Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago Stickied
For anyone following along:
This is only allowed because of the site this was on (Millionaire Match).
This sort of profile on any other site is wholly unremarkable.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
If she thinks her annual income is 300 to 350k then she can't count. She gets some welfare and some support from her baby dadies. The rest is up to you!
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
age range 19-99 is the biggest tell there is. This is a prostitute.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
I figure that she's Hank Hill's niece Luanne, all growed up.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Someone should inform Jabba the Slutt that gobbling down $350K in welfare benefits doesn't count the same as actually earned income.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Haha, that's the minimum setting on the site.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Imagine if women were held to the same standards then for being able to have a profile there lol.
Or hell, any standards at all!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
There was a recent viral post on X about a good looking 30 y/o doctor whose friend was lamenting about how she can't land a husband. It is likely to become weekday content so saving for that. Here's what I find interesting: THAT is the kind of woman that would be ideal for this particular dating site, wouldn't it? I don't think she earns $350K but likely she could list that and nobody would care unlike women who gripe about 5'11" guys saying they're 6 feet.
Hmmm, I'm curious. I found numerous "strong and independent" women forums out there griping that there weren't enough rich guys go to around but yet the rich guy watering hole is filled with tatted up single mother trash or green card mercenaries? Why don't these rich guys just get on Hinge OR is Hinge almost like Tinder in that the doctor women on Hinge want only Chads making it a more trad form of Tinder?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
I think most of them realize that women are trash no matter where they look.
Hypergamy isn't just about money, you know.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
On that site, there are a lot more appealing-looking women than this one on. In fact, Imma gonna post a very recent (short) conversation with one.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Tats. kids, pink hair and a cold sore too. You are under selling this girl. She brings more than you bargained for.
Imagine being those 3 boys. This is what you think a normal woman is. You will think a man is either baby daddy who she shouts at down the phone to send more money and fuck off from her kids or some random guy who takes her out, rails her and leaves her angry and sad.
And they wonder why young men today are angry and directionless. Where is their hope for a destination when this is their starting point?
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
Takes her out? No guy is taking her out man.
The kids are going to get to see her being 'taken out'.
What they will see is strange men appearing, going upstairs, and leaving some cash on the dresser.
not even the most desperate guy is going to be taken this dumpster fire anywhere.
JudgeSmales Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Objection, Your Honor. The witness is purporting facts not in evidence.
See above. Shall we subpoena the children's daddy (or daddies) to verify this assertion?
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
I don't know the rules in Australia, but a lot of states and counties in the US had a dysfunctional child support enforcement system that would have the mom identify the dad(s)-- only if she felt like identifying them-- then garnish the wages of those dad(s) to reimburse the state for whatever various poverty-alleviation monies which were being spent on the mom. So the states were mostly chasing down poor dads to pay to support poor moms, after taking a 'fee' for processing. Child visitation for these dads was not a priority so they were expected to pay to support kids they didn't necessarily have contact with; a few of these dads probably turned to the underground economy out of frustration. The uncollectable debts ballooned to something like $70-100 billion.
In severe cases of neglect, the state would become the guardian and the kids would be taken away from the mom and put in a foster home-- which typically didn't care for the kids as well as an actual biological relative-- and the support stipends for foster children typically had a value greater than what the biological parent would've gotten (because the two programs had different ideas about what purpose the child was being supported for). Meaning that the child protection agency reimbursements for federal money were greater for removing kids from parents than from keeping them together.
I think there may have been some tweaks around 2018, but it was a system rife with perverse incentives.
MentORPHEUS TRP Endorsed 1mo ago
No way this woman earns 6 figures. And even at 10% of that, she ought to hold tighter standards than 19-99. ????♂️
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
That's the minimum setting for income.