TRP.RED: Home | Blogs - Forums.RED: ALL | TheRedPill | RedPillWomen | AskTRP | thankTRP | OffTopic
Hot New Old TopControversial
Login or Register
15
- Hide Preview | 56 Comments | submitted 9 months ago by AutoModerator [Post Locked]

Every week we post our Pet Theories and Ideas Megathread and invite you to share the new theories you've been developing while out in the field. Have you noticed any strange trends that you either haven't understood or have a pet theory about? Have you noticed something new or different that we haven't discussed? Are there any ideas that you've been formulating that wouldn't warrent a new post but you want to share/discuss? Do it here.

[-] MarcosDomingues 33 Points 9 months ago

In order for one sex's sexual strategy to win the other has to lose.

You can see this when a guy asks a woman how to have a gf, and she tells him to be nice, caring and loyal. She's basically telling him that in order for him to have sex, he needs to cater to the feminine imperative.

When a girl asks a guy how to get commitment, he will tell her that she has to give sex on the first date right away, which will most likely have the girl end up becoming just another plate.

So never ask questions to the opposite gender about dating, because it will only lead to failure

[-] kidbagz 24 Points 9 months ago

A wolf does not ask a sheep how to hunt.

You are correct

[-] Throwaway-242424 18 Points 9 months ago

Both are projecting their desires onto a fictional ideal where attraction is already assumed.

The woman wants Chad to be nice, caring, and loyal.

The man wants the nice, loyal girl who cooks and cleans for him to put out ASAP.

The actual challenge is addressing the unspoken assumptions.

[-] [deleted] 9 months ago
[-] Born2flip 12 Points 9 months ago

I don't look at it as the woman losing at all. There's a lot of girls out there that just want to fuck, and there's plenty more that can be sold on the idea that having sex outside a relationship has been stigmatized for women.

I fucked a girl last week from out of town who told me she doesn't sleep with randoms. I told her I don't have platonic girlfriends. She asked why, and if I just expect every woman just to sleep with me. I told her I think society puts sex on a pedestal it doesn't belong on, and women who think that sex should only be in a relationship are buying into patriarchy and religion.

[-] yungassed 9 Points 9 months ago

what a shitlord reply. I love it.

[-] [deleted] 9 months ago
[-] MattyAnon 11 Points 9 months ago

> When a girl asks a guy how to get commitment, he will tell her that she has to give sex on the first date right away

This is where your analogy breaks down. Men don't say this. Men are much more likely to give girls good advice (and their daughters good advice) than women are, because men are more honest.

[-] [deleted] 2 Points 9 months ago

Totally true. Lost me there as well.

[-] [deleted] 9 months ago
[-] FrankCostanza111 7 Points 9 months ago

If I had a daughter, this is what I would tell her in order to be successful in the social marketplace and lock down a quality guy:

-Always take care of yourself physically by going to the gym several times per week and eating a healthy diet. Learn the best beauty practices for hair and skin care. Wear fashionable but not overly expensive clothing.

-Do not ever have sex with a guy on the first date, or you will likely never get his commitment. He'll look at you as cheap and easy.

On the other hand, if you lead a guy on for too long without having sex with him, you'll push away a good guy who will think you are using him (which you essentially would be doing).

-Read the news every day, and have several interesting things to talk about with a guy. You should be interested in intelligent guys anyway and they will value an attractive girl who can also have interesting conversations.

-Don't play "hard to get" but also don't put all of your cards on the table. Keep your true feelings to yourself at first, for a while. Don't respond to his texts or calls right away. Keep him interested by keeping him unsure of your interest level. Remember, there are lots of easy girls out there. Set yourself apart by not always being available at the drop of a hat.

-Screen guys for red flags: prison time, his relationship with his parents, alcohol/drug use history, employment history. Are his finances in order? Does he have a ton of debt or blow money on flashy things?

I'm sure there are more things but that's just off of the top of my head, from father-to-hypothetical-daughter.

