Them: “Men need to take responsibility for helping solve the sexual assault problem.”

Me: “Why?”

How women and a feminine-primary social order control men by reserving the title of “manhood” for men who comply with female primacy.

They're incredibly bad at this, if this is a real thing. It is painfully obvious to even the most socially awkward of men... that the men who comply with female primacy are neither rewarded sexually nor respected. Feminists don't like male feminists. It's the dudes who don't give a fuck. They get laid, and they walk with a swagger that just instantly commands more starting respect than average.

Society says we have to serve women and accept every responsibility, but not only we don't get to have any kind of authority over them - the crazy part is that we are even oppressing them.

It's like babysitting a child , while you have to do everything it says otherwise you are a child hater LMAO.

One curious thing about female authority and the rhetoric surrounding it is that most women are ignorant of their power. This prevents them from acknowledging the power they wield which, supported by their solipsistic thinking, prevents them from a certain type of power that cannot be granted: confidence or the ability to take on the unknown.

Because women are told they do not have power, they still feel powerless, and often do not exercise their incredible authority to outcast men from a social group/get him arrested. This, of course, also leads to abuse of power by those women who have somehow learned their power, as they believe they are 'resisting' with whatever means they can conjure, following the standard justification of being an abuser by identifying as a victim.

I would add that the solution to this problem is to reclaim male authority, NOT to drop all male responsibility.

Too many males have been gaslit to think the only solution to rampant progressivism is to find their place on the progressive stack, just one more victim among many.

Victimization and resignation is feminine mentality. We need to end the decline, not enjoy the decline. Enjoying the decline is the symptom of the fundamental problem with society itself: excessive individualism and egotism.

The old system worked because it was balanced: men were expected to be disposable but in exchange they got authority and privilege. Now the authority and privilege are long gone, but they are still expecting disposability. It's unbalanced, and unstable. I can really see this causing major problems in the military, the crucible of male disposability where servicemen are routinely taken to the cleaners in divorces by predatory thots. If these men lose their families, their money, and their property then what is left for them to fight for? The same system that took it all away from them?

It is as I wrote up here some time back -- "Good" "Nice" are adjectives used by people (and this especially includes family) to label you if you're serving their imperatives. You are considered a good guy if you do what others want, and believe whatever they want you to believe and comply with their terms.

You become a 'bad guy' or a 'jerk' or <insert list of shaming adjectives here> when you look out for yourself, have your own opinions and standards, your own desires and ideas and ways of doing things which even if sensible, do not go the way other people want them to go.

What's really good or bad for you is not the point here. Unless you're doing doing whatever it takes to fuck up the rest of your life, simply having ideas and realistic expectations of your own does not make you bad simply because it disagrees with people's expectations of how you should fit into their lives.

Now a man is a leader because he's the one with the vision, the frame, the ideas, the beliefs, the questions, the answers and the initiative. This means that at some level you can't expect him to totally act like a 'good, obedient boy' forever.

A good way to know where you belong in the pecking order is to act like a leader for once, and put up your own frame (frame could be anything, your style, beliefs, ideas, points, contributions, ways of doing things, your clothes). Then watch what the reactions of people are around you.

Note, you just initiated a power play here even if that wasn't your intention, and it will awaken you to the underlying power dynamics beneath your relationships.

If you're high value, they'll appreciate it, and respect it. Some may even copy your ideas. There might be some constructive criticism, but that's expected. Others may even feel proud they've got you on their side. If you've got genuine well wishers, (bless you if you do, cause I can't tell you how many people you think are close to you are really swimming in jealousy and pain underneath those smiles), who know what's good for you, they'll be happy.

There will be others, who will appreciate you as well, but only because your frame aligns with their imperatives, and what they're really looking for is how they could use what you have to their advantage. These people are not really interested in you, but only in how they benefit from you in the process of your growth.

If you're low value and you have been playing a role where you need to serve other people's visions, and have spent most of your life doing just that, they'll react with shaming, passive aggressive behaviour, discomfort, throw the 'tradition' arguments, tell you you're just fine (JBY), you're insecure and a whole host of stuff -- basically all different versions of 'bad kid'.

If you're low value and the powers that be absolutely NEED to keep you beta to safeguard their own power and survival, they will see you as a threat, and they will get seriously aggressive.

Truth is, nobody gives a man power. Men create and take it and it makes sense -- only proactive people who take things into their hands are really meant to lead and handle power and responsibility. The reactive ones by virtue of their nature are powerless betas, radiate an aura of powerlessness and victimhood and therefore don't create any power to themselves and no one sees them as powerful and trusts them with power. What vibes you send out matters.

The ironic thing is that women still love men that take authority. That's why, to me, feminism is a shit test. A man can still take athority today. It's much harder and it's not defaulted to him, but he can still take it. He will suffer the wrath of society in doing so, but a man that can take authority despite massive blow back shows that he is indeed the ultimate alpha.

With a society that is technologically advancing every day, making it easier and easier to do things, is also making it harder and harder to decipher, for women, who is alpha. A beta can get a job, get a credit card, get a mortgage on a house, and a loan for a nice car, but still, he can be very beta. So women step up the game. They create the "Let's see how you can hold your own against society." AKA feminism and racial equity and other bullshit. Betas can't compete here. Betas fear ostracism. An alpha can overcome that. This is the new game; the next step in hypergamy. When men master this, war will be next.

If you don’t like the alpha women who are a 8,9, or 10 for looks and a feminist, maybe try a beta chick who is a (gasp) 6 or 7. She just may be glad to be with a “man” who has gone redpill and become a better person. The only nine I ever had the “privelige” to be with reminded me of my big man on campus basketball neighbor/friend. They both had so much smoke blown up their ass for so many year, they believed they were superior. The 6 or 7 I go out with now is a feminine person who is glad to see me and doen’t want me to leave my balls in a jar on the mantle when I am home. Oh yeah she is also fun to be with, get things done, is helpful. Most people like to be around her.

If you present authority naturally (not fucking ordering people around like a try hard) people will fall into your frame anyway.

Well...thought I made it to the acceptance phase but after this straight back to anger..