TLDR: A look into why Women and SJW are trying to censor the Immigrant Rape Crisis.
There is "rape" and there is rape.
There is the "rape" where a drunk couple in the heat of the moment have (seemingly consensual) sex in a frat party which becomes "rape" the following morning when miss sororistute regrets it in the morning.
Then there is rape where a girl is lifted off the streets by force, her clothes torn from her and a she is penetrated while being strangled. Too weak, too scared to resist the perp who is sometimes armed.
Note: Throughout this article "rape" (within quotes) will refer to the former type of "rape" and the word rape (without quotes) will refer to real rape described in the latter example.
See, feminists in these current times are pushing hard to convince the world that "rape" is rape. Why? because due to current world of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) there are no major powers waging war on each other. Other than the ruckus created by the middle eastern radicals, the rest of the world is too afraid to start WW III and are too busy eating KFC and figuring out how to pay their credit card bills and mortgages.
So, the western world is, quite frankly, free from rape. I'm not saying rape doesn't happen, but instances are few and far between, committed mainly by guys fucked in the head of who, fortunately, there aren't many.
Now, obviously feminists need a male to blame so in the absence of rape, "rape" takes it's place and, come on! isn't it just easy to blame a young college kid for it?
Also it is pretty easy for women (or anyone) to fight "rape" because "rape" isn't committed by a hard core gangsta criminal. "Rape" is committed by young feminized males.
But you know what's difficult for a woman to fight? A gang of huge middle eastern dudes with no regard for the law forcing themselves on women.
And you know who protected women from these crazy dudes in the past? Masculine men who knew it was their duty to protect their women from external PHYSICAL threats. The world was (is) a violent place and when affronted with violence men know to fight violence with violence. Why? Because violence is effective.
During WW II the Japs made a violent attack on Pearl Harbor. The US replied with a much more violent answer with nukes and forced a surrender. Why was Alexander the Great great? Because he conquered country after country using violence.
The best defense is a good offense. Violence is sometimes necessary. To protect what we hold dear. And violence falls in the domain of masculinity. Not just for humans, but for lots of animals as well. The males are always the violent sex. Although few women can be physically violent. It is simply not their domain.
Women can protect themselves from the non-violent "rape" quite easily. So when there is primarily "rape" occurring, feminists are fighting it hard. Simply because they can. They do stuff like marching with placards that read "STOP RAPE CULTURE" "TEACH MEN NOT TO RAPE" "RESPECT WOMEN". Women fall into this false belief that they don't need men in this safe world (that men created). They start to believe they are as physically strong as men and can do whatever men can do, including protect themselves. And to be honest this belief has worked out very well after WW II. This belief stayed unchallenged... till now.
Women don't want to be told they are weak. Not after fighting so hard to prove they are not. So when an adversary arises that's really difficult to fight (Muslim Immigrants). Instead of saying, "OK we are too weak to fight this new enemy, help us", They'd rather hide the truth or risk losing what they've been fighting for for so long. They and all they SJWs that had been supporting them all along.
It's easier to hide weakness than to accept it.
WakandaDrama 8y ago
I like how no one on this sub talks about how the most under reported rape victims are men and boys. Most child sex slaves and rape victims in the US are underage white males. Raped by other white males.
[deleted] 8y ago
Interesting theory but I have to disagree with most of what you wrote. In reality, all of these things are explained due to PC culture becoming mainstream. As an aside, PC culture is just code word for feminism.
PC culture is growing into a religion. The religion of sameism. The foundational tenant of the religion, and that which all other beliefs emanate from, is that all people, regardless of race, sex, culture, or social status we are all exactly the same. Thus, any differences that we can observe between individuals must, by definition, be a product of discrimination or some other form of oppression.
Accordingly, we can't say the rapists are predominantly muslim because that would be racist. Because in "truth" we are all the same. We cannot say a particular culture is inferior to another for the same reason. Instead we must turn a blind eye to reality. Its important to realize that there is way you can convince a Sameist otherwise. Should they accept that there are real differences, their entire belief system would crumble. It is akin to convincing a Christian that there is no God. It won't happen.
