TL;DR: In the face of hypergamy/branch-swinging/alpha fux-beta-bux/Chad/cheating/lying, can we ever fall in love again in a vulnerable and poignant way, or is it just impossible and to be avoided?
If I ventured in the slipstream
Between the viaducts of your dream
Where immobile steel rims crack
And the ditch in the back roads stop
Could you find me?
Would you kiss-a my eyes?
To lay me down
In silence easy
To be born again
To be born again
These are the incredibly beautiful lyrics from Van Morrison's song, Astral Weeks. I remember once upon a time I felt this way about a woman. A woman that was very special to me. I simply can't ever imagine feeling like that again, given the complete realisation of the reality of it all.
As I listen to poet-artists like Van Morrison, Neil Young, Paul Simon, Yo La Tengo, Beach House, and other such geniuses; I can't help but wonder, ... with lyrics so poignant, heartfelt, and vulnerable, isn’t it completely impossible this sort of sentiment could ever exist in reality? What I mean is, given the unfortunate nature of women, primarily hypergamy (but all of the other negative qualities too), being in love in such a poignant, vulnerable way is ultimately foolish and unrealistic. And yet, I can recall feeling like it was the most incredible magical world. Colors were brighter. I felt like the lyrics and music were written for me, and they painted my world and made my soul sing. A truly blissful illusion.
Does that sound beta? Probably. But I simply cannot forget the years I was with this woman and the music and poetry we'd share - how real it felt. Spoiler alert: She ended up treating me like shit leaving me when I lost my job, completely deleting my perception of how deep and transcendent the 'love' was. I showed a moment of weakness and hardship, and she was gone in an instant.
I read the poetry of Pabldo Neruda or the letters Vladimir Nabakov wrote to his wife (“Yes, I need you, my fairy-tale. Because you are the only person I can talk with about the shade of a cloud, about the song of a thought — and about how, when I went out to work today and looked a tall sunflower in the face, it smiled at me with all of its seeds.”) and I can’t help but feel so depressed that it’s all just an illusion. I thought it was real for so long; the highest thing to aspire to, a genuine love.
Are these poets and musicians just ‘blue pill beta males’ in the eyes of the TRP community? Where does this sort of heartfelt sentiment fall under this framework? It just saddens me. I feel freed because I think I’ve found the truth, that it was just an illusion. But just the same, it makes me depressed beyond belief.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
totorox 8y ago
THIS. Thx. Don't deny love. Be cynical about women if you want/need to, but love isnt limited to romantic relationships.
RealRational 8y ago
Love is a thing of beauty.
Beauty is fleeting.
Just because it doesn't last beyond the moment doesn't mean it holds no value.
Unfortunately the reality we live in means we can only attain that type of love from a hypergamous unreliable source, females.
Men used to be able to commit to love and be rewarded for it, because the hypergamous nature of women was held in check by societal pressures, like the bonds of marriage. Now that those bonds are gone it is foolish to invest anything more than what's fleeting, momentary into love.
It's a sad state of affairs, it goes against our romantic nature. We WANT to escalate by committing more resources to maintain access to that feeling. Because that's the underlying social contract between men, you do for me I'll do for you. Women have repeatedly and without exception punished us for trying to apply this social contract to them, labeling it "oppressive". If we don't adapt and change we will die out. We meaning men, not betas. Which are essentially children.
You must restrain yourself to committing only momentary value, because all women will give you in return, regardless of what you give them, is momentary value.
totorox 8y ago
NO. Rendering a service is love. Helping a stranger. Children. Parents. Friends. Creating is love. You think Tesla changed the world out of what? Pride? He was dying of love for Humankind. For me and you. Come on.
waldo888 8y ago
love is obviously a loaded term. But I think it I obvious what OP is referring to.
RealRational 8y ago
There are many different types of love, yes.
I would believe Nikola Tesla had a love for humanity much the same way I do, for the potential of the species, just not the current reality.
But that's not at all what we're talking about here, entirely different type of love.
Vasallo7G 8y ago
I think a big thing is that love is not the same thing for a man and a women. Women are in a movie and they are the star, the director and the producer, they can not think but on themselves. But it is cute when they try to love you. Problem #2: society makes it reaaally easy or even encourage women to cheat. there its an interesting story on Don Quijote where a man wants to test his wife and makes his best friend try to seduce her, after the friend succeed and they both end running away, the man understand that it was his fault, that he was not that special and that his job as a husband was to keep his wife out of compromising situations, modern life in a big city with kids activities socializing, 10 hours sedentary job shifts, social web and easy transportation, its just a perfect setup for cheating.
