Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Do you guys realize that Gloria was a playboy bunny? She worked in one of the Playboy clubs. Get this. She had the face and the body to be a bunny, yet complained about how hard life was as a woman. Too bad, I could not get the attention she got while young, rather than going through life with barely anyone noticing me. Oh what a terrible hand she was dealt in life. For some reason I do not feel to sorry for her.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Her 'expose' on being a bunny was some weak sauce. She had to wear uncomfortable shoes, boo hoo.
But what's also interesting is that after college in the 1950s, she didn't want to marry her college boyfriend-- because that would've put her in a life of servitude-- so after graduating she got some fellowship to do stuff in India before working as a journalist and-- hey, WAIT, I thought women weren't allowed to go college, choose their own paths, get fellowships OR work as journalists back then?? WHUHHH???
Like, her own personal history seemingly undermines everything feminism claims about the Bad Old Days of the 50s.
And then, after she got famous, she overheard some sexist crack from someone while riding in a taxi alongside Saul Bellows. Ohhh no. Riding in a taxi with a famous novelist and hearing a one-off sexist quip! Oh noooo! No no no, ohhh noo, oh, the humanity! Oh, the cerebral hemorrhage!
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
The title and the article reminds me of that meme floating around. The first panel shows a Chad saying good morning and the girl giggles and says how sweet. The second panel is the same except Chad is now drawn as fat with glasses and says the same good morning and she is on the phone with a look of terror asking for help from HR.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
That's not a direct quote, by the way. It's just what her opinion came to be called.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
But let's be real, it's more than one depending on how Chad he is. Moar Chad = moar freebies.
Like a casino comping room and board if you are a high roller.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
We need a baseline somewhere.
Hell, if the dude is a Hollywood bigwig, he's allowed endless do-overs.
Why do you think it took so long to take-down Harvey Weinstein? He needed to be fat & useless before he was an OK target.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Yeah it's literally going to be a subjective and possibly not even conscious benefits/ROI analysis for every single woman involved. Not enough benefit despite consenting? Rrrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaape accusation. Reputation loss at stake? You guessed it, rape accusation. Some other women got "paid" more? Or not getting offered/paid for it anymore? Oh look, a trend!
Which is why not having legalized prostitution is so dangerous for men. It means they resort to covert/unsanctioned contracts that women are allowed to renege on at will, and why women collectively do not push for full legalization despite progressives being theoretically sex-positive.
It would ruin one of their most powerful and "inadmitted" grifts - the weaponization of sexual access.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
To be fair, the progressive left is rather divided on legalized prostitution.
See, there's a nuanced debate: one side says 'it's always a form of rape', the other side says 'but I make money off the oppressor, and it's only rape when I feel it is'.
It's a very, VERY intellectual debate. With words. Lots and lots of words.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Yup. Magical words. Like casting spells. Extractum denarius ex partriarchi!
-Hairy Pooter and the Chamber of Secretions
The ones that are sex-negative of course are "fuggles" whose spellcasting attempts kept fizzling.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
There's a similar debate about pornography.
One side: "It's exploitation". And the other side: "But I make money; it's only exploitation when I feel it is."
But they both agree that men are disgusting bastards for paying for what they'll freely give to Chad.
With lots of words, though. LOTS and LOTS of goddamned words.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
That is very interesting to read. A message in a bottle from a time when no one knew how it would go and they were worried about powerful men taking liberties not young men failing to initiate courtship.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
It's easy to forget what a big stud that Clinton was to feminists. He vetoed abortion restrictions, nominated RBG to SCOTUS, signed VAWA, coined the phrase "deadbeat dad", put his wife into a visible policy-suggesting role early on... they went to bat for him like no one else. For the first term, the feminists were basically the only D constituency that he didn't piss-off in some way. If he'd merely been the CEO of a large bank who'd fucked his intern? Or the CEO of a media company? Ohhh man, he'd have been dead meat in a piddling little position like that.
"He couldn't have harassed anybody! ANY woman would've wanted his dick!" was the vibe.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
I came of age during the Lewinsky scandal and that was my first does of political awareness. What got me was the proclaimed feminist and their level of mental gymnastics, the hamstering that spun so fast that it threatened to open a rift in the space/time continuum. Their defense was it was "just a blow job!!!" not the perjury part. They bury how that mess started in the first place and get really quiet when it is brought up. How that mess started: When Clinton was governor of Arkansas he had a girl on his staff named Paula Jones. He invited her to his hotel room for business and when she got there he was just wearing a shirt and no pants. He grabbed her and tried to kiss her. She ran out of the room and he fired her the next day. That is textbook sexual harassment, a superior using his power dynamic to attempt to sexually take advantage, unjust firing, retaliation, etc... All the stuff #metoo now rages about. Not one comment from those same feminists. Literally crickets.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Ahh, but there was a comment! There was an ally of Clinton, a bigshot feminist lawyer, Susan Estrich, who worked on the Michael Dukakis campaign in '88. Anyway, she later coined the phrase "nuts and sluts defense" to attack how Clarence Thomas and rapists might try to defend themselves. I mean, obviously that's just a slam to the woman's character, a defamation, a slur, to distract people from the heinousness of the crime. God knows a female accuser would never lie.
When someone asked her about Paula Jones' accusation against Clinton, Estrich resorted to calling her nuts.
So there you go. She got a chance to use the nuts and sluts defense for him! Sometimes accusers DO lie! Flippity floppity floop!
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Wow I did not realise Clinton coined that piece of man bashing language "dead Beat dad". One more reason not to like him.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Well, he pushed the phrase. My understanding-- based on my recollection-- the initiative originally worded it as "deadbeat parents", but he changed it. Knowing his family background, I kind of understand, but he also surely recognized which side the bread was buttered on.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
If memory serves, he was mainly talking about his own.
And of course, Clinton being Clinton, who lied even when there was no reason to, this may have been yet another lie.
hhhhdmt 1mo ago
Bill Clinton's biological father (Bill Blythe; a bigamist) died in an accident before Bill was born.
So Clinton wasn't calling his own bio dad a deadbeat. He was just bashing men in general.
Or he may have been bashing his step father.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
So Clinton slagged off his father? That tends to be a thing liberals like doing. Allows man bashing virtue signalling, gains victim points. Both these things help to level up in libtardedness.
Funny how O' Bummer didn't say his dad was crappy even when his dad was a drunk who abandoned him. Why? I suspect it was because his dad gave him his super power, putting the African in his American. Without that what would O' Bummer have been?
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Sometimes, kids manage to idolize a parent who was crappy. It's another reason I wouldn't want to get involved with a woman who already has a kid: the kid would always be asking "what was my real daddy like before he was electrocuted by the state of Arizona?" with fond gooey eyes just before complaining that I bought the wrong brand of creamscicle at the store.
hhhhdmt 1mo ago
Bill Clinton's biological father (Bill Blythe; a bigamist) died in an accident before Bill was born.
So Clinton wasn't calling his own bio dad a deadbeat. He was just bashing men in general.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
If I were Clinton I would have leaned into it myself: "Yah! She wuz a raight whore! Rode me laka tollet seat!"
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
He might've gotten away with that.
It's not as if you or I were to ask for a woman's phone number today. That'd warrant a damn good tear-gassing.