameChirality 6y ago
To each of his own. People here treat men like one size fits them all. My cock goes limp with a stupid woman.
ThrowFader 6y ago
Facts, like I wouldn't want a dumb bitch.
Some are too dumb to even realize how dumb they are.
Next them once they open their mouth lol
swejap 6y ago
And now apply 200 000 years of evolution to that.
TheRealJesusChristus 6y ago
Humans are on planet for since about 1.2million years. Earlier humanoids arent considered humans (homo). So more like apply 1.2 million years to that.
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
Don't even get me started on the lobsters.
[deleted] 6y ago
"SO YOU'RE SAYING WE SHOULD BE LIKE THE LOBSTERS?" --Dumb bitch 2018
goldenhourlivin 6y ago
“TELL ME ABOUT THE LOBSTERS”
Such an abrupt transition lol. She knew she was going down in flames.
earlpfeiffer 6y ago
I spent a good part of my childhood with my hands kept closed with a rubber band and I find this a painful and insensitive line of discussion.
My father was boiled alive!
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Georgeaid 6y ago
Nothing I’ve ever read is more accurate than this statement.
ass_boy 6y ago
Luckily we get to read it in every post even when it is completely out of context.
whatsthisgarg 6y ago
god I'm so sick of seeing that.
It's also not accurate and not helpful. It's a cuck mantra that completely throws in the towel on the whole thing.
Get good enough, become man enough, and it's HER turn with YOU. I speak from experience: it's HER turn to have you fuck her in a stairwell, or in a stranger's van parked on a public street.
[deleted]
SuperbDuke 6y ago
“hoes are like a doorknob, everybody gets a turn”
Cross_De_Lena 6y ago
Nice observation.
Just listen to their conversation when they meet with their girlfriends. Only gossip.
Lambdal7 6y ago
Yes there are some women like that, but this theory fails for any law, business, medical, science student pretty much, which are a significant portion of women.
IdoNtEvEnWaTz 6y ago
Well they get treated like goddesses when they are in their prime which probably reduces their drive to become competent in a particular field of knowledge.
Cringey as fuck. Just because you watched some physics youtube videos and JBP you think you are knowledge in these subjects? You only scratched the surface and that doesn't take much time. The truth is it's most impossible to be a rennaisance man because the depth of knowledge available in every discipline these days is incredibly vast.
Everyone has strengths and weaknesses. It's not healthy to only point out the worst in people.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
BetaBitchBoy69 6y ago
pop a modafinil your IQ will instantly be 210
WalterEArmstrong 6y ago
"The truth is it's most impossible to be a medieval man......." Did you mean "renaissance man"?
whoismikejoneswho 6y ago
Lol. "Its like, yur never gonna be that smart bro, yur not fkn mid-evil man"
[deleted]
CanuckinFL 6y ago
that's absurd. Of course you strive to repeat that level of knowledge or you're just simply a dumbass.
The metric of intelligence is curiosity. Talk to a very pretty girl. They're the most un-curious people you can find.
It makes dialogue with them sheer tedium.
[deleted]
Boeijen666 6y ago
But also they can feel things! My current cum sock says to me "I think the full moon is making me feel moody lately. I feel emotional, bit all over the place". I said "Ah that sucks, maybe if we root youll feel better". She replies " nah I cant, got my period".
MrCarepig 6y ago
Well if you put women on the same standard as men yeah they are. But theyre not really programed to be ambitious, diciplined and strong like us. The worst thing you can call a man is a loser. Call a woman a loser, no biggie. The worst thing you can call a woman is a whore, call a man a whore hell say thank you.
[deleted]
tolerantman 6y ago
"Girls are whores"
Now that would shake things up
[deleted]
[deleted]
brinkleybuzz 6y ago
To be brutally honest, substitute video games for Netflix and internet boards for social media in this line and you will have described a large portion of the male population.
The difference between a male and female loser is the female loser was born with something that has value out of the box, her vagina. A male loser is worthless.
Jcart105 6y ago
Except men... You know, build and maintain civilization, occupy all the important jobs, and pay all of the taxes.
tolerantman 6y ago
In the end, it is OK to be a worthless loser as long as you have a vagina, female privilege at its finest.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Dimethyltrip_to_mars 6y ago
For the sake of video games, there are ways to capitalize off of gaming abilities, be it a twitch streamer or a game tournament winner for cash prizes.
I'm not a gamer myself, but I'd say video games aren't a fair comparison. Maneuvering a controller or using a mouse or keyboard to even solve a puzzle involves more than staring at a screen watching a work of fiction.
Jikira 6y ago
Don't forget you can make a lot of money from social media if you are a girl. You don't even have to be that hot, you just need to know how to do makeup and work angles.
Dimethyltrip_to_mars 6y ago
Yeah this is all known and not part of my argument.
ioncehadsexinapool 6y ago
Girls also strip on camera for hella money
Dimethyltrip_to_mars 6y ago
Or in clubs. But that's a detour from the above argument.
Dude says girls just lay about on social media and watching TV, which are passive activities. Then another dude commented and tried to compare those passive activities with playing video games, which is a way more involved activity than staring at a phone.
Sheesh.
bc9toes 6y ago
Twitch streamer? A girl with a nice rack is instantly more successful on twitch than 99% of gamers.
But on the pro side you are correct I have only seen a couple female esports pros.
