TRP.RED: Home | Blogs - Forums.RED: ALL | TheRedPill | RedPillWomen | AskTRP | thankTRP | OffTopic
Hot New Old TopControversial
Login or Register
280
- Hide Preview | 196 Comments | submitted 4 months ago by johnpayne10 [Post Locked]

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/02/opinions/what-if-women-went-on-a-sex-strike-before-the-midterms-martin/index.html

As incredulous as the title sounds, CNN actually has the audacity to publish something so disgusting. The entire article is a female hamster on roids, running round and round in full throttle. Just go through the article to see what kind of bs is spewed in our mainstream media. Ironically, it actually propels the notion that women are just sex objects, but the hamster does not care.

Make no mistake. There is a war declared on men. The majority of us are blind and plugged and it is our duty to ensure that we do not join the masses. Majority of mainstream media, democratic/leftist ideology and political parties, corporations and sadly, manginas and plugged betas, liberal cunts, all are on the opposite side. Conservatives and men like us are their targets. Enjoy the decline or resist and fight. Grab some popcorn or protest against them. It doesn't matter what you choose. (Because it is hard to say who will win in the long run) The important thing is to be aware of what is happening around us. You have to understand reality in order to manipulate it in your favor.

Tl,dr: CNN is really CUNTNN.

[-] GayLubeOil 369 Points 4 months ago

Your woman going on sex strike because of "Rootless Media Metropolitans" told her too is probably the best thing that could happen. It's a clear and decisive message that your not actually dating a human being but a media controled NPC robot.

If your girlfriend/wife disproves the Cartesian maxium "I think therefore I am" it's time to pull the ejection switch before she uses your semen to make retards.

[-] Whisper 101 Points 4 months ago

If your girlfriend/wife disproves the Cartesian maxium "I think therefore I am" it's time to pull the ejection switch before she uses your semen to make retards.

It's also a sign that you have failed your basic pet training responsibilities. Women have no more volition than pets or children. If they do stupid stuff, or believe stupid stuff, it's because you either weren't selective enough, or your control game sucks.

Freedom is meaningless to a woman. They can't have it even if you give it to them, because it's not something they are capable of having. If you do not control her, someone else will.

[-] GayLubeOil 58 Points 4 months ago

If your pitbull eats your baby you failed at training him but you also need to get rid of him

[-] IVIaskerade 19 Points 4 months ago

If your pit bull eats your baby it was your fault for leaving the baby alone in the room with an animal literally bred to kill everything smaller than itself.

[-] GayLubeOil 29 Points 4 months ago

It is but you still have to get rid of the pitbull

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] abstractplebbit -3 Point 4 months ago

And mourn the loss of ur ‘dead baby’, who might have survived a little bit longer if you actually trained the ‘pit bull’

[-] [deleted] 14 Points 4 months ago

How much further down the rabbit hole you guys plan on going with this?

[-] GayLubeOil 8 Points 4 months ago
[-] abstractplebbit 2 Points 4 months ago

You can’t have the red pill without a god damn rabbit hole. The whole point of this sub is to see where it takes us, ad infinitum

Do you even watch The Matrix?

Have you ever owned a ‘pit bull’ or ‘previously living baby’?

[-] LukesLikeIt 9 Points 4 months ago

animal literally bred to kill everything smaller than itself.

Wtf you on about? It’s a strong excitable breed of dog not a murder machine

[-] Selfishaltruist181 13 Points 4 months ago

It's just a preconception about pitbulls, it use to be that german shepards were the vicious dog that you never left alone with your kids, now its pitbulls.

[-] UshankaDalek 4 Points 4 months ago

German Shepherds are intelligent, well-disciplined dogs. There is a reason they are used by the military and virtually every police force in the US.

Pit bulls can turn violent for no reason.

[-] reluctantly_red 15 Points 4 months ago

German Shepherds are intelligent, well-disciplined dogs.

Pit bulls can turn violent for no reason.

Obvious someone with no actual experience with either breed.

[-] [deleted] 1 Point 4 months ago

[deleted]

[-] reluctantly_red 3 Points 4 months ago

German Shepherds can easily be trained to be aggressive toward humans (many are so trained). They make very good guard dogs.

Many pit bulls do have dog aggression issues. However, they've actually been breed not to be aggressive toward humans (a fighting dog needs to attack the other dog not its handler). Pit bulls make shitty guard dogs.

[-] max_peenor 1 Point 4 months ago

Generally speaking, we kill domesticated animals that are aggressive. There are a few exceptions, particularly military or other other marshal purposes. Unless there is a specific reason, these sorts of animals should be put to death before they can breed.

Of course, there is one huge exception that few people actually notice--domesticated cats. They are cold blooded murders that thrill kill purely for entertainment and we helped make them that way. The are also significantly smaller than us. So if you want a 10 pound pit bull, I say go for it.

[-] Whisper 10 Points 4 months ago

Yep.

[-] warburgio 2 Points 4 months ago

Retards and baby-eating pitbulls. All I needed to be a happy man it turns out. Thank you tremendously!

[-] Gorech1ld 33 Points 4 months ago

Freedom is meaningless to a woman. They can't have it even if you give it to them, because it's not something they are capable of having.

This is why women in politics are a complete disaster. They do not want or understand freedom, this is why they're the ones more likely to advocate for censorship.

[-] HiggsBooze 14 Points 4 months ago

This\^
Something you don't hear very often: Weimar Constitution established universal suffrage with a minimum voting age of 20. Because sex ratio was skewed heavily towards women after WWI casualties, it was actually women who voted Hitler to power.

