Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 3w ago
Her advice is probably the same as any slut: don't get married young, just sleep around until you are past your prime and THEN you can 'settle down'. It's nuts how often you hear this advice. I even heard Kristen Bell recently on a podcast saying that she 'regrets' not having slept around more (she was pretty slutty before she settled down, but she regrets not having been more of a slut).
Poor Kristen. Anyone any advice for her? I guess she could get divorced now (she is 45) and she could sleep around some more. Would that work? Would that make her happier? She could sleep around from 45 until say, 53....and surely then there would be some giga chad that could wife her up and look after her until she died?
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 4w ago
for a quick glimpse into just how red pill Ai is, just check this out...
Did you mean: what are we to do with the emma watson's
AI Overview You are not meant to "do" something with Emma Watson in the sense of having a task to complete for her, but rather to recognize her work as a UN Women Goodwill Ambassador and activist. You can support her and her causes by getting involved with the HeForShe campaign for gender equality, advocating for girls' education, and being mindful of climate change. Additionally, you can support her recent academic pursuits by respecting her decision to step back from a full-time acting career to focus on her studies in creative writing.
It's fantastic stuff! We all just need to kneel down and obey this 'woman' that has been frozen in time since aged about 11.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
This was nearly a decade ago, but I remember reading something about her boyfriend that was by all accounts a mega giga Chad. A true Alpha Bux. He was some buffed out rugby player that had a Royal Title, came from old generational money, and was hot. She was dating him when she was at her young, hot, fertile in her 20s phase of life and on top of the world with her fame and money. To a poor like me, this seemed like a match made in heven: Kings marry Queens I was always told... now she exemplifies the typical WhereAreAllTheGoodMen woman which is a crazy feminist, hypergamy, delusional, and the fool that let Chad get away and didnt lock him down when she had the chance and while she was young and hot.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 4w ago
If you search hard enough you can find p0rn pics of her 'finding herself' at burning man. Like many women that 'find themselves' and 'experiment' she will soon find out that no man worth his salt would ever want her. She may find some beta bux kind of guy to bring her flowers, but that isn't going to moisten the vag.
[deleted]
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 4w ago
That's what grinds my gears. She had a giga mega Chad and she fucked up that royally to "find herself?" Now at the wrong side of 35 and ran through and her eggs almost gone; is no way giga Chad is going to wife her up. And yes, the dirty truth is there are plenty of rich Beta Bux out there that she cant stand and cant imagine him climbing on top of her that will wife her up and give her the jet set lifestyle
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
@Typo-MAGAshiv Reposting. I perhaps posted the original URL instead of the archive.ph perhaps because I copied-pasted the wrong tab? Anyhoo, Emma reappearing in Celebrity Edition and she's not getting younger.
If someone could be kind to post the Reddit site due to the injustice I'm unable, it will help to drive traffic to this site.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
If ever there is a woman I would suggest should not marry, it might be Miss Resting Bitch Face-Watson.
That said it would make some liberal Chad a rich man when he irritated her to the point of divorce. She knows she is too intolerant to stay married and that is why she is glad she has not yet been divorced. Its funny how women start to think more like men about marriage when they would be losing not winning.
Isn't it annoying how the left have stretched the concept of "violence" from the use of physical force that would cause injury or death to societal pressure. If they succeed in making such definitions stick they will be undoing themselves. We must presume that "cancellation" of people is an extreme violence then.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
I think that it might be fun for a man to marry Emma Watson, as long as there is a pre-nup in place.
Pre-nup should state that in the event of a divorce, it's 50:50. Estimates for her wealth are $85m.
It would be fun to see some equality in action, because that marriage would not last long. And it would be nice to see a brother walk away with $40m in the bank. (the missing $5m is for lawyers fees - we want a 'hear all' divorce case with plenty of details)
hhhhdmt 1mo ago
Any woman who embraces any kind of feminism is not only not marriage material but also isn't relationship material.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
“That said it would make some liberal Chad a rich man when he irritated her to the point of divorce. She knows she is too intolerant to stay married and that is why she is glad she has not yet been divorced.”
When I reached 40, I was astonished at what my friends went through in divorce. It’s what makes me committed to my own marriage: Divorce is so awful it’s worth putting in the effort to avoid. One dear friend’s ex-wife took on her anger on him by alienating their daughter and the daughter is a blue haired obese lesbian.
That said, all it would take for Emma Watson to avoid divorce would mean personal change away from being intolerant you observed. It’s not tough, really: Separate bedrooms so “her space” isn’t infringed upon, servants so she doesn’t get angry about him leaving socks on the floor. She has luxury that’s at Queen level but she can’t make a relationship work. Astonishing.