Telsaah 6y ago
Even being a pro is easier for females as they're usually separated from men. For example in CSGO, female pros are about the same skill level as a male player who is good at the game but not good enough to play competitively.
This is an old pic (http://i.imgur.com/eUZmC68.jpg) of a no-name Male team (completely amateur, not paid) against a top 3 Female team (pro, gets paid). Its a joke lol
Irinam_Daske 6y ago
Look at at any sport... they are always separated, because there are very few sports where females could really compete with males.
[deleted]
Dimethyltrip_to_mars 6y ago
True, but that wasn't what I was getting at. it doesn't stop a male gamer's attempt at capitalizing off of his gaming abilities via streaming from happening. Just different outcomes, revenues.
Lavlamp 6y ago
I'm not here to defend video games, I cut them out because I have a tough time with things that can be used to disassociate from reality and abuse them to escape my internal voice. But, it is important to note video games build hand eye coordination and reflex timing.
OneInAZillion 6y ago
I've been searching for years for a way to explain this. Thanks.
Lavlamp 6y ago
Took me 30 years, I hear ya. You are welcome.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
Stop hamstering your video game addiction.
[deleted]
MoDuReddit 6y ago
Stop labeling everything you don't like (or can't/won't use) an addiction.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
Stop getting defensive about your videogame obsession. Imagine if you did something productive with all that time you spent playing videogames throughout your life.
MoDuReddit 6y ago
You must be thinking of somebody else. The nerds are "addicted" to games, the same way as worthless girls are "addicted" to instagram/facebook. Talk to to me about actual addition when you're around people who consume opioids.
Do-it-for-you 6y ago
It's called dopamine addiction, it's not the act itself you get high off, it's the fake rewards your brain gets every time you beat a level or get 100 likes on that photo. Too much dopamine is bad for your mental wellbeing.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
That's called a mental addiction. People addicted to opioids are addicted mentally and physically to opioids. An addiction does not need to be physical in order to be considered an addiction. Many people are mentally addicted and dependent on their video games. It's really sad.
MoDuReddit 6y ago
I stand corrected then. I live in way to backwards a country for "gaming addiction" to be more than a parent's rant because their kids don't do their homework.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
There are people out there who dedicate their entire life to world of warcraft at the expense of taking care of themselves and moving forward in life. It is possible to become mentally addicted to every form of escapism out there. People get sent to rehab for being addicted to video games and have to go to Narcotics Anonymous meetings. I'm not making this up. It is not a fake "problem" invented by parents.
MoDuReddit 6y ago
I'm not denying it's a real problem, far from it.
SwoleyMoleyFrijoley 6y ago
Games are no different than any other hobby. Last night I played Monster Hunter world for most of my day off, killed a chef quality dinner, and told my woman to clean up while I finished playing. Took her to bed and slammed her brains out. It's all about the attitude you have. She's fully aware that is my hobby of choice outside of lifting and strongman. She can leave if she doesn't like it. But instead she plays with my joystick while I play games.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
BS. Stop hamstering.
Other hobbies are also productive, like reading or playing a sport, or cooking, or carpentry. Video games are a brainwash tool. Tell yourself they improve your handeye coordination or whatever, but games are not like any other hobby. Games are a time sink that bring no benefit to you other than escapism and distraction. Other hobbies actually lead to self improvement.
tater08 6y ago
Ironic how most dudes who talk shit about video games are addicted to espn and fantasy football. Don't kid yourself that that's a huge waste of time as well and another form of escape.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
I agree with you. Pro sports are a giant bread and circus and fantasy sports are just as big a waste of time as video games. Pro sports promotes fake tribalism and a false sense of accomplishment for fatties to watch and project themselves in to the players. I feel sorry for any grown man who wears a shirt with the name of another grown man on his back.
I completely agree with your post. People are better off playing sports than obsessing about pro sports and fantasy sports leagues.
Don't worry, I never kidded myself about this.
SwoleyMoleyFrijoley 6y ago
If you never watch TV, whatsoever, you have an argument and a leg to stand on. If you do, however, it's no different. My nuts are empty and my stomach's full at the end of the day with 2 hours of gaming every night. So I have no complaints.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
TV is also a waste of time and giant bread and circus distraction designed to stop people from being productive with their time. Turn off the idiot box and your life will improve tenfold.
LiveAFTSOV 6y ago
Okay, what if youre making a game?
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
Programming a game and making $$$ from the game you make with your creativity and talent and hard work is completely different from sitting on your ass while flicking a joystick and pushing some buttons in correspondence to pixels on a screen.
LiveAFTSOV 6y ago
I feel its the same. I sit there drawing maps and writing dialouge or coding for hours infront of my computer in a dimly lit room. Also while sitting on my ass
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
That's because you have never created anything of value and you have zero comprehension of what it takes to create something that people want.
Pushing buttons that correspond with light pixels on a screen like a chimpanzee is completely different from creating and programming a game. But keep hamstering gamerboi.
LiveAFTSOV 6y ago
Why are you so angry? I recommend visiting my red pill youtube channel and watching my monk mode series. Its on my reddit profile.
Also subscribe.
I see you edited, so ill edit as well. Im the one making the game, so once again, why are you so mad?
