Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1w ago
First off, those that she claims are expecting women to look a certain way are mostly other women. That is, most of the preparation she does is largely unnecessary in terms of what men will be happy with. Sure, a woman can put on some makeup and make sure her hair does not look like she just rolled out of bed. But for men to be happy with a woman's appearance, it does not require nearly the money and effort she claims it does. A simple amount of effort for low cost would be fine.
Now what really matters to men is not in the makeup, it is the overall fitness of the woman. Is she at a healthy body weight? Does she have a proper diet to help keep not only her body in good health, but her face/skin (which becomes worse when makeup is used too much)? Does she avoid excessive drinking and drugs? These are things that cannot be addressed in front of any mirror other than the ones you see at the gym. Being in good physical shape will take you a lot farther than any number of skin products. That is, if you are trying to attract a man. If you are trying to engage in some petty competition with other women, I suppose you can buy a whole arsenal of products for your body, but the men will not care about this one bit. Stop getting mad at men for the things you do that men did not ask for.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
This is typical modern women behavior. She expects the man to do everything and pay for everything. She expects the man to gamble his resources with the possibility she will like or want him. No effort is required on her part. That is what men are for.
She: Boo Hoo Where are all the Simps? I want a man to put me on a pedestal, spend his money on me and pamper me, with the off chance I will like him. And if I don't like him, that is life. I just didn't feel a spark. (Notice: She feels no effort on her part is required, he has to do everything.)
44 and single, her game plan didn't work. I wonder why?
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1w ago
Comments should be restored.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1w ago
Thanks again!
No-Stress-Cat 1w ago
It's quite simple ladies: Man expected to pay = woman expected to give up sex.
Do you think that makes you a whore? Well it does, because you are.
Justanaverageguy 1w ago
Ol trouble making Karen. She’s bitter and knows she’s dying alone because of her stupid past decisions.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I like happy endings.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1w ago
I like to point and laugh.
[deleted]
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
A) Let's keep this private for now.
B) see my counter-proposal I replied to you elsewhere.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2w ago
I don't see your counterprosal elsewhere, DM me the permalink
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Many women fail to understand that every date is an exchange of value. She gives up something to go on the date. He gives up something to go on the date.
And as with any exchange of value, there's an opportunity cost.
I can't and won't speak for what women sacrifice, but I can speak from a man's perspective.
If I go on a date, I surrender my time and attention, both of which I could otherwise devote to other stuff (hobbies, napping, cooking, investing, vacations, personal development, hanging with friends, career, etc.).
That's a lot to give up.
Arguably, a woman might give up the same things (although, women tend not to have hobbies like men do).
So far, so good. Things are pretty even.
But now the man has to pay, too?
That makes things uneven.
She might argue she's worth it, but only her date can decide whether she's worth it to him.
She might argue that she wants him to show effort and commitment by paying. But he would reasonably want the same from her.
She might argue that it's only right because... chivalry or something. This ain't the 1940s. That boat has sailed, and you can thank feminism for that.
She might argue that she's an absolute catch. But many men would disagree given her age. If she were 21, tight as a drum, and immune from gravity, perhaps. Otherwise, probably not.
She argues that women have to spend a lot of time and money getting ready for a date. And then she jokingly threatens to show up "natural." She's inadvertently making the case that men have the advantage in the looks department, particularly as men and women age. This is another factor that both parties should consider when negotiating an exchange of value.
Ultimately, if she continues to approach dating in this manner, she risks pricing herself out of the market.
After that, it's boxed wine and cats.
Side note: Thanks to Typo-MAGAshiv for PMing the above post to me after it was temporarily lost.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Threatening to show up without makeup isn't a threat at all, in fact it would allow to see if she is at least decent looking or not, if anything it would be scarier for her to go out sans makeup.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
This ain't the 1940s. That boat has sailed. It was torpedoed and sank you can thank feminism for that.
Ultimately, if she continues to approach dating in this manner, she risks pricing herself out of the market.
She has priced herself out of the market. That is why she is 44 and single.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
The way she 'threatens' to show up natural is a funny one. What she doesn't realise is that men lust after 'natural' women with no make up all the time. I often see a woman with no make up, jeans, hoodie and a baseball cap with her hair in a pony tail that I looks absolutely smoking hot.
She seems to imagine that men are turned on by make up and fancy clothes.
We are not. We are turned on by fertility.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
We are turned on by fertility and looks i.e. healthy body, weighs what she should, no excessive tats or piercings, and fucks like a rabbit.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago Stickied
Redditside version of post got nuked; guessing because face was not blacked out even though the sub name and poster names were. And even though she posted her own damn face on reddit. Admins are cunts like that.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Tell me about it...
