They also stress that a mismatch in sexual desire in couples is normal and typical and that couples may want to address these issues with a therapist.

LOL.

Satisfaction.

Survey says - researchers can’t get Pusey at home so they are on their own quest

Note that in this article, they'll make the statement of fact....

Researchers have identified a potential source of this dissatisfaction that has not been assessed in previous work—a mismatch in the way couples’ sexual desires change over time (McNulty et al., 2019). This work appears in the new issue of the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

... but they don't have solutions on how to solve the problem.

and this little gem

The authors suggest that women’s sexual desire may function not only to facilitate reproduction, but also to enable pair bonding. They speculate that once couples marry, women may not feel as strong a need for sex to secure their bond with their husbands.

If she has no reason to work for you, how could she give a fuck and/or care?

It’s tempting to criticize this, but there are very practical reasons why this study had limited findings and did not overreach in terms of speculation on why sexual desire declines amongst women.

The study tested three (and only three) things:

1. Whether male and female members of newlywed couples experienced different rates of change in sexual desire.
2. Whether any such changes were accentuated by childbirth.
3. Whether any such changes had implications for marital satisfaction.

Since it was a yes to all three, any subsequent research on changes in female sexual desire can reference this study to tie it back to marital satisfaction. I’m not surprised that the researchers stopped short of speculating as to the causality behind changes in sexual desire; the study was clearly not designed to evaluate the “why.” I am surprised that such a study had not already been undertaken.

I love this gem: "The researchers also recommend studying the factors which might prevent women’s sexual desire from declining, such as “being more willing to meet a partner’s sexual needs, believing that sex takes work, and expecting sexual desire to fluctuate.” 

See? You can just blue pill your way out of it! Lots of helpful shoulders to cry on over at Dead Bedrooms.

Kind of amazing. This group is the first time I’ve ever heard anyone verbalize a solution to these issues. “Everybody knows women just aren’t interested in sex after marriage”

Unless she has a high value man and a good reason to try.

Never felt more relevant

Edit: working on better phrasing of my thoughts

Indeed, recent perspectives suggest that extended sexuality functions to help women gain and maintain investment from men. [She hooks you with her pussy, no duh. But the key part for the married man is the "maintain". She will use her pussy to keep you only if she thinks she needs to.]

Consistent with such perspectives, recent research suggests that women are more likely to engage in sex outside of their fertile window when they perceive that their partners are relatively low in their investments into the relationship. [If she thinks she needs you more than you need her, she deploys her pussy power.]

It is thus possible that women’s sexual desire functions in part to secure investment from the partner through sexual behavior. [Hence the power of Dread - which tacitly threatens the withdrawal of your investment.]

If so, this perspective also suggests women’s desire may decline more than men’s as interdependence deepens over time, such as with the birth of children, because it may be less critical for women to maintain high levels of sexual desire as men grow more invested over time. [Once she has your commitment locked down, her pussy dries up. The bad news is, once you have children, you can't realistically threaten to "withdraw your investment" because the state will ensure you keep your resource investment coming to her even after she withdraws her sexual investment from you.]

Science confirms the obvious.

Tl,Dr; "Chin stroking blue pill motherfucking psychologists get paid a shit load of money to conduct a pointless multi year study and draw no conclusions other than what they see through their chin stroking, blue pill motherfucking eyes."

Interesting, that an entire study, and their handwringing conclusions, are so sharply focused through a fem-centric blue pill lens. Even when these intersexual issues are keenly observed and well described, the solutions escape them.

I'll conjecture that the couples in this study had 1 or more of the following characteristics.

1. The masculine / feminine polarity gap between the 2 was very small.
2. The men were not built. They were either overweight, or clean and thin bearded runners of average height.
3. The man followed behind the woman and looked to her to make decisions.
4. Every year the woman posts a happy anniversary announcement on FaceBook telling everyone how great it is to celebrate X years with her "best friend".
5. They often sit in a restaurant and the woman will glance over at Chad and be pulled in by his bass / baritone voice and wide shoulder to hip ratio.
6. They come home and woman allows her thin bearded husband to bang her in her "favorite" doggy style position so she can pretend it's Chad banging her from behind.
7. Woman gets tired of pretending it's Chad and wants the real Chad.

No shit.

this is the money shot

Because these data were collected over time, the authors were also able to assess the reverse possibility—that declining marital satisfaction was predictive of less sexual desire. However, this was not supported by the data.

in other words; attraction cannot be negotiated

The authors suggest that women’s sexual desire may function not only to facilitate reproduction, but also to enable pair bonding.

if only it were so simple, IMHO - women meme a personality that is not truly their own in order to win their mate. it's not Machivelian; it's just nature. it's also a lot more pernicious problem than her gina tingles.

you and I have had this conversation several times in OYS - there is no substitute for actual competition - dread is a weak substitute and at best a compromise versus other priorities in a man's life

Psychology today... great gynocentric rag. Not gonna read the article or link because it's already explained below. I personally can say that with the RP my sex life has gotten better and the marriage much stronger than in the past. The "why" is because of game and frame. Shamelessly kino my woman, and I'm the family alpha/oak tree. It's so simple a cave man could do it.

Sexual desire? Or sexual desire for their partners?

They'll never make progress, no one would fund a study to solve male sexuality, and no ethics board would let anyone experiment on people.

It's the limits of social science