Zodiac117 6y ago
You clearly have never played a competitive game in your life. To get to a competitively level in games like League of Legends, Dota, Super Smash, you HAVE to self improve. Which requires lots of discipline. Period. It's no different then competing in a sport.
Smokerbank 6y ago
Keep telling yourself that
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
You're sinking time in to improving at a completely useless and unproductive skill. You're right, I never got to the point where I was a "competitive gamer" and I'm very happy about that fact.
It's very different. When you compete in a sport, you generally aren't sitting on your ass and staring at a screen for hours at a time. Sports generally involve physical exercise and activity.
Zodiac117 6y ago
Sports have different categories. You can't based your argument off that lmao.
Traditional mind sports include things like Chess, Go, Poker and others. These all don't involve any physical exercise or activity. There is an element of where the opposing player can predict the player's judgement and follow-up accordingly.
Competitive videos games fall under this category, especially fighting games Why? Mind games, cons, reading your opponent and baiting your opponent are some of many examples.
Competitive play in video games have a physical element much like playing a musical instrument. To become good, one must practice a set of notes over an over again to achieve mastery. Same to be said in mastering a controller and the inputs required. This is actually why you'll see a lot of pro players in fighting games come from musical instrument backgrounds.
THEnimble_mongoose 6y ago
Those aren't sports. Those are games. Getting to the point of being a "competitive gamer" is a massive waste of time and does not benefit you in any way. It involves hours and hours of sitting on your ass and staring at a screen.
Real sports provide you with a healthy body and exercise.
Not at all. Playing a musical instrument is an actual skill beneficial skill. Playing music requires creativity, technique and intelligence. Reading and composing and playing music is not the same as sitting on your ass and playing Dota for 4+ hours at a time.
There are no physical requirements to being a competitive video game player other than not having arthritic hands.
You sound like someone who has never gotten good at playing an instrument. No, fondling an x-box controller does not compare at all to playing chords while fingerpicking a guitar, or breath control and technique required for a woodwind like sax or flute that takes years to develop proper technique.
But ultimately it is just two people sitting on their ass, fondling a controller and staring at a screen. They both spent several thousand hours sitting on their asses and fondling controllers to get to the point where they are doing it for a living.
Stop trying to hamster away and justify your video game addiction.
Video games are a waste of time and do not benefit you in any way, unless you are one of the top 0.01% of video gamers who actually play games for a career and make a decent living from it.
Zodiac117 6y ago
Your personal opinion not fact. Chess is considered a type of sport in over 100 countries. and eSports is also considered a sport.
https://vr.eslgaming.com - VR esport which requires physical exercise. /thread
Again your personal opinion not fact. Competing competitively requires these.
Where is your inference indicator that this is true?
And...again, your personal opinion not based on fact. See the trend here?
Do you have the data to back this up or is this one of your personal opinions? (rhetorical)
You like this phrase a lot don't you. Again, where is your inference indicator that I am addicted to video games? Because I would hope you aren't that simple.
liizzsar 6y ago
Thanks to Marie Curie, a physicist, chemist and Nobel Prize winner, you can get an X-ray to see how tiny your brain really is.
Honestly, I'm not saying every women is an intellectual machine, but to categorize the whole female population as losers when just as many guys spend their whole life being gym rats and spouting "bro" (the equivalent of female "like") while posting Instagram pictures of their perfect abs to get attention, without the slightest interest in politics, business, history or science, doesn't strike me as fair.
You're simply talking about vain and low IQ people like Kim Kardashian, and maybe there are more women in that category, but that doesn't mean ALL women are like that.
SelfTaughtPiano 6y ago
"women in general are unexceptional in most field"
"not true, look at this one exception from decades ago"
liizzsar 6y ago
Men and women are biologically different, so we're not going to excel at the same things (modern feminists will try to say differently, but obviously most rational people can agree on this.) That doesn't make one gender "losers."
Biologically, it's much easier for men to take risks and become entrepreneurs, while women tend to be more cautious. That doesn't make us "losers" it makes us better mothers, wives, homemakers.
The point of all this is, we're all better when we work together, instead of pointing at the other gender and saying, "Men aren't shit" or "Women are losers."
L0wD0g 6y ago
Marie Curie. Solid 1.5/10. Please read again btw.
jackandjill22 6y ago
This is true. Women can make it further in life being mediocre.
High achieving men, & average women have every incentive to STOMP average & below dudes. Combine that with the fact that women have hoards of people willing to take care of them. The scenario's entirely different.
suckinfishboy 6y ago
This isn't really redpill material
BetaBitchBoy69 6y ago
Lmfao if you want a good example look at any social media...chicks will fucking set up photos to look sexy/cool/fun.... Then the beta comments come rolling in...they love the attention, but just in the form of likes and comments. The second said beta tries to directly contCt them they’re creepy!
[deleted]
victor_knight 6y ago
Some would argue that self-improvement, in itself, is a myth.
SickofUrbullshit 6y ago
The world would be so much better if only men had power.