Izzenw 8y ago
Yesterday I fucked an escort, and she said to me:
-You kiss me passionately, and you are fucking me like you are really in love
-You are correct, you are the woman that I love most in this life, more than I have ever loved.
She creeped out so much that she couldn't answer it. Then I replied.
-Just for this night. Right now, I'm loving you as much as I can. You are my bride, my wife, my lover. After we are done, its over and we won't see each other again. ( I rarely fuck the same escort twice )
And then she smiled again, and I kissed her gently, looked deeply in her eyes and said "I love you my baby" and she replied "I love you too, thanks for understanding me and my lifestyle."
I do love bro, but on short spikes. I train to love and live intensely. And to be able to let it go.
Sometimes I really miss having a girlfriend as I had it on the past. And it really hurts when I fall in love with a normal girl. But i'm sure that I can fuck an escort anytime, and dampen this necessity of loving someone easily.
royal_fucktard 8y ago
So it sounds like Van was the accurate depiction of "love" in your BP days. But now it's more something along the lines of Chris Brown's - Loyal?
[deleted] 8y ago
I used to do this with explosions in the sky. It felt real to me and unique.. like something special that no one else would ever understand what "we" had. Anyway one day she told me she couldnt hang out because she had to go to the gym, she dumped me and posted pictures of the guy she then left me for on instagram and basically humiliated me. You think you have some sort of connection but in reality that connection is only in your head and born out of a need and that need can be easily replaced by someone else.
WakandaDrama 8y ago
Shaggy's Mr Boombastic is a pretty red pill song...if you understand Jamaicans
Chinzon 8y ago
Many times I find myself in the internal conflict. I tug between the ever increasing knowledge that I must look out for myself and the ingrained desire to share myself with a "woman I can call my own". I can almost call it a relapse when my emotions try to overwrite the knowledge I wish was anything but real. .
One thing I've learned that helps me push onward is whenever those emotions bubble up I stop and really ask myself "what do I stand to gain by letting my emotions dictate my life? Now what do I stand to lose?"
totorox 8y ago
OK I got it. You guys need God. Of course women are just women. The ultimate object of your love is Creation and the Creator themselves (male or female, earth or sky).
[deleted] 8y ago
I've felt the same. I'm pretty sure we all do. But ain't life any less beautiful after we discover there is no after-life? Applied to RP, it means love and be romantic. Your partner's branch-swinging 10 months or 10 years down the road doesn't make love any less beautiful.
waldo888 8y ago
Just once. You'll only ever really love once, then you'll learn and fucking protect yourself!!
redzorp 8y ago
Excellent, heartfelt and honest post.
I think many guys on this sub with some relationship history feel the same way. I know I do. All-out romantic love with the right woman at the right time can be like living an incredibly beautiful dream. Reality eventually hits of course and then that dream is shattered. But so what. The old adage that it is better to have loved and lost than never loved at all - is absolutely true. Simply be thankful you experienced that high point. Many people never do.
As to the "solution" to this dilemma, I have found it through years of meditation, psychedelic exploration and other such "spiritual" work. I'm not an enlightened master by any means but the work has paid off. Many days I walk around feeling a low-level, "background radiation" of that same love I experienced romantically. The best thing is that it's pretty much always there and does not depend on any external factor. It's not as intense as being with my past romantic partner but it's pretty damn good. To further satiate that aspect of my being, I could always buy a dog and expand my circle of friends. Love is there in many different forms. One just has to be open to it.
All of society brainwashes you into believing the highest love only exists in a romantic partner. But that is a lie, a concept that is only 600 years old or so. Thinking this way shuts you off from experiencing love in its many forms. Heck it's at a point now that I can be hiking and literally drop to my butt as I stare at a far off mountain, engrossed and in love with it! If I had any poetic talents, I could write about that sort of thing, like so many great writers have done before me. But I suck at poetry so won't bother.
Maybe one side benefit of TRP is that it will inspire masses of men on a spiritual quest, as they simultaneously improve themselves in the material/physical realm; Breaking away from chasing "love" in the romantic sense to finding LOVE everywhere else? One can dream at least. The world would certainly be a better place.
And for the record, I am not against allowing myself to falling in love with a woman again. But I just know going in that it will never be an unconditional, infinite thing. It can't be. If you want the real thing, you have to find it internally, no if's and's or but's.
