Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
DextroShade 1y ago Stickied
In the past, men were willing to potentially sacrifice themselves when needed because society afforded them authority, respect, and usually a wife and family. Feminism has taken these things away from most men, yet they are still expecting sacrifice from them.
Why would a man sacrifice for a society that treats him as an inconvenience at best while most are unable to find wives?
Most men are better off simply laughing at the feminists as they burn in the hell they made for themselves while they wait for the whole house of cards to collapse so they can reinstate the patriarchy that allowed society to flourish in the first place.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
As a man who is routinely called a "chauvinist", I'm still here.
What am I doing? Working. Lifting. Reading. Being a dad. Being a gentleman.
What am I not doing? Not a god damn thing for women under 60. If you're elderly and you need something done, I don't hesitate. If you're disabled, I got you. If you think being a woman is all it takes, well... I'll be over here reading my book.
Fuck em. I take a special joy in giving them the asshole they have groomed men into being. I'll fuck em and chuck em and smile about it the next day.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Men are capable of great sacrifice for great reasons. We have not lost the reasons to sacrifice ourselves, rather we have learned that the great reasons never really existed.
Men woke up and we will not be lulled into sleep again. I predict we will see more of these articles in the future.
inevitableowl1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I’m reminded of a quote about WWI from F Scott Fitzgerald :
"This western-front business couldn’t be done again, not for a long time. The young men think they could do it but they couldn’t. They could fight the first Marne again but not this. This took religion and years of plenty and tremendous sureties and the exact relation that existed between the classes. The Russians and Italians weren’t any good on this front. You had to have a whole-souled sentimental equipment going back further than you could remember. You had to remember Christmas, and postcards of the Crown Prince and his fiancée, and little cafés in Valence and beer gardens in Unter den Linden and weddings at the mairie, and going to the Derby, and your grandfather’s whiskers.”
“General Grant invented this kind of battle at Petersburg in sixty- five.”
“No, he didn’t — he just invented mass butchery. This kind of battle was invented by Lewis Carroll and Jules Verne and whoever wrote Undine, and country deacons bowling and marraines in Marseilles and girls seduced in the back lanes of Wurtemburg and Westphalia. Why, this was a love battle — there was a century of middle-class love spent here. This was the last love battle.”
*
The important part being the century of middle class love part. All the exact right circumstances and conditions existed that saw men sign up to walk into machine guns in their hundreds of thousands. As well as the same circumstances that saw those that initially didn’t get brutally (and successfully) shamed by the first feminists of the white feather movement into going and dying
That was the beginning of the end really. The second happened because of strong ideological reasons and because the perpetrators were going after civilians very very willingly.
Point being - you can be pushed too far
I don’t think there has been a clear tipping point. Or maybe even a series of obvious smaller ones but I assume something has changed for good.
Does anyone have any view on how far we’d have to go back to find a moment where men would have stepped in during that train scenario?
Some potential flash points (but I am sure there are more)
(First one may be a recency bias)
Johnny Depp being dropped without evidence when it was pretty apparent Heard for the crazy one - and now how there are feminists in places like the Guardian and her lawyer doubling down. You’d think her lawyer would be thinking “I represented you because it was my job and I had to do it the best I could but thank fuck that is over. You are clearly lying and making me look stupid”. Just like the lawyers who defend serious criminals who are clearly guilty because they have that right.
Gillette advert - the most obvious and egregious man shaming advert and Co-opting of a traditional space to preach
These all suffer from recency bias to an extent. I imagine Vietnam is up there as it turned people against the military
I am speaking from the perspective of someone in their early to mid 30s so there could well be older ones. And I am trying to avoid the more obvious feminism ones such as women voting, women joining the work force en masse, intro of the birth control pill etc. As I still believe men would behave in the “traditional” way far later that those things so something else is surely at play here (hence me musing on how far you’d have to go back to have people step in)
Although I have heard stories about people not stepping in for a woman on a train going back to 1940s/50s Japan. So perhaps these women are crying out for a world that either never existed or hasn’t for a very long time? I’m not sure where I fall on this
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
They expect it because of chivalry. I suggest you read up so the posts on the topic in Dalrock's blog. I might do a post on this when time permits.
OckerLarrikin 1y ago
A few years ago I took one of my sons to the movies. A man and 2 women sat down behind us and the women conversed at full volume through 1/3 of the film. I finally asked them to stop, saying I paid to watch the film, not to listen to them. The women started calling me "asshole" in front of my child. The henpecked man said nothing. After the movie one of the women followed us outside repeatedly calling me "asshole" and then swerved towards us in her car, screaming "asshole!"! Why protect one of these foul, entitled, childish beings? They act terribly and they get away with it. Where were the other women telling this harpy to stop saying obscene words in front of my young son? Where were the other women protecting my son and myself from this maniac who tried to run us over simply because I dared expect her to act decently in public? I've never seen a female white knight, so don't expect me to be one for a female.
inevitableowl1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
If you want to see how much some women hate us - and I mean HATE us then go to two x and have a browse. You don’t even need to go to something as fringe as FDS.
