Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 4w ago
This woman should be left to starve. I lean toward letting her children starve as well, as a disincentive to other would-be welfare queens. True, it's not their fault they were born to a useless whore of a mother, but neither is it mine. Nor should I be held responsible for cleaning up her mess, whether on an individual level or indirectly through taxation to fund social welfare programs.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
What an odd way to spell "this is bullshit"
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Press 1 to doubt
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
If you don't think you're a baby daddy, think again.
This is just 1 of the 15 million baby mommas you're paying for.
This is why I'm an advocate of no welfare for those who are neither elderly nor physically disabled.
(The mentally disabled can fuck off to a mental institution where they belong).
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
I'd like to add that anyone getting a significant portion of their income from the govt other than the elderly shouldn't be able to vote, either.
But that is a whole other mess that I don't know if I'll ever see addressed in my lifetime.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 4w ago
I will say this for her: she is honest about what she won't be putting in (money / job)
I doubt she's honest about the package being well worth it though.
How could it POSSIBLY be worth it?
Let's say she is as perfect as she could possibly be..... let's go full fiction mode here.....
This is the absolute best that she could theoretically offer. Better than any other woman in history has ever offered a man.
It's still a shit package.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Someone please post to the Reddit site since I (due to an injustice) am unable. It drives traffic here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Are you STUPID?!
Are you ILLITERATE?!
And are you STUPID?!
Oh, shut the FUCK UP.
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
You made me think of this meme vid. lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q74Ej1uEl6Q
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Now now, she's not stupid. She's just a very very terrible person who makes stupid choices and has stupid opinions and writes stupidly and.... ... nah, I guess you were right the first time.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
Yes, she is stupiding.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Priceless.
"I am lazy and won't carry my responsibilities. Take me and my brats on, it will be worth it"
Why? All I know about you is that you are lazy and shirk responsibility. These are not things that suggest value. What you are looking for is a cuck. The liberal state is a cuck or a man who takes you on is a cuck. You have had a blissful sheltered life and it is about to be filled with increasing disappointment as cucks get poorer quality while you get more demanding.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
This is why I'm no longer a libertarian or small government economic conservative. We need a welfare state BUT not the sugar daddy one that feminists have gotten in the west. Someone like this is not capable of raising a responsible child because she's irresponsible herself. I wouldn't even want her as a babysitter when my wife and I go out to an adult event. Her children should be put into a state run orphanage monitored by multiple church, media, and watchdog agencies. Those children should be either studying or doing chores, no TV or "screen time" (books ok, even encouraged!) In Japan, the school students clean their own schools and make the delicious and nutritious school lunches.
In the meantime, just as they are MORE than happy to tell men we have to literally earn our existence, this woman should be assessed a dollar amount of "child support" for the state run agency. She doesn't have a job or daycare?
No problem, tovarische!
The state is looking after her kids so she doesn't need daycare. They'll provide with a job and, again, monitored housing if needed. No cigarettes, weed, or drugs allowed and there will be an incentive for snitches. Snitches will get better housing while the snitchees get demoted to lower tiers.
Lower tier: Agricultural work. Plenty of jobs. They can apply for any one they qualify for (see above). I heard lots of places raided by INS need lettuce pickers. Middle tier: Restaurant kitchens, janitorial work, landscaping. Upper tier: Lower level office work. Night shift security. "loss control" at department stores.
Yes, tovarische, all managed by the state but with this caveat: It's all paid for by the proletariat women such as this who "don't planning on a getting a job". Unless her account is paid up in full and in good standing, she stays in the system.
Our current system of our oligarchs happily selling us out to cheap immigrant labor for quick profits and a welfare state on the backend just doesn't cut it for me anymore. Also, sorry conservatives, I don't cry anymore at church at the leftist poor aborting their kids.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
I agree, we do need to take care of elderly people that can't make it without help and some other cases, but the single moms... eh, its just a bachelor tax that I don't want to pay for anymore.
I'll just file it under the usual frustration at non-granular and non-representative taxation that has been annoying me since deductions have been made from every paycheck I've ever had.
Maybe automation/robotics will get us out from under, but that is a whole other problem - do you then give the people who have no job prospects handouts? I don't even know what society will look like if we have a significant labor upheaval through robotics. I do fear its coming though, creeping at the edges from the warehouse and simple labor jobs being replaced right now.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Shout out to the Lettuce Pickers of society! \o/
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I doubt her productivity in the workplace will ever be worth the investment of control measures needed to ensure it.
First world societies just need to come to terms with the reality that a good chunk of women cap out at "whore". Some even sooner, like this one. This one caps out at "leech".
Dump her kids into foster care/adoption, revoke any welfare benefits for her for life and register it on a publicly viewable Wall of Shame, and let her figure out how to feed herself. At most offer her a state funded tubal ligation or hysterectomy. Completely obviates the need for any future abortions that way. As is, she's basically admitted that she is just a life support system for a vagina.
And if that is the only value she allegedly offers then she should be treated accordingly.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4w ago
My point being that her working her entire adult life to pay back the state is a massive disincentive to become a welfare mother. Look at this woman: she LOATHES work. And yes, most of the money would be recovered if, like student loans, they go for life. Let her work 40 years picking lettuce. They have no problems telling us men to pay our debts.
GeorgeIII Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Well, she can dream like all of us. Heh