But what you’re mistaken about is that she doesn’t “know” this and resents even obliquely being educated on it “violently”. Probably nobody tells her she’s insufferable, selfish, lazy, and over demanding but she frets about people who are successfully married saying they had to give up those things to do so and THAT is violence to her: Simply witnessing others being successful and showing what it takes.
She would prefer a Taliban like society where everyone wears a veil and hides what it takes to make a marriage work so she doesn’t have to feel shame.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Assuming of course that she managed to override her own firmware enough to "accept" a man of lower socioeconomic strata as a marriage prospect. Most women like her can't/won't and that's how they end up cat ladies.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Yeah she would struggle anyway to accept a man with less than her. He would have to be very Chad-tastic.
On the subject of firmwear, it will be interesting to see how her next decade goes. At the moment the alarms can be silenced by hours of thinking hard by herself (hamstering lots). As the wall looms, she will start to worry more and more about her failure to reproduce. Marriage may then no longer look like "the culmination" of life and more like the start of adult life, leading to reproduction. Will she snatch at a beta late in the day?
hhhhdmt 1mo ago
If she manages to get a man who is less wealthy than her, she risks losing part of her wealth to him.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I suspect that when a woman's early life is literally based entirely on her ability to hold the attention of others that the coming invisibility will hit particularly harsh without a family there to give a damn about her.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I hate to be argumentative, but she has already hit The Wall and then some: 2x35=70. She's officially middle aged.
35 is also a special age in that she's unlikely to bear children in a normal marriage. It would take at least a year for a man to feel comfortable popping the question, then getting married and starting to try to have kids. My parents were virgins when they met in 1958 at 22 and married at 25 when he was discharged from the army. My older brother was conceived on the honeymoon weekend (people did a head count of his birthday in relation to the wedding date.)
There's a special kind of shame for someone who has all the privileges and advantages and yet still fails at life. The rabbit in the rabbit-and-tortoise race story who loses because he decides to take a nap halfway.
She cries about violence but this is hilarious. NOBODY is her friend whom she doesn't want. She's a feminist who claims to be strong and independent but she can't handle even the possibility of obtuse criticism. She can't handle rejection whereby she approaches someone she finds attractive but she can't be soft and compliant either.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
The wall is a tough time to define. But you know it when you see it.
I would argue its around perimenopause, when fertility is only a very distant hope. Until then yes she may have started to age faster but she could conceive OK (probably, you can't tell with some specimens today). If she shut up and smiled, she could still get most guys eating out of her hand now. She has had a sheltered privileged life. What she calls stress is irritation. She is probably not that old biologically and I would say she has not hit the wall yet.
Don't worry its coming and its going to be worth the wait.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
It's when a woman starts losing out on male attention to her younger competition. Average age is 30, but for some it's sooner, and others later.
Rollo's blog post on it from 2012 for anyone interested.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
It also means when they are no longer at their peak. This is something women become angry about as "male privilege" that a man can work his way into a higher SMV role without considering, of course, that role comes with caveats they disdain. "Strong, Independent women" will say they want hot men with $200K/year incomes but she doesn't want to pay her own way on a date. Successful older men accept that to get hot, young women they need to pay for them.
I had this discussion with my landlady in Hollywood Hills who also wrote a relationship book and she said "You married a hot Ukrainian girl!" Well, yes, I also learned Polish, accepted financial responsibility, and spent my life improving to be a better provider. Boss babes don't provide. Their income is theirs.
It's funny that 200 years ago before modern feminism, it was men who were hypergamous and the homely daughters of noblemen or enterprising women buying "arm candy" or dashing military heroes or athletes to show off at ballroom dances.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
I don't think the point at which she stops getting as much male attention as the next crop of women (30 ish) is as useful a point as when fertility is gone. 30 ish is when the afternoon shadows are lengthening but the day is still hot and many good things could still happen, the threshold I am talking of is when the clock strikes midnight, its dark and nothing good is going to happen for anyone left out in the cold.
The first milestone is a gentle warning -"you are not immortal princess". The second is when the wall slams into her and she goes practically invisible. The loss of the ability to reproduce is when her value beyond her family sinks to minimal. Until that point she has potential mate value as a second choice.
You can define it earlier if you want but its not as useful a milestone to mark and its not as final. The wall is the wall, there is no getting around it. You are no longer a reproductive woman. You no longer have any pussy power.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
That's my point though: You can't tell if she can conceive or not, but if you have a choice, why risk it?
I liken it to if you have a choice between gallons of milk at the store some with 1 week expiration dates and some with 2 days. If they cost the same to you, why not get the ones with the later dates? Clerks had a hilarious scene of "milk maids" who would empty the whole fridge of all the milk to find the absolute freshest even if they were goign to finish up the gallon in a few days anyway.
