Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
ogrilla99
Posted 1w ago in Pushing Muh Agenda! - Permalink - 1K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 1w ago Stickied
For those that don't know, John Dolan is the man behind the pseudonym WarNerd (itself the pseudonym of another of his characters, Gary Brecher).
I think he hits upon a great point here: feminism, especially the type that focuses on sexual dynamics with men (as opposed to say the push for voting, or [un]equal pay, where women actually mean it), isn't actually real: it's a label worn by women to serve their own purposes, most of which have nothing to do with, and are usually contradictory to, what feminism actually says. And for the longest time, men were in on it. We knew they "didn't really mean it" when they said stuff like all sex is rape, or all men are potential rapists, or whatever. Because at the end of the day, they'd come home from their Take Back The Night rallies and fuck their boyfriends' brains out.
The truth is, most women don't want to be strong, independent, single and proud, yadda yadda yadda. It's just a nice label that they like to attach to themselves (who doesn't want to call themselves strong and independent?). Especially once they hit the workforce and realize your boss cares less about you than the most checked out husband ever did. Despite 50 years of sloganeering about being strong and independent, or wanting men that can cry, or how horrible heterosexual relationships are, and even how "hot" lesbian sex is (only women really know how to please women!!), as long as everyone (including guys), recognized that this was all an act, and after the megaphones were put down, everyone would happily go back to pairing up as usual (women seeking hot, rich Chads, men seeking hot young Stacy's) there were no real consequences to what they were saying. So they could go on saying whatever they wanted, getting ever more strident, extreme, whatever, without having to face the consequences of actually living in the type of world they purported to want to bring about.
Note, this is generally par for the course with women's communication about most stuff. They say "No means no!" but then wonder why we stop chasing them and move on the first time they say no. "But I just wanted to see if you'd put more effort in, chase me harder!"
They say they're afraid to cleanly reject a nice guy orbiter because, even after years of evidence to the contrary they're still worried he might turn psycho and assault her. Yet they'll have a one night stand with a random Chat off Tinder without the same concern even if he has prison tats and a felony record. You're never supposed to believe what they say, you're supposed to just go along, support their words, then treat them how they really want to be treated, which you're supposed to divine from nonverbal means.
IMHO, this is what made #metoo so fascinating. For a year or two, it looked like #metoo was going to take over the world. Women latched on to it and started declaring that pretty much any type of male/female interaction was oppression, prone to abuse, trauma-inducing, men need to go to re-education camps (i.e. HR mandatory training), etc. etc.
But then a funny thing happened... Men actually took them seriously this time. Rather than just shrugging our shoulders and rolling our eyes and letting them have their fun with no consequence, we started asking ourselves the question "if all of this is true, that just being in the same room alone with a man can cause massive trauma to women, or that a single joke that she doesn't find funny can create an oppressive, hostile workplace, and it can literally be any guy out there, just waiting in the shadows, then how do we solve this?" And we came to the same conclusion that Andrea Dworkin did: separate the sexes. Just like Dworkin accepted feminism's statements at face value and mapped out its inevitable conclusions, men accepted #metoo's statements at face value and came to the same inevitable conclusions.
Of course, that's not what women really wanted. They knew that the worst thing you could do to a woman is put her in a workplace full of women. Most of them will tell you their male superiors are far more helpful and mentoring than their female superiors. And their male peers are far easier to get along with than their catty passive aggressive female peers. Heck, even male underlings are far easier to manage, since they naturally understand hierarchy whereas female underlings are like herding cats. Just ask a female doctor whether she prefers working with male or female nurses.
As men started to withdraw from interacting with women in the workplace, stopped including them in after-work social gatherings, limiting interactions to strictly the bare minimum needed for work requirements, etc. (like they asked us to do) women all of a sudden stopped and did a 180. All of a sudden, it was about how men no longer wanted to mentor women, and that the lack of workplace social interactions was now oppressive and discriminatory, etc. etc. Of course, they couched it in the language of man shaming "what are men so afraid of? if you aren't a creep, you have nothing to worry about!" but at its core, what they were really saying was "please men, don't believe what we're saying. We're not really going to throw you in jail for complimenting our appearance. We're not actually going to get you fired for telling an off-color joke. I actually enjoy working with men. You're not a creep, even though #metoo says every man could be a creep. Please don't make me spend my whole day with the other catty bitches in the office!"