Another aspect of the PC culture is the destruction of masculinity. Masculine traits (self-reliance, aggression, control of one's emotions, competitive, confidence, etc.) are increasingly carrying a negative connotation in society. We can see this most clearly with children born in the last three decades in that the school system openly punishes children who exhibit such traits. We also see it in our media. It pervades the entire society.
For that reason, the definition of rape is ever-expanding. Just as the definition of sexism and racism is ever-expanding. The PC culture demands it. In the Sameist view, any exercise of masculinity is unwanted and thus should be criminalized. When a college boy "pressures" a girl into sex he is exercising masculinity. Therefore it is inherently wrong and these sort of actions get lumped into groups like rape, sexual assault, etc.
HarleyWalker 8y ago
PC culture and feminism are both just cultural marxism. Modern women are a symptom of the problem but cultural marxism is the disease and it's only once you have studied that and understand how it came about and for what reason will we stand a chance of coming out of this slumber
Kalidane 8y ago
This is a definitive explanation. GJ
jorgander 8y ago
If they're continually watered down like that, these words will lose their effect. The word rape still has meaning because as OP described, people still associate it with violent and obviously non-consensual sex. Regardless of the PC definition of the word, as that association deteriorates we will need to invent a new word for what it used to mean, else how will we refer to the original definition?
agustinsz 8y ago
Wow some of you hace great talent explaining and putting ideas and reality into words
dr_warlock 8y ago
Pc culture and sjw activism is a secular religion. Everything about it can be derived from that premise.
skoobled 8y ago
This is also something I've come to realise
interestedplayer 8y ago
There is already a word for the religion of sameism:
COMMUNISM/COLLECTIVISM
That's what pc culture or feminism or whatever is. Look up cultural Marxism.
FugginBenis 8y ago
Yeah I looked up, it's a conspiracy theory.
jb_trp 8y ago
Statistics are often not politically correct and consequently don't fit the SJWs narrative. For example, children raised by single mothers generally end off worse in life (e.g. more likely to become incarcerated at some point in their life, have more emotional disorders, etc.).
Anything that doesn't fit into the SJW narrative is simply ignored or thrown out the window (e.g. that Muslims coming from Syria are more likely to rape a girl than the average college kid from a healthy U.S. family). Only their statistics are accepted no matter how dubious the study. For example, the idea that 1-in-5 college girls will be victims of a sexual assault is complete garbage (and would put their frequency of rape on par with war torn Congo or when the Soviet Army occupied Nazi Germany). Nobody believes these statistics, even the ones who claim they do, or else they'd be taking drastic measures to protect "vulnerable" college women.
[deleted] 8y ago
Exactly. Which is why I refer to it as a religion. Religion starts with a conclusion and, to the small extent it cares of facts, cherry picks those that fit the narrative.
Zerael 8y ago
http://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/relationship-between-welfare-state-crime-0
jb_trp 8y ago
And that's one of the primary issues facing African Americans: There is an epidemic of children raised by single parents.
Nigbones 8y ago
Great post. This thing you fittingly call sameism is just a symptom of the globalists influence of the world.
Xevalous 8y ago
Also known as communism. I'm happy to see TRP become enlightened politically. TRP is only the beginning of the dark enlightenment.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
Right. but then you get some dumbasses whining because this place is not PUA plus. It's getting rarer, though.
foldpak111 8y ago
I remember my son got into trouble for spitting the truth all over the place in class. The teacher and I had a serious "talk." They gave him a three-day suspension for calling out his History teacher for politically correct data manipulation. They told me to take him to therapy so I bought two tickets to the Super Bowl.
