Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
A good wife wakes up thinking, "How can I please my husband today?" She goes to bed thinking the same thing.
Dalrock defined the prime directive of feminism as: "Never, ever do anything for the express pleasure of a man."
In other words the complete inverse.
This woman will wake up thinking about her child, cats, and career. Not about you. She will expect you to be there for her when she needs it, take care of her child, do all her chores, and make more money than her at the same time, as if you are an omnipresent, magical, multi-tasking entity. You will never be appreciated for any of this because after all, she does all that already.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4w ago
My theory about modern sexual pathological western women is this: They regard relationships with men as a tool for their benefit: To get them stuff from men, protection, social status, and heck, just abuse him with humiliation rituals for the fun of it.
There's the saying "If you enjoy your work, you'll never work a day in your life" but in reality, it's hard to make that happen. Work is Work. Most of us if we won the lottery would quit our day jobs and women who regard relationships with men as a tool to get Other Stuff regard sex and relationships with men as a chore. Perhaps if a man is super "hot" she can envision just enjoying it, and women do "simp" for those men, but they feel bad about it afterwards as they feel exploited. I'm reminded of a reality TV star who made money attending parties and talking about it and calling it "work" and actually being serious about that statement.
Since they have mental gymnastics to justify their entitlement and to try to fool men, they aren't aware of this paradigm at a conscious level and even when pointed out, they will refuse to consider it because The Dream is a great Relationship with men while exploiting the man and women will shame her if she dares to have an actual Relationship with a man for the sake of it.
Nonetheless, Relationships have value. I think women do enjoy intimacy and genuine emotional connection but their habit of sabotaging it for something else makes them miserable. It's pathological.
Consider laws against recreational drugs such as H and Coke: Normal people are not trusted with the discretion they can buy a few lines of C or H and still lead productive lives. Women were limited by social mores from sleeping or Hoeing around and feminists griped about "oppression".
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
I would message her to ask how her day was...
She wants to get married but prioritizes men dead last in her life? How's that supposed to work?
Translation: I want another income, but do not want to deal with the person it comes with, be as low-maintenance as possible. She's phishing for simps. Bonus, if her "business" turns out to be an OF account... It's 100 years after women were given freedom to vote and marry and the current world is the reflection, a reshaping of a 4000 year old male world into a female one, and look how it's working out for women.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Yeah Fried Ice moment. There are fewer and fewer men with every passing day that are remotely willing to bust their asses to be at the bottom of some single mom's priority list.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
I'm sure she'd be cool with a dude who openly announced he'd put her and her kids dead last in his life. She'd understand.
I don't blame her for putting her kids first. I do blame her for putting her goddamned dogs ahead of a future husband. Like, the fact that she doesn't seem to realize how horrendously bad that message looks... just, wow.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Fictions, in other words. These kinds of "conspiracies" are actually alleged conspiracies, for which they are often contradicted by copious amounts of hard evidence, but are good at pointing the finger at cheap distractions and easy scapegoats.
"Conspiracies" are a lot more comforting and agency-free than the scary idea that you might've been duped by misdirection.
To wit: Project Mogul was a secret military project in the late 1940s which carried sensors on high-altitude balloons over the southwest for the purpose of observing the effects of atomic testing. It came at a time when the Atomic Energy Commission and the military were trying to calm public fears about open-air atomic blasts. When one of the balloons crashed outside of Roswell, NM the air force was naturally very secretive and gave unclear information about the wreckage. Somehow, out of this, the rumor spread that it was a crashed flying saucer and this idea took-on a life of its own with local businesses springing-up to cash-in on whatever gullible gawkers passed by. I can only imagine that the officials worried about a public backlash to atomic testing were overjoyed by the now-distracted public.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
Yes, very nice. Now do the [fake] moon landings :D
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 4w ago
The cost of building and launching a fake rocket and training astronauts which all looked as if they could go to the moon is gonna be just about the cost of actually doing it, not to mention the Russians would've publicized any hint of fakery. So instead of spending equivalent money and risking embarrassment... NASA might as well actually do the real thing instead of hiring Stanley Kubrick to shoot the footage. And Kubrick probably would've insisted on re-shooting the moon landing multiple times-- on location.
About 10 years ago, Buzz Aldrin got pissed at some young punk who was pestering him about this, and he punched him in the jaw. That's way better than any response I would've come up with.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 3w ago
I never got how popular the 'we didn't go to the moon' thing is. I've been to the Air And Space museum, and the museum where one of the Shuttles were stored.
It would take some crazy tech to ablate a heatshield on a capsule like the one I saw, and every single tile on the shuttle had a small incident angle faded burn mark as the tiles aren't perfectly aligned at the angles they are installed, so you'll get some turbulence as the plasma of re-entry scorches them.
Not to mention the inventions/tech that came from the missions themselves. I understand why Aldrin punched that fuck in his face, I probably would've too.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
I wouldn't know by experience, as I foolishly got married at 25. But from what I've read and heard and seen, I'd agree. It looks like nothing but commitment-hungry single moms with entitlement complexes and nothing to offer but a list of demands yet who also want to put men last while extracting resources from them.
Oh.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
"Do you think that female entitlement has been encouraged by the law and by western culture as a conspiracy by liberals to destroy the family and create a socialist utopia where everyone pays tax?"
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4w ago
Don Quixote was written 420 years ago as a comedy about a chivalrous man living in a delusion where all women were "ladies" and tilting at windmills. It was meant to be a joke.
Polish Knights of the 17th century were relatively austere warriors with some luxuries compared to a peasant, of course, but didn't own land. If they were valiant, they would be given recognition and then nobleman, to curry favor with the King, would offer their daughters and huge tracts of land in dowry for him to marry her. Knights treated Ladies with supplication because they wanted that dowry. In other words, hypergamy was something men practiced.
I chuckle when men today say they wouldn't want a woman who was wealthy. She can't divorce him and take all his "stuff". She can't threaten or nag him that she'll leave him. She wouldn't need him to pay the bills. Oh no! How awful!
Looking back, I wonder what my life would have been like if I had seduced one of the more wealthy corporate nuns...