Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
ScribhneoirIldanach
Posted 1y ago in Psycho Bitch - Permalink - Locked - 2.7K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago Stickied
There is nothing wrong with this advice. The problem is not the advice itself, but rather how it is often used by women to be an unauthentic version of themselves. But given her stance that it is "weak," she must have far more deceit involved.
And sure enough she does! Invading a man's privacy in order to spy on his life. There is something to be said about trust in a relationship. It is indeed crucial for any relationship to work. By doing these actions, she already shows that she has no capability to trust someone. I am not saying that you should just give full trust to someone who has not earned it, far from it. But you need to be able that ability to do that if you want any relationship to succeed. If this is how she starts the relationship, it is already doomed.
More about the topic of trust, I will tell all men here that my advice applies to them too. For those that say they cannot trust any women, that confirms what I am saying about relationships. Perhaps it is simply not going to be something that will be possible for you. But I will not shame you for saying that you cannot trust women in general or any individual woman, any TradCon that does that only does a disservice to you and men as a whole.
No relationship should advance further than you are willing to trust someone. So yes, if you cannot trust a woman not to attempt to baby trap you, you should not be sleeping with her. If a woman cannot trust that a man will stick around in the event that she gets pregnant, she should not be sleeping with him. Perhaps you may not see things the same way in terms of morals, but I am not merely talking about that. It is about not extending yourself beyond how much you can trust someone in what you give to them or what you do with them. If you do not trust someone to be financially responsible, you should not open a bank account with them. If you cannot trust someone to be a cautious driver, you should not lend them you vehicle.
Trust is not to be granted to everyone. But if you cannot grant it to anyone, you will never have a workable relationship. This woman may be able to pretend she is not a full on psycho, but that will eventually come to light. Let us hope for the sake of any man she is involved with that he does not put a ring on it before he finds out the truth.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I appreciate what you say. It took me years to emotionally digest the concept that people need to EARN our trust and those that break it, should never get it back. Part of this is because we're shamed by those who say "You forgive but you don't forget" but if we do that, then we effectively invite someone to hurt us repeatedly.
Nonetheless, when I got married 18 years ago, after carefully vetting my fiance best I could, I knew I was taking a risk. The courts are rigged against men but I wanted a family. About 4 years later, she learned what a pre-nup was and asked me "Why didn't you ask for one with me?" It astonished me. In those years, she's shown she can be trusted although I trust her morally, she can be impulsive and dumb a lot of times (but that's a different matter.)
This is why thirty-something biological clock tickers are so screwed in wanting to have kids: Not only does she need to vet a man to see if he's father material (beyond just a baby daddy) but sensible men who get to their 30's without debt and baggage themselves also should spend at least 2 years just observing a woman and seeing how she behaves. Women such as the above are sure to slip up somehow, eventually. Unlike shit tests women make which is sort of like trying to see what's in a box by blowing it up, men can simply learn a lot more about a woman by just observing what she says about other peoples' relationships, etc. How does she react to hearing the word "no"?" Since that takes time for not just one, but two people, then a properly vetted family marriage easily takes at least 2 years. With my wife, it took about 3 years before the papers were signed.
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago
A lot of people misunderstand the purpose of RPW. Especially the sociopaths in the screen shot. Women don't need help or advice on getting laid and being shitty to men.
That's why FDS makes zero sense. They're focus is to just embrace being selfish even more than before. You don't need a support group for that.
No, the hurdle women actually have is securing commitment from the right guys and knowing how to keep that commitment.
And until a woman drops the ego and realizes fucking their way through spring break ain't the answer, she's going to be headed straight to wall town with no hubby and a dozen cats.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
FDS is the belief that women's demands of men is somehow an asset. It's understandable similar to men who believe, to a point, that our own standards and demands of women has an attractive quality to it versus pandering to women which only makes him appear weak. The only "strategy" to FDS, that they don't even go into, is that blue-balling men by denying sex and affection largely works on blue-pilled men that they find unattractive to begin with so they have to hope that they get lucky and find a red pilled man "self-confident but sensitive" just vulnerable enough to fall for it.
Hence, the large portion of the "strategy" of it that I read was them reminding each other that most of them are going to be inspins. Sort of like Squid Game where they know that most of them are going to lose, but they stick together in the hopes of keeping the beta bucks thirsty. They should take an economics class.
The tragedy of history is literally that a lot of great things our grandparents did (mine, great-grandparents for most here) is that such women back in the 1920's were NOTHING like "traditional" women today: They were truly "strong" women who didn't sit around waiting for men to notice them or playing hard to get and such. They didn't sleep before marriage but they put in an effort at emotional maturity and self-development that's staggering from the stories I heard. They didn't care if, by today's standards, they came across as "desperate" and "submissive" when they landed a reliable, kind, and loving husband. They didn't offer men happy and loving families in exchange for him buying her stuff. They viewed the happy and loving family as their PURPOSE in life.
