OP @Dorballom08 (and everyone else):

I'll leave this up, at least for now (more on that in a bit), because it truly is an excellent example of women's Dual Mating Strategy. It reminds me of Rollo's classic article Saving The Best.

however, for future reference (and why this post may end up removed in the future):

1) due to the Fair Use clause of Copyright Law, as per this announcement concerning the dot reds' content policy, screenshots of text are required to have the portions that make it relevant underlined, circled, or otherwise highlighted in some way. if the OOP (aka copyright holder) contacts us and requests we remove this post (as it's her post reproduced verbatim), we will have to honor that request.

2) this post doesn't actually meet rule 5 for weekday posts. WAATGM's rule 5 in its entirety (minus links to examples):

Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy".

5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly.

This woman already has commitment, and therefore doesn't fit what we normally want to showcase at WAATGM, which is inspins suffering the consequences of riding the Cock Carousel. It would have been great for weekend content.

Attraction cannot be negotiated. Respect cannot be begged for.

You know, if we were to try to explain it to a woman that doesn't understand why this woman's strategy doesn't work, I will try to explain it here.

Most modern women realise without even having it explained to them that they can punch above their weight in the market place of sexual exchange. Men 'downdate' for sex, so women can 'update' in the hook up market. the can get railed by men far above their station in the value chain.

In the LTR market, the 'equilibrium price' is much worse for women. They are more likely going to have to 'settle' for a guy that is pretty much their equal. A lot of women can get railed by Tryrone McMBA in the bathroom stall of a night club, but Tyrone ain't putting a ring on some skanky mid butter face.

So the modern strategy for modern women is to delay LTR's until about 30 something age, once they have been railed by men far above their worth. That is when they start 'dating with a purpose'. But the men that are so desperate that they will settle for a used up mid are not alpha. They are beta. And the panties are not damp for beta dudes.

With me so far? I think most women would agree with me so far.

The issue arises in the next phase. Women think that the beta guy should just put up with her, a woman that doesn't want to have duty sex with a man that she doesn't find attractive

And to honest, more and more men are realising that this is not what they want. They don't want a woman that has wasted her most fertile years on casual sex with chad, and then panic buys a beta husband for a life of shitty duty sex.

dudes have figured it out by the time they hit their 30s.

Congratulations for climbing out of the "dark period" shithole that you enjoyed very much but which is also in your current favor to downplay.

Now, you are a pure being of light who has no need for bodily fluids or filthy caresses of the flesh. Perhaps you can make do with a life of quiet meditation and your own morally-advanced thoughts.

Here's the thing: While I can appreciate she may not want to do that stuff anymore, she should expect that doing stuff you don't necessarily want to do is what marriage is about. "For better or worse". Men are told to "man up" and do what's needed even if we aren't in the mood.

Let's imagine if a wife found out that her hubby had willingly taken all of his previous girlfriends out to expensive restaurants but she hadn't ever gotten that treatment.

"I literally admitted to giving my husband worse treatment than some rando that didn't put a ring on it, and am now assigning blame to him for that"

Bet she's going to be shocked and appalled when the divorce papers hit too.

Holy fuck this is a Black Pill moment for the husband.

If he wants to keep his marriage, he now has to accept that she’s a former slut, and doesn’t want to fuck him the way he wants. Even if she does do anal with him, he can never believe it’s her own organic desire.

If he decides to leave, she’s likely to get half his money, and he will have, at the end, felt like he wasted a prime decade (20s through early 30s) on a woman who does not, and likely never loved him the way he wanted.

If he was a romantic before, he never will be again.

Basically, she didn't tell him she was a dirty slut when she married him, only that she "did some drugs, but didn't inhale".
If I were him, I'd be like, "You know what, sweetheart? If you don't want to be MY dirty slut, then I'll go find a woman who will."

This is like another couple where the woman taped herself and 5 guys and another girl in an orgy in college. The Husband finds the tape and watches it. Their married sex life is seldom and boring. He tells her he watched the tape and asks why she didn't want to do the things with him that she did the college boys. She says, I thought you would have thought less of me. He then says, She is not attracted to him like those men in the tape. she says she is attracted to him. This just set off the BS meter, for if she were attracted to him, she would be doing those things with him. BTW the couple was married 7 years. He is nothing more than an appliance to her, with a penis. She wants to be married, but not a wife.

This is the the dildo of consequences arriving, as usual, without lubrication.

She is just learning that a woman cannot outrun her past. They can run, but they can't hide.

What can we learn from this sad tale?

• Never, ever send a girl to college
• Never marry a girl with a sexual past, because it will come back to haunt you
• Women and the internet do not mix
• Female friendships are weird
• No empathy or understanding here, just avoiding consequences and responsibility at all costs.

She married him for a husband. Had she wanted a hot lover he need not have applied. He is her type as a husband, he is not her type as a Chad.

The worst thing is that most men in his position -no previous relationships- will just end up going back to her when their balls turn blue. Unless they manage to fall out badly enough from this, him serving a miserable life sentence is the likely result, though he did no wrong. She holds the only pussy he has ever been in. That is terrible power.

A slightly better option will be if they do fall out badly enough to split and he gets to watch her go and slut out for a string of hot guys during her gay divorcee phase.

Either way this guy will have more pain to come.

Men and women both need to be educated that a man's "Third leg" is the biggest contribution to his desire to remain in a relationship. It just is. Both parties need to see this as the norm ahead of coupling up. Your dick's need lets you tolerate a whole lot of shit you would never take otherwise. But men need to have limits and standards too or they get terribly used. Women need to know that they are buying into a man needing them for sex for life if they want a husband. Sure the law will let you refuse him but then you can't keep his good will. The law can't change how you feel.

This man needs to divorce her and leave. He is young enough to rebuild his finances but he can't wait a decade for this.

HE NEEDS TO LEAVE.