When your 17 year old is academically dominating 40 year olds, you know you're doing something right. Don't worry though, villains, I'll teach him how to 'play the game' before he get's to MIT.
a7244270 8y ago
I'd love to hear more about this story.
xfLyFPS 8y ago
What was he talking about? I'm interested.
Jaereth 8y ago
I teach my niece and nephew "real" history as well and I know my niece (when she's right about something and you are wrong she relishes the opportunity to let you know it) has gotten a talking to about it before.
What fact did your son correct the instructor on?
CreekPirate 8y ago
I'm really sorry that's happening to your kid. The parallels between this and religious schools is really striking. When above poster says it's turning into a religion, I think he's only half right: it's already there. It's been there awhile.
alwaysDisputing 8y ago
I would also be proud on him but still you should teach him the 38th Law of Power: Think as you like but behave like others. He is soon becoming an adult. He may get into serious trouble without it.
[deleted]
bluedrygrass 8y ago
That's crucial for his well being. Leftists are cowards, but also murderous if adequately stimulated.
rickster67 8y ago
Murder is easy when someone else does it for you.
foldpak111 8y ago
Coward is an understatement.
ramblemn 8y ago
Don't you love that?
my Daughter has a OOS now on her record, (vacation day I called it)
for defending her friend from a kid. kid was sneakier and got her 'caught' while he played innocent.
NJ anti-bully law in full force: it happened during winter break.
blobbob22 8y ago
god damn. How old is your daughter? I went to school there but at my school fights didnt break out often. I wondered about how these rules could be abused but didn't see the result ever.
ramblemn 8y ago
Stand them up and then tease them the next day or so.
My daughter told him she'd hurt him if he did it again. But she did it on Instagram. That was her mistake.
I never saw the post.
During the winter break.
He goes and tells the teacher in school that she threatened him.
[deleted]
Mr_Donnerhuhn 8y ago
tangentially related: The best way to handle these immigrants....
teach them how to use sniper rifles.
http://newobserveronline.com/sweden-state-funded-muslim-sniper-training/
pushtheskyaway1 8y ago
There's a lot of reasons. They don't want to appear to be criticizing those marginalized brown people. But mostly if they talk about it it makes the petty bullshit they complain about look even more pathetic by contrast. It is also extremely easy to make fun of white/christian/straight males because they are overall pretty civilized and fear of retaliation is minimal. Criticizing people who may or may not be willing to commit terrorist attacks takes a lot more balls.
The media narrative that you either let them in or you are a racist is insane. No country should let people in unless they are sure that they will uphold the law and have respect for their new home. Angela Merkel allowing them to come in carte blanche shows that she cares more about the welfare of refugees than the German people.
Germany has become a cuck country, where they allow rapefugees (the majority of which are young men who should be fighting against ISIS in their besieged country) to go around and openly rape their women in the streets. The police have actively tried to cover it up and they also have little to no gun rights, which make the victims of harassment easy targets.
The lesson for America is simple. Stay armed, and be vigilant about who comes into your country. Only respectful, hardworking people should be accepted no matter where they come from.
TLDR: Essentially it does not fit into their narrative so it must be disregarded.
daswareinbefehl 8y ago
What I cannot fathom is how could those guys in Cologne even achieve an erection on NYE in that cold weather?
bluedrygrass 8y ago
Porn and scantily dressed women in movies and publicity have an high impact on the brain, that quickly raises its tolerance. There are men that cannot achieve erections with good looking girlfriends giving them head. Entirely psychological. It's also why there's the "raising the bar or weirdness" effect in porn consumption.
There are subreddits dedicated to those effects and how to reverse them.
We are desensitized, those people on the other hand never got to see even a bare leg before in their lifes, and suddenly they're walking between camel-toed yoga pants
obama_loves_nsa 8y ago
Fuck what a great thread. Thank you for bringing this up. It needs to be heard.
TheMGhandi 8y ago
The moment SJWs acknowledge other men are capable of rape, they lose the war against the 'white patriarchal society'. They want to shut down white guys for good. The weirdest part is white women are the strongest advocates for this.