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1w ago
I'm still shocked i haven't gotten a strike yet on reddit. I've duked it out with some retards determined to see the sub fail
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago Stickied
Here is what happened. I received this notice: "After reviewing, we found that you broke Rule 3 because you shared intimate media of someone without their consent. Sharing, threatening to share, or soliciting intimate or sexually-explicit content of someone without their consent is not allowed. This includes fake or “lookalike” depictions, as well as images or videos of intimate parts of a person’s body, even if the person is clothed or in public, if contextualized in a salacious manner (such as “creepshots'' or “upskirt” imagery). This also applies to leaked, stolen, or privately-shared content of someone who does not consent to sharing it on Reddit. As a result, we’re removing the violating content and permanently banning your polishknightusa account from Reddit. [...] Note: This decision was made without the assistance of automation."
I noticed that someone had posted a (positive) comment of the woman on reddit and yet his profile had been also perma-banned at the same time. His SOLE post was of a different woman in a bikini that he was praising.
I have sent an immediate appeal stating that the image was previously posted publicly by the woman and is not "intimate". I did not state at the time that it was possible I was caught by association with the other poster on an unrelated matter.
I have 6 months to appeal and can make multiple appeals provided each are separated by at least 24 hours. I'll wait to see how the initial appeal goes because I don't think I did anything wrong but will make another appeal if necessary later.
I have part 2 lined up and will post here and someone can post on reddit for me then or hopefully the ban will be lifted by then.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
I'd be sorely tempted to message the admins: "She's fully clothed and posted it herself, and it's only sexual/intimate if you are the kind of degenerate that couldn't even get laid in a women's prison if you had a fistful of pardons." (note to mods: the admins have to be people first to count as men, and I am not assuming they are men either; so it's not actually not man-shaming, for all I know they are wannabe rug munchers)
But that's mainly because I am a contrarian asshole and I damn well know these shitbirds will abuse any pretext they can manufacture to satisfy their activism.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Comment approved. And upvoted.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2w ago
She’s 45 and has a “good career,” but when it comes to dating she is suddenly “traditional” in that she expects the guy to pay for everything, even though they just met.
Schroedinger’s feminist, again. Treating equality like a smorgasbord… always choosing with part of modernity and tradition she feels should apply based solely on her perceived self interest in any given situation.
If he’s like a lot of men, he’s been used as a foodie call enough times to want to avoid it with her. I can’t blame him: she outright admitted that she has gone on first dates, allowed the man to pay, then turned him down for a second date. Of course she will say that she just wasn’t interested (which is undoubtedly true), but from the guy’s perspective, that’s indistinguishable from a foodie call. She also openly admitted that guys who pay are more likely to get a second date, so her “interest” has a price tag to at least some degree.
I think that if a man pays and the woman has no desire to see him again, she should use her words like an adult and then pay her portion of the bill. Let’s normalize that. If guys didn’t have to be constantly on guard against scammers, things would be better for everyone, right?
Another item to unpack is her declaration that she has her own money / business. My question is: SO WHAT? Why would a man view that as an asset if her money isn’t on the table like she expects his to be?
Let’s use an analogy by likening her “good career” to a McLaren.
Her: You should want to date me because I have a McLaren 720S.
Him: Nice. Can I drive it?
Her: No way!
Him: Can I at least ride it while you drive us around?
Her: Of course not! I’m not paying for gas to drive a grown-ass man around. I’m not your chauffeur.
Him: Then why do you think having a McLaren 720S makes you more attractive?
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I think that if a man pays and the woman has no desire to see him again, she should use her words like an adult and then pay her portion of the bill. Let’s normalize that. If guys didn’t have to be constantly on guard against scammers, things would be better for everyone, right? GREAT IDEA NUMBER 1 THE PROBLEM HERE IS THAT WOULD REQUIRE HONESTY AND INTREGRETY WHICH IS IN SHORT SUPPLY WITH MODERN WOMEN.
Another item to unpack is her declaration that she has her own money / business. My question is: SO WHAT? Why would a man view that as an asset if her money isn’t on the table like she expects his to be? GREAT IDEA NUMBER 2.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
The problem is that these women have been playing a game for generations demanding men pay as "gentlemen" because he enjoys it, not because he's paying for a chance to have sex with her (even as these women will snap when men get uppity by openly withholding sex from him.)