[-] FrankCostanza111 1 Point 9 months ago

"don't ask deer how to hunt them. Ask deer hunters." - paraphrased from Patrice O'Neal

[-] notyourfathersfather 30 Points 9 months ago

I heard this on a podcast ( Free speech by Gavin McInnes) “You know how you can tell when a guy wants to fight? He doesn’t say anything, doesn’t come at you, but you just feel it?” “Yeah, of course” “ So I though, what if the same thing applies to women? So now, when I approach women, I think about fucking them, taking them from behind, and they get a totally different vibe then they get from any other guy.” I’m paraphrasing, of course, but what do you guys think?

[-] Georgian9500 15 Points 9 months ago

What you are speaking about is "Law of attraction".
If you are thinking a certain thing continuously ( fucking the shit out of the woman you're aproaching) you will behave accordingly, this is on a subconcious level obviously.
Thats why they say "fake it till you make it", you will surround yourself with a different "aura", a different "vibe", tingles.

[-] xrorox_rp 6 Points 9 months ago

While I don't remember his name, a PUA was quite famous for using this technic. There were some explanations about emotionnal states, because we tend to mirror them. So by being slightly horny, you can bring a woman closer to this state. However, it don't work if you are too far from her state, such as humping the table in front of her.

That's also why, not being nervous yourself work. If you are nervous, you make her nervous. If you have a fucking great time so she will.

[-] MattyAnon 5 Points 9 months ago

> While I don't remember his name, a PUA was quite famous for using this technic.

Sounds like Gunwitch. Great strategy. Fucked up guy though.

[-] xrorox_rp 3 Points 9 months ago

Thanks for the name. How was he fucked up ?

[-] MattyAnon 6 Points 9 months ago

He shot a girl in the face.

[-] [deleted] 15 Points 9 months ago

[deleted]

[-] TCMThommy 8 Points 9 months ago

Oh god yes. So hard to listen to music after TRP.

[-] tiger_stu 6 Points 9 months ago

Luke Bryan's 'light it up' is probably the most Beta song ever written. The lyrics are vomit inducing.

[-] arthurabyssal 2 Points 9 months ago

Watch "it's no good" on youtube. At first it seems blue pill. But watching the video makes you realise that Depeche Mode is mocking the Blue Pill perspective. Some of their music is BP but only because its New Romantacist stuff. Romantacism is BP & RP in ways.

Rammstein is pure RP and fun (the big guy rides a massive dildo and shoots fake cum everywhere and its amazing)

Linkin Park is wayyyy to Blue Pill for me. But I love their music. Rap music in general is RP but not my style and I wouldn't call most of it 'music'. Anyone can sound RedPill by rapping. But being able to project a strong voice and let it all out while being Redpill is a challenge.

[-] MarcosDomingues 1 Point 9 months ago

I'm not a native english speaker so I can't relate . Can listen to an entire playlist without actually understanding the lyrics

[-] ez55 1 Point 9 months ago

oh yeah i know what you mean, every time i hear :

joe jonas one chance to dance

im literally dying from gaggign on my own vomit, while crying what is world come to.

[-] Lkeacentipede 11 Points 9 months ago

Pieces of advice on reading:

1.Your goal when you get into reading books should be to develop a collection of a few select masterpieces you understand cover to cover, instead of merely "having read X billion books".At first use a shotgun approach, but after your first 5-10 books go back and re-read the one you enjoyed the most

2.Read philosophy and/or literature and get your mind working.A week or so ago I was reading Nietzsche and spent a whole hour thinking of why I value truth over convenient non-truth.Questioning who you are/why you are will set you apart

3.Really question self-help stuff.Most creators are out to make a quick buck.A book telling you to try harder or to have more confidence is not lying, but neither telling me something I did not know or worth $10 - 20.Cliches and platitudes should ring a bell

[-] Fantawaters 2 Points 9 months ago

Recommendations on which masterpieces to thoroughly understand?