Typical divide and conquer strategy in use, gentlemen.
useyourmouth 8y ago
I would change that to single, childless white women. Mothers of white boys with strong white fathers are often anti-SJW bullshit.
Nofap192192 8y ago
This is only possible during times of peace and excess. Once the war begins all the sjw bullshit will go back into hiding until the next peace era begins
Edit: gotta make sure you don't get conscripted for the next war. This shit ain't worth fighting for
bluedrygrass 8y ago
I'd rather die fighting against the ones trying to conscript me to fight for their suicidal economical and political views
MyLittleAtomBomb 8y ago
I convinced my exgf to purchase pepper spray by pinning her to a bed with her permission.
Up until that point she was all girl-power and convinced she could fight off a rapist.
Probably wasn't a smart move on my part but the next day she had pepper spray on her keychain.
runnerrun2 8y ago
Another reason is that shaming these muslim immigrants simply doesn't work. Only whites respond to shaming tactics. They only use what works ie shame other whites.
FugginBenis 8y ago
From my point, the immigrant crisis was started for various reasons, mainly:
There is a massive surplus of labour, thanks to automation, jobs are being replaced by machines, but the increase of available workers from firstly woman, and now immigrants, means that if you try and go for a job, if you don't like the pay, someone else will work the same job for less. And immigrant's home countries don't have such good pay, so will be willing to go for low paying jobs at lower pay than a normal person. This helps with preventing companies moving their production facilities to China or somewhere else for much cheaper labour and to stay in Europe. It's a way of countering the huge economic boom China is having (or had, its slowing down alot at this point.)
Social media has proven to be really good for organizing protests and other actions, (see Arab Spring.) So spying on there will help to silence/sabotage those who have differing opinions to the elite, so the leaders allow immigration openly and create scaremongering due to how easy it is for terrorists to come in to Europe and cause havoc. They then in the name of counter-terrorism start spying to 'protect us' from terrorists.
And to make sure people don't get fed up with the bullshit and take collective action, they use media, which has been used for years to push feminist rhetoric and pussify and bluepill men, gets used on the general public once again to feel bad about opposing immigration, and to welcome them with open arms, even though half of them are still following a ancient religion and are basically incompatible with western modern culture. People are also divided. With the feminist shit dividing the two genders, there is also the immigrant crisis dividing people. The general population can't work together because they disagree with each other on so many things. This is great for the political elite and the capitalists (CEOs, Bankers, etc.) They can do things and there will be no proper formidable action against them because everyone is squabbling about those immigrants, those misogynists pigs, etc. Divide and conquer tactics.
Our real enemies are the political elite and the capitalists. Not the immigrants, who came for a better opportunity (because their country is shit or because our elite have been waging war in their countries for oil) but don't realize they are being used.
[Edit: format and grammar mistakes]
KillYourselfLiving 8y ago
Poor immigrants who are forced, by your hated elite, to rape & fight. Maybe you should start a charity for those pitiful victims of elite-oppression?
You bum need to get a job, join politics and stop crying about the elite & capitalists.
skoobled 8y ago
He's basically right, though. However, always bear in mind there's rarely need for actual coordinated smokey room conspiracies for events of this nature. It's enough that conditions encourage enough people in the right positions of power to align their interests in the same direction
FugginBenis 8y ago
They aren't forced, but if you live in a shitty third world nation, and the wealthy and peaceful first world countries open up their doors, who wouldn't want to take that opportunity. They aren't forced to 'rape and fight,' but because European governments give them houses and payments, some are bored and they are also part of a religion that hates Christians, the values that most of Europe came from, and go around and be unproductive and cause chaos because they get away with a slap on the hand. They won't even get deported, because white guilt, etc. It's like expecting a monkey (not in a racist way but the difference in values and law) to act like a human when place in the middle of New York. There will be trouble.
And also, thanks for your motivational words, I am in the process of that.