WalterEArmstrong 6y ago
Giving women the vote was an EXTREMENLY bad mistake.
nomorelulu 6y ago
Man you're missing out on a lot
[deleted] 6y ago
Good post, one thing I realized when learning the red pill was that you should have the mindset of women needing YOU and never the other way around. And it's true, bitches are pretty and all but in the end they NEED men
Reunn 6y ago
To be fair, you have to be very high in the dominance hierarchy to understand Jordan Peterson. He is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of psychology most of the truths will go over a typical listener's head. There's also Peterson's non-nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterization - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Jungian literature, roughly speaking. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these truths, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Jordan Peterson truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in his existential catchphrase "Clean Your Room," which itself is a cryptic reference to Dostoevsky's Russian epic The Brothers Karamazov. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated post-modernists scratching their heads in confusion as JBP's genius unfolds itself on their computer screens. What Neo-Marxists... how I pity them. ???? And yes by the way, I DO have a Jordan Peterson tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they've climbed the dominance hierarchy.
sharp7 6y ago
I love JP but this copypasta is hilarious.
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
Imagine getting a THE RED PILL tattoo. I bet someone out there has. AWALT
[deleted]
Rian_Stone 6y ago
the fact you think there is only one tells me you're simply parroting what you're told.
Which is funny, in his attempts to quell millennial narcissism, he's given it a perfect narrative to wrap itself around.
Dominance hierarchy. What does it mean? Who knows, but I know im in the top of my own!
Reunn 6y ago
Of course I’m parroting, it’s literally an adaptation of the Rick and Morty copy paste.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
I never watched it. I've heard people who quote it are midwit though
[deleted]
dreadfrog 6y ago
I did not read The Brothers Karamazov (yet) so I'm interested in knowing what the "clean your room" cryptic reference is. Would you elaborate?
danhaas 6y ago
It's a copypasta, ignore the original commentary. But Dostoiveski is such a rich source that the "clean your room" phrase does have a use. In "Crime and Punishment", the protagonist is a nihilistic blue pilled that lives alone in a filthy and depressing room. His room reflects the state of his mind.
BigLebowskiBot 6y ago
Ah, that must be exhausting.
[deleted]
Reunn 6y ago
It's just an adaptation of the Rick and Morty copypaste. I'm not aware of any actual reference between the two and I have read it.
vengefully_yours 6y ago
So you're saying only smart guys like JP. While you might be correct in that assumption, you might not be all that jelly skewed to the higher bracket. Something about those who think they're smart are so self assured of it, those who actually are smart are often full of doubt....
Reunn 6y ago
You're taking a meme as serious commentary.
JamesSkepp 6y ago
It's called Dunning–Kruger effect, you should ask JBP about it so he can explain it to you.
Reunn 6y ago
To whom are you attributing it to?
JamesSkepp 6y ago
Dunning, Kruger and stupid people.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
Ha! I miss the days when people would wiki for a few seconds before retorting
Reunn 6y ago
I know what Dunning Kruger is, I was asking to whom in this comment thread he was attributing it to.
JamesSkepp 6y ago
There's no Dunning or Kruger here, therefore it leaves us with stupid people.
[deleted]
XanderS311 6y ago
The amount of times that I have listened to a conversation between two young women and wanted to vomit at the banality of it. This old adage has never been more apt:
Great minds discuss ideas Average minds discuss events Small minds discuss people
hisbirdness 6y ago
The funny thing about that quote is that it was said by a woman.
[deleted]
waldo888 6y ago
except that nearly every single girl gets to reproduce and only like 75% of men do. So I guess if success is having some worldly knowledge you can lord over them then ya , men are gods. hahahaha
[deleted]
DR_JDUBZ 6y ago
If I ever have sex it will not be with a girl who has intelligence equivalent to that of a monkey (such a thing may as well be known as beastiality) or is so shallow as to think ghosting is an acceptable practice.
zealanderx 6y ago
LOOOOOOOOL
This guy is in for some real pain-
[deleted]
hdosnxbjdjeb 6y ago
All we have to do now is be attractive enough and fucking LIFT to get the hot girl
WalterEArmstrong 6y ago
You can't be a dullard. A woman wants a man who has some spark, energy, dynamism.
DickyDurbin 6y ago
Takeaway here is be a winner
Andgelyo 6y ago
Girls are fucking losers. Most guys are fucking losers. All we can do is keep fighting to become the top 10% (not even 20% to me) of men.
GoGetting 6y ago
Yeah, sure, the grapes are sour.
[deleted]
drkinferno72 6y ago
She only loses when she's forced to settle
[deleted]
Blueu2 6y ago
Oh yes. Dear Lord have I seen this all too often.
Jonlife 6y ago
All they have to offer is pussy and headaches. At least before they used to make you a sandwich in between bitching
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
Ask a pretty girl- ANY pretty girl- a deep question about politics, cosmology, or history. Unless she is a politician or this is her "one trick" she will know nothing. Even if she is an Astronomer she will know NOTHING beyond her narrow range. She may be able to tell you all about Cepheid variables in the Triangulum Galaxy but she won't know a Black Hole from an Alpha particle (except the Alphas somehow make her tingle while the Beta particles don't do much for her). She may be able to tell you about 14th Century Victorian England but she won't know a thing about the Battle of Jutland.
Even the most accomplished woman is absolutely a one trick pony.
My wife is a ridiculously highly paid Business Lawyer and knows the federal tax code inside and out and backwards and forwards. Beyond that? Well, she can recite every character and all the relationships between every house and every character in Game of Thrones- which is really quite impressive- but not exactly a sign of a well rounded intellectual.
