Women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of marriage.
Because men do all the things that makes for a functional society and women make the babies.
Therefore, women need men for their basic survival, but men only need women for making babies.
A man who wants a better life, must work longer/harder/smarter. A woman who wants a better life, must marry a man who works longer/harder/smarter. Such is the nature of hypergamy. The woman seeks out the man who is the most dominant.
Thus, a high value man, is a man who can better protect and better provide for his wife and family. Because that is what women need from a man.
But what do men want in a woman? He already must fend for himself in this world and if he doesn't, no woman would even piss in his direction. He therefore does not need her for her brains or her money.
He needs her for sex and all that surrounds sex. He needs her to receive all that he has to give. He needs her to get with his program.
-
A woman who already had sex with others, cannot offer exclusive sexual access to her husband. Her marriage value is lower.
-
A woman who is highly edgmacated, is often too strong minded to yield to her husband. Her marriage value is lower.
-
A woman who makes a lot of money, is too full of herself to respect a man, especially if he makes less than her. Her marriage value is lower.
-
A woman who has been in many relationSHITs, has too much baggage and is too jaded to be vulnerable and trusting towards her husband. Her marriage value is lower.
-
A woman who has been around other modern women, is too opinionated and empowered, to differ to her husband. Her marriage value is lower.
- A woman who is fat or loaded with fake add ons, is less physically attractive. Her sexual value is lower and thus, her marriage value is lower.
Each one of these factors, will lower a woman's desirability to a man. Combine them all together and you have your average entitled bitch, who cries out in everlasting pain - where oh where, are all the good men???
Because somehow, it must be the fault of men, that she's a disgusting, fat, jaded, entitled, cunt who had a mile of cock and is now looking for a high value man....
Listen bitch. If you get a decent man making minimum wage, you already got much more than you deserve. He certainly doesn't deserve the purgatory that it is, to live with you.
Just lube up your toy with your tears and your cat's piss and please leave men alone.
You aren't a pristine virgin, yet you demand full virgin prices. You make men wait for sex and you demand that a high value man, make a full investment into your sorry ass.
That's why you will likely die alone. You deserve it.
Cheers!
Boar_excrement 1y ago
Women fought and won the right to be replaced by household appliances. It is ironic that after all of the female grandstanding about equality, their only remaining value is sex. And once sex is weaponized, there is little benefit in associating with women at all.
Ice them out.
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago
The glass ceiling has long been shattered.
Women can choose to do anything and they choose to be whores.
Einsamer 1y ago
Yes and no. They need men, but they don't need A man. They can supported by the state with money (which comes from tax that men pay), security (police) and so on.
So no, they don't need any concrete man for their basic survival anymore - and while that's unfair, that's how it is. So the rest you write doesn't apply. Depending on the country of course, but in many places women can now fuck an SMV 10 guy, get pregnant and live the rest of their live being supported by the state.
And when UBI will come it will get even worse.
Overkill_Engine Endorsed 1y ago
The issue with that dynamic on a long enough timescale is that it only works so far as there is surplus productivity to be harvested to supply it.
And men without a partner or progeny aren't exactly known for producing that surplus; since there is no point for them on an individual level to do so. It's effectively cuck-slavery using the state as a proxy.
And the retards in the State can certainly try to force those men to work harder, but all they will accomplish is guaranteeing economic collapse as men go Galt or outright violently rebel.
Women might certainly find the idea of a harem society to be attractive for their short term strategy, but those sort of societies tend to be neither stable or able to out-compete societies that enforce monogamy, because women themselves do not collectively produce enough to make up for a large portion of men withdrawing economically.
My advice to any man not already in the elite echelons and thus at least partially insulated from this is to get yourself some land in an area a safe distance from the hive cities and work on your skills at producing basic necessities as you need them, but also carefully conceal your ability to do so if you can.
When the bubble pops, it's not going to be pretty. There will be a lot of hungry+angry mouths, and anyone looking like a Kulak is going to get ate alive.
Einsamer 1y ago
Yeah, I agree with that. I'm just afraid that we are currently at the point where it is just starting and ongoing. There doesn't seem much we can do (except for preventing UBI for example, even if it has some other benefits).
Also, with advantages in AI and better control through IT, it might happen that men are forced to contribute even though they don't want to. I think it's a new kind of slavery.
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago
So now they aren't searching for high value men who can take care of them?
Wait, what??? They are??? I wonder why.
It's because women need men.
Did you read the rest of what I wrote?
Einsamer 1y ago
They do, but would you call that "basic survival"? Basic survival to me means food, shelter and safety.
I like your posts so I always do!
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago
Who pays for that?
Men pay.
Men do all the things to facilitate her basic survival. Even today.
Sure, the government points guns at people and forces the male collective to pay for women - making her not as dependent on an individual man as she is in nature.
But this doesn't diminish my original point, that women are wholly dependent on men for their basic survival.
The dating market reflects this. Women still seek out men who have the traits of a protector and provider.
I appreciate it
Einsamer 1y ago
Yeah, but I think we are circeling here. I said "yes and no" because while men pay, it's abstracted away through the state and not a concrete single person. Because if it were a single person, this person could just decide to stop. And knowing that will make a woman behave accordingly. But the state is actually going more and more into the direction of helping and it guarantees to do so - so women don't have to fear anything. That makes it quite different.