[-] exit_sandman 7 Points 4 months ago

Something you don't hear very often: Weimar Constitution established universal suffrage with a minimum voting age of 20. Because sex ratio was skewed heavily towards women after WWI casualties, it was actually women who voted Hitler to power.

Overall it was roughly halfsies. In the last free elections, the Nazis got 33% of the vote - 36% of the male vote and 30% of the female vote (interestingly, I got the numbers from an article about female voting behavior, and it was conveyed that the author herself was rather surprised that there wasn't a larger gap as it is these days when women overwhelmingly vote "progressive").

What's more interesting is that after the war, while the moderate left (Social Democrats) had more male adherents, the conservatives (Christian Democrats) owed their 20 year supremacy to a voterbase that was 60% female. However, half a century of social engineering and a strongly left-leaning media landscape turned women into left wing-voters with a strong penchant for Green policies (that includes Angela Merkel, who is the epitome of "conservative in name only").

[-] HiggsBooze 1 Point 4 months ago

Yep, my mistake – I got the proportions the other way around; I remember this from high school history book, that was quite detailed, but that was 17 years ago. Still quite telling, I would say.

[-] gELSK 1 Point 4 months ago

// , Thanks for the details. Looks like it may be a bit of a "post her ergo propter hoc" to put blame at the feet of the old Frauleins.

[-] gELSK 2 Points 4 months ago

// , Whoa. Do you have a source for this?

That's some pretty heavy ammo for any kind of discussion on these topics.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] axxxman 1 Point 4 months ago

Any suggestions on books on this topic?

[-] [deleted] 22 Points 4 months ago

I do find it intriguing how women are essentially copycats of those around them. I've begun to notice that women literally directly feed off of the emotions and body languages you express and behave accordingly. Unless it's an old woman on menopause or an insane woman, in which, I'd steer clear from as much as possible.

[-] jwarner95 3 Points 4 months ago

I was wondering earlier whether old women on menopause derive any pleasure from their life these days. I mean, It seems most are just climbing the corporate ladder and/or whipping their beta husbands around, but all look completely miserable doing so. Their sex drive and appeal is demolished, so what benefits of our society can they actually reap?

[-] Thatbiengsaid 8 Points 4 months ago

Can you please go deeper into the incapability of freedom i need to understand this better because that shit is deep.

[-] FractalNerve 10 Points 4 months ago

I think he means that you can as a woman not utilize freedom the way a man would. Not because of missing opportunities or of a greater force that sabotages your honest efforts, no. Simply because women usually do not want to break free from social bounds and they cannot keep a real social network stable that has no men in it.

Men are less social and seize freedom, because we can afford to be, due to our masculinity, power, force and lastly also due to our role as a hunter (prehistorically). We even destroy social networks to make them ours or simply to wipe them out, because we want more power or terrority. It may seem like I am talking from prehistoric times still, but I am not. Currently men who act original still take control of masses and they delete other people's will by socially instruing them to follow, cheer and be committed to their greater goal.

You are a villager to them and not a warrior, because you were ripped of the ability to speak up. That's what happens in the media, which is completely controlled by company interests. The village girl, what do you expect them to do? Some use the internet as an alternative echo chamber to become brave warriors who seemingly organize, just to realize that even there they lack the force to act. Google Staff being fired and stuff like this is where they go into active duty.

[-] NeedingAdvice86 -1 Point 4 months ago

It isn't deep, except in displaying the posters level of bitterness and irrational hatred of women...don't go down that rabbit hole.

Nothing good comes from such level of animosity....unless you plan on jacking off to reddit and other Incel subs for the next 30 years.

[-] Thatbiengsaid 2 Points 4 months ago

Ok thanks for your input have a great day.

[-] gELSK 1 Point 4 months ago

// , Isn't this just tone policing? Do you have any facts to offer, or even opinions beyond commenting on the tone?

And as for animosity, his tone was pretty urbane, simply pointing out a syllogism from 2 premises. Although the premises don't necessarily have facts behind them, at least we have a shred of logic to pull at.

You on the other hand...

"You sound really angry/irrational" doesn't really mean the other person is incorrect.

I've seen plenty of women who seem capable of agency, but even in the age of feminists there just don't seem to be that many around me, even in the identity political area in which I live. Even in terms of economics, when people talk about an attention economy, they're talking about women, and, by extension, successful marketing to women (not men). This is because women make 80% of the discretionary purchasing (unnecessary not investment stuff) in the US.

This seems to imply that it's much more profitable to market toward women, and that women are more influenced by marketing and the appearance of trends.

[-] johnpayne10 1 Point 4 months ago

Bruh did you read my latest article? 'The world we live in'. Your comment is in tune with my observation/perspective.

[-] SKRedPill 8 Points 4 months ago

The war on men is another giant shit test -- have my eyes changed or does practically 80% of women say and do seem like a shit test?

[-] MoDuReddit 4 Points 4 months ago

Put yourself in their shows: all they see is a bunch of needy betas around them, they're trying to find one that has a backbone. Of course, there are a million ways to vet, but shit testing is easy...

[-] SelfTaughtPiano 7 Points 4 months ago

If you do not control her, someone else will.

HOLY SHIT. DAMN, MAN.

Can you award you a point or something.

[-] KewlThanks -6 Point 4 months ago

It's why I might switch to Islam, soon. But they'd kill me, so...

But they kinda have it right, lol. We gave women too many responsible.

[-] Whisper 17 Points 4 months ago

Why the fuck would you do that?

Look, believe whatever you want about the origin of the universe and if there is anyone in charge of it. Talk to people you can't see if you want. Live your life according to whatever principles you think best.