[-] Lkeacentipede 2 Points 9 months ago

I think it's highly related to your worldview.I am a nihilist, so my library includes Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Camus, Ligotti, Machiavelli. Define your worldview (are you religious?Do you think there's any higher meaning to existence?Are you willing to fight for a higher purpose?) and read pieces related to that

[-] one_more_iteration 3 Points 9 months ago

> Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Camus

Dude, you're not reading critically if you think any of those guys are nihilists.

[-] Lkeacentipede 2 Points 9 months ago

I don't think they are Nihilists, especially Camus and Dostoyevsky.Their works though do portray the world from that perspective

[-] Lkeacentipede 2 Points 9 months ago

Also, I love the work of Kafka, especially Metamorphosis

[-] [deleted] 5 Points 9 months ago

Girls with lower SMV are more loyal towards me. However, they still lie.

[-] [deleted] 6 Points 9 months ago

Surround yourself with people greater or equal to you in terms of value. This goes for girls as well. Don't bring yourself to their level. You are what you eat.

[-] Born2flip 5 Points 9 months ago

I've been finding almost every girl I sleep with is into BDSM. This has been almost every single one for two years. I actually went to the sex shop and bought a bunch of restraints, a whip, and a gag. I went on some sites and learned how to tie knots. Fuck it I'm in.

I had a fwb chick that's a chemist. She would have me come over and fucking ridicule her, slap her across the face, and shove my dick in her mouth like she was a fucktoy. She loved it. I would be hanging out with her watching a movie and just make up excuses to lose my temper.

I have this french girl right now and a Korean that's the same way. The Korean girl wants to go to swingers clubs with me.

I've found the more open I am about being a complete freak, the more freaks I draw in. Some chicks are put off by it, sure, but I want to weed them out anyway. Most of these freaks tell me their ex was boring and didn't try any of this shit with them. One girl even told me her ex laughed at her when she said she wanted to be tied up. She fucking left him.

[-] LiveAFTSOV 5 Points 9 months ago

If we made "shitposting" a reportable offense we could clean up the sub easily

[-] magnificent18 4 Points 9 months ago

The bottom line of a relationship is quite interesting to look at since it actuality leads to failure instead success for both parties, whenyou really understand how the different sexes work and what they sexually react to. With that being said before jumping in one should really consider the long term effects and effort required before jumping in.

In the beginning two people of the opposite sex jump in a relationship based on sexual attraction but as sexual attraction slowly fades overtime you are simply left with the chemistry of personalities to keep the relationship going. Which you THINK is a great thing...

Assuming there is chemistry, what's interesting is that your relationship goes from sexual attraction to best friends, pure sex to emotional bond. You think this is great, thinking your relationship is on a higher level but in reality this will lead to familiarity and complacency overtime.

Let's back up for a second. As a man you can have multiple male best friends in which you can have a TRUE and real emotional connection with since there is no desire to have sex, since you are straight, which makes it genuine.

But when it comes to a woman, there is also sexual attraction involved, and establishing an emotional connection is dangerous to the sexual attraction of the relationship since this can easily lead to familiarity, and familiarity breeds complacency which destroys sexual attraction.

Complacency causes your partner's perception in your value to decrease as a result of them getting to know you on a personal level. This knowing of someone gets rid of mysteriousness (a key component of attraction). It is as everything that there is to know about you is known. Game over.

This lack of attraction can drive some people to look for other people since the feeling of complacency is not as exciting and not the same great mysterious feeling that sexual attraction brings. (Sexual attraction can be compared to a drug addiction, a drug addiction that one can't get rid of since it is genetically programmed within us to desire it when we are youthful and filled with hormones.)

By knowing this information your objective when entering a relationship would be to continuously show value (the lack of emotional availability) to keep the sexual attraction alive in the relationship to avoid eventual complacency.

So is it worth the effort? For males alone the coolidge effect will kick in and to keep your relationship alive you will have to continuously think on your feet to keep yourself above your partner in value to avoid the loss of sexual attraction. This means as a man you have to purposely say and do things you normally wouldn't do in order to get sex from a person whose novelty has worn off. Not to mention the time and money that is also being used to do so.

[-] ding3 -1 Point 9 months ago

Mate I don’t know how close you’re to your friends but opening up to them emotionally doesn’t seem to me like a good idea.