Edit: Just wanted to add a tidbit about how Tesla, one of the most brilliant men who ever lived, gave up on women (since they were becoming too feminist for his taste) and ended up falling deeply in love with a pigeon! Yes, of course that sounds totally whacked and I am not advocating man-pigeon love. But it just goes to show that the mind can find/project a shadow of infinite love onto any finite object or being. In some sense, it really is all in the mind:
http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/timeline/1922-teslas-favorite-pigeon-dies
[deleted] 8y ago
Just wanted to say, thanks so much for your reply. It gave me a lot to think about and the Tesla anecdote was fascinating. It reminds me of Jack Kerouac when he talked about 'finding God in an animal's eyes'.
[deleted] 8y ago
Love as you used to perceive it never existed. It was a myth, like the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus. Welcome to the real world.
[deleted] 8y ago
It existed, and it was a beautiful experience that is worth pursuing again; it should simply be accepted that those feelings are just that, and nothing more.
Dronelisk 8y ago
sadly this is true.
For men "love" is lust and infatuation, they're attracted to an ideal of female that they try to project onto a real world woman who they are interested in fucking.
Women's love may be a tad more romantic than just sex, but lasts as long as they get bored of it. As Chinweizu said, paraphrasing "when a man loves, he becomes stupid and irrational, when a woman loves, she becomes cold and calculating"
EDIT: got the correct quote: " when love smites a man, it turns him into a dazed prey; when it possesses a woman, she becomes a clear-eyed, calculating huntress cooly stalking her befuddled prey"
totorox 8y ago
Great quote. Still, love exists and isnt limited to romance. Careful there, guys. Treading on sacred ground:)
[deleted] 8y ago
"Are these poets and musicians just ‘blue pill beta males’ in the eyes of the TRP community? "
No. They are deluded Blue Pill Males in reality.
OK. Longer answer.
There is such a thing as biological love. That process seems to be a shared experience which crosses the genders.
Yet-the Law of Hypergamy is NEVER suspended. Not even for true, goal oriented chemical love. She may really , chemically love a guy and feel kinda shitty about leaving him for the wealthy friend . But leave him she will do without hesitation if Hypergamy demands it. The idea of "true love conquers all" is total bullshit. As the Mafia would say, its just business capiche?
I learned this during my military stint. Met a married military girl and we chemically fell for each other. Did she make a move? Fuck no, not on me anyways. She hooked up with a dude two ranks above me. Just business, capiche? I didnt care, because feelings or no, I wasn't going to Leavenworth Military Prison potentially over an Article 134 Adultery charge. Heartbreak is easier to escape then jail was my reasoning, so I kept my hands to myself and learned a valuable lesson in the process. If a female can make the feelings work within her hypergamous nature , life's really good. Usually the goal-oriented affection happens in an inconvenient manner, like falling for a broke dude at work instead of the President of Operations. In which case she'll commiserate with her girlfriends about the unfairness of it all over boxed wine while chasing Mr Money.
What she will NOT do is drop everything to hook up with a fulfilling , lifelong relationship with the man she loves. Thats not the point of why she associates with men at all. I've even seen cases where women unable to execute ANY logical forethought or planning deliberately avoid men they chemically love, because they had multiple irons in the fire regarding men they were using and didn't want to fuck up their plate rotation by being with a guy they couldnt control.
ChairBorneMGTOW 8y ago
The eloquence of a body of text has no bearing on its veracity.
These men were just as delusional as you or I were at one point, they just expressed their delusions very well.
[deleted] 8y ago
They spoke of what they were perceiving. Those feeling really were intense and beautiful for them.
The thing that TRP changes is that it makes you confront the fact that for most intents and puposes, emotions are irrelevant.
tio1w 8y ago
Yes, poetry is bullshit.
Yes art in general is bullshit
Love is at best an illusion.
It's very curious how your soul mates usually depend on very physical attributes like sex (even for homosexuals which generated huge amount of poetry at least relatively).
Shed your illusions, live according to reality.
This post was so sweet that I thought it might give me diabetes.
[deleted] 8y ago
Evolution gave us those wonderful feelings called love because without them there would be no humans alive today.
[deleted] 8y ago
Having men love women is what allowed humans to continue to exist
Having women cuckold men is what allowed humans to exist
Milleniums of men loving "their" woman that cuckolded them by having an alpha inpregnate her is why we are here. The cuckolding part is well known within TRP. The love part is the other component, it is also well known within TRP that men love women and women love children. The evolutionary implications of this arrangements are amazingly clear.
J_AsapGem 8y ago
i know the feeling, when a man is in love it's a beautiful thing( despite the betaness ) i think that's why the pill is so hard to swallow, our illusion has been destroyed and reality is smacked in our face. I was so happy in that illusion, but as you said depression came after the truth was learnt.
