Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Typo-MAGAshiv
Posted 1y ago in Leftovers - Permalink - Locked - 2.2K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago Stickied
With all the new people arriving these past few months, we're starting to repost some of our older stuff they may not have seen yet.
Original forums.red post: https://www.forums.red/p/whereareallthegoodmen/275451/it_seems_sparks_are_more_difficult_to_come_by_when_you_ve_bu
Original reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/q3hgt0/it_seems_sparks_are_more_difficult_to_come_by/
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
@moorekom, @Kevin32, @goodmansaysfuckyou - can one of you fine gentlemen with access to that other platform crosspost this, please?
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Done.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Thx
DextroShade 1y ago
This is a perfect example of a woman who has had the ability to pair-bond fucked out of her. Now she's for the streets.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
She started in the streets.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
Well now she's ending in the streets, too
ChadBigly 1y ago
Face down lol
maseboogie Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
And of course, ass up.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Reposting my old comment:
Exhibit # 57688336787 that most women's dating strategy is to set up shop and to wait for the right guy to walk in. She is addicted to that "spark" like a drug addict is addicted to cocaine and she is entirely dependent on the Chads to procure it for her.
She does not know how to get what she wants or to keep what she gets or to produce something worthwhile herself which will attract someone else to stay with her.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
Hard to have "sparks" when Chad and Brad and Tyrone have tingle-jolted you enough times
Further, all the men who gave you or could give you sparks are now chasing younger women who give THEM sparks instead. They're not swiping on you. In fact, you're probably outside of their post-wall age filter and will never match with them, much less see their profiles.
It's a combination of you losing the capacity to have sparks and a smaller pool of sparkable men that has you tingle-deprived
Also, that poor guy you went on three dates with probably thought this was going somewhere. Turns out you were just trying to extract tingles out of him knowing he wasn't what you were looking for
NeoSpartan 1y ago
I think I've gotten good at doing that tingle jolt thing to them. Seems the formula is start with conversation add in some light flirts and then later do the kino progression once they are more comfy with ya. It's about building up tension yeah?
Trouble for the girls is that when we choose to that it's because we are following a formula, one date is not enough time to get to know much about a girl so the tingle following is pretty stupid for them if they are looking for a long term thing. If I have sex with a girl it's always on the second date, not nearly enough time spent to know if I want to keep seeing them for the long haul. Though, to be fair, before I got gud.. if a girl rejected physical stuff I just assumed she was not interested and lost interest... Also, I did the heavy emotional investment thing early on too, fucking just time wasted if you don't know how to do kino properly once you go out on the actual date, they lose interest like this woman. Complicated situation no? It's better on the winning than the losing though, definitely. Still, I do wish it was like 1930 or something and society was natural and not social engineered all to hell. Probably would be a lot better. Gotta make do and adapt to reality as it is though right? It's definitely better than being bped, at least now you succeed in getting the basics of what you want, even if the overall environment is far from ideal.
I'm assuming these dudes she dated had no conception of game and hence didn't know how to provide tingles since anything about sex and reality is censored heavily by our PC overlords... I guess as part of a weird plan to make as many people as possible tranny incels or gay monkeypox spreaders. Sucks for them, and for society really. The modern world is a bit of a dystopia aint it?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I think it's more than that. She says they "weren't unattractive" so perhaps this isn't about chad looks (although that certainly helps!) It's more the "badboy" PUA quality that modern women have become addicted to.
Movies, popular culture, and the feminine hivemind have taught young women they're entitled to a "special" romance (which ironically is highly formulaic) where there's magical chemistry and a combination of qualities that normally don't go together (light humor and drama when it suits her). Most movies run on the same formula except that we know movies are fiction going into them. Consider Star Wars and Harry Potter dweebs who take all that a bit too seriously.
Being a PUA takes an incredible amount of work and personal suffering. I got hooked binge watching "The Kaminski Method" on an international flight (I watched 8 hours of it!) Great stuff about an acting class with Michael Douglas being incredibly fun. But that's nothing compared to what a PUA goes through to master his craft.
Being a PUA takes effort. If it was fun on its own, more men could easily do it. And like you said, men such as that have choices and why should they go with a biological clock ticker when they're younger, and easier pickin's available?
