Been following this story as the girl who was strangled was neighbors with my sister. Archive is blocked at work where I type this, but you can find the full article by googling the title of this post.
Anyway, the point of this post is pretty self explanitory. Local newspaper interviews the alpha widow of the rape/murder suspect, and all she does is claim that "No way, I never saw that side of him, I just refuse to believe it" etc. and finally cut contact with him once he was charged, but still maintains she just never saw him that way and that she isn't fully convinced, even though the woman who was strangled to death was her best friend.
Just reading her quotes in this article you can see the hamster wheel spinning at light speed.
Lewis was at a Fayetteville bar in December of 2015, nursing a recent break-up, when she ran into Kimbro. “I felt like I was just meeting someone new,” Lewis recalled. “Even though I had known him, I really didn’t know him because they were always just in and out. I never really sat down and had a conversation with him.” The two started talking and soon Kimbro was offering to take her out to dinner and for ice cream to cheer her up. Lewis said she was hesitant because of Kimbro’s past with Matheson but reluctantly agreed, spending the night venting about her recent break-up while Kimbro listened.
Revisionist history hamster. This is likely not what happened. This is her version of the events. What likely happened is that she got tingles and that the rest is history. There may have been token resistance but in no way was there actually resistance like she claims.
“Looking back, I can piece things together now,” Lewis said. “He’s a charmer. He’d know what to say, when to say it, how to say it.”
The "it wasn't my fault" hamster. She ends up playing the victim here. "It's not my fault I was attracted to this rapist and murderer, he totally seduced me and manipulated me into liking him!" Bullshit. He gave her tingles. That's all that matters.
She said people were drawn to Kimbro. “He knew everyone and everyone knew him,” Lewis said. “He was the life of the party. The funny guy. You would never assume anything bad of him. He was always outgoing and being happy and loud and obnoxious.”
The rose colored glasses hamster. He had natural alpha qualities like owning the room, confidence, and being able to talk to people without looking like an autist. Qualities that were further enhanced by the fact she gave him tingles. These were just the qualities she was OK with telling the media about. The most important(and only important) quality about him was that she gave him tingles.
Lewis said Kimbro was never physically violent with her though he could became emotionally abusive when they argued over his constant contact with other women. “He’d get super defensive,” Lewis recalled. “He would basically go off on you, let you know how wrong you were and how stupid you were for even considering that to be a fact.”
The sharing hamster. She'd get a bit jealous that he would attract and talk to other women, and bring it up, but he would put her in her place and she'd shut down. She was content with sharing him with other women, as that is preferable to being exclusive with a lesser value man.
“I basically, every single day from that Tuesday on, was refreshing my Google search. That Friday, I happened to refresh it and it came out that they had arrested somebody but it didn’t have a name on it. I was like, it’s not going to be him. OK, it’s not going to be him,” Lewis recalled.
The he's not that bad hamster. If a man gives a woman tingles, he can do no wrong in her eyes, even when the evidence mounts against him.
“I’ve never seen that side of him. It’s like a double life. Two different people,” Lewis said in a recent telephone interview with the Star-Telegram. “I don’t know if at that time [when she dated him] he was really trying to turn himself around and that’s why nothing had happened or he was just really good at hiding it and nothing happened to set him off again,” she said. “I’ve really been trying to figure out ‘why’ since it happened. There’s no ‘why’ I can figure out.”
The I refuse to believe this hamster. She just can't seem to understand why this man who gave her massive tingles and amazing alpha dominance sex could have possibly murdered her best friend. She can't seem to figure it out, even with all the red flags and warning signs. To the point where she continues to apologize for him and white knight for him in the paper.
This woman's comments in the article highlight the alpha widow hamster. She is clearly an alpha widow here and still clearly pines for the dick of this suspected murderer. Women who get amazing sex and banged like a ragdoll by an alpha who gives them tingles see the man as basically a god. He can do no wrong. He is flawless. She will hide or mask or spin the flaws into positives in her mind. And even when an overwhelming tidal wave of evidence proving the guy is a scumbag comes out, she still can't see it. She still has to defend him and talk about him in positive ways.
