Lol

Troll post.

But what do most men have to offer to women?

A lot more than women offer men.

Women will only enter a relationship when she has everything to gain and little to lose.

I don't ever see men here actually having quality LTRs,

Why would a man having quality LTR's need to be here?

and usually try to attract low quality women for quick and short term lays.

There is nothing wrong with sex.

Most men would be very happy with a quality girlfriend, but the simple fact is that a LTR is "long term only as long as you are the most attractive man she has spoken to today". LTRs are usually shit because women have endless options and are lazy as fuck

While complaining about the lack of quality women.

There are almost no quality women today. There are fuck tonnes of quality men.

What steps do you think one needs to take to truly attract a high quality LTR material woman, or what characteristics and traits does he embody?

Who the fuck cares about how high quality men are........ that is not what this website is for. We want women, we don't care about trying to find high quality men.

What the fuck is this shitpost

I've had a quality LTR for the last 18 years. I'm nobody special but what makes me able to succeed at an LTR are:

1. I can provide for myself, my wife, and my 2 sons as a result of decades of shit work for shit pay, years of grueling college, and constant grind.

2. I can lead my family in finances, child rearing, protection, neighboring, family-ing.

3. I can command respect from family.

This is pretty much the beta stuff we're told all our lives. The stuff women say they want, but can't get, from Chad.

Meow, you also delve into what is a high value man when you ask what it takes to attract a high quality LTR woman. Women define what is a high value man and it is a relative thing. For example, where my wife comes from, an average American man is high value. That means a guy who is 5'9", makes $40k/yr, and is skinny-fat. In the US, that guy is getting nothing but the lowest value women. So it's all relative.

While what your saying logically would make sense, it lack perspective on what's actually going on with men and women in todays society. So much in fact, that its really too much prerequisites of perspectives you are missing here. Very subjective post.

For example, In your second sentence you speak about what women should have to offer, but fail to admit that those are the same exact things modern women fail to offer. You then continue to ask; what do men have to offer? This is akin to simply blindly picking a side, without even considering the faults of the side you picked.

""""" A lot of men here's emotional depth goes about as far as distrust and contempt towards women. Do you have skills in life to attract these types of women? Are you a light that people are drawn to and that people enjoy being around and love? Can you offer anything other than emotional manipulation and a self-aggrandizing ego?"""

1. Your also making assumptions here. Who are you to guage the emotional depths of the thousands of "redpillers"? You also ask those questions, as if the answers to all of those questions are; "no". This also lacks understanding and comes across as disdaining.

"""""I don't ever see men here actually having quality LTRs, and usually try to attract low quality women for quick and short term lays. While complaining about the lack of quality women. What steps do you think one needs to take to truly attract a high quality LTR material woman, or what characteristics and traits does he embody?"""""

1. Once again, lack of perspective and wisdom. Also subjective. Plenty of redpillers are in LTRs, plenty have been married or/and divorced longer than most of us have been alive.
2. Redpill also is not about quick lays, its about female nature and female DATING strategies. The reason men now have ONS/plate/LTR systems is to filter out the billions of chameleon feminists in the first place.

This post is idiotic. I mean, yea, out of the entire population, 90%+ of people are probably unrighteous. But that's male and female included. Both genders are responsible for their own actions, but your suggesting that only the women is not. Its too discriminatory. Also, if you observe the male and female dynamics of this world closely, you would know that the roles of male and female are literally reversed, (which makes your observations make even less sense). And, when it comes to what traditionally makes a male high value, its relative like how whytehorse says. What is a high value man? A superhero? Its what she and her societys decides it to be. We live in times where a ganglord is high SMV to an Amish chick. And If we compare what makes a male high value vs a woman, they are simply not on the same levels/platforms and should not be discussed as if they are. But you say things such as "If you are to be a leader in a relationship, you also have to lead by example, and be as or more capable than your woman." As if the capabilities of men and female should be likened. As if your average capability of a man is by default, lesser than a woman's.

When a women throws shit on a guys face, you tell the man he's a pussy and should "do better". But then the man throws the shit back tenfold, and you call him an asshole. This is the mentality of your post. What you should have done was; tell the woman to not throw shit at the guy, or "worst shit may be thrown back". If you want to be a white knight choose the battle of justice, not dumb shit.

There's more and more woke bots on these forums