Just don't join a fucking religion. Religion is a blue pill for stupid people.

"Islam" literally means "submission". In reality it's submission to some asshole without an actual job who somehow gets paid to tell you what god wants. Which, by an amazing coincidence, is always exactly what's good for the dude that's doing the telling.

[-] KewlThanks 1 Point 4 months ago

I'm not switching to fucking Islam man, but it IS a better system with our evolutionary psychology, it's sad.

Women are capable of the standards we set for them, but like in a marriage with no way out, and no dread game for a civilization, women will break the society down as they are now (well the ugly and unhappy ones)

So we will see, I'm enjoying the decline, too. Willing to fight for America but this isn't a fight exactly, it's a disease we let ourselves get from decadence. Maybe a wakeup is required every few generations like WWII and 'Nam, and stuff.

[-] exit_sandman 1 Point 4 months ago

Bonus points for Islam being by and large a pretty regressive ideology that is in no small part responsible for the sorry state the societies that adhere to it are in.

[-] smarthmouth123 11 Points 4 months ago

Not a muslim But you become religious because you believe in that religion, not because you like the religions treatment of women, wich is (in its extreme form at least) not trp But just barbaric. I guess youre anger phasing. If you haven’t already, try to read more material on here. You are perfectly in control of women and most importantly your own life if you develop trp qualities. Don’t turn your entire life around with religion if your only goal is to use it as an excuse to put women down.

[-] GayLubeOil 7 Points 4 months ago

Sure under Sharia some miniscule percentage of women get stoned. However in the west 1/5 is chemically lobotomized on anti depressants.

If your making black and white we are just and they're are bad arguments because you can't see past byour own you own ideology your not unplugged.

[-] ECoast_Man 8 Points 4 months ago

However in the west 1/5 is chemically lobotomized on anti depressants.

And closer to half are chemically lobotomized if we use the broad definition of 'anti depressant' to include alcoholism. There is a link right now being debated at the Canada subreddit about growing concern with rapid increase of heavy drinking in women.

Now, of course the data of this article is not surprising to any man in this sub. Spinsters, alpha-widows, biological lack of self-control, pretty much all of it is contributing to it.

And of course, it is interesting to note the health authority lays the blame on corporations:

"What I find extremely disturbing is advertising has been using the pretext of sexual equality to encourage women to drink like men," she said.

This is statement is true - feminism has always been a strategy to get more people buying shit on credit, like glittery objects and shoes. Whether its alcohol or car companies, advertising to the 'independent woman' is commonplace now.

But at the same time, they won't come to the obvious conclusion that Western women tend to fall into the NPC category, incapable of self-awareness and mindless consumers of 'You go Girl!' wine spritzers.

[-] smarthmouth123 2 Points 4 months ago

I don’t mean to make we are just they are bad arguments. I mean that a religion is something you actually believe in. If you like the ideals a religion stands for that does not mean you can just switch to it. Religion is way more than that. If I believe in forgiving people but don’t believe Jesus ever existed, that doesn’t mean I can switch to christianity because I like it’s ideals.

[-] KewlThanks 5 Points 4 months ago

I'm just talking inevitable fate of western civilization.

1 tribe 1 goal, vs. 1 tribe with traitors encouraged to do just that (well brainwashed)

but it just, in practice, works better. It's a disgusting system, but it is what it is, a book on conquering, shut your women up and don't let them say shit, and go out and forcefully push your religion. It's a war-guide.

I prefer Western Civ, but...I don't think female evo psychology allows for this.

[-] sentient_cumsock 8 Points 4 months ago

Submitting yourself to a belief system in order to receive sexual gibs is a cowardly thing to do. More than that, your belief would be motivated by external desires, effectively reducing you to an ideological serf.

Refuse, resist. Make yourself the best that you can be, and then inspire others to do the same - greatness is an end in itself. A culture that rewards men for attaining maximum greatness will always outcompete a culture that keeps their men subdued with undeserved pussy.

[-] KewlThanks 2 Points 4 months ago

Are we not to enjoy the decline? How are we gonna win a war when half of our (allowed to participate) population is susceptible to being traitors to the ideology of the nation?

This is like telling a terminally ill patient to keep fighting if they don't want to. It's kind of inevitable. I will be the best I can but until women want to realize the rapes, fat disgusting husbands they'd be married off to, being stoned based off a man's word and needing 5 witnesses to overturn it, and all the horrors of Islam, it's hard to get motivated to fight for ungrateful shits.

[-] yazen_ 12 Points 4 months ago

I'm born in Muslim country and I live in the west, so, I get both sides. I just want to clarify something before commenting. No, in Muslim counties women aren't stoned for a man's word. This isn't even in Isis playbook. It's the fornication that's prohibited by religious laws, for both males and females, which are virtually not enforced in Muslims counties, except few like Saudi Arabia. It's more social. women who cheat are socially-osterized and Slut shamed. The honor killing is some primal tribal shit you find in some remote counties. The problem the west is having now, is the disregard of any conventional wisdom and the active destruction of the very basic mechanisms that allowed humans to survive for millenia. Nuclear family is halfway demolished, manliness is a thread, femininity is oppression, etc. These things created a whole generation of soyboys and Xanax girls. I can't believe the amount of depressed people here on reddit. From where I come from, life is tougher than the west, but suicide rate is much lower and people are much less depressed. Both males and females in these countries have their problems, but hypergamy is kept in check, and people live happier in their nuclear families, through shitty situations.

[-] Auvergnat 34 Points 4 months ago

I'm at the point where I am laughing at this sort of opinion piece.