But there were enough examples of this happening -- whether nationwide, like Al Franken and Aziz Ansari, or local in your own company or group of friends -- that men refused to dismiss the rhetoric, and actually believed what women were saying, and took it to its logical conclusions. Andrea Dworkin was a single oddball feminist, and so could easily be dismissed by guys, but that's not so easy when you saw #metoo cases actually happening around you. It's ironic: men now believe in #metoo and #believeallwomen more than women do.
And so now we're left with women complaining about men actually listening to what they're saying. If you believe that the workplace is a hotbed of sexual abuse, harassment, discrimination, leading to lifelong trauma and distress due to the men that women must interact with there, then the logical conclusion is not to assume re-education camps are going to solve this (because they never do). It's to separate the sexes. After all, the whole point of #metoo is that sexual harassment wasn't a rare occurrence by true sickos like Harvey Weinstein or Bill Cosby. That it was far more widespread, and even harmless Bob From Accounting with the pocket protector could actually be a sexual predator in disguise.
If you believe that the personal is political and that heterosexual relationships are really just power struggles, all men are rapists, all women have been raped at some point in their lives, that you would truly choose a bear over a man then the logical thing to do to protect women is to stop having relationships with them. But when MGTOW proposes exactly that everyone shrieks about men not "growing up and taking responsibility". I mean what is the logical conclusion of women saying literally they'd choose the bear over a random man? All men (except family) start out as random and unknown to you. Logically that means you should marry a bear. And when he mauls you to death in gruesome fashion, you can at least take solace in the fact that you stayed true to your stated preference.
So I think we're at a turning point. One that it's clear women didn't actually want us men to reach, which is, we finally believe what they're saying, and taking it at face value. So now half of them are vigorously backtracking, trying to tell men they didn't really mean any of it, and the other half is doubling down, hoping that shaming men further and calling them even bigger rapists and clueless oppressors will somehow work the way it has for decades.
How do you reconcile a group (women) who simultaneously beg men to come back into relationships with them (both sexual and non-sexual e.g. workplace) while also saying they feel safer with a bear than a man? The answer is, you don't. Once you've withdrawn, it's far easier to let them spin their hamsters whichever way they want to and go about our lives far more peacefully. And in the end, even if #metoo eventually goes away, it'll be far harder to get men to go back to interacting with women the old way.
Anyway, hope you enjoy Dolan's article!
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
The men took it serious when enough women started to seriously use it to ruin innocent men, so the old unspoken rules between men and women had to go, making things like MGTOW and men walking away from women go from a fringe response to mainstream enough that women are regularly asking on social media why men are not approaching them anymore.
TL;DR Version: Women used #metoo as a weapon against innocent men, and the Man vs Bear question was the final straw for many men.
JudgeSmales 1w ago
"We knew they "didn't really mean it" when they said stuff like all sex is rape, or all men are potential rapists, or whatever."
One year a few decades ago, my bitter and widowed mother said, "If you want to know what to get me for Christmas, buy me the new book by an author named Catherine MacKinnon." I'm sure she thought I had no idea who MacKinnon was.
To the contrary, even though I was still years away from being redpilled, I knew all about MacKinnon, an aging University of Michigan lesbyterian professor who was claiming sex = rape and that porn constituted a civil rights violation. She was an ally of Dworkin. MacKinnon, who is now 79, has wasted her entire life and career trying to weaponize the justice system against men for having testosterone and a penis.
My mom had always been Lefty Lite, but this was when I realized she had gone nutso. Needless to say, I bought mom something much more harmless for Xmas.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Just wait until robotics improves, and its getting to some rather scary turing-level dexterity now. Put a nice face on top of that chassis, and you will absolutely gut the need for any guy to deal with a biological woman ever again.
Its closer than anyone thinks it is, and the burgeoning trend of text-to-video prompting from free open-source models means you really don't have to care what women think anymore, because they won't be involved.
You win girls, so go off and cry to each other while we slowly go extinct.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
"Did you notice what went wrong in that scene?" https://youtu.be/4uE96qUlJ_4?t=64
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
LOL nice one.