ButterTartWarrior 6y ago
And you are an alleged liberal arts PhD professor and a barred attorney with your own practice and just typed the phrase "14th Century aVictorian". What a ridiculous joke you are
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
I did not study English History in law school or in my Social Science discipline or in any romantic fiction which I never read. However, I am sure you are quite the student and it must give you great satisfaction to finally find a practical use for your education. You get to fact check the professor after making my Latte! Gratz, but don't forget the extra chocolate.
ButterTartWarrior 6y ago
You claimed to be a liberal arts professor , not a social sciences PhD. You know that, right?
No liberal arts professor in the US is unaware of when queen Victoria generally reigned, who do you think you're fooling?
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
You would be surprised how narrow PhD training actually is. When they say piled high and deeper they are not kidding.
A 'liberal arts professor' just last week got into a fight with a student claiming that Australia is not a country so confusing Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth is hardly a capital crime.
The gotcha games are tiresome and so typically female. Nitpick, bitch, moan, and criticize. It is what they do. Anybody want to get married yet? THIS is what you have to look forward to. Constant arguing. Constant criticism. THIS is what women add to your lives fellows. They see it as their goal to slight any man they hear. They argue, whine, bitch and complain NONSTOP. Go back to 50 Shades and your Angel Porn. Nobody gives a fuck about your games.
[deleted] 6y ago
Ask any female a question of any depth and they'll run off, "creeped out". Lolz
They can be intelligent, but not intellectual.
Augustuscrassus 6y ago
My sister worked as an accountant at IBM for a number of years and I'm often shocked at how little she knows. This is a woman who graduated with a 4.3 GPA. Shows you just how awesome our school system is.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
nomorelulu 6y ago
This thread as a whole is retarded, including the comment you're responding to
Jonathan_Frias 6y ago
Well I mean that seems true enough, but at some point people might find somebody who is mostly one dimensional (and usually closed minding) to be off putting. People tend to like people who are well rounded. You might already be well rounded. I don't know you
RandyMcsavage 6y ago
She couldn't tell you about 14th Century Victorian England as it wasn't a thing!
whatsthisgarg 6y ago
I would like to think that was just a typo or oversight or something, but I really don't think so.
[deleted]
CanuckinFL 6y ago
absolutely not, there have been, and always will be "men of letters". Despite our current idiotic social climate (flat earthers, conspiracy theorists, and #metoo and that nonsense), many men aspire to know as much as humanly possible about all subjects. But if you want a treat, head over to Buffalo Wild Wings one night, watch the trivia play. Women know nothing. They're empty headed as a brown paper bag you burp into.
God and it's worse via text, the preferred means of her having many empty headed conversations at the same time.
[deleted] 6y ago
With a difference: there's a certain % of the male camp that breaks this rule. Nobody does on the female camp.
[deleted] 6y ago
I wouldn't say this is true of "all" people. True of many, yes, when you look at the population as a whole. But anecdotally, on the individual basis, I would say it's more true about women, than it is about men, by a significant margin.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Fuck.... One of my favorite bar tricks was to ask a girl any question about WWII. Such as, name one weapon used in WWII. "A gun" would get points, for effort at least, which often didn't even happen. An important weapon like, I don't know, the atomic bomb would be hugely impressive.
Or, name the sides of WWII. Most, usually, would get the U.S. and Germany, but then I would ask them what "side" Germany was on. Most look like they're having a stroke at this point. If they by chance knew "Axis", I would then follow up with: name one more axis power. Stroke face again, and it would usually end here, or just at the first question. I would preemptively tell a friend I sat with what I was going to do, what I was going to ask and what the outcome would be(usually we would make a $1 bet to make it interesting). 1 time(only), I was proved wrong. As it happened, she was a history professor.
I'd say I've maybe done this 30-40 times with a high success rate for my predictions.
Now, I know there are different interests for both men and women. Because most women aren't going to be knuckle deep into history, I don't ask them questions like, what was the Hammurabi Code?
But World War II? That's something you shouldn't need to be a history buff to know cursory details about. It's something that changed the world in such a drastic way. Anyways, thought I would share this relevant little activity.
SB-1 6y ago
Well I gues that explains why you need the Red Pill to get laid.
eclectro 6y ago
There is a huge amount of unfair downvoting on reddit these days for stating your valid opinion, your experienced fact, or just established scientific facts in general that goes against the sjw groupthink. Just keep that in mind.
[deleted] 6y ago
TRP has slowly turned into the echo-chamber it sought to differentiate itself from. It's also kind of interesting there are vitriolic comments regularly up-voted on TRP, yet other less offensive comments are down voted.
[deleted] 6y ago
Dude this is pretentious as fuck. Most men would have difficulty answering questions like that. I wouldn't, but most would.
eclectro 6y ago
It's in the context of a conversation at a bar. Hardly pretentious for anyone who is not triggered that easily.
wendysNO1wcheese 6y ago
This thread is autistic as fuck. So many try-hards trying to impress other dudes on a forum. No value here.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Well, the funny thing is, most men didn't/don't. WWII fundamentally changed the planet. If you've grown up in North America, you've heard of Pearl Harbor, D-Day, Hitler, and most likely the holocaust.
[deleted] 6y ago
You're hitting major points there. But you started out with "name a weapon". Most people are going to have trouble with that.