The kind of wife who would seriously consider "going on sex strike" as a form of political protest are women who are already not enjoying fucking their husbands and already finding many excuses to avoid doing duty/service sex. And they would be very dumb to trade their usual believable rational ("I have low libido" or "I have this condition that makes sex painful to me") for one as stupid as "I won't fuck you because Trump".

No substance. No chance of it making an impact. That's what this sort of publication is. Simply outrage porn for feminists and MRAs. Something to laugh over, not get mad at.

[-] ardu- 20 Points 4 months ago

Those rootless media metropolitans are the same people who own the financial systems and who are responsible for communism.

[-] saibot83 13 Points 4 months ago

Who peddle porn and degeneracy through Hollywood and the music business.

[-] caveatze3 3 Points 4 months ago

hmmm I wonder if they have any ethno-religious commonalities as well???

[-] gELSK 1 Point 4 months ago

// , I just had to slap my knee. Court Jester indeed

[-] U_Lika_Da_Tomato -2 Point 4 months ago

I worry about the isolation surely to result from holding Westerners to that maxim.

[-] btrpb 155 Points 4 months ago

If your wife does this, withhold her credit card. See how long it lasts.

[-] mrBatata 76 Points 4 months ago

Getting an expensive dinner to yourself:120$ Changing door locks:40$ Witholding her credit card and see her trow a tantrum outside the house: priceless

There's things money can't buy, For everything else there's master card.

[-] Fiach_Dubh 22 Points 4 months ago

And for that Divorce, there's Monero after you take out a line of credit on the house or do a reverse mortgage.

[-] Ghyslain333 4 Points 4 months ago

I wonder if doing so would actually guarantee you to evade the wealth split after the divorce. I mean yeah Monero is not traceable, but your banking info will still say black on white that you took a reverse mortage and invested those funds into a crypto trading platform. Thus, won't you be held accountable for those funds and forced to transfer back 50% of the wealth that was initially transferred on the trading platform?

[-] Fiach_Dubh 6 Points 4 months ago

you are right. no sane court is going to believe you "lost" "misplaced" or had your crypto funds stolen, especially with the convenient timing of your full line of credit withdrawl.

but it does give you options. a court would be forced to find you in contempt...whether you surrender to that court is up to you. the fact remains, they cannot confiscate your wealth without your consent if you use crypto.

my understanding is that in the USA, the marriage courts only have jurisdictional oversight at the state level. so it may mean moving states to start over again.

[-] ex_addict_bro 14 Points 4 months ago

This is called “financial abuse” in my country and doing so could get you sued.

Never marry.

[-] EvilPenName 3 Points 4 months ago

Yeap, making a household budget and forcing your wife to stick to it is abuse.

Look up the duluth model.

[-] gELSK 1 Point 4 months ago

// , Holy shit that is some fucked up nonsense.

A couple of the examples are comical.

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+duluth+model+budget

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] [deleted] 6 Points 4 months ago

I'm new here but isn't this a beta bucks attitude...?

This article is wrong because it implies that

  1. Men can be controlled by women through sex
  2. Women do men a favor when having sex

I believe countering with "withhold her credit card" actually reinforces this and makes you look like a beta bucks. If you're with a woman that's with you due to your credit card you're supposed to leave her in fact. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] CharacterReindeer 2 Points 4 months ago

Right? Good lord, what a dumb article.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] RevolutionaryPea7 154 Points 4 months ago

If anything, the statistics show, we are owed.

You have to laugh. Before men invented washing machines women had to spend their entire Monday every week doing laundry. Now technology is at the point where essentially women don't have to work at all, and they still think they are owed something?

But of course women don't owe men anything either. I sleep with women because they want to sleep with me. When they don't want to sleep with me any more that's fine. I'll sever all contact and move on.

If you have a woman, ask yourself what you would do if she withheld sex. If the answer is anything involving giving her one iota more of your attention then you've already fucked up and need to fix your life.

[-] Whisper 22 Points 4 months ago

+1

/u/Halitenina

[-] Halitenina 14 Points 4 months ago

You got it.

[-] chrisname 86 Points 4 months ago

Forget about the retarded message, I did find the stuff about women’s sex drives interesting. The bits about “women find it harder to have monogamous relationships than men” and “women don’t owe men sex, they are owed” were pretty funny too. So someone should be serving someone else, as long as it’s not women serving men, and also you should let your girl sleep around because it’s hard for her not too. Lmao

[-] Kpwn88 33 Points 4 months ago

If your girl wants to sleep around, you are doing it wrong.

[-] WiseMonkeyGoodMonkey 44 Points 4 months ago

If she wants to sleep around let her come home to her stuff on the curb and locks changed. Fuck that noise.

[-] LukesLikeIt 41 Points 4 months ago

They always want to sleep around bro believe that. Your job is to become high value enough that losing you isn’t worth it. Don’t kid yourself otherwise

[-] antariusz 14 Points 4 months ago

Exactly, the only thing keeping her in line is FOMO. Soon as she goes to ladies night or carnival cruise with her friend, all bets are off. Hell, if the guy is hot enough and she thinks it’s a once in a lifetime opportunity, she’ll end up fucking some member of a band at a concert even though she’s only a few hours away from coming home to cuddle with you.

[-] JayRock379 3 Points 4 months ago

Your job is to be high value enough that locking in to one woman would be a terrible idea

[-] rebelde_sin_causa 9 Points 4 months ago

I thought hypergamy and awalt were fundamental tenets of trp

[-] Ryonne 9 Points 4 months ago

Been an influx of normies since the sub got quarantined. I've noticed a lot more salt and bitterness towards holes around here at least.