I was intrigued to see what the two x response to the Depp/Heard situation would be as I knew it would be awful
I browsed some more general posts and they are truly awful and far more prominent (and allowed) than anything similar for men
They massively over generalise and shit all over men. They brutally dismiss anyone who tries to say “not all Men”. They just don’t care
They ask seemingly rhetorical questions about why some men feel oppressed and then downvote and scream and shit on anyone who tries to volunteer and answer - usually with “but women have it even worse than that”
The lack of sympathy and empathy is truly staggering. Truly staggering Especially from the gender who are supposed to be more versed in that kind of thing.
One guy told a heart breaking story about how he was constantly invalidated when taking his 5 year old to the hospital with “where’s mom?” multiple times and “we’ll do that when mom gets here”. He described it as being treated like Homer Simpson. As well as being treated like a kidnapper when at the park with his kids. He was largely met with “boo fucking hoo” and “women have it worse”. They don’t realise that the very sort of treatment they bitch about they are dishing out in spades. They’d screech to high heaven if the roles were reversed (and do)
They will fully and deliberately group all incels together and ignore the “involuntary” part. They say “no one should be an incel”. Missing the point so spectacularly that it would be like playing darts and then turning around and throwing the other direction. But this is another language issue like I was talking about yesterday where there aren’t words to describe what I can “Capital I” Incels and people who are just involuntary celibates. No nuance seems to be allowed though
Another staggering this is the amount of post there seem to be about women bitching when finding out their FWBs are pro life or pro biblical gender roles. They are wilfully eschewing men who would happily commit to them and likely be malleable in beliefs in favour of guys who they clearly have nothing in common with and then screaming in rage about it on the internet and think that ditching them is a W for them and an L for the guy. Most guys who can tee up a FWB situation is going to have other options.
They also use the term “femicide” a lot. A manipulation of language where they are clearly suggesting that the murder of women is more horrible than of men. And anyone who dares question that general logic gets met with “this has strong “all lives matter” energy”.
Sorry this became a rant because I was reading last night with my eyes bugging out of my head at the misandry and hatred. I wanted to reply but remembered my only two Reddit accounts are the one tied to this and one my real (and unambiguously male) name in the username
I have a particular dislike for this sub because I was auto registered for it with my first Reddit account along with some other much more general ones. And I have no idea why. It probably wasn’t as toxic an echo chamber 6 years ago but still.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Keep in mind the women who use reddit are losers. The women who won, like my wife, are at home with a ring on their finger enjoying their family and having orgasmic sex with their husbands. We just celebrated 18 years of marriage last night :). Never forget the laws of power:
Law 10: Infection: Avoid the unhappy or the unlucky
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It’s conditioning. They’re been conditioned to believe in whatever divisive, anti-male, anti-family, leftist garbage is fed to them. Because all of that good stuff before was just a “structure of oppression” set up by the “white man” (I’d be interested to know what historic culture was gender egalitarian, but I digress).
You can present them with all of the facts in the world, like in the JD/AH trial. And it doesn’t matter. If you’re below someone on the victim scale, you can’t wrong them (see also their position on racism and how it’s totally not a problem that over 2x as many white men were murdered by black men in 2018 than Vice versa).
If they want good men to return, maybe they should consider not championing policies and movements that render us into second class citizens, and then being shocked when we respond with “f this s I’m out”
inevitableowl1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I looked on the guardian U.K. website yesterday. There were at least three swivel eyed lunatic ranting pieces from women about the verdict and it’s impact on women and how misogynistic it was etc
All the pieces had the comment section disabled. The political pieces did not. They seem to KNOW their stance on this is deeply unpopular and an extreme minority view but they posted at least three pieces on it regardless
It’s like watching the “let’s push more supporters away from the (centre) left due to culture issues where we take an insane stance” in real time. Easier to spot having already been pushed away and taking a more outside view I guess
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yeah, I’ve said it before, but while I expected an outpouring of support for Johnny Depp from men, I did not expect it from women, too. I think most people are still willing to change their minds in the face of overwhelming evidence. But a loud and extremely vocal minority, who seem to intersect quite nicely with the group of people who see government as a way to enforce social engineering, are determined to ignore the facts. Because the facts hurt their narrative, that a rich man exercises all of the power and needs to be taken down.