There's no going back from race realism. It's just a fact of the world we live in and once you start seeing it, you're never going to unsee it.

For an actual answer watch any video that Ryan Faulk has responded to on race-realism. Here are some good ones (The origional videos are linked in the descriptions. If they dont exist anymore Ryan's responses usually have all the important bits)

https://youtu.be/WPV6Hz9iwQo

https://youtu.be/OIinyYwmB04

https://youtu.be/1r7Tl0FYJ64

https://youtu.be/CGatnTixNW0

https://youtu.be/GzEKWiqicPA

https://youtu.be/oAaTr2Rzlm0

If you think to yourself while watching these "This cant be it, these retards have obviously been cherrypicked becouse they were low hanging fruit for Ryan, I want to see the real experts and real arguements!" Well, this is it. There is no magic science man up in the ivory tower. These are the experts. And any smarter or more credentialed race-denialist is just going to use the same arguements except maybe more convoluted and word-salady.

In general a problem with finding arguements against alt-right ideas is that nobody ever hears or responds to alt-right arguements. All that happens is we get deplatformed, willfully ignored, and public intellectuals can make up whatever strawmen they want of us with no chance for us to meaningfully respond.

Once the myth of egalitarianism has been broken, there’s nothing you can do.

What's wrong with Tucker? I wouldn't say he is"dog-whistling", but he is hiding his power level and is the most based in the MSM. Tucker is just one step along the way to AR. He was for me at least. In the past, he's critisized Trump when he needed to be.

tbh, you really cant go back... hence the name "the red pill." Once you take it, the rest is history.

I’ve wondered the same thing myself, have yet to find anything.

The short answer, as others have said, is you can't.

But, just for argument's sake and because you asked...

The only sane and potentially valid argument is that, in fact, race/genetics/etc. isn't such a large determinate of behavior, but in fact some other X factor that we have not accounted for -- or multi-faceted contributions.

We know, for example, that it's not JUST class/money/poverty -- that's debunked because even the richest have the same crime rates as the poorest.
We know it's not JUST culture -- that's debunked through twin studies and the fact that we can recreate these trends on a global stage in countries with radically different cultural norms.
We know it's not JUST fatherlessness -- that's also debunked, but a really, really, REALLY good line of argument actually (I think it's the strongest).

The fatherlessness question has only come into the public conversation recently (within the last 3 years). And the correlations between fatherlessness and crime are really good. So maybe -- JUST MAYBE -- there are other certain factors that we haven't yet been able to identify that play into the phenomenon we see.

It's not very likely. Possible, not probable.

That's the same thing as asking how can you unlearn basic maths or writing... You can't unlearn basic facts, so you can't go back.

There's a dude who dresses up as a woman on youtube that has deradicalised many neon-nazi kkk white supremacist fascists, go to this holy one for wisdom.

Perhaps that technology is more at the root of what we see than anything else.

I’ve found it’s pretty fucking difficult to convince yourself of something you know isn’t true

The best argument I have heard against the alt right is that within the next few decades, genetic manipulation and cybernetic implants will advance to a point where not only could we equalize the races, we could far surpass current human capibilities.