[-] Selfishaltruist181 1 Point 4 months ago

God don't use the word "normies", it just speaks 4chan.

[-] Kpwn88 1 Point 3 months ago

4chan, 8chan, Murdoch-chan.. it's all good.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] erthian 3 Points 4 months ago

Yes, and that's why you manage the behavior.

[-] SKRedPill 3 Points 4 months ago

Oh Hamster, entitled hamster... how they spin themselves to make it look like they're always giving more and so they get more. They're so sollipsistic!

[-] DareyFathom 66 Points 4 months ago

Even though I'm not a registered Republican, I'm looking forward to voting straight GOP on the mid terms.

[-] TheImpossible1 32 Points 4 months ago

Party of female supremacy out in November.

Bring your friends, every vote counts!

[-] reluctantly_red -52 Point 4 months ago

I'm looking forward to voting straight GOP on the mid terms.

If they win you'll deserve the ass fucking that's coming everyone's way. Unless you're a multimillionaire voting GOP is the stupidest thing anyone could do.

[-] DareyFathom 61 Points 4 months ago

Almost as stupid as voting for the Democrats and their anti straight white male social agenda.

[-] reluctantly_red -48 Point 4 months ago

WTF? You actually believe that alt-right trope?

Straight white males are doing just fine -- even in California.

[-] Acrimont 44 Points 4 months ago

The alt-right is bad, but it's a natural reaction to the anti-male and anti-white agenda that has been (totally) pushed by the New Left in the United States, almost as if to shame and guilt them into submission. Well, Nietzsche said, famously, extreme ideas don't lead to moderate ones, but to the opposite extreme. If the revolutionary socialists want their 'revolution', than they will get - but they will lose. The right holds all the guns, the military, the numbers, etc.

And no, California is ranked forty-eight in freedom, they're not doing fine. The socialist-dominated government is slowly strangling the patriarchal, oppresive white men, and there's no surprise they're voting young men, or, say, spending their time on stormfront.

[-] reluctantly_red -20 Point 4 months ago

I'm in wine country for the weekend. Can't think of a single thing that I'd like to do that California's government is preventing me from doing. Indeed this is one of the most hedonistic places in the planet.

[-] ChrisKimchee 21 Points 4 months ago

I own guns and live in California. Nuf sed.

[-] reluctantly_red -11 Point 4 months ago

I don't care about guns. Indeed I've always found the American gun fetish really strange (almost creepy).

[-] ILikeToBurnMoney 7 Points 4 months ago

German citizen here, you wanna trade citizenships?

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] max_peenor 1 Point 4 months ago

History is quite strange too. It's amazing how many people have died because of the ambitions of others. It's amazing how many people have just walked to their deaths because they they were helpless.

The Constitution is just a piece of paper. It cannot do anything. Believing words have power is a very feminine standpoint.

Can't think of a single thing that I'd like to do that California's government is preventing me from doing.

It would be nifty if I could just have a back for my groceries. It's a legislature that goes out of it's way to make everyone miserable just so it has something to peddle during the elections. Of course, that's hilarious because most of them are pretty much assured re-election. Then again, I suppose they would rather talk about banning shit than funneling billions of dollars to their rich friends to build retarded trains in the Central Valley.

[-] reluctantly_red 0 Points 4 months ago

walked to their deaths because they they were helpless.

Like a bunch of rednecks with small arms can do anything against a modern army. Get fucking real.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] civilizedfrog 10 Points 4 months ago

Can you drink using straws?

[-] reluctantly_red 0 Points 4 months ago

Never liked straws. I only drink for glass or ceramic glasses/cups/mugs/bottles.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] untitled56 11 Points 4 months ago

Username doesn't fit. Unambiguously_Blue might be better.

[-] derrtderr 3 Points 4 months ago

Can confirm. Straight white male in California. Sun is still shining on my beaches.

Imma go surf today. Surfing’s the source.

[-] reluctantly_red 1 Point 4 months ago

Yeah!!! I hang out on the beaches in Ventura County on a fairly regular basis. Unfortunately the north coast is cold and rocky so you have to be a little insane to surf here (but I know guys who do).

[-] derrtderr 0 Points 4 months ago

Yeah it’s fucking tiny balls cold. I just got back from Costa Rica and the water temp there made me consider renouncing my citizenship.

I have an ocean swim triathlon tomorrow. Wish me warm currents.

[-] reluctantly_red 0 Points 4 months ago

Cool, have fun! I need to do at least a short triathlon before I get too old.

[-] Acrimont 26 Points 4 months ago

What a silly, unfounded thing to say. Capitalism is the best way to make people more wealthy and prosperous across the board, socialism is the path to poverty and tyrrany.

[-] reluctantly_red -4 Point 4 months ago

News flash -- us Democrats are capitalists.

[-] Kpwn88 15 Points 4 months ago

You are either a liar or extremely naive.

[-] reluctantly_red 3 Points 4 months ago

Have you noticed that all the richest states are Democrat controlled blue states? Democratic policies are good for business. Just ask soybean farmers how Trump is working out.

[-] Nuevahombre123 12 Points 4 months ago

I'm allergic to soy, so the less of it the better. Red states, Black beans and white rice FTW!

[-] reluctantly_red 10 Points 4 months ago

Regardless Trump's trade war has destroyed their export market.

[-] cuteshooter 5 Points 4 months ago

Pro-Soybean cucks are communist china trolls.

[-] max_peenor 6 Points 4 months ago

What capitalists? There are no capitalists. We have a giant central bank than prints unicorn money for businesses to try and fail until they get just enough traction to sell equity to retarded stock investors, who also use unicorn money to buy it. It's a great game as long as we can still import shit to feed the machine.