[deleted] 6y ago
Most people don't know the U.S. dropped an atomic on Japan? I wouldn't always lead with the weapon question, sometimes I would just ask which countries were involved. Again, prefaced with the question, in "WORLD"(with emphasis on that word) War II, what countries were involved? The easy answer is, most countries. I would even accept "Europe" as an answer to that question. Didn't usually get that far though.
wendysNO1wcheese 6y ago
Most likely???
That shit is jammed down everyone’s throats every god damn day it seems like. In all aspects of life.
[deleted] 6y ago
I suppose I'm giving room because I've met some people with different educational experiences. Facts about the holocaust are lesser know than the other's I mentioned.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Pretentious? Possibly. Pompous? Absolutely. I didn't really give a fuck though. I did what I wanted. Some people liked it, some people didn't. Usually the daft or the sensitive white knights had the problem with me highlighting how shallow most women's minds are.
[deleted] 6y ago
I'm definitely not a white knight bro. But lording relatively obscure knowledge like what weapons were used in ww2 over random civilians is a douchebag thing to do and doesn't at all prove anything alpha about you. I mean unless you were shooting for shit like "rifle, machine gun, tank, bombs, etc"
[deleted]
eclectro 6y ago
That's exactly what you sound like. Some triggered millenial that happened upon this thread from r-all and doesn't understand exactly what "the red pill" is.
[deleted] 6y ago
I'm definitely an early millennial, and fucking proud of it. You're probably also a millennial and are under the delusion that you're genX or something else. And I definitely didn't waltz in for /all. This sub very rarely hits /all because reddit is mostly a leftist circle jerk, so lets be realistic. And nothing about what I said implies I'm a silly white knight. If you think that what this loser does is at all a red pill attitude then you've totally missed the message.
Unfortunately, I've watched this become more and more common over the years in this sub. Originally it was about preserving masculinity, and what that meant, and not surrendering it to this feminazi paradigm shift our society is subjecting itself to. It's starting to devolve into a list of retarded peacocking tactics to smash pussy.
Any swinging dick can smash. Its not hard. That doesn't make you a man. It makes you a male. There's a chasm of difference between the two, and guys like you aren't understanding that.
[deleted] 6y ago
I'd accept those answers as well, which I clearly stated in my initial comment.
I really never had to prove I was alpha, so I'm not overly concerned with that. I guess I've always thought if you have to prove you're "alpha" you're doing it wrong.
Douchebag is primarily a pejorative women use. Creep is another catch-all women use, though rarely deserved and often intended to describe a guy they don't desire, that desires them. These names intended to shame men in order to get them to fall in line. To prove my point, how often have you heard women been called a douchebag?
I've been called a douchebag for an infinite number of reasons, like refusing to buy a girl a drink, or not give a girl my attention. I'm not really concerned with being called names.
[deleted] 6y ago
Dude you sound like the guy the pejorative "douchebag" was invented to describe. Randomly working ww2 into conversation at the bar and the looking down upon ppl who don't know much about it is ridiculous and is just you trying to feed a desperate ego. Like, if I started asking you questions about very specific military equipment and then scoffed when you didn't know the answer, is that kosher? Your premise is ridiculous, your exercise is ridiculous. There's nothing red-pill or alpha about it. Its no different then some feminazi glowering at you for not knowing some random fact about Marie Curie.
[deleted] 6y ago
Like I initially stated in my comment, it was to win a trivial bet with a friend, not to look down on anyone. You're placing your own narrative spin on the whole thing. However you think it went is probably way off. It was usually received well and it sparked conversation, but like I said, not by the white knights or the beta of the group, they would be offended. Name calling, like douchebag would usually follow. And I would just shed the insults, self deprecate a bit, and make fun of the asshat that felt like he wanted to make a big deal about it.
Also, I typically left with the women I would ask these questions to. It's was deliberate action on my part. Demand the attention of a group, make myself and the girl a focal point of the conversation, offend and placate. It's about changing the dynamic and being confrontational and flirting. It's a different level of negging, if you will. But it also highlighted something important, most girls don't know shit about history. It's just something you don't fully understand, yet are so eager to criticize.
[deleted] 6y ago
Oh I fully understand it, you're that is jackass that goes "pfft, brah, you didn't know that? Read book dude" in a vain attempt to lord some pathetic type of intellectualism over random people, then you come here and try to pass it off as some red pill tactic. You're just an attention whore, no different than these "social experiment" fools that intentionally provoke then pass it off as some kind of leftist message to the world (hence the "trivial bet with a friend")
You think you're hot shit. You think you've learned something. You haven't even got to the point where you've learned enough to know that you don't know anything.
Sometimes calling someone a douchebag isn't simply a beta defence, or an offended white knight spouting rhetorical nonsense.
Sometimes that guy is just a douchebag.
[deleted] 6y ago
I am hot shit, or rather I was. I pulled those type of shenanigans when I was in my early twenties. I operate a lot differently now, about 10 years later.
An attention whore? Sure, now and then, in certain situations, when it serves a purpose. There is nothing wrong that though. Having the spotlight on you can be an asset, or a detriment. It was usually an asset for me because I was charismatic.
I would rather lord some type of pathetic intellectualism than need to stoop to name calling. I think it's more elegant to exhibit why I'm smarter than you. You know who else would call me a douchebag, the BP dude at the table that couldn't understand why the girl sitting next to him was interested in me. And I agree, sometimes a label is appropriate, but very often, it's not. Most name calling that's meant to shame someone is Ad Hominem.