[-] HectoSexual 3 Points 9 months ago

It's a lot better than suppressing your emotions, that's for sure.

[-] LiveAFTSOV 4 Points 9 months ago

Women who say they are "looking for a workout partner" (most commonly said on tinder,) are covertly saying they want a lean, muscular man with low BF% to fuck their tiny little pussy brains out.

[-] tb87670 3 Points 9 months ago

INTRODUCING THE PRB, THE PERFORMANCE READINESS BAR

I do not think this is worth making an individual post about, but has anyone paid attention to the development of the new military Performance Readiness Bar? This is a nifty thing, it's a high dose of Vitamin D and Calcium in the form of a chocolate-type snack bar. It is likely something along the lines of a chocolate Clif protein bar from the scarce pictures I have seen. Supposedly less than half of recruits in testing took their Calcium/VitD pills like they were supposed to in order to prevent injuries, with the PRB they have a 90% compliance rate by deploying this bar as a bedtime snack that actually tastes good.

The military designed this bar because many recruits are supposedly out of shape and getting stress fractures that either get them discharged or causes long-term issues during their deployment in the field. So yes, this is a good idea to cut attrition loss during training, especially since many of the recruits getting the boot over stress fractures actually want to stay.

WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH TRP? If you look at the stats on the stress fractures and injuries that this PRB is supposed to prevent, 5% of male recruits have the problem with stress fractures but up to 20% (!!!!!!) of female recruits have the issue, and the researchers specifically state that women beginning training with poor vitamin D status are particularly vulnerable. Read that again. Yes, 1 in 20 men are dropped due bone-stress related injury, but 1 in 5 women are dropped due to this issue. The military never bothered with making the PRB until this recent feminist push into the military, has anyone noticed that the same as me? It seems no one is paying attention to this but the first time I read about it this was a loud alarm going off in my face.

It boils down to the military having to compensate for the poor diet of unaccountable women in society because female dropouts go against "the plan". They are now manipulating the diet to cut a decent percentage of the dropouts in theory since new food is cheaper than PC-fallout in their eyes, it is easier to just pay more taxpayer money to accommodate these feel-good ventures of putting ineffective women in the military. They already have watered down training and enlistment requirements. Do not get me wrong, I would personally buy these bars because I had stress fractures and a knee injury in my late-teens, they suck. And 1 in 20 men getting booted due to stress fractures, if this prevents half of those dropouts then that means 1 in 40 are recovered instead of being money down the drain. That can save a lot of money on the scale the military works at.

They blame the current out of shape population but that is BS, the military has much harder training today than it did in WW2. More weight in packs, longer runs, the regimen is designed to have high anabolic response in the body to make bigger stronger men. The old regimen of making sure a guy can run and climb a feasible amount and still shoot a gun like they used to do back in the day was not near as hard on the human body, and they dealt with a generation that grew up eating poor in the soup kitchens of the great depression. **But these PRB's were not designed for men, and because I see the world with red-pill optics I can see that it's mostly to prevent women from dropping out. This drives me nuts because these bars are a brilliant solution for stronger soldiers, but the motivation behind them IS SO WRONG AND BETA!!***

[-] cupshadow 2 Points 9 months ago

Some guy linked this article in a forum and it has many concepts that I found relatable to TRP, as a guy in the beginnings to understand the sexual strategy woman employ. There is also some strange idea about sexually unrestricted woman knowing better to differentiate the alpha fucks from the beta bucks. And no wonder, I guess that if you ride enough cock, you kinda become an expert in knowing which turns you on the most.

But of course, what's your guys opinions on this?

[-] Born2flip 6 Points 9 months ago

I think they know themselves and people better, because generally women that are not sexually restricted engage a lot more men, than some girl who's repressed.

They know damn well that some nice guy might be a clinger, so they shouldn't sleep with them. I've actually heard a lot of them say it. They look for emotionally unavailable guys to sleep with, because just like me they don't want some fucking psycho calling/texting/stalking them.