[-] reluctantly_red 0 Points 4 months ago

Looks like its tin foil hat time.

[-] max_peenor 2 Points 4 months ago

What? That we have a federal reserve that has printed trillions of dollars to has fueled non-tangible asset inflation? What world do you live in? Find me a single trader in NYC that would disagree with that. You realize that the Fed actually publishes reports, right?

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] mattizie 6 Points 4 months ago

>Ass fucking

The only party that is encouraging that is the Democrats.

If anything, I thought the Republicans were AGAINST ass fucking.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] SuperCrazy07 65 Points 4 months ago

This is dumb. The only women who will sign up for this are the ones who don’t want to fuck their husband anyway.

A woman with an attractive husband isn’t going to stop fucking him. One, she likes it. Two, he might leave.

Again, this is just dumb. I feel for the guy married to the author...he is probably posting in dead bedrooms right now wondering which flowers to buy.

[-] johnpayne10 16 Points 4 months ago

And I think he was the one down voting you. Here's my up vote.

[-] Gawernator 2 Points 4 months ago

Pretty much. Everything about this article is nonsense. It's sad. If your relationship with a woman is like in the article, then you know you really messed up!

[-] untitled56 56 Points 4 months ago

They [researchers] have learned that the overfamiliarity with a spouse and the institutionalization of the relationship that accompany companionate domesticity actually dampen female desire in ways they don't male desire -- suggesting long-term, monogamous relationships may actually be harder for women than for men.

In other words, it's more difficult for women to maintain a lifelong, monogamous relationship.

What is also interesting is the study the author uses to support her word vomit. The abstract of the study states

Three core themes emerged from the data, all of which represented forces dragging down on sexual desire in the present sample: (a) institutionalization of the relationship, (b) over-familiarity, and (c) the de-sexualization of roles in these relationships.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is saying (a) women lose interest after marriage because (b) the novelty has worn off. So, if you want to keep a woman interested, don't marry her, and don't be easily accessible.

[-] Anonymous-O 23 Points 4 months ago

She is acknowledging that women are inherently more promiscuous than men. This is rich. It's like saying, "We are hypergamous whores and you better treat us like that." Fence-sitters better read this. Red pill is your way to salvation from this bottomless abyss of hamsterism.

Wonder what her hubby thinks about this? Or is he too betaized to object.

[-] untitled56 7 Points 4 months ago

Yes, I too read it as her rationalizing hypergamy.

[-] nebder 6 Points 4 months ago

You skipped over even addressing C where hubby is too busy doing choreplay to notice.

Benevolent sexism is hot to a woman. They want to be treated like a woman from a dominating man. Dominant doesn’t mean tyrant, it means the person wearing the pants in the relationship. If you don’t put them on she will see them sitting on the floor and put them on.

[-] 420KUSHBUSH 16 Points 4 months ago

Use of jargon and overexplaining to confuse the reader, a classic. Would fit perfectly into George Orwell's "Politics & The English Language"

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] SKRedPill 3 Points 4 months ago

The novelty wears off because of a) mundane stuff and b) Lack of escalation - most people don't realize how conducive the dating game is to create an exclusive space to start the attraction process. At home, many of those people have no clue how to start it, since they have to be constantly with each other.

One thing is clear, women always complain...

[-] livear 3 Points 4 months ago

Women lose interest after marriage because the power dynamic shifted.

Women are attracted to powerful men and when you marry her she gets all the power.

[-] Cum_Victor 32 Points 4 months ago

The writer managed to objectify women after feminists for ages been trying to say women are not objects.

CNN is gon' CNN. Nothing new here.

[-] Acrimont 23 Points 4 months ago

It's crazy that this kind of thing is coming out to arguably the foremost media outlet in the country. Similarly, I always find myself how century old institutions like the NYT or the Guardian continually spew ridiculous shit.

[-] UBC_Obrimotic 3 Points 4 months ago

The industry has changed. No one reads the newspaper anymore so they rely on add revenue more than subscriptions which means they need clicks which means they need to generate outrage and controversy. They also receive funding from groups with an ideological goal

​

[-] Avertus 1 Point 4 months ago

Trump happened. I could still remember reading a Time editorial from five years ago arguing both the pros and cons of US intervention in the Syrian war. Now one can scarcely find any objectivity--or common sense at least--in politics.

[-] [deleted] 22 Points 4 months ago

This just proves that the only thing women can offer us of value are their vaginas

[-] penisretard42069 21 Points 4 months ago

So the liberals literally just admitted that women are only for sex and they use it for power

[-] niczar 20 Points 4 months ago

In Athens this idea was once the height of comedy.

[-] mojavelover 13 Points 4 months ago

Everything Old is new again, Lysistrata 411 BC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata

[-] MoDuReddit 10 Points 4 months ago

Goodness, doesn't get much more old school than this:

LYSISTRATA There are a lot of things about us women that sadden me, considering how men see us as rascals.

CALONICE As indeed we are!

​

[-] [deleted] 7 Points 4 months ago

Had to scroll awhile before someone finally mentioned it.

We studied the play in college, about the wives of men who believe that when they came back they could stop all war by withholding all sex from them.

The women hailed it as totem of feminist ideology.

[-] niczar 8 Points 4 months ago

The women hailed it as totem of feminist ideology.

That's hilarious, considering how obvious it was that the author intended it to be a preposterous notion.

[-] nel1985 1 Point 3 months ago

Y'all still get mad about it though

[-] Borsao66 18 Points 4 months ago

Google the authoress, Wednesday Martin and you'll see why this is so predictable

[-] MoDuReddit 9 Points 4 months ago

Wednesday Martin

I can see that wall from space.