Leftist? haha. Are you that guy that brings politics into arguments not concerning politics? In my initial comment, I said we would make 1$ bets on the outcome. I would normally win. Tell me why that's leftist to say? hahaha
wendysNO1wcheese 6y ago
"I read if you have to prove yourself alpha, you’re doing it wrong" is what you meant to post.
Trying too hard my man.
[deleted] 6y ago
Are you criticizing me on my syntax while typing on my phone? You shouldn't be talking, your comment is pretty fucked up too.
wendysNO1wcheese 6y ago
Yep, that what I was doing.
whatsthisgarg 6y ago
Really? I'm having a hard time seeing this not coming off as a huge nerd. Maybe change it up to ask them if they know the difference between Stravinsky and Kandinsky. That way at least if they do you can take the conversation in an interesting direction.
Not arguing with your success (you're the one there, not me), but I can't imagine what you're counting as success here.
[deleted] 6y ago
You don't need to be a nerd to know about WWII. Besides, I don't spend much energy being concerned with whether someone thinks I'm a nerd. It's common, broad based knowledge that most people should have a cursory understanding of. I mean, it's usually taught in your 9th year of school.
The point wasn't to have an interesting conversation about WWII. The point was to see how most women are 1-demensional with very little knowledge outside of pop-culture and fashion.
I'm sure you would have similar results speaking about artists, especially those which are not quite as mainstream as Picasso or Van Gogh. I would imagine it would be an even smaller population that could speak to the differences of specific artists.
whatsthisgarg 6y ago
The fact that you mentioned two other painters makes me think you MIGHT NOT know who Stravinsky was.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
I mentioned Picasso and Van Gogh as an example because they are more recognizable names than Kandisky. Would you have liked me to use composers instead?
whatsthisgarg 6y ago
This is hardly worth pursuing, but: use the symmetrical example of one composer, one artist.
Now go back and keep fighting that other guy! Much more interesting.
[deleted] 6y ago
Hardly. Syntax is not my strong suit while typing with my thumbs. And in iAlien I can't see what I'm writing as the keyboard covers the text box. And thanks, I know, I'm enjoying the rapport him and I have.
whatsthisgarg 6y ago
I was going to say that's not syntax, but I can see it now.
Forgive the pedantry, but use "he and I" in this case. I just hate it when I read/hear "Her and Ashley snowballed" or some shit.
Carry on.
[deleted] 6y ago
Yanno, I'll write however I like. This IS reddit and I don't care enough make every comment grammatically perfect. Do you critique comments often? You might be interested in this article.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Had a chuckle at the water slide part. Very valuable observations, great post.
Solodolo1795 6y ago
Then how the fuck most of you guys get past all the cringe? I can't even find a common ground while talking to a dumb girl, seems impossible for me.
[deleted] 6y ago
In fact the "talk" is instrumental to the fuck/reproduction/having a housekeeper.
That was the natural order of things.
If you try to make serious talk of the "talk", women will leave / their liking gauge will go a notch down.
[deleted] 6y ago
The key is to find a girl that can offer more. The issue is that beauty and intelligence are usually an inverse relationship.
hugaddiction 6y ago
I agree with a lot of this, but imo, its harder as a guy to truly understand this and live by it, than it is to read it and technically understand it. Until you see first hand through experience the extent of how meaningless their lives are in their 20's, you can't really see them for who they are.
Outside of partying, looking good, basic mindless entertainment in the form of tv, magazines, and spending money, you will not find much more going on. And generally the more interesting they are, the less attractive they are, because at some point they realized in order to get male attention they were going to have to develop interest in a male interest category, or a skill that they were good at and would set them apart from other women in the SMP.
A great way to remind yourself of how much depth a girl is lacking, log onto her instagram. If its full of travel photos and activities and friends, she has some substance, if its full of selfies and pictures of her doing things in her normal life, then she is self centered and has nothing going for her other than her looks.
[deleted] 6y ago
Oh yes. Lotta substance in that.
hugaddiction 6y ago
I agree with you, and the other comment, its still showing off competition bullshit, but I would rather spend time with the girl that has the drive to take her female competition to the next level, and doesn't solely rely on selfies and ass shots to keep her ego in tact. In your opinion what is the idea ration of selfies and other pics?
[deleted] 6y ago
Are you considering LTRs or fuck buddies/lays?
For 1), I'd screen out anyone who does any silly things on FB (as long as you want something more than a conglomerate of flesh with a vagina)
for 2) their social media doesn't matter
[deleted]
Andgelyo 6y ago
95% of girls on social media put travel photos though lmao
hugaddiction 6y ago
i live in a tiny place with a lot of people that never leave. Many of the attractive girls just have a wall of selfies. Thats what IM conplaining about.
Andgelyo 6y ago
You need to get out of there my dude. On the other hand you wanna switch places? I’m from the NJ and NYC area and everyone here are fucking assholes and the girls are absolute entitled whales. The only good thing is the amount of abundance here, but hands down the most feminine and beautiful girls I’ve seen where from suburban and rural environments.
[deleted] 6y ago
Exactly what I said.
It's part of the normie-hen preening ABC — to word it kindly.
They can go no further than hen-see-hen-do, and of course it can't be but silliness.