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Being a salesman for PUA coaching is not fun. Being a PUA can be fun. As we've discussed it before, I tried it out for a few short months for the fun of it. I had fun because I was after the crowd, not the girl. That said, most of these connections do not stay. If you have money and time to burn, you can indulge yourself. If not, you're better off with social game.
NeoSpartan 1y ago
"Badboy" quality is just the confidence to escalate and take chances, looking like you can do some damage(i.e protect them) and maintaining mystery. It's true though, girls are definitely attracted to that stuff. Makes sense evolutionarily too, for most of human history girls needed to pair bond with a guy who could protect them from getting raped or w/e. The instinctual part of our brains is powerful and overrides logic pretty damn often, especially with women who are more beholden to emotions.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Not arguing, but consider... that before civilization women just rutted with whatever man was around. There was no social interaction since there wasn't language, etc. After that, men determined who women would mate with either by capture by conquest or the Patriarchal family head would marry her off.
So the concept of women as "independent" via a welfare state society that protects her choice of mate is unprecedented in human existence.
NeoSpartan 1y ago
Before language? I think they probably rutted with whatever man was the most dominant the majority of the time. Probably a chimp like situation, with a single alpha or "chieftain" enjoying most of the groups women. Of course that's just one dude so the clever protohumans likely were able to get sex too but through brains.
Like uh... for example. Maybe gorilla greg wants to get all up in cute chimpy chelseas monkey basket, but alpha chimp chad would smack em down if he saw so greggy comes up with a plan. He entices Chelsea with some sign language indicating he knows where to get a bunch of sweet fruit or w/e, she follows him away from chad and etc. Monkeybusiness XD
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
But note that this alpha situation is different than today's in one key perspective: It's the alpha ape dictating to the group, male and female apes alike, who gets to mate while the women accept his rule because he can smack down male and females alike.
The notion of women being CONSCIOUS selectors (not just rutting with whatever is around) was relatively brief in evolutionary terms. Now granted men could provide food in exchange for access to sex (hmmm, do we see that in modern times?) and this certainly occurred quite a bit throughout pre-civilized and civilized history before marriage was more strictly enforced by tribal punishment.
Monogamy is quite recent and is perhaps the impetus for humanity's civilized development as most men now had a personal stake in the support of the children and protection of the society. It was the first stage to abolishing feudalism as we know it. Extended family units also were common in nomadic tribes (which existed in pre-history) but a form of monogamy nonetheless. A woman belonged to the family unit such as her children's father and close relatives. She would be punished if she slept with a non-relative. (And we see this in other cultures today.)
NeoSpartan 1y ago
Oh for sure. Part of the reason why the west has so many problems is that we are drifting further and further away from monogamy and strong marriages. Definitely contributes to nihilism.
UpsideDB Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
The sparks/tingles are our lizard brain trying to ignore the bad parts of a person so we will reproduce. They are not to be trusted at all.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago Stickied
That's why for most of human history unmarried men and women would never be alone together unless they were engaged. Dating, as we know it, is practically unheard-of historically.
Look at what's happened: young women go out on a series of dates where they're alone with young men. Not just any young men, either: the young men with the confidence to approach them and make their interest known, who are also attractive enough for the girls to agree.
It's a recipe for disaster; made worse by the fact that even the old social networks that put the brakes on the worst excesses of "early" dating are absent in the age of swipe apps. Add in the fact that we're half a century post-SexRev, and it's no wonder the streets are filled with bitter inspins like this one. Too young to be a widow, but irreparably alpha-widowed all the same.
Gurren843 1y ago
That’s called pair-bonding, something she can’t do anymore.
chunky 1y ago
Three dates, but she cancelled a fourth. How much time and effort did she entice this poor schmoe into putting in, just to get skunked? She should have met for coffee, and told him in the first hour.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Ok got it. Item #278 of women's expectations: be thrilling.
LolTroll11 1y ago
This shit is retarded. If she had a bit of self awareness she'd see that as sabotaging her relationships. I guess it's universe's fault.
I don't think she's not self aware enough. I don't think she doesn't know she's sabotaging her own relationships. She knows it very well, she doesn't want to acknowledge it because doing that would mean she now has to take responsibility. Blaming the universe and men is just easier. Best lies we tell ourselves
Oddest-One-Here 1y ago
If you want sparks, get yourself a career in Arc Welding.