[-] TroyJHeatwole 17 Points 4 months ago

Clearly this bitch never heard of No Nut November

[-] [deleted] 17 Points 4 months ago

This just proves that the only thing women can offer us of value are their vaginas

[-] mette13 16 Points 4 months ago

Just more feminist bullshit. "What would happen if we focused on what females want sexually?"

Pretty much their hamster trying to justify hypergamy and infidelity.

[-] Acrimont 15 Points 4 months ago

What kind of name is 'Wednesday'

[-] SilverGryphon 8 Points 4 months ago

Maybe her parents are fans of the addams family?

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] scromboidfish 13 Points 4 months ago

Mainstream media is dying...
They've got nothing left to keep themselves in the game.
Sensationalist bullshit articles such as this one are nothing more than a last futile grasp before the waves of irrelevance wash over them.

[-] mattizie 7 Points 4 months ago

I don't understand how they are still in business.

I'd rather advertise my product on the Joe Rogan Experience than CNN or mainstream "TV". Much more bang for your buck I reckon.

[-] UBC_Obrimotic 1 Point 4 months ago

I don't know about that, I'd imagine the viewers of CNN are quite "suggestible"

[-] Ill_Will7 12 Points 4 months ago

The article calls not for a sex strike as much as it calls for women to stop giving starfish sex(service sex) to thier so called LTRs or husbands. Then they call for women to get back out there on the CC, because dey women and dey deserve it.

I guess they are unaware of the wall..

[-] Tombert_Williams 11 Points 4 months ago

"Service conversation" - "Wanting to keep their women happy, these men often had conversation anyway, with a resigned attitude and little thought to their own pleasure."

​

BTW, when there is something in dead bedrooms or Glamour or Jezebel or any of the others, about a woman whose man is not giving her the quantity of sex she desires, why, then, do women regard it as a problem that needs to be fixed? Why is that not regarded as pernicious entitlement?

​

[-] johnpayne10 16 Points 4 months ago

Hypocrisy... It only runs one way. Men are accountable to everything. Women to nothing.

[-] HumbleRedPillStudent 9 Points 4 months ago

It's just such an insane article, because while the economics are completely off (mythical wage gap, women are slaves, etc, yawn), the sex statistics are more or less right. Women ARE as horned up as men during ovulation; marraige and monogamy DO put anaphrodisics on women (and obviously men as well). Women (and OBVIOUSLY men as well) crave sexual novelty and variety as a top priority.

What's so disgusting is what this post-wall shrew does with the statistics. She acts like women are somehow entitled to top-tier men who will splooge them the hottest seed, along with sexual variety (every woman should have as many alphas as she wants to woo her, win her and fuck her), in as many exciting ways as she can imagine-- just in order to be satisfied. All the betas that committed all their hard-earned resources get slapped with a sex-strike. After all, "women don't owe men anything".

Uh, lady, men want sexual variety from as many hot women as they can get as well. Men are more logical, more romantic and idealistic and more naturally faithful, and so they put more effort and investment into boring marital sex. Does this lady think her 45-year old wrinkle-sack of a body would excite her husband? Women at that age don't even have the ABILITY to satisfy men sexually. The fact that men have the same infidelitous predilections has never given us license to go on a sex strike-- fucking HB10s as the only exception. What a ridiculous notion. The ugly truth is that marital sex is done by both men and women, not out of sexual desire, but as a way to strengthen an emotional bond. For both sexes, to be married is to deny sexual desire-- it's amazing that she could live this long and not get that through her head.

If women went on a sex-strike, it would only expedite what is happening in society today. Women slut it up with the alphas, only to experience trouble consolidating on betas who know they aren't even getting an occasional half-hearted lay. A duty-sex strike is the only thing buffering women from an ugly truth-- that their worth to men is entirely wrapped up in two things-- sex and feminine energy. To withold those things, they might as well toss out the ace from an otherwise crap hand. It's all just more of the same in this scenario-- more used up sluts, more bitter old childless cat-ladies, more women who thought feminism would empower them, watching their power wrenched from them by the fingers of time. If women started a unilateral sex strike, they would end up with unilaterally nothing. I say bring it on.

It's true that women DON'T owe men anything. In the same way that men owe women nothing-- no sexual commitment, provisioning, no resources, no military services, no quality of life benefits from mostly-male STEM workers, no protections from domestic/migrant rapists. Without sexual access, why would men help them in any way?

[-] johnpayne10 2 Points 4 months ago

That's an interesting way to look at it. Bring it on. Keep some popcorn ready to enjoy all the shitstorm that will go down.

[-] AutoModerator 8 Points 4 months ago

Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[-] hearse223 8 Points 4 months ago

That wont happen, hoeing is at an all time high unless they want their men to fuck other women they wont dare do it.

[-] SKRedPill 7 Points 4 months ago

The war on men -- This is yet another shit test. Men should go on a commitment strike!

Now-a-days my shit test detector is so honed, I can tell a shit test just from what they're wearing (nothing is worn with more intention than clothes!)

And you know what, most men are so needy they WILL fail this shit test. That's why CNN can write about it in the first place.

What people do not realize is that mundanity and the lack of exclusive spaces and scenarios to kick start the attraction process and the betaization process causes sex drive to weaken over time, and women's are anyway weaker in general - after kids and all... Most men have no idea how to keep up the attraction either.

If women don't owe men anything, the reverse is also true. Men shouldn't simply say it on CNN, they should do it right away! Actually this is sad in a way, because it reeks of narcissim. Those sollipsistic hamsters.