[Made no mistake: serious pics of real travels shared not to strut like peahens are totally legit. But that's not the case of females... "Travel" was in origin a male sort of adventure, and a genuine experience made for the travel itself.
Social media & hen-minds have turned it into an item of mode: like clothes and dresses, a new one every year must be shop-windowed, not to be left behind in the henratrace.
To word it kindly :)]
wayneinthegame 6y ago
Pretty law student had a giant property law book under her arm so I asked "Does that book say anything about finders keepers?" She had never heard of it. So I said "you know, if I find something on the street, whose property is it?" She said "oh that's Tort law" Tort law is civil liability, suing McDonalds for too hot coffee.
This woman is in law school. Why?
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
This is property law not torts.
[deleted]
CaptainSweno 6y ago
I just read the Wikipedia article on tort law and I'm pretty sure you're wrong, bro. It seems to be the category of law breaking that isn't really criminal and has a lower requirement of evidence. But it can definitely be about individuals. Seems like her point was that finders keepers is considered a sort of negligence with intent to steal. Since it's reasonable that you won't be able to find the person anyway so like you can probably keep it but they can take you to tort court (lol) to get it back if they find out.
wayneinthegame 6y ago
Good to know cause I've found some nice shit and I'm not just gonna go hand it in to the police station like some goodie two shoes.
Stolles 6y ago
Wow dude. You just tried to shit on this girl for telling you what law that falls under, you having NO experience or knowledge of said law (otherwise you wouldn't have asked her) and then it doesn't make sense to you even with a quick google search well within your grasp, so you shit on her and insult her intelligence? The fuck dude.
wayneinthegame 6y ago
Except I was right. Finders keepers is part of property law. It has its origins in Roman law. Later cases set the precedent that when you find something it belongs to you unless the original owner claims it. A law student carrying a property law book had never heard of it. The fuck dude.
Stolles 6y ago
So if you find someone's wallet, finders keepers?
If you find an item and the owner comes back for it, then you have the tort issue.
The page on tort law states: Property torts involve any intentional interference with the property rights of the claimant (plaintiff). Those commonly recognized include trespass to land, trespass to chattels (personal property), and conversion.
Finders, keepers is just a lazy saying and doesn't mean a whole lot legally. She was studying actual law and told you what it would fall under.
wayneinthegame 6y ago
No, if you find's someones wallet it is both clear that they didnt abandon it and known who it belongs to. You have a responsibilty to return it if you know who it belongs to.
Finders keepers is not just a lazy saying and it DOES have legal meaning. There was a case where an employee found something, owner never claimed it and employer sold it. Employee sued and won. Finders keepers. Same precedent for finding a watch and taking it to police station. If you want to earn karma by hoping they check there for it then good for you, but you dont have a legal requirement to hand it over to the state anymore than the employee had to give it to employer.
Stolles 6y ago
Yeah? Cause as far as the law goes, it was the employees, however the employee has an obligation to try and find the original owner, not necessarily through the state. If it's just not possible then that's fine. If the original owner comes back then you have to give it back. If you find a lost phone and there is a contact number but you ignore that because you want the phone or try to get rid of the sim card, then you can be charged.
Finders, keepers is a slang term, no judge is going to say "well this is clearly a finders, keepers case" He's going to use the legal term.
CaptainSweno 6y ago
Why have two shoes when you can have four? That homeless guy didn't need them anyway right?
Lateralanouncer 6y ago
An attractive woman has no biological reason to perform in any way. She can have a shit personally and be a broke ass bitch so long as she doesn’t hit the wall to hard will be fine. This is where the red pill has it correct, men have a biological reason to be the best we can. Strive in all areas of our live. if we don’t we will hit 30-40 and be nothing. No body will help you. Only u can help yourself.
throwlaca 6y ago
Sorry to dissapoint you but the only thing that the majority of men and even men in this very sub think is "ahh my team is better than yours!" or "I'm alpha as fuck hurr durrr fucking betas everywhere!"
And this is what girls have to put up with, because they are attracted to this beasts of men.
[deleted]
econquest 6y ago
NOTE: I am just a novice to TRP so take this with a grain of sand.
This is what I thought of your post. There are two kinds of pretty girls:
Humans, who are subject to the same laws as a perfect-10 male model. Do you think with the right genetics a man can be a model without any regard to his choice of clothing, style, health, diet, anything? Of course not. The first type of perfect-10 girl is only human and of course gets to be a 10 by investing the required amount of time into fashion, beauty, travel, clothes, diet, friends, and so on.
Please note that the red pill teaches you the male equivalent, but from the point of view of the first type (humans.) There's a second type of man who is a billionaire, but without any time investment (has all the time in the world), can read thoughts, is an expert at everything, can take care of a woman without any hesitation and always knows just what to say in all situations and all this doesn't take any time at all. This is the type-2 that lives in women's heads.
The actual billionaires are "losers". They're just in meetings for 100 hours per week, or reading 100 page legal opinions from their chief legal counsel. And they have a beer gut. Here's mark zuckerberg.
What a loser. Type 1 billionaires are losers, just like type 1 perfect 10 models are losers. what you're looking for, and what some women are looking for, is just a fantasy.
Heinzdoofens 6y ago
They are looking for a magic show. It is the Prestige
bearinfoxhole 6y ago
I have more respect for Harvey Weinstein than cunts and thots these days. At least, he delivered quality entertainment most of the time.