Because of this lie, these women buy into their own delusion but also many men do as well (no shame, just an observation) and therefore there will be men who are "happy" to pay even if he knows she has no intention of seeing him again. Such women also do the fake-purse-reach to train men into DEMANDING to pay and acting as if he's privileged to do so.
Sheesh, that game is so degrading to men making him say he wants it similar to an abusive boss demanding their employees act grateful for unpaid overtime because he's afraid of being fired. It also lowers such women's respect for men as sexual beggars.
The paradigm that these women have, of "self-confident, but sensitive" is of a 20 percenter man who has the option of 5 other women, but he's a "gentlemen" and enjoys paying and sees how "special" she is. It's like Revenge of the Nerds and Big Bang Theory where hot women fall in love with nerds.
In any case, as long as there are men out there who are believing in this and feeding it, there will be women like the above who think they can get away with these games.
Ironically, once I figured out what the-fake-purse-grab was all about, I personally found it a great way to avoid paying for a failed first date but, also, at times even if a second date was on the table sometimes I just enjoyed, out of principle, taking it, watching their face as they realized that I was rejecting THEM through their own cheap trick, and spreading some good karma out there.
In respect to women, they do have a group alliance going on where they will put the group's good ahead of their own individual interests even if to excess. After all, this woman is sacrificing her own fertility and potential family upon the altar of men paying for dinner dates.
About the age of 30, I came to the realization (with.a short supply of published RP wisdom) that the ideal was to pay for dates but only for women that were in the top 20 percent for me. If all milk at the store is marked at the same price, why pick milk with a close expiration date?
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2w ago
Jeez...... these girls need to factor in the $0.10 I pay for shampoo literally every week.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Lul. But to be real, a LOT of the "expenses" they incur are their own damn fault. Maybe if they stopped playing musical dicks before they had to apply foundation with a spackle trowel to conceal the Grand Canyon sized cock divots on their face, they'd not have to spend so much on makeup.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2w ago
Yep.
Realistically it's more expensive to be a dateable male than a dateable female.
Female expenses: Hair: $50 / 3 months. Nails: nail polish: $0.10 per application. Makeup: $0.20 per application. Toes: no man gives a fuck about her toe polish.
Male expenses: Gym: 50 / month. Extra food, protein, supplements to be in shape: 100 / month. Time in gym and getting in shape: 30 hours per month.
The dumb thing is how often this "equality" bullshit leads women into narrow thinking...... "I have to pay for makeup, he doesn't, therefore he pays for dates", instead of "His gym membership and supplements and workout takes more time and money than it does me, therefore I'll pick up the tab and I'll come to him to save him some time".
Really it's just a power-play with a thin veneer of narrowly applied facts. Same shit, different day.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
That's it right there.
Wahmyns are so "strong and independent" until they want us to supplement their lifestyle.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
All makeup is fake and gay. It's all concealment of flaws and the illusory conjuration of things that do not exist.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
If all guys demanded to go dutch, women would be demanding inexpensive coffee dates or a walk in the park. If all guys paid 100% women would be demanding 5-star luxury dinners.
My wife always shoots down expensive meals out, opting for cheap local stuff or meals at home. One thing the restauraunts in Bali do is charge cheap prices for Western food and triple prices for Indonesian food. My wife be like "What??? $3 for fried rice? I can get it around the corner for $1". So then she doesn't eat and then gets the cheaper food later.
So it makes me think this is just a modern Western woman phenomenon. The man is just a tool to be used and discarded. There is no future together so why bother advancing each other's financial positions?
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Heh, you got one of them... frugal types. My wife is one too. Like the carryover generations from the Great Depression era - the types of women who steal sugar/ketchup packets from restaurants, shop at Salvation Army, mend clothing regularly, save every bit of leftovers like there's a famine coming, and frequent dumps for crafting materials.
I'd certainly rather have this quality than the typical woman, but it's kinda funny sometimes.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Yeah she's from a poor family in Indonesia. She doesn't steal but she'll save unused napkins and put them in the glove box, re-use plastic containers from things like parmesan cheese, ricotta cheeses, etc. I don't mind because I grew up the same way since my dad was an orphan and had to get by on very little.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Also can be annoying when their "thrifty accumulating" starts turning into unmanageable clutter.