Let's try this on ourselves: A man whose 5'5" is not that short biologically (such as Danielle Radcliffe, her co-star in Harry Potter), but to Emma that's probably a deal breaker.
Emma is performing a valuable public service by displaying her entitlement and inability to make her life work for all to see and criticize. Other stars who reach this point are more quiet about it.
Regarding marriage: It's a moot point for her. She just said that divorce is always an option and there will likely not be children in her future so what's the point? She has financial security for life. There is one thing she's missing, though, and it's not something she has the mental capacity to comprehend:
My wife has been married to me for (nearly) half of her adult life. I'm the confidant she has to trust with her most important decisions and concerns. Her father is getting old and she realizes that I'll be the most important member of her family along with our daughter. Marriage is about a strong connection to someone who knows you, in and out, and is there for you. I remember a dating coach trying to tell aging "independent" women that a spouse is someone who gives you a ride home from the hospital. It's not a big deal but hospitals usually don't discharge someone to an Uber. For such singles, it's a reminder that the cat will eat their remains when they pass on.
Don't get me wrong: I'm ok with my cat eating my remains if she's hungry but for women who are privileged and entitled, it's quite a fall from grace.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Sure, if you are looking for a wife, you would not think of her due to age and inability to be any use to anyone. You would not take a chance but that is not how most men end up getting married today. They go out with a woman and fall in love and she begs them to ask her and they eventually feel cornered enough that they agree to.
Men would date her, they would fall in love with her but as you say she has nothing to gain from marriage but an embarrassing failure. They say you don't know the meaning of celibacy until you hit 50. She has been getting plenty of cock but in practical terms she is celibate. As you say no one will be taking her to hospital, collecting her and getting her prescription unless she pays them and once off the clock, they will be gone. Then when she is invisible and alone the hamster may have a harder job.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
If I had a son, I'd advise him as to "game" I learned the hard way via experience:
The asker-pays scenario utilizes the Ben Franklin Effect to get men to fall in love with women via sunk-investment cost: He's paying for her, holding up her doors, and so on while she dangles the possibility of sex. It's a tremendous advantage negated amusingly by one factor: Women find such subservient men to be sexually repulsive. Their dream is a man who doesn't NEED to do dog-and-pony tricks for sex, but will somehow want to do them anyway because he's a "gentleman" (note she'll find even attractive men who do such things suspect by association.).
So the challenge for men is to put up with such nonsense long enough to get tail and then to deprogram himself and this is where a long courtship process is invaluable and likely what messed up Emma's previous love interests. In the current culture, these guys paid for some dinners with her, listened to her political diatribes, and got laid and sex hunger out of their system. Then for the next year or so, they had the opportunity to de-toxify from that hunger. An excellent example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJevL0a8XZU
In my father's time, when sex only happened either after the wedding night or at least a firm engagement, women had a greater chance of getting married to a prime beta with the caveat that, well, they didn't get to sleep around with alphas that much.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Hypergamy isn't just about the beta bucks; I've seen plenty of dudes in my field who married women who made more than them. Hell, back when I was an E-4, my wife made more than me. It happened again briefly after I got out of the Army (I've since left her in the dust).
If a man is attractive enough in other ways, a decent percentage of women will overlook the less money thing.
The dudes I know who pulled this off? I'm the shortest one by quite a bit at 5'11". All are intelligent and charming and can make just about anyone laugh. Etc.
It can be done!
However, in the particular case of Miss Watson, I would strongly recommend against it unless he's really just looking to dig some gold in a quick divorce.
On a somewhat different note, I saw this just the other day, and will share for anyone interested: from The Critical Drinker, Crash And Burn - The Emma Watson Story.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I have often endorsed the Nobel Prize winning novel (and later movie) "With Fire and Sword" which classically represented chivalrous romanticism of the 19th century where it was politically popular and dashing officers who swept ladies off their feet so they could land dowries of Huge Tracts of Land from the father-in-law. Most tales from that era and before were about dashing and brave men looking to marry rich princesses, not the other way around.
edit:
Want to add I enjoyed the Critical Drinker video and how he dived into how Emma Watson was simply selfish and entitled and didn't think through anything. She bought into social trends particularly as they thought they suited her and didn't care about JK Rowling or Men aside from what She wanted out of life. She reminds me of plenty of bourgeoisie women I know who were feminine and attractive, but utterly without loyalty or character.
