The drive to normalize female promiscuity has been coasting along steadily in recent years, lapped up by every eager cock gobbler to justify their inability to repress their in-the-moment desire to get their clam filled.

Most recently, post wall, thousand cock honorary member Wednesday Martin, with her book Untrue, which vehemently presses the point that promiscuity is in fact more prevalent in woman than in men. Her fempower compadres at every libtard news organization have hopped on the bandwagon, giving this notion as much airtime as possible.

The primary study used to vomit up such a conclusion, found that women are twice as sexually dissatisfied as men after one year of partnership. This must mean that monogamy is a far greater challenge for women right?

Well, not exactly.

Interpretation is an issue as it usually is with feminists, wanting their cake and eating it. First there's no inherent differences between men and women, it's all a product of centuries of rigorous conditioning administered by the big bad patriarchy, then when evaluating a study such as this, all of a sudden women are inherently less inclined for monogamy than men.

They're closer to the truth second time round, there are in fact inherent differences between men and woman and we have to understand them, particularly as it pertains to sexual strategy, to better evaluate the results. When we do, the results are not all that fempowering.

Men have somewhat of a dual strategy. Alfalfa men naturally want to pound many women, they are driven to pollinate as far and wide as possible, luckily for them, they have the power to act on this urge. Beta boys also wanna pound loads of peaches, but have less power to act on this urge, nudging them into the provider camp to pick up the scraps. For this reason, they're far more likely to be satisfied with a single flower.

Women on the other hand are driven to select the most godly alfalfa they can get their hands on, but with a caveat of hypergamic monkey branching to a higher value male if the opportunity presents itself. Their attraction is singular, one high value fella at a time.

As we know over here at the RP, woman lust after the Alfalfas and settle for Beta boys, which creates a paradoxical relationship dynamic. The men that woman are less attracted to are more relationship inclined, while the men they are more attracted to are less relationship inclined due to more options. This skews the data from the start.

Next, we have to evaluate the effects of a relationship on the females attraction levels towards her partner.

An Alfalfa is able to execute his inherent sexual strategy(spread thy seed). To be in a monogamous partnership would require an abandonment of this strategy. He would only be able to spread his seed as far as his princess and his favorite baseball glove. The longer he sticks around, the more loyal and honorable he is, the longer he abandons his inherent strategy. The longer he gives up all oysters, for that one amazing oyster, the more beta(who is unable to execute his inherent strategy) he appears to be.

Comfort is a killer too, it's most common victim being attraction. In the beginning, she's not sure how all of this will turn out. Then a couple weeks go by, months, years and things begin to shift. Somewhere deep inside her lizard brain she's realized you're not going anywhere. Most guys on darker side of beta blue help her to this realization right off the bat. The more comfortable she is with you, the less she wants to fuck you.

Contrast this with how she begins to view other men she encounters, other Alphas(betas are invisible). They're fucking hordes of women. Unlike you, they're not on a strict diet of the same pussy on repeat. She instinctively on a biological level begins to wonder how much of an Alpha could you be if you're super happy with the affections of only your little princess yet these other guys are dropping girls like dominoes.

Women also tend to not necessarily follow the most logical train of thought in favor of a more emotional, feeling based operating system. When she first meets you, feelings are ignited, it's intense, fantasies are cooked up. Who are you? what do you do? how do you do it? It's a lustful, emotional peak filled with mystery and excitement. As time goes by she finds out more and more about you. She sees you're just a regular guy, who works, shits, has some off days, loses frame and tells her how he's feeling.

Contrast this with the other men she encounters, who she can look at through that same idealistic fantasy lens she once looked at you through. Who are they? What do they do? How do they do it? All of a sudden you seem pretty stale in comparison. Once you become her reality, you're always going to be competing against her fantasies.

Considering all this, it's easy to see why a women's attraction for men dwindles far quicker. It's not that she's promiscuous, wanting to fuck all sorts of members of the opposite sex the same way men do, it's that she's hypergamous. The men she's not dating, from her perspective appear to be so much more Alpha, therefore attractive than the one she's with.

The question for men to ask is, how do you combat such a thing? If a loyal, honorable relationship makes it all the more likely you'll end up on the cuck list, what do you do? Well, the answer is fairly simple.

You have to consistently display your market value.

Women live for today, you could behave like an Alpha for years and then stumble into Betahood for a couple months and you'll become repulsive to her. She won't keep a golden scorecard, tracking your progress, giving you the benefit of the doubt. She'll look no further than how she feels today. It's up to you to be a person that no matter when any women evaluates you, it's responded to with tingles and eyes of desire.

The way you display you market value is not necessarily by fucking everything in sight(which would probably work too), but by showing her you can fuck everything in sight if you wanted to. She has to be aware that she can be replaced on a whim. That her place is dependent on how well she behaves, and if she slips up, her spot is going to her best friend Amanda.

If you don't show her you can get other girls, she'll think you can't get other girls, which is why we end up with data such as this, because most men are being excessively chivalrous and honorable, showing blind loyalty when they should be showing conditional love, abundance, with a steady diet of dread game, while maintaining their looks and behavioral supremacy. You either keep showing Alpha traits, or you show blind loyalty long enough to become a Beta, your choice.