Still better than the usual covert dinner whore.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Yeah, her annoying thing is she saves containers that food comes in so you have 50 containers and 50 lids to sort through to find a match. I throw them out periodically and buy a set of glass bowls with lids. Now she's hoarding spices so I'm going to get a glass spice set and labels and organize them alphabetically.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
It's true, that has been a source of annoyance. Easily fixed with various prohibitions on what I call "piles of junk". Or when I get really annoyed I'll do something like empty out an entire kitchen cabinet full of stuff and just throw it all away. She hates that because it's "wasteful" and defeats the entire point of stockpiling like some kind of chipmunk. This motivates her to more carefully save things in the future, or just ask me before storing things I would consider "junk".
sean_karaya Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
paraphrasing my comments from the other post:
Did not you say that women dress up not for men but for themselves?
Also,No, i think there is a misunderstanding here. I, speaking for myself, expect a woman to be pretty - not put on a mask to appear pretty. Just like you say that nice guys who expect intimacy, aren't really nice - i can say women who "drop bills to look pretty" are faking it.
I had this discussion with a woman in my BP days.
Congrats. You got invited for the interview by faking a CV, but you are consistently failing the interviews. Asa career woman shouldn't this trigger your alarm bells?
YES , speaking for myself , I like women who are naturally beautiful. Not make up beautiful. This is like saying women dont like a man rich in monopoly money.
And speaking of unnatural - i personally dont like when the face of a woman shows lot more specular reflection than living tissue would, or it lack the color tone that one would expect from living tissue.
Statements like this make me think radical ideas like women should not be given access to education. They eff it up.
That, speaking for myself, is automatically a disqualification. Speaking of which, it does not resonate with me that an aging non-virgin is making demands, but here we are
I also used to want effort from the other side in my BP days, but I never got a good answer or even an half hearted attempt of what effort of a woman should be.
Then what good is your career? If you want other people to pay you for your qualification, get a Job? Dating is not a job.
Uhh, I smoke- that is to say, I have some addiction - but I am not sure anyone will be that addicted to pay to hope for a second date. But then again a) I am not a gambling man in terms of intimacy and b) there are others who are gamblers
AAAAaaaaand? Aren't you women asking for shared housework and things like that?
YES , be equal. And face equal rejection.
This entire text look like its written by Schrödinger's cat between alive and dead states.
Sure, but you want to be lotteried. Just below the level of definition of being "bought".
That being said.
It appears to me, that people, especially women take "mUh rElAtIoNsHip" as a shortcut to compensate for their failures in the world.
We saw the other post where she wants to manage a millionaire's business. Yet she did not build it. so she wants a shortcut to the top with the carrot of sex.
Here, we see the woman wants to gain some emulation of professional success (even tho she claims she has her success elsewhere) in that a man should pay her because she has some sort of "career".
I guess some men who pay in the hope of a "second date" may also fall in that sort of a trap [ this is not a shaming attempt] that they can't play in the stock market and investing, so they think a woman might be a more sandboxed event. Other men might do it because it is pointless to fight a social norm where the reward may not be worth the effort. (There's that word again)
I will not continue the thread toward the direction of discussing men.
Mods, if this violates the no shaming rule, please give me a head's up - I will edit it away
Thank you.
[deleted]
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago Stickied
The last sentence in your last paragraph is a violation of WAATGM's rule 1, "no shaming men for any reason".
The rest of your comment is great, but I'm still removing it for that violation.
Please reply to this comment that you agree to edit out that sentence upon my restoring your comment, and I'll restore it (or one of the other mods might beat me to it).
orbilius 2w ago
I want to make sure that I understand the rule. You want everyone to pretend that men never ever make mistakes or bad decisions?? Seriously??
How do you propose that we learn from our mistakes if we are not allowed to point to them and say, "that was a mistake?"
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1w ago Stickied
Then read the following posts and their comments in their entirety, as your concerns have been addressed already many times over the years:
From @moorekom we have PSA: We are not here to shame beta men
From @lurkerhasarisen we have "NO SHAMING MEN FOR ANY REASON" is Rule #1 For a Reason
And to reiterate and slightly paraphrase what I said in my sticky comment in lurker's post: this isn't up for debate or negotiation; this is comply if you wish to be here.
sean_karaya Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
There are other tribes for shaming and "learning". Here, we avoid going towards that direction
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1w ago
Learning is great. If @orbilius had said something like "it's against a man's interests to take a woman like this on dates, and here's why" that would have been fine and dandy.
Instead, he chose to shame such men via name-calling, which a) doesn't teach them shit and usually gets men to double-downb on such behavior, and b) is usually motivated by a desire to feel superior rather than to actually help them learn.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
You're good.
A decent woman who is into you will do things for you, unsolicited, out of her affection for you.
