for me personally, yes.

this applies not just to women, but to men also. I think tattoos are a mark of degeneracy, a clearly visible indicator of poor impulse control and lack of self-respect, regardless of gender.

will I fuck girls with tattoos? absolutely. Will I wife them? absolutely not?

Would I want to hire dudes with tattoos to work for me? no

Yes, a tattoo is almost always a red flag and almost always a sign of BPD.

Focus more on your self, man.

Yes, there are a million little things that can go wrong, especially since you have a child.

But ultimately, you can't control everything. There's always a chance that a meteor will fall on your house and crush you all tomorrow. Do your part, and then smile and try to have fun. That's the most you can do.

I came back to this post several days later to read the other replies, and I saw your replies.

Jesus Christ dude.

Your question is the equivalent of this.

Does a tattoo always mean that a woman is bad or is secretly a slut or untrustworthy?

No.

Like anything, context matters.

There's a lot of anti-tattoo sperginess in the manosphere, but not all tattoos are bad. I was always OK with them as long as they were unique and meaningful, and not so many that she looked like a circus freak.

I'll put it this way: my wife and I both have a little ink, and we can both easily hide it under ordinary clothes. And the worst two mega-sluts from my past were both ink-free.

Tattoos and their absence can clue you in on someone, but they aren't end-all, be-all, and again, the context matters.

All women are secretly sluts. Tattoos or not. It's just a matter of the right guy bringing the slutiness out of them.

In terms of tattoos, think about them as a reflection of the woman's thirst for attention. If a woman has many colorful, complex tattoos in overt places, then she most likely needs a lot of attention. That will almost always come back to bite her boyfriend in the ass, because she will eventually seek sexual attention from other guys. Those types of women should strictly be used for sexual pleasure, nothing more.

On the other hand, women who have a couple of simple, meaningful, discreet tats are generally less inclined to be attention seeking.

What if there is only one tattoo and it is your name (this is the situation with my GF)?

Was the tattoo done FOR YOU....... or is it a coincidence that her last bf had the same name?

"I see you got a tattoo with my name on it."
"Oh yeah...that...yeah...umm...yeah it's got your name on it..."

Honestly, I've never met a woman with a tattoo that wasn't a slut, or an alcoholic, or a druggie, or a basket case.
Including the women in my own family. But YMMV.

If a woman tattooed my name on her i would think she is nuts. My first thought depending on the context would be BPD.

Remember that women don't have hobbies or interests of their own that weren't influenced by a man. There is nothing motivating a woman to go get a needle poked into her arm. So to me it's a 5-alarm hoe signal to have almost any ink. The exception is perhaps a tiny (not small, tiny) ankle tattoo and the like that don't signal a larger interest or commitment to tattoos.

Where do you guys get these retarded ideas?

If enough endorsed contributors wrote that eating dog shit once a week would get you a beautiful wife, would you go out to your local park and start chowing down on some turds?

Here's how this works. Some jerk-off with a stick up his ass came on here and decided that he didn't like women that weren't typical tradcon fare. Then a bunch of weak beta men who weren't getting laid decided it was best to listen to the opinion of someone getting laid. Fast forward and we have a whole generation of spergs with needs to "please daddy" instead of developing their own opinions on what's attractive.

Tattoos aren't really a red flag, but herd think will make guys jump on a bandwagon to condemn them.

You clearly are not being honest.

Or can't communicate.