This article can be summed up as : Monogamy is the issue, novelty is the solution, so why not let's all keep switching partners to keep the freshness up and threaten men with withdrawing sex if they don't? Women don't owe men monogamy or marriage or devotion.

Fucking Media retards.... go see their authors' background - often you'll find train wrecks of individuals. I won't be surprised if this woman turns out to be a former CC rider.

[-] BoughtenCockloft 7 Points 4 months ago

One rule: Put out or get out.

[-] mattizie 6 Points 4 months ago

Lol. This is no different than any other "no sex" shit test.

Women need sex too, if they don't get it, they turn into really pissy, bitchy, cunts... Holy shit, maybe this is like a recruitment drive for them. Deprive the women of sex, and turn them into feminists and democrat voters.

[-] mojavelover 5 Points 4 months ago

Everything Old is new again, Lysistrata 411 BC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] Designof 3 Points 4 months ago

A truly redpill concept. Not getting carried by the rage wave on the "Us VS them". Tired of people coming here and telling everyone "To be redpill, you have to be this and think this specifically way!" It's basically PUA way of doing and thinking.

[-] furcryingoutloud 0 Points 4 months ago

I cannot understand the rage over us vs them.

Red Pill should literally be above all that bullshit. Bullshit that is meant to keep the sheeple fighting while those in power, real power, are laughing from inside the banks.

[-] civilizedfrog 4 Points 4 months ago

If my girl goes on a sex strike, I will go on on commitment strike which will last till the day I die.

[-] politeAndLevelHed 1 Point 4 months ago

I think refusing to take the garbage out would do the job after about a week.

[-] RPLawyer 3 Points 4 months ago

Lol they tried that in 2016 and it didn't work for the simple reason that any woman who would try to do that is either a lesbian, in a LTR with cuck or so full of red flags that no man will touch with a ten foot pole.

[-] CheerlessLeader 3 Points 4 months ago

I feel like if a woman tried to sex strike on me, I'd just cheat on her, rub it in her face, then dump her.

[-] MoDuReddit 2 Points 4 months ago

You must still be young. Just leave when she finishes the sentence "I going on a sex strike". If you want to get zany, just state "ok, then you're fired, bye".

[-] xdrunkagainx 3 Points 4 months ago

Is CNN saying that women are only objects for sex?

[-] BlueFreedom420 2 Points 4 months ago

Fucking morons cried that the "Onion" was obsolete because of Trump and then they put out shit like this without blinking.

[-] lkarlatopoulos 1 Point 4 months ago

What exactly is a “sex strike” ? Not sure I know exactly what it is, sorry

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] UberGenes 1 Point 3 months ago

In a radical upending of long-held stereotypes I think of as The Great Correction, they have discovered that when measured correctly, the female libido is as "strong" as the male. They have learned that the overfamiliarity with a spouse and the institutionalization of the relationship that accompany companionate domesticity actually dampen female desire in ways they don't male desire -- suggesting long-term, monogamous relationships may actually be harder for women than for men.

The womanese in this article is as deep as the author's butthole.

This might be laughable to us now, but there will be many guys who's wives finally get on the bandwagon because of this and future articles based on it. Combined with the steady decrease of testosterone amongst men and all the other feminist propaganda being thrown around, it's not hard to see that in 20 years we will be shaking our heads when cuckold relationships is the new norm. Buckle up, boys. We're in for a bumpy ride.

[-] MarquisDePaid 1 Point 4 months ago

Did anyone else remember the "fish sex" huffpo piece?

I genuinely get sad seeing stuff like that. America for all its flaws used to have a unique culture with some good aspects and now, now I completely understand why some foreigners refer to us the "great satan". Writing such decadent trash really requires an absolute hatred towards not just men but human life in general.

[-] UBC_Obrimotic 1 Point 4 months ago

The problem is all these "intellectual" movements birthed in the States that want to destroy family, sanctity and just have no standards in society except for a few choice ones like diversity and affirmative consent

[-] MoDuReddit 1 Point 4 months ago

Link is dead, removed?

​

Still... WTF. Encouraging women to use fish as dildos, so they can "give up on men".

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] BluBlac59 1 Point 4 months ago

I've seen these leftist women. And I think that most of them would be be doing their husbands a favor by going on a sex strike. But if you are a desirable man and can get other women's attention the odds of your wife going on a sex strike would be pretty slim. Stay attractive and dress well. It makes a difference. Weak and timid men are the only ones that will suffer this nonsense.

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] [deleted] 1 Point 4 months ago

They bring this up before every election. It's nothing new. It's just an NPC talking point that gets clicks.

It's not like we care about the women who would be persuaded by this type of thing anyway.

[-] NeedingAdvice86 1 Point 4 months ago

The men or husbands who were at risk of this happening are not getting any pussy at any rate so it is meaningless.

They gave up sex for some sanctimonious righteousness long ago thinking that by being a male "feminist" it would lead to these women finally see how great a "nice guy" that they are and want to have sex with their pajama wearing twigs-selves.

[-] sonder_one 1 Point 4 months ago

CNN just admitted that women weaponize sex, in addition to generally using it to manipulate.

[-] johnpayne10 1 Point 4 months ago

Haha...guess CUNTNN is not so smart after all xD

[-] Chump_No_More 1 Point 4 months ago

Rational response from The Federalist.com

[-] RiskyRewarder 1 Point 4 months ago

It's obvious these women don't have a man to satisfy then anyway, so what difference does it make?

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] [deleted] 4 months ago
[-] [deleted] -8 Point 4 months ago

[deleted]

[-] [deleted] 4 months ago