This is why you see so many women go back to abusive exes. Because the only thing that matters is tingles, the only thing that matters is feelz over reelz, the only thing that matters is getting a good dicking in bed from the alpha. If you can do that, you can do no wrong in the eyes of a woman. Even if it means strangling your best friend to death and raping women.
[deleted] 6y ago
Women let men molest their kids, murder and rape, and do anything and even collaborate with these scumbags just because she feels she benefits in some way (being the LTR of the chad for ex) women are subhuman.
LordThunderbolt 6y ago
I think you're overanalyzing. He just never showed that side of him. It's that simple. You think hes ginna siscuss rapes and murders with his gf? It hapoens all the time. Maybe you just have a friend that does some really wild shit amd you go "Wow, really? He never seemed like the type to do that". It happens. That's why I tell you guys "Trust nobody" because you never know what secrets about themselves that they're hiding. The same way a killer who has kids will never show that side of him to his children.
Not RP worthy
Dmva100 6y ago
You only need to be amazing at sex to have women worship you and genuinely want to be around you.
Very simple.
How many guys can provide $ for her in some way? Nearly all of them.
How many guys can tell her she's beautiful? Nearly all of them.
How many guys can cater to her ever-changing emotional whims? Nearly all of them.
How many guys can melt her brains with amazing, dominant sex that makes none of that other shit even matter to her? Not many.
You will only get the best side of a woman if you are her SEXUAL best. Your 'self improvement' in the area of intersexual dynamics should be primarily focused on your sexual performance. Everything else is for the betas.
You can be the ultimate 10 Chad, but if you bust in 2 mins you're dead.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
See latest question at askmrp if you doubt
[deleted]
kowbrandt 6y ago
Any good reading on how to improve yourself in bed?
max_peenor 6y ago
I'd say 99% of men could benefit from one single point: just don't stop. Blew your load? Keep mauling her. Change things up until you are ready to plow again.
[deleted]
[deleted]
40Watts 6y ago
Read the book Sex God Method
Trooper_1868 6y ago
Step 1: type "sex god method trp" into google.
Step 2: Navigate
Step 3: Profit???
Wiry_Wireman 6y ago
The book costs $150 on Amazon. WTF?!
[deleted]
halfback910 6y ago
Hahaha you're giving her way more credit than I would. My immediate conclusions were:
1: Oh, they're both psychos.
2: Probably in cahoots.
3: There's a 100% chance she's picking him up when/if he gets out of prison.
Look, he fucking strangled her best friend. I would put money down that she, at very least, lured her friend into a vulnerable position so hubby could do the deed. She probably even helped (strangling someone is difficult for one person, yes, even if it's a man vs. a woman. Male serial killers have struggled strangling children).
I'd bet anything they both planned this, that a large portion of their sexual chemistry stems from their mutual desire to inflict harm on others, and that this was not the first victim, just the first one they found.
GreatGoldSphinx 6y ago
Interesting post. She's hamstering because she doesn't want to think she was with the wrong guy (who is a scum of a human being). But, that is the reality. She made a poor decision and just chooses not to believe that was the case.
Men: Usually understand if they made a mistake with a girl and own up to it. Women: Will never understand that they made a mistake and will never own up to it fully.
The last thing you should do is try to make a woman feel bad about her decision in rejecting you, or about any her actions. IT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN!
halfback910 6y ago
I feel like everyone here is giving her so much slack because "stupid woman".
This bitch was fucking in on it. Everything about the situation screams that they were in cahoots, that she lured her friend to a place where her husband (maybe even with her help, strangling someone is difficult for one person) killed her.
This wasn't in spite of their relationship or in spite of his sexual attraction to her. This shit was the relationship. This shit was their sexual attraction. I bet you anything that if he ever gets out of prison, she picks him up and they go for round two. Doesn't matter if he's 60 and she's 58. For sickos like these two lovebirds, murder is fucking timeless.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Most men would be troubled by the fact that she was in a relationship with a murderer despite knowing the fact of what he is and perhaps "trying to save him"
We all know she did it because dangerous turns her on like you wouldn't believe
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Throwawaysteve123456 6y ago
Countless examples of this in the world today. Remember that photo of the good looking convict that went viral? He ended up with hundreds of obsessed followers, and I believe ended up with a modelling contract, lol. Case in point. Words vs actions.