[deleted] 8y ago
Still coming to grips with it. Literally shook for a few weeks after taking the red pill. You can't make me go back though. I said this a few times already, I would rather die than go back.
boredgod 8y ago
Romance is a male-dominated genre. Men are the true romantics. Start paying attention to women, especially singers, who try to sound romantic. They are either trying to appropriate male desires and portray themselves as fulfilling them, or they go out on a limb and try to actually portray romantic feelings - with silly, strange results.
Yes, despite the beauty of the romantics throughout the ages, the female species cannot reciprocate those feelings or even understand them. Women love opportunistically. They love not who you are, but what you do for them. There is no true love to be found in women.
This is the birth of the "anger phase", when you realize that no woman has the capability to love you like you love her, and so you change and become more valuable to women (and more importantly yourself) by being above their wiles, their deceptions and manipulations.
Then comes "amused mastery". You no longer are angry at women, but you find them funny in their ways.
If you're like me, you bounce back and forth between anger and amusement. You slowly see The Red Pill eat your world around you. Like the Matrix, you no longer see things for how they are portrayed to you, but rather for what they really are.
[deleted] 8y ago
New redpiller. Walked on first plate recently, and I've just bounced back into anger phase myself after 3 days or so. Do you bounce back and forth all the time? Does it ever stop boredgod?
boredgod 8y ago
New piller myself, so take this with a grain of salt (the sidebar is your friend). My experience so far has been rocky but still marked by progress. The key for me has been to never let up on increasing my SMV through lifting, game, work, etc. While my knowledge of the depths of deception we've endured grows and makes me angry or depressed, constantly-increasing SMV fills the absence. While I discover how much I had been losing the old game created by the female sexual imperative, I simultaneously grow in the ability to conquer in the new game of the male sexual imperative. One hand takes while the other gives. I think that's the key to getting out.
dj10show 8y ago
Taylor Swift is more red pill than most guys.
boredgod 8y ago
Funny how her old songs are pathetic, female whining, while there is a new song all about an alpha fuck - the one where she doesn't expect him to stay but asks him to simply remember her. Ah, to be cared about for more than a quick fuck by an alpha.
crazysmallbrain 8y ago
"As I experience certain sensory input patterns my mental pathways become accustomed to them, the patterns are eventually anticipated and even missed when absent" ~Lieutenant Commander Data~
waldo888 8y ago
He is describing everything you have ever experienced or wanted. If you throw out love to some neural impulse repetition, you must throw it all away!!!
crazysmallbrain 8y ago
At the end thought is not much more then patterns and pattern recognition.
Love can be described as similar to drug addiction. The pain you feel when your 'feelings are not returned' is very similar to rehabilitating from drug use.
And yes, you should throw away the fantasy of love. It doesn't exist.
waldo888 8y ago
Everything is pattern recognition...does it make it less real Idk. If you throw away love you have to throw away every fucking emotion you have. Fuck even rationality is a heuristic. Even quantum physics has probability. Life and everything in it has as much value as you/others place on it/systems depend on it. Love exists only your conceptions if it has changed. So if you need to say its a chemical reaction so you don't get caught up in it, ask your self why should you even fuck a girl then if not for babies. |Enjoy the ride brother it is real. Temporary but real.
MattyAnon Admin 8y ago
People conflate and confuse all the definitions of love. Women especially expect to receive parent-to-child unconditional care and support and adoration. Men expect to love women this way and hope for the reverse.
I find it best to totally avoid using "love" as a word. Replace with "care" and "adore" and "affection for" and the world makes a lot more sense.
She says "I love you", does it mean "I would willingly die for you?".... unlikely. Does she mean "I care about you unconditionally"? Probably not. Does it mean "I need what you do for me and I'll go out of my way a little bit to sustain that for now"? Quite likely.
Women are especially good at demanding all the definitions of love, while subdividing their own. "I love him.... but I'm not in love with him" is something women often say. What does this mean? It means she's comfortable but not horny for the guy. She likes the house and income, but isn't gina-tingling for him. It means beta bux.
I might do a full post on this stuff.
In short: analyse what everyone means (and what you mean) when using the word "love" and replace with other words.
ChiefReap 8y ago
I don't believe in cupid that shit's stupid -Chief Keef
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
Very, very good analysis. I really appreciate what you wrote here. I guess I did overlook the power aspect of these guys.
chad_starr 8y ago
the complete death of this childish love you describe, the total lack of hoping for that feeling ever again, is the true definition of swallowing the pill.
tio1w 8y ago
It's not the death, it's realizing it never existed in the first place.