But you know as well as I do the moment they can customize and experience and appearance - either physically or if the tech gets there, through direct implant/brain stimulation, then we're going to have a very hard time fighting perfection.
Who knows, maybe the reason the universe is emptier than we thought in terms of civilizations to contact isn't just that space is mind-bogglingly huge, its that every civilization had to get to that point and either overcome the mental trap or go extinct.
I don't want humanity to die off, but I do know how alluring such a thing could be even in its crudest form now, which is text prompt-to-video and image generation.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I find it interesting how there are some men blowing thousands on OnlyFriends when they can get better images for absolutely free from google images. Sheesh! I remember paying $5 for a Playboy in 1984 and getting excited about, say, two dozen naughty photos. I went to a strip club with friends and for bachelor parties and I couldn't get into it either: Mostly sad looking men being pestered continually for money with any affection being clearly transactional.
I feel bad that there are genuinely lonely, vulnerable men out there ripe for the pickin' by the unscrupulous and zero protection for them from society. There are men willing to wife up tatted, broke, single mothers but, fortunately for these men, the single mother rejects them!
I wonder what makes me different. Maybe it's because I had The Talk from my father when they found the lingerie magazine under my bed and he gave me a pretty good, albeit limited, RP talk. I also had excellent sex-ed teachers (who were the shop teachers, I suppose because they're the baddest guys around.)
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
Or at least, not on any damn terms they try to set.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Thank you for writing that out. Twas very thought provoking.
As usual they want the privilege of a woman, the authority of a man, and the accountability of a child.
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I skim most posts. But this post is the reason I read yours in their entirety.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I enjoyed the article but for different reasons. Ponder that women have gradually come to look like Andrea Dworkin deliberately unattractive: obese, face piercings/tattoos, and hair dye jobs that look like the peroxide was mixed wrong.
This is a sign that feminism DID work as the economic/social effects took time to “trickle down” as wages stagnated from women entering, DEI, and a general hamster-treadmill rationalization of “I’ve been oppressed by the Patriarchy so that’s why Chad owes me a luxury housewife lifestyle” versus being appreciative of the Patriarchy for doing so. It’s not “Thank you for protecting me” but rather “You OWE me protection!”
Dworkin’s obsession with rape is prescient as many women online shriek about “rape!” and “not ALL men, BS!” and yet have rape fantasies such as 50 Shades of Grey and The Handmade Tale “Please, alpha male! Don’t put me in missionary position to breed me!”
As their little games progressed (pun intended) over the past 40 years of my adulthood, we observe how things have reached the breaking point. Some women don’t “get it” while others are becoming “pick mes” because they need to pick a side particularly if they want kids before their biological clock runs out.
We are entering a generation of women who either are going to “get it” and have a family and lives or be in a nursing home a half century from now with tats and face holes attended to by 3rd world nurses.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
If we didn't have a welfare state enabling the most worthless of women to be complete leeches on everyone else while still having a chance at having children who survive to do the same, this selection dynamic would overall be a positive for humanity on a longer timescale. We're far from any danger of going extinct due to lack of population, so we need to discourage the r-selected that would be useful in that particular scenario from causing other issues.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
goddamn giggity giggity - she is drop dead gorgeous!!!!
The thing that makes me doubt all this red pill stuff is just how hot those feminists are. Maybe they have a point?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 4d ago
You fap to Lena Dunham, don't you?!
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 2d ago
who in the world doesn't? She is just smoking hot
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
That line irritated me as well, it was defamatory and I didn't understand why it was in the movie. The speaker was not only implying that there was incest, but the reality was that Nietzsche proposed marriage, several times, to some woman other than his sister.
After Nietzsche died, his sister was actually the one who systematically falsified her brother's unpublished works to make them hue more closely to Nazi ideology in the 1930s. So, yeah, "Nietzsche's sister traded on her brother's name to curry favor with Hitler" would've been an appropriate rejoinder.
...anyway... the irritation stuck with me.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Very true.
I might have this wrong but the one line I remember form that film or one very like it was (if it was that film) the line that follows which went something like "Don't worry there is a whole section on tax law over there" That somehow made up for the earlier one.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I actually really enjoyed that article thanks. Quite an aware article for a lefty to write.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
You could almost taste their disappointment over how performative western progressiveness is.