I lost a hat I liked on an outing with one of my exes, and she sent me a new, even better hat along with homemade cookies.
My wife bought me a few different gifts back when we were dating/FWBs and even before we were exclusive.
Unfortunately, most women are just parasitic takers.
Einsamer 2w ago
Wow, rare to see a blue heart in those
JudgeSmales 2w ago
Just reading all that hamster spinning made me dizzy.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
And then they wonder why men would rather just right swipe on an app for a booty call. Why go to any effort if it's not even going to be perceived, much less appreciated.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Had to repost (minor edit). Part 1 of 2. Two themes going on, part 1 is Leftover with Meal Whore demands (Meal Whore might make a cool flair if it happens enough). Part 2 will be WAAGTM In the Making. Note on reading: Different colored markings indicate different commenters.
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Bummer. I wrote a long post (long for me, anyway). It's now gone.
Kind of a disincentive to write that way going forward.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
You can always write it here at the dot reds.Edit - oops, thought you meant at the reddit side where the admins removed his post.
Like I said in another reply to OP, I still have his deleted post open in another tab. If you like, I can DM you the content of your comment so you can add it to this post's comments section.
It would be a pity to lose it.
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
That'd be great. If it's in a format that can be easily copy/pasted, I'll do that straightaway.
Thanks for the offer.
PoopBeast 2w ago
I love that phrase; "meal whore". I'm going to start using that. It could even be a flair.
Phrases like these are actually the perfect way to move the Hamsterton Window with women. It's a shaming tactic, albeit a valid one, and shaming tactics are very effective against women. It'd be great if this entered the common lexicon. It could even give men more courage to NOT pay for women's meals.
I can see it now:
Him: "Oh... You wanted me to pay for you? On our first date?"
Her: "Is that a problem?"
Him: "I just didn't think you were ..uh...you know ... nevermind..."
Her: "What!? Say it...."
Her later on with her friends "Guys, be honest; am I a meal whore?"
Btw: Is it just me, or is there a lot of meal whoring going on nowadays? It's either that, or there's a lot of women complaining about meal whoring going wrong
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Dinner whore fits pretty well since most of the time, the meal she wants to scam off of you is dinner.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Foodie Call
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Food is way more expensive than it used to be.
Food is way more expensive than it used to be.
[deleted]
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Meal Whoring is what initially RP'd me 40 years ago: I heard women say they wanted equality and then they avoided paying for dates using any tactic imaginable. If someone isn't adult enough to pay for their own dinner, what makes us take them seriously on other matters?
For example: The aging woman last week who complained she was tall and couldn't find tall, professional men griped that some of the men who qualified weren't paying AND "planning" dates. She wanted to be wined and dined by her admission, the top 7% of men. If anything, she ought to be paying for THEIR meals.
I'd add that this issue also made me rethink the whole shaming ploy of men who have gone to prostitutes. "The oldest profession" was cavewomen exchanging food for sex. Whether it's golddigging, or free meals, most women have engaged in one form of prostitution or another so hasn't that taboo been largely broken?
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
FTFY
A woman should know how to cook and be able to impress a man with that ability. This is incredibly easy today because the standards are so low.
Going out to eat is a waste of money anyway. We go about twice a year because wifey is such a good cook that I've realized how bad restaurant food is (and it's marked up beyond belief).
In the Brazilian church we were in for a couple years, they had an interesting system. The guys would pay for the meal/snack, and the girls would do the shopping and preparation. The idea is that it prepared the younger folks for marriage.
Not that dating is ever a smart idea, but if you could pay a few bucks for some basic ingredients that the girl then prepared for dinner, that would actually work out really nicely. Much cheaper for you, she gets the tingles because you paid for something with moneys, and you can vet her for actual cooking skill.
Who am I kidding, no women know how to do anything in the kitchen now. This is why my daughter's homeschool curriculum is so heavy on cooking, cleaning, and other housewife duties.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
I was just about to remove the first one due to the issues you fixed in this one, and the page refreshed and showed removed.
Did you delete it yourself? Or did one of the other mods remove it and DM you? I didn't see any moderator comments, so I'm curious.
To anyone who commented at the original: I still have it open in another tab, so if you'd like me to copy and paste your comment into a DM to you, DM me. That way you can put it here.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
I was in preview on mac and when I went to underline something, I changed the line width to thin versus thick when obfuscating aliases. It turns out that the line edit affected an object that was offscreen I had just done. When I went to scroll down upon a review, I caught it so deleted, fixed and reposted. I have to remember to click on the background whenever I finish and edit so line width doesn't retro change.