Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3w ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
@Typo-MAGAshiv has tentatively cleared this for weekday content (please comment) by giving me a pass on Rule 5 but also for this following observations:
I appreciate (and respect) the commitment rule 5, but consider much of the problem these women are having is due to them refusing to express commitment desire because they are SO entitled, such as this one, that they refuse to even express basic respect and vulnerability to men therefore men are supposed to force commitment upon them because she's such a wonderful "table". They expect men to give them tingles and make her perfectly happy but until then, she's going to say she prefers to remain single UNLESS she gets EVERYTHING she can possibly imagine. Their argument of "refuse to settle" gets it wrong about having standards and remaining alone if needed. If someone is making your life WORSE or even miserable then, yes, of course remain alone but they interpret it to mean they'd rather be alone than "settle" for someone who merely makes their life better. They DESERVE superstar 10X better life at his expense. It's like someone saying: "He offered me a trip to paris at a 4 star hotel! I'd rather sit at home and eat beans and watch TV than go for a mere 4 star Paris hotel trip!"
Also, she is expressing panic about getting old and facing winding up alone and doesn't sound too happy about it. Those bird hands nearly pecked my eyes out.
If necessary, please pull and this can be reposted as Weekend Content.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2w ago
I've likewise seen a decline in women asking for commitment, online and IRL, it seems like they can't even get approached by a man they want nowadays
Cc: @Typo-MAGAshiv
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
That was a different video.
I'll go ahead and let this one slide because the commentary is so good, but the other video was much less of a stretch for rule 5.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Another sign of aging I get these mixed up. Fantastic in that I have that ready for next week then. I also found something else I'll run by you for the week after that.
X is THROWING these at me!!!
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
She would rather be alone than be with someone who barely tolerates her. I guess we all feel like that but watching the video, she might be going to struggle there. She doesn't sound too tolerable or tolerant.
Some many of these women think its all about what they need to get to make them behave tolerably to a man, not what they need to give to make him grateful for them, to make him value them. These women seem to have lost sight of the fact that relationships are mutual and reciprocal. Its all me me me and that is, indeed, hard to tolerate.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
What's hilarious is these women and white knights will talk mad shit about guys that just Peter Pan or otherwise retreat into hobbies and occupations that only support themselves.
While completely failing to grasp that the reward for "manning up" is being chained to one of these selfish creatures that offers nothing of value and is riddled with baggage and liabilities.
Fuck that noise. If there is no prey worth hunting, a hunter isn't going to bother hunting. Or also expecting men to become dedicated fishermen in an area with only barren mudpuddles. They're going to do literally anything else.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
"Barren mudpuddles" lol
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Spot on. The pond is poisoned by feminism and liberalism. There are no good fish left. Why sit for hours to catch something that will probably upset your stomach?
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
And give you the shits.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
This post is wonderful because it literally touches on the theme of this site being opposite "nice guys" who aren't really "nice". She claimed they "barely tolerate" her but what does that mean? She even says they were "nice guys". Let's translate from womanese such as these scene in Falling Down (52 seconds in) https://youtu.be/54WYFJ95wEI?t=52
She plays the "ask rhetorical question" game: "They do bad things... no. Did they treat me well and make me feel loved in the relationship?"
Do you see? She's angry because they didn't MAKE her FEEL something!
Imagine a man comes home to a well cooked dinner, she's in a great outfit, and she gives him a blowjob and then does his taxes for him.
Did she MAKE him feel loved? Did she treat him well? He doesn't FEEL it.
And maybe she's right about that. Maybe Chad didn't FEEL it.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
A man is in a relationship with a nice women who is just not feeling it for him, -well then he better man up or lose that poor good woman.
A woman is in a relationship with a nice man who is just not feeling it for her, -well he's better man up and or lose that poor good woman.
That's how the blue pill sees it. Its always the man who is deficient and who must pay the price if the women is not totally satisfied.