I went on a date on a dating service back 30 years ago and a woman was describing all of the stuff she wanted from men and later it occurred to me I should have told her about my grandmother: She helped co-run a Polish grocery store which provided credit to coal mining families. Up above it, she also raised two children and cooked for them and the store. She ran a Catholic charity to help new mothers, "New Mothers", who might have problems with feeding, colic, and such. She never raised her voice or cursed or said an unkind word about anyone (or at least not in public or where we saw her). I should have asked this career woman that if she wanted a "traditional" man if she was up to the standard my grandmother set.
Why she died, the community drove in a procession to the graveyard. It was a mile long. My daughter is named after her.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Sticky this please.
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago
Alright, will do.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
I don't know if you noticed, but one of the ways this forum is actually superior to that other platform is that we can sticky other people's comments
Check it out: it's right there between "remove" and "permalink" on every comment. @Kevin32 has used it to sticky other people's comments already.
Tag @redpillschool to give a big thumbs up for this feature.
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago Stickied
@moorekom you can also sticky comments in sub threads so the comments rise to the top of a given thread.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago Stickied
I've used it on my comments, but haven't done it anyone else's yet. But I've seen the option.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
I did it to yours and @redpillschool's just to mess with it
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Yes, it's a very useful feature. We no longer have to post a comment pointing to the comment we want to highlight.
I have as well. But this is a courtesy and respect thing.
ScribhneoirIldanach Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Gaelige-Béarla Translations:
[deleted]
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
What a vile bitch. Chameleons like this are the worst.
Good find, @ScribhneoirIldanach.
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago
AWALT.....
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Yes and no. Everyone is capable of it, but whether they are or not is what defines them. Most don't ever raise above it.
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago
Found the guy who hasn't found them hidden cameras yet. :)
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
Ha.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Heh
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
This is a normal woman, except slightly more self aware but dumb enough to be honest about it.
She even nailed the reflexive attack on masculinity the moment she gets called on her shit.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Lol and she will never understand how to get what she wants from men by: baking, looking nice, and not having sex too early. It's like the ultimate irony.
Gondola_the_Observer 1y ago
Use the flashlight in your phone to find hidden cameras. The lens of the hidden camera will give off a blueish reflection when you shine light on it.
Use biometrics to unlock your phone.
Use two factor authentication for important stuff.
One important thing, that a lot of people don't do: make sure to configure your messenger, SMS and email services so that they can't pop up with content like whom it's from or the first line of the message on the locked screen. It's no use to use two factor authentication if the code pops up on the locked phone. Also you don't want to have to explain to your lady friend why you just got a message from Jennifer.
When you save passwords in your browser for convenience save the password with one extra character at the end. When you log in just always delete the last ●. It's still convenient for you and the password won't work for someone else even if the person goes into the stored passwords and gets it from there.
wswZtyqNGQ 1y ago
Or just use a second phone, aka a phony. Get a used phone or just keep your last-years-model. Create "boring" versions of email and the major apps. This works for professional jobs too, so that you can present yourself as "clean". The best part is that it's a lot cheaper to add a second phone to your plan, and $20 a month is a lot cheaper than however much you'd have to pay for false accusations and/or unemployment.
Gondola_the_Observer 1y ago
I consider this a bad tactic as it creates more problems than it solves. You want your main phone always with you. But if a girl catches you with 2 phones she'll be immediatley suspicious of you. Even if you can pass off one as a work phone she still wants to get into your private phone. Stick with one phone, secure it and tell her "no" when she wants to see it.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
In an ideal world, she should get dumped way before you ever get to get house. Preferably on first meet. Vile creatures like these can only lie for so long and their masks slip eventually. You would be better off learning to screen people than to go to such extent to guard yourself from someone you might decide to trust.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Yes, but there might also be information in your phone you just don't want anyone else to see. I mean information that has nothing to do with other women you might be seeing.
Example: if I left my phone out and unlocked, and a co-worker saw my username and was familiar with it. That could cause a lot of drama I just don't want.
Scorpion69_ 1y ago
for situations like these, its true. But for hiding chicks to other chicks, is simply retarded because preselection will work on ur favor and girls should know that their man (in case of a ltr) has more options, which is healthy for the relationship
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Pre-selection only goes so far. When in a committed relationship, they want a man who can cheat, but they most certainly do not want him to actually cheat.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
True. Opsec is vital for security. My point is that the woman you choose should be the exception to that. If not, she should not be in your life playing a vital role at all.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
The woman in the OP reads as though she does that as soon as she can, rather than after they become serious.
Back when I was still on the prowl, smart phones didn't exist yet, and texting sucked because you had to hit the number 2 four times to get the letter C, for example.
I still muted it and didn't let women (or anyone) see it.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
She relies very much on appearing innocent. Innocence, no matter how hard one tries, cannot be faked. Fake innocence is easier to spot after you encounter innocence. On a personal level, this bitch would not get past casual acquaintance.
On a general level, she can only do it after they get somewhat comfortable, at least comfortable enough to get in her house (and her). Realistically, she is only going to attract Chads who will not divulge much because they intend to pump and dump her or clueless nice guys whom she would prey upon. The second category is not going to get that close until it is somewhat serious.