I'm not a big advocate of divorce under most circumstances and I think people are far too quick to divorce, but to say that it automatically makes children fatherless is very false. Divorced fathers can still parent their children. Fatherlessness is only the case when the father is not interested in the child, the father is incarcerated in prison or unwell and is physically unable to actively parent the child or there is a situation of parental alienation by the mother. A couple can be divorced or separated and they can both still actively parent their children. It's not as ideal as a couple who are both together but it's not fatherlessness. Also most situations of fatherlessness arise when the couple were never married to begin with.

After say age 4, the father makes all the difference.

Fatherlessness is almost a death sentence for kids.

Without a father, kids are way more likely to do drugs, drop out, commit crime, and a whole host of other shit that isn’t conducive to them or wellbeing.

Coupled with denigration of men all over, fatherlessness does not help

Easiest target to destroy societies is to attack the institution of marriage.

That's not entirely true. You might have two parents who are crazy as hell and make your life miserable. You can have parents who neglect you and belittle you everyday. What we need is good parents. Not all people deserve to be parents.

The family is the foundation of society, but the marriage is the foundation of the family. This is why people who want to, quite literally, destroy Western Society go after both.

If a lack of a father was such a big factor in mass shootings why would they only use Ramos as an example? Both the columbine shooters lived with and had very good relationships with their fathers (I’d say better than most kids their age) and the sandy hook shooter had a present father who he only stopped living with after childhood and they still communicated. I feel this is a big claim/big shift in the conversation just cause one shooter didn’t have active parents since he didn’t live with his mother either.

I've always held a lot of respect for men who wrote about sexual strategy and life between TRP, the pick up industry, and the manosphere.

There's usually a number of women who are aware of who /u/whisper and some of the other prominent writers on TRP are and their promotion for men's sexual strategy in the modern west.

Along with this awareness is usually some mixture of moral superiority, anger, and contempt that these guys are the embodiment of 'evil' for teaching men how to improve socially, how to value themselves, and how to have relationships on their terms (of course with an added dose of locker room talk).

What these women and many people outside of the community fails to see is that these men, who are working with the new cards that society dealt, have been helping turn potential Elliot Rodgers from going on a shame, apathy, and despair filled delusional murder revenge rampage.

Our country does not have a gun problem. Our country does not have a prescription medicine problem. Our country has a mental health problem.

Reddit's favorite red haired ginger (incels) that everyone loves bullying are the young men who are being told that their toxic masculinity is the root of their problems, which is a super encouraging method in bringing these young men to therapists and psychologists who are the only members of society that's willing to help these types of people as long as they're paid to do so (and often lack the ability to help).

Other than that, nobody else is willing to give a shit about these men because men are only as useful as what they can do for society.

These 'evil' men became the internet fathers and uncles to a generation of young boys where society said, ''you're on your own''. Everyone is willing to give the two second platitude of 'just be yourself' as advice when they ask for help, but these men are the people who stepped in and invested years and hundreds if not thousands of hours of offering specific advice and met them at their level so that they would feel heard and encouraged them to grow up and get their shit together. Where was mom and dad when these young men needed help? Where was society when these young men needed help?

When governments, businesses, and society begins canceling, banning, censoring, and silencing the people who's likely done 100x in helping the most detested and marginalized groups of young men become functional members of society that nobody else is willing to reach out to - they're going to begin seeing an increasing amount of young men who turn renegade on society.

Unfortunately this situation can no longer be fixed on a broad scale.

Couple reasons:

1) rampant hypergamy: 80-90% of the women are only giving sex to the top 20% of men. Since women prefer sharing top men rather than settling for an average man for themselves, it is normal that some will become single mothers.

2) economics: stagnant wages, rampant inflation, and higher taxes means that the average man cannot afford a family, let alone a wife. Men that cannot afford a family typically will not intentionally have children. Assuming that every man that cannot have children economically is one less man a woman can have children with, if that particular woman wants children, she would effectively need to be a single mother if she cannot marry.

3) average/bottom tier men: if men aren’t getting sex and not getting the money they need to succeed in having a family, they will typically opt out of society. The ones that choose to not opt out either succeed, or become dangerous.