Blue pill + feminism = the shit show we have today where almost no one can feel they have enough
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
If a woman hasn't found a suitable good guy to commit to her by her early 20s, she has likely swallowed the feminist cool-aide, wasted her best years, and has risen her body count high enough to disqualify her from marriage.
Giving commitment to a woman past her prime years (25+) is a gamble, I would not recommend it.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
As a man who married a woman who was over 30 at the time, neither would I.
Then again, I also don't recommend any marriage to any woman until the laws are overhauled.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Two simple changes that would take a giant shit on the worst behaviors by themselves:
1) Assets on dissolution are awarded in proportion to fiscal contribution during marriage. If you only brought in 10% of the total income, you only get 10% of the (marital assets) pot at divorce.
2) Custody of any children defaults to the highest earner. Child support paid to the custodial parent is calculated based off of BAH rates for the ZIP code the children are residing in, not the income of either spouse. Shared custody averages this between the rates for each residence.
Given that most women prefer to marry up economically, these changes would protect men from economic predation more often than not. And would allow men an indirect way to enforce fidelity since adultery is not a golden ticket to a divorce lottery payout for most women anymore.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Another fading flower, another obstinate woman that has fully loaded the malware that all the other women in the crab bucket have.
I can tell that she at one point was able to pull whatever she wanted, and now she can't admit that her attraction is trending down. We see this with people who trade, when you're in a loser its so much easier to just 'wait a little' to see if it goes green. (It doesn't.)
So she'll cling to her losing position, red numbers piling up until she capitulates - and then there won't be anyone to lock down.
Maybe its nature's way of weeding out the ones that can't figure it out. I don't want more little-miss-I'm-the-table wandering around, so works for me.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Huh
Great, prove it! I'd rather see you own 40 cats than see some guy have to put up with that sarcastic laugh and your horrible attitude for the rest of his life.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
With 40 cats, she's guaranteed to have a very clean skeleton long before the smell of her rotting flesh would warn the neighbors that something needs investigating in the never-visited apartment at the end of the hall. It's the hungry meowing a week later which would make the landlord go in to check. It's the county examiner that I'd pity more. All that paperwork?
wswZtyqNGQ 2w ago
Fresh ground coffee and old fashioned portable brewers are the secret to surviving shut in body removal and cleanup. In fact, the cheaper the coffee the more effective.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
That sounds like a trade secret.
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
It's funny how women assume perspective for these phrases and words. "Settling" is a relative term. You could settle with respect to what you deserve by some objective standard, you could settle with respect to what you feel you deserve, or you could settle with respect to what you consider is most ideal. Seems like women are talking about settling with respect to what's most ideal to them, which is not a very sympathetic position, but because of the ambiguity that comes with the other possible meanings, no one really questions them.
Oh well, keep your standards, I say. Women like this aren't capable of successful relationships so they should just stay picky.
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
"Settling" or "to settle" is bad vocabulary in regards to discussing relationships.
You're not settling; you're deciding to make an agreement with another person.
JudgeSmales 2w ago
Miss Vocal Fry doesn't seem to entertain the possibility that men "barely tolerate" her because she is (wait for it ...) barely tolerable.
She says she didn't settle for certain "hot guys" and other high-value men who didn't make her feel loved. Maybe they were happy to stick around for sex, but when it came to a more permanent relationship, they had long since decided not to settle for her. I see a pattern here, but not the one she thinks.
GeorgeIII Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I haven’t watched the video, cause I assume it will give me brain damage.
But I guarantee this woman is over the age of 30.
“Where are all the good men?” Is the rallying cry of women past the wall.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2w ago
Women would be happier sharing an alpha than a duti...
Man it's all so tiring
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
The only reason why they haven't changed the laws to allow legal bigamy/polygamy so the top men can marry many women, and allow women to share a rich alpha is because no rich man in his right mind wants to deal with a glut of women clamoring to become their wives if such laws existed.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
True, it limits the number of women that can legally divorce a man at any given time.
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
this ^^^^^