[-] cupshadow 0 Points 9 months ago

They look for emotionally unavailable guys to sleep with, because just like me they don't want some fucking psycho calling/texting/stalking them.

And here is where it gets interesting: they openly admit that they are gonna get back to the clinger guys for marriage. I mean, this article screams hypergamy.

[-] Born2flip 1 Point 9 months ago

Actually that is not the case at all. Women are rejecting marriage because they've shifted from hypergamy and men are still stuck in thinking that way. There's more women in the workforce than men, and there's more getting higher education. I know that's a hard pill to swallow, but that's the facts.

With the paradigm of women shifting towards being more independent they have a different idea of what a marriage should be, and I think this shift is causing a lot of friction between men and women.

[-] cupshadow 3 Points 9 months ago

With the paradigm of women shifting towards being more independent they have a different idea of what a marriage should be

What do they think a marriage should be then?

Women are rejecting marriage because they've shifted from hypergamy

Am I on the right sub?

[-] Born2flip 3 Points 9 months ago

Interdependent.

There's plenty of psychology articles on it. Women aren't happy either. There's fewer men working and fewer getting higher education. They don't feel like coddling mamas boy who doesn't have a bachelor's degree or a job.

You can bitch all you want about broads wanting guys with status that are attractive, it's fucking irrelevant since now they are taking the status. Meanwhile more men are durp durping on mom's couch with the ambition of a turnip.

Some of you need a hard dose of the truth.

[-] HectoSexual 2 Points 9 months ago

Can someone please explain to me what "I don't want to play games" means from a redpill POV? This is written on almost every older women's profile on online dating, and I have no clue what it means. To me, not playing games means just getting right down to sex, but I doubt that's how they mean it.

[-] [deleted] 4 Points 9 months ago

It means she wants a beta male to pay for her, but all she can get is a pump and dump. She rode the cock carousel until father time closed the amusement park, and now she has nobody willing to drive her back home. Her bargaining power is diminished, and she just feels entitled to a beta male's commitment and money.

[-] HectoSexual 1 Point 9 months ago

her bargaining power is diminished

Yeah, I think this is it. This is what she is trying to say.

[-] [deleted] 1 Point 9 months ago

She's bitter about it too. LOL

[-] daymi 2 Points 9 months ago
  • She isn't on the site just for validation
  • She wants a relationship and men aren't giving it to her any more
[-] [deleted] 9 months ago
[-] magnificent18 1 Point 9 months ago

Understanding females on a deeper level:

In today's society we have tend to say "everyone matters" or "no one is left behind" all to encourage and make everyone feel good about themselves.

However when it comes to biology not everyone will make it when it comes to procreating and it's not always their fault. Biology is just shooting dice every time a new human is born. I'll explain what I mean.

It is my own belief that in order to survive as a human species, our DNA purposely does not copy exactly the DNA from our parents and that there is slight variations formed in hopes of giving us that new individual/survival edge (value) to be passed on, so that our species can survive. Now that edge might not be an edge. An edge is whatever that meets the criteria to simply survive. It is up to the female to decide whether that edge is an edge or a good enough edge.

Now let me explain why I think this is.

If you look at your parents you will see just regular humans that are no different from you. If you look at your grandparents or great parents they too also look like us. However if you go back million of years into the past, you will have seen that our ancestors looked totally different from us today.

So the question one might ask is where did the change occur from species A to species B??

The answer is it never did. What is happening is each generation is slightly different (very very small differences) and overtime those very slight differences start to show themselves as thousands of years go by, that's IF those slight differences that showed up at the time were advantageous to keep producing. Which is the point I'm trying to make by saying that biology is shooting dice with every human born. Not everyone will be born with a "perceived" advantageous trait.

For example, in this case, say there are 4 new males that are born. A, B, C, And D

All 4 males look exactly like their parents but as mentioned they themselves have slight differences on a very small level compared to their parents. Let's call this small difference the "x" factor.

Each 4 males have a unique "x" factor that could possibly "give them that survival edge" or not.