[deleted] 8y ago
That is hard-hitting. Once you realize women can't love men for anything beyond their provider-capability it makes you look at all couples in a different light
totorox 8y ago
They can. It just makes no/less sense biologically. I'm in love with a married woman. I'm not plan B. I won't go into details but plan B doesn't apply to us. What biological purpose do I serve? You guys are pigeonholing.
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
Good luck. I mean it sincerely. Personally I've met too man guys who had their wife's leave after a job loss to ever have any measure of confidence in women's ability to remain loyal. Too many divorces where women need their "life-style" maintained by the ex.
totorox 8y ago
That love is fine. Its object was not right. You threw that love at the feet of a piece of meat. Love the soul. The children. The Sun. Whatever deserves that love. God himself. Nature. Mother Earth. The soul can be your woman's. But it is soul through her, for however long biology dictates her presence besides you and her welcoming attitude.
[deleted] 8y ago
Did your cry when you found out magic wasn't real as a child? I did. Same life lesson in a different form.
totorox 8y ago
Yet, it revolves.
http://tikaboo.com/library/Initiation%20Into%20Hermetic.pdf
[deleted] 8y ago
So you agree that Neil Young, Van Morrison, and all of these other artists/poet/intellectuals are just completely making stuff up and all of their lyrics ultimately mean nothing?
[deleted] 8y ago
Oh no. I happen to love all the artists you have mentioned. I am also an avid lover and reader of poetry. I love beautiful things and I believe those songs and poems are beautiful. I think those songs reflect a very real emotion that the artists felt. I believe men are capable of feeling things such as unconditional love and percieving beauty in weakness. Have you ever read poetry about women? Everything is praised from freckles to toes to insanity and hostility. Men love women in a way women are not capable of reciprocating. Women are pragmatists above all else. They are survivors and they have to do what it takes to insure that they and their offspring survive and loving of male weakness and sentimentallity does not aid that imperative. Women love male power and only male power. In a certain species of territorial bird if a male is jilted from his territory by another male the female also jilts him and mates with the new territory holder. Human women are much the same way. I strongly encourage you to read the material on the sidebar specifically the first two "Women in Love" and "Men in Love".
Oh and here's a poem by Paul Neruda I think you should read http://allpoetry.com/If-You-Forget-Me
[deleted] 8y ago
Late on replying to this, but I wanted to say I really appreciate your response. And, that Neruda poem was phenomenal.
ComradeCynic 8y ago
Huge fan of Van Morrison here, also ... as you might know, he married "Janet Planet" (her hippie name) and was madly in love with her for a few years, and they had a child together. The marriage lasted about 4 years; I haven't been able to find a description as to why they broke up.
mikesteane 8y ago
Nor should you. The man likes to keep his private life private, for which I respect him.
NightwingTRP 8y ago
Feminists killed male love a long time ago mate. The difference is we're only recently starting to realise in the past few years. Women can still love, they get to enjoy their feelz and love their children, but thanks to the imbalance in the SMP, we can no longer afford the luxury of male love for women.
totorox 8y ago
And our people is dying as a result. TRP is fine and well but if it's just about getting your dick wet while your people is dying... time for a new theory.
mikesteane 8y ago
If you are going to quote Van here, a better choice would be "The Great Deception."
[deleted] 8y ago
WAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Im gonna cry! How sensitive!!!!
[deleted] 8y ago
Oh, good job contributing absolutely nothing! Although, based on your posting history you don't really seem like the type that would ever have any sort of meta, bigger-picture, intellectual thoughts.
[deleted] 8y ago
You have to understand that TRP teaches masculinity and part of masculinity is stoicism and rejection of all sentimentality. This poster is probably just echoing those sentiments, though in the worst possible way.
Piroko 8y ago
This is quite possibly the worst post I've ever read here.
And after that stormfront lunatic last month that's a feat.
You don't get it, okay? You just don't.
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
Yeah because it looks like all you submit is solid gold ... /sarc
Sorry it wasn't a lifting/protein powder thread or a thread about someone's wife being a slut, 'bro'.
Piroko 8y ago
Not "in the eyes". THEY JUST ARE. Period.
There is an objective truth sir, and it's that women are conditional about love. It is a vehicle, not a destination. It serves the purpose of facilitating the continuance of themselves, both in the now and in future generations. That is its sole function and and if it appears to them to be failing in that capacity then it is jettisoned as garbage.
totorox 8y ago
...To women, in your theory. Don't extrapolate.