Essay:
https://therationalmale.com/2019/03/20/the-existential-fear-men/
​
Excerpt:
Patriarchy & Monogamy
Socially enforced monogamy was the least barbaric of those compromises, but in this century destroying that monogamy has been a priority for the Feminine Imperative. In theory, socially enforced monogamy was the most beneficial mating strategy for largest number of (low SMV) men to solve their reproductive problem. But the fact remained that it was still an exercise of control over women’s Hypergamous natures. In essence, monogamy worked for men, and it was beneficial as a compromise in parental investment for women, but it also assumed direct a control over women’s sexual selection process.
Patriarchy and monogamy answered a woman’s Hypergamous doubt for her, and that is the crux of women’s Existential Fear – to have the control of her Hypergamy, her selection process, and ultimately the cost associated with that choice determined for her. This fear is exactly why the primary goal of feminism has always been the maximal unlimiting of women’s sexuality and the maximal restricting of men’s sexuality. It seeks to replace the social-scale compromise of the Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies with the total capitulation of the male strategy. Today, the Gynocracy has achieved this almost entirely.
But for one sex’s strategy to succeed, the other’s must be compromised or abandoned. For a gynocentric social order, only men’s abandonment of their own strategy is acceptable – and this abandonment insists men deny the evolved imperative of their own Existential Fear – insisting on paternity.
In the evolved scheme of things men’s reproductive best interest involves sacrifices. When a man commits to parental investment with a woman he takes on sunk cost risks. The time he spends investing himself committed to one woman and the children they produce comes at the cost of reproductive opportunities with other women. Women’s sexual strategy necessitates he compromise or abandon his biological imperative. Naturally, both men and women have adapted ways to circumvent monogamy to optimize their sexual strategies (infidelity, short-term breeding schema), but the basic equation is the same; if a man is invested in one woman it limits him from seeking other (potentially better) reproductive opportunities. If you want to know why Plate Theory irks women so much look no further.
The only way this compromise of sexual strategy can be advantageous to men is if he can be relatively assured that the child he’s raising is his own. This is where men’s Existential Fear of paternity fraud begins. He cedes his own strategy and the sunk opportunity cost for reproduction in exchange for the certainty that he’s invested in a child that bears his name and his blood.
I call this men’s Existential Fear because denying men the certainty of paternity presents the same existential anxieties as a woman’s control of Hypergamous doubt taken from her. Women fear the idea of being forced to birth and raise the child of a suboptimal man not of her choosing, while men fear the idea of being deceived into raising a child not of their own genetic lineage. And until the advent of DNA testing only a woman could be certain that the child was her own.
This is root level stuff here. So important was the determination of paternity for men that an obsessive concern for it was written into our mental firmware. The risks of falling for paternity deception was that important, and the men who evolved this compulsion were selected-for. The reason we Mate Guard, the reason our hindbrains default to jealous suspicions, the reason we cannot bear the thought of another man mating with our womanis rooted in the fear of investing ourselves in a child not our own.
In the previous essay I mentioned the natural revulsion response humans have towards things that are inherently harmful to us. A reservation or revulsion of snakes, spiders, feces, rot and necrosis are part of the evolved firmware we’re born with. I would also argue that the revulsion women feel towards “creepy” (low SMV, Beta) men and the revulsion men feel towards “slutty” women is part of this. Both these revulsions are adaptational protections against our respective Existential Fears. Each represents our Instinctual Interpretive Process letting us know what our ancestors had to avoid.

JudgeDoom69 6y ago
In addition to the social construct of making the stepdad a hero, the legal obligations of child support and spousal support make single mothers that much more desirable.
Personally, I have no problem dating a single mother if I find her sexually attractive. Single moms rock! They have nice new houses and new cars (thanks to child support and spousal support), while their ex’s live in a shitty studio apartment and eat Ramon noodles every night.
I have no obligation to support her children financially, while taking expensive vacations and going out to eat at fine restaurants using funds that her ex-husband or her spawn’s biological father generously donates every week. I enjoy all of the sexual and social benefits of the relationship, while paying much less of the price.
And she’s happy to be fucking an alpha and showing me off to her you-go-girl girlfriends. Then when I'm bored of Miss Single Mommy, I can choose to find some other thot to bang.
Meanwhile, while this party is going on, the dutiful baby-daddy is writing a nice check every week. Who is the cuck in this scenario? Maybe the biological father is the real cuck after all.
Edit: spellling is hard
SteelSharpensSteel 6y ago
Excellent essay, and particularly poignant bringing it back to the opening quote: "You need to understand WOMEN HATE BETAS in fact they hate them so much that they would prefer to work soul destroying jobs to support themselves than attach themselves to a Beta provider that wants to fuck them and impregnate them with his shitty beta genetics."
Women DO hate betas. Why do you think she doesn't want to sleep with you. To interact with you.
"Permission to return to beta, Capt'n?"
"No. Permission denied."
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
weakandsensitive 6y ago
.... Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu, Nu, Theta.
Speaking of cucks of the social hierarchy, why are you here? Does being this much of a nerd make you a gamma or omega?
Reach180 6y ago
I'm no longer convinced this is true.
SKRedPill 6y ago
It's more fundamental than that. It's a question of trust. In a man's world, trust failure within his own camp meant death. Nothing in this damn world runs without at least a professional measure of it.
SorcererKing 6y ago
Congratulations. Care to say why?
Reach180 6y ago
Because nobody has made much of a convincing argument for it, aside from asserting that it must be true.
RStonePT 6y ago
deleted ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.9491 ^^^What ^^^is ^^^this?
resolutions316 6y ago
It's the central premise in the book I'm reading now, "The Dangerous Passion."
However, I'd wager he'd cut that with "Jealousy has a variety of causes, and is part of an intricate early-warning system designed to guard against all manner of genetic disasters, and is neither precise nor fully accurate."
There's an interesting bit right in the beginning; he notes that women across all sorts of cultures nearly universally pick "My mate is forming a deep emotional connection with someone else" as more disturbing/worrisome than "My mate is engaging in enthusiastic sex acts, the likes of which I cannot imagine, with another person."
Men universally pick the sex one. The idea here being that emotional liaisons are more likely to result in resource loss for the woman, while sex is more likely to result in raising someone else's offspring for the man.
​
​
Reach180 6y ago
Real research into fake science.
RStonePT 6y ago
deleted ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.8108 ^^^What ^^^is ^^^this?
[deleted] 6y ago
Rollooooo