Male A: Slightly taller than parents Advantage: Can see predators from far away

Male B: slightly Smaller eyes than parents Advantage: Can see further away than normal

Male C: Slightly more webbing between fingers Advantage: Can swim more efficiently and not drown

Male D: slightly larger lungs Advantage: Can hold breath longer and survive inhaling anything toxic or can hold breath under water and swim to safety

Now depending on during the time of society or events/environment some of these small advantageous traits can be very useful and valuable or not. Because of this increase of value, it's a no brainer for females to mate with that individual male so that the offspring has that trait and can survive. Again survival is the basis.

So what this means is that the changes of our human species from million of years ago up until today are the result of female nature at play, which is value/survival based. It is their role from a biological standpoint to pick out males that have these advantageous edges.

So going back to the example, if there was an urgency to keep safe from predators, being taller would help, and the female's job would be to produce with that male. Male A would be highly desirable over all the other males. However that is not to say that the other 3 males don't have advantageous traits, it's just that they are not needed at this time so those other traits might get weeded out.

So this is what I mean by not all males will get to pass on their genes: "no one is left behind"

Now this is a very simple and crude example I am presenting. There's a lot more variables that play into this.

But its how we humans today have less hair, are taller, more attractive, are smarter, creative, and athletic on average compared to our ancestors millions of years ago.

Overtime the females of our species slowly weeded out males who didn't have any of the above valuable traits. Some males did manage to get by but the trend is going towards the direction of what's valuable and is needed to survive.

This also explains why there are whites, blacks, Asians, Latinos, and middle easterners. Based on their location and societal values, certain traits were valuable and those valuable traits were passed on which led to different forms of Homo sapiens being created for survival.

So you might be wondering what traits are valuable:

Here are the increasing categories of value: -being decently attractive, non neediness/independent/not a bitch, confident, any societal high achievement, leader, athleticism, social presence, creativeness, any feature that is popular in current society (like being white).

Sound familiar?

You might be wondering how come women have so many things they can be attracted to when guys are simple and only like face, ass, and tits?

It's because a females sexual attraction is vague since a lot of things can hold value from a biological and societal standpoint. Which is why it's hard for people to understand what females are attracted to, even themselves.

For everything that is deemed valuable, there is a female that is sexually attracted to that.

Another twist that makes it harder for people to understand females is that they are all not the same. Females gravitate towards certain categories than others. It's both biological and societal. Nature vs nurture.

It can also be said in today's age, some categories are more popular with most females. Like money, fame, status, good looks. But there are females who value the other valuable categories but not at a higher market level.

An example: female A will gravitate towards guys who are white, tall, got looks and money

female B who will gravitate towards a guy who is athletic and creative

female C who only cares about resources (aka gold digger).

Regardless of what kind of category, all categories are of value and survival. It all varies per woman and can changes overtime.

Essentially the take away is essentially be valuable in some form (the more the better) and find women that value what you have, and having a decent personality to glue it all together helps.

But since a majority of females fall under liking the same type of mainstream valuable categories "looks, fame, resource, status" then I'd work on those to expand your market and then I'd work other qualities of your liking like athleticism, being creative (music, art), or winning awards.

Happy procreating! Peace!

[-] FrankCostanza111 -1 Point 9 months ago

If you have a better-than-average physique, try this on your next first date.

Wear a wife beater. (American slang for a thin men's sleeveless undershirt). Seriously. I wore a wife beater, chinos and dress shoes on my last first date and you should have seen the shock on her face. She even called me out on it, saying "what you don't wear clothes?" and I told her very seriously that "yes, actually I have a medical condition that prevents me from wearing clothes. It's very serious." :smirk:

I think this is a very, very polarizing move. If a girl is looking for a beta provider, she will realize right away that this is NOT you. It immediately puts you into the "jerk" category. Simply because you do what the fuck you want and are audacious about it.

[-] MarcosDomingues 4 Points 9 months ago

No, they will just think you're a fukkin phaggot

[-] FrankCostanza111 1 Point 9 months ago

...Or I got laid Saturday doing this.

[-] [deleted] 9 months ago