I found a huge collection of studies about women's sexuality on 4chan. I kept reading, some I've already read, and most of it was pretty interesting. So I decided to save and post here for redpillers.

A healthy reminder is that I found this on a 4chan imageboard, so they might be inclined to some bias.

So If you have some criticism or something to add about some of the studies, feel free.

Well... time to take some redpills.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845881

Following recall of a conflict involving direct aggression and role-playing a reaction to it, compared with men, women reported their anger would dissipate less quickly and they would take longer to reconcile. Women also exhibited increased heart rate, but little change in cortisol, whereas men exhibited little change in heart rate but increased cortisol production. We interpret the results as indicating that women are less prepared than men to resolve a conflict with a same-sex peer.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160509085748.htm

"For their own partners, women focus on an attractive appearance that suggests good health and an ability to pass on their genes. At the same time, they prioritize qualities in their sister's partner that can provide direct benefits for the whole family," say the researchers. "This is consistent with our previous studies where we compared mothers' and daughters' choices," they add.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26098378

Hierarchical linear modeling indicated that wives' total narcissism and entitlement/exploitativeness scores predicted the slope of marital quality over time, including steeper declines in marital satisfaction and steeper increases in marital problems. Husbands' narcissism scores generally had few effects on their own marital quality or that of their wives.

http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf

This one is an analysis of women's dual sexual strategy across several cultures. There are many interesting observations on this one, I'll leave one of them:

There is abundant evidence that women, as well as men, desire long-term committed relationships; but there is also an emerging literature revealing a hidden side of women's desires suggesting that women have also evolved to pursue short-term or illicit affairs. The purpose of this article is to review these lines of evidence and other recent findings pertaining to the evolution of women's sexual strategies

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1617143/

Here, we show that women in the fertile phase of their cycle prefer body odour of males who score high on a questionnaire-based dominance scale (international personality items pool). In accordance with the theory of mixed mating strategies, this preference varies with relationship status, being much stronger in fertile women in stable relationships than in fertile single women.

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/367/1589/657.full.pdf

This one is arguing that monogamy developed as a form of social control and stability. Approximately 85% of human societies have allowed MEN to have polygynous marriage, yet Europe adoped monogamy.

Here, we develop and explore the hypothesis that the norms and institutions that compose the modern package of monogamous marriage have been favoured by cultural evolution because of their group-beneficial effects—promoting success in inter-group competition. In suppressing intrasexual competition and reducing the size of the pool of unmarried men, normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses.

http://www.ibtimes.com/women-less-forgiving-toward-unattractive-men-study-1943420

The study of 170 college-age women revealed that unattractive men earned a “negative double bias” upon violating a social norm.

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/the-evolution-of-bitchiness/281657/?utm_source=SFFB

The Evolution of Bitchiness: Women engage in indirect aggression and slut-shaming, even in clinical research studies

In his book, The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, Buss argues that women do this because, evolutionarily, women who are willing to have casual sex undermine the goals of women who want long-term relationships. "Slutty" women hint to men that it’s okay not to commit because there will always be someone available to give away the milk for free, as it were. Their peers' “derogation” is thus intended to damage the reputation of these free-wheeling females.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150624155436.htm

Being disgusted is a bigger passion killer for women than fear, according to new research.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4790313.stm

Study shows that once a women 'bonds' or knows she has fully secured her mates commitment she will lose interest in sex.

But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner.

But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.

http://www.psy.unipd.it/~pbressan/papers/BressanStranieri2008.pdf

Because men of higher genetic quality tend to be poorer partners and parents than men of lower genetic quality, women may profit from securing a stable investment from the latter, while obtaining good genes via extrapair mating with the former

In this study, 208 women rated the attractiveness of men described as single or attached. As predicted, partnered women favored attached men at the low-fertility phases of the menstrual cycle, but preferred single men (if masculine, i.e., advertising good genetic quality) when conception risk was high.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract

Using nationally representative data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, I estimate the association between intimate premarital relationships (premarital sex and premarital cohabitation) and subsequent marital dissolution. I extend previous research by considering relationship histories pertaining to both premarital sex and premarital cohabitation. I find that premarital sex or premarital cohabitation that is limited to a woman's husband is not associated with an elevated risk of marital disruption. However, women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution.

EDIT: Just one more, this is a pretty good one. Especially for Europeans.

http://faculty.washington.edu/hechter/KanazawaPaper.pdf

The evolutionary psychological perspective on wars suggests that the ultimate cause of all intergroup conflict is the relative availability of reproductive women. Polygyny, which allows some men to monopolize all reproductive opportunities and exclude others, should increase the prevalence of civil wars, but not interstate wars, which did not exist in the ancestral environment. The analysis of the Correlates of War data supports both hypotheses derived from the evolutionary psychological perspective; polygyny increases civil wars but not interstate wars. The evolutionary psychological perspective implies that women should be far less resistant to alien rule than men, because they have the option of marrying into the conquering group; however, this sex difference should disappear when women are no longer reproductive. The analysis of the Eurobarometer data from 15 European Union nations strongly confirms this prediction.

EDIT 2: Just one more, from the user /u/SummertimeMelancholy . Some motivation for the next workout.

http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2007/06/19/0146167207303022.short

Evolutionary scientists propose that exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics are cues of genes that increase offspring viability or reproductive success. In six studies the hypothesis that muscularity is one such cue is tested. As predicted, women rate muscular men as sexier, more physically dominant and volatile, and less committed to their mates than nonmuscular men.