Consider that "gentlemen" conduct often meant men with "soft hands" didn't need to sully them with actual work because they had been born into wealth and therefore could afford to be generous and lavish in public due to the feudal order of the peasantry condemned to earn a literal living via harsh means and then looked down upon for doing so as crass and vulgar much like "rednecks" and the working class in the USA are mocked and ridiculed by elements of both political parties although both parties often try to portray themselves as populist.
Ponder and marvel that feminism likely turned around this popular working men's movement of the American Revolution, and daresay, Marxism into one of a welfare class of women sitting around having children and collecting food from markets as equally valid and deserving of the men who literally 'supply side' western civilization.
Anyhoo, Typo, if you haven't seen the film, please get some alcohol and a few friends and marvel at the film. It's long, in Polish with subtitles, but a fun period piece of how people from that era actually thought and how women ideally and many actually were like. I saw a lot of my grandmothers in the women of the film.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
That's why I used the phrase "socioeconomic strata" rather than "raw income"; all those bennies soldiers and their spouses get access to save a fuckton of money, which we both know why dependapotamuses are a thing. Indirect wealth is still wealth.
Sure, but for most guys moving up the wealth strata is probably easier to achieve and maintain. (Hell, men with the ability and discipline to make it through even one enlistment term are becoming rarer within the last couple generations.) The issue is it makes the guy a more tempting divorce mugging target too.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Fuck dude, I don't think most of them could make it through basic training.
Sad!
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
I watch everything Will posts on his main channel. Solid stuff, and his Emma Watson video is no different.
Adding to your link, here's Rowling's Twitter post if anyone is interested in reading it:
https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1972600904185483427
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
I never read the books or saw the movies, but the left cannibalizing one of their own has been quite entertaining to me.
JudgeSmales 1mo ago
I couldn't care less about this genre, but I finally watched the first Harry Potter last year on an international flight. I was quickly turned off (but not surprised) that any time a novel or complicated solution was needed, it was always Emma Watson's character that came up with it. I should have just watched "There Will Be Blood" for the 100th time.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Keep in mind that JK Rowling is a TERF feminist with an attitude problem towards western men in that even as Harry Potter was cast in the Savior role, she wanted to make sure that the brains were female and from an unprivileged ("muggle") background to reflect her victimhood mindset.
The great irony being that it's not Voldemort or even right wingers that are tearing down Rowling's legacy or even JK Rowling herself, but the woke disciples of her culture such as Emma Watson that stabbed her in the back much like the left did with working class white males.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 4w ago
As I understand it, that's actually an artifact of the movie. There was an interview with the director at some point in which he stated he kinda' fell in love with Watson on set, giving her lines solving problems and figuring things out that should have been stated by other characters, making her role even more prominent than it was in the books.
This usually came at the expense of Ron Weasley, making Grint's portrayal of the character rather more buffoonish than it should have been, which came back to bite them later when Hermione fell in love with Ron despite his seeming largely incompetent throughout the films.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
And of course the irony that if Rowling and her ideological cohorts had just listened to the warnings from men a decade+ ago, they'd not be in the position they are now.
But of course that was mainsplaining, not a gross lack of womanunderstanding.
hhhhdmt 1mo ago
If women couldn't learn from the likes of Pamela Anderson, Jennifer Aniston, Charlize Theron, etc. then they certainly won't learn from Emma's failures.
JudgeSmales 1mo ago
"(My mom, Diana Ross) didn't build the wealth she has, she didn't build the career she made because of a man."
Oh boy. Nothing could be further from the truth. Without Motown founder Berry Gordy, Lady Di would have remained what she was: a low-rent ghetto girl from the Brewster Projects in Detroit.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
I was about to say "I don't think Diana Ross was personally delivering the payola cash to radio stations in the early days..."
JudgeSmales 1mo ago
Indeed. Berry Gordy not only championed her, but he was banging her on the down-low for years. Was she talented? Yes, but if Gordy didn't pull her out of poverty and invest serious resources to make her a star, we never would have heard the name of Diana (actually Diane) Ross.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
I keep getting that "Welcome to nginx!" message. Sux.
Also, who gives a fuck what a used up slut like Emma Watson thinks. She got permanent thousand-cock stare, and it's fucking creepy.
Durek_The_Bald 1mo ago
Women have a tendency to self-shame, and then project the shame as if coming from somebody else (men, the patriarchy etc.). This affords them the mental space where they not only avoid accountability for their own broken hopes and dreams, but also get to be victims of some cruel external entity. Double-win.
Ms. Watson would've liked nothing more than to be married by 35. That much is obvious to anyone willing to listen beyond the rationalisation hamster. But for her own peace of mind, it's just more comfortable to frame it as a protest against some sort of cultural war, rather than to just take the L.
JudgeSmales 1mo ago
Agreed. The quotes in that article indicate her hamster is dead-tired and now on life support.