[deleted]
cant_hold_me_down 8y ago
This is probably the most plausible explanation for what's going on that I have heard. That mixed with a healthy dose of the feminist mantra that any criticism is "invalidating". That means they don't want to call out the rotten apples among the mass of incoming immigrants because that somehow means that they are juding all immigrants/Muslims, et cetera.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
darkrood 8y ago
Elites are fine, because it's the general population that will be fucked.
Nofap192192 8y ago
Russians are probably laughing at the west right now
bluedrygrass 8y ago
I think they're more worried about how the west is planning to nuke them all. Because that's definitely the vibe you get from Barack Hussein and friends when talking about Russia, the old fortress of marxism turned out not enough marxist for marxist western's standards.
LyricBaritone 8y ago
I doubt it, Russia's economy is shit atm.
Nofap192192 8y ago
Every economy is shit right now...
LyricBaritone 8y ago
Russia's economy is shit by the current shit standard, though. There's a difference.
[deleted]
HeadingRed 8y ago
Hypocrisy exists across all political boundaries. You are encountering a group known as regressive liberals
The premise is this - any group who is not a part of those who largely make up the elite and powerful cannot be oppressors. In other words if you are oppressed it is now impossible for you to oppress others or at the least is the excuse for why your behavior should not be held to the same standard as those in power.
In the USA (and Europe) most financial and political positions are held by white men. Therefor most of the time anyone outside that group is oppressed 24/7 and is somehow magically exempt or given a pass for bad behavior
Mind you I see hypocrisy\double standards on the other side of the isle as well - this is just one of the stupidest ones out there at this time.
noobforlife 8y ago
Extremely relevant article:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/the_lefts_endgame_hits_the_wall.html
I'd also really recommend watching Children of Men, prescient movie released in 2006 with Clive Owen.
Jaereth 8y ago
I think the whole thing goes back to the core of the SJW/Feminist group of people.
We've become so afraid of "racism" as a people that we can only roll shit uphill
Therefore, Upper/Middle Class White Females, cannot come out against any group but Upper/Middle Class White Males.
This is why whenever the feminists get behind a cause, it looks asinine because there are about a million other things to worry about that are having a real, direct impact on women. However, they are limited in the causes they can champion. They must make sure the antagonists are Middle/Upper class white males, or else they would quickly become the exploiters they are so quick to accuse us of being.
So yeah, a bunch of Middle Eastern men going on a rape spree in Europe? That seems pretty relevant to the modern free woman's interests. However, Antagonist =/= White so they can't even approach the issue.
DexterM1776 8y ago
"There's no moral order at all. There's just this: can my violence conquer yours?"
nzgs 8y ago
I don't think the "rape culture" feminist meme has anything to do with broader politics; it is merely the conclusion of feminism's attempts to remove accountability from women and use the state as an instrument to wield power over men. This is why the deep link between feminism and marxism is so crucial to understand and why a rejection of government is so crucial to taking the red pill.
I-Am-Dickish 8y ago
It really is disappointing how suppressed masculinity is in children today, and I have to admit I was a pussy when I started high school. Fortunately I realized pretty quick that violence was actually a pretty good answer. Shouldn't be a default, but nothing says "dont fuck with me" like decking a guy.
MattyAnon Admin 8y ago
Another factor - victim solidarity.
"These people are victims and need our help" is a mindset that benefits all victims, and there is nothing a SJW needs more than sympathy for victims.
EnlightenedViking 8y ago
I think I've saved 5 off-shoots of this thread. Great post
Christian_Kong 8y ago
I would say most of the rape in this country is probably within the sex trade.
My buddies cousin(about 21 now) was stripping for a while and made some bad acquaintences. One day she was invited over a fellow strippers house where some dudes forced her into a room where for several weeks she was chained down(literally according to police) and pumped full of heroin while her body was put up for sale on backpage. An ex of hers found out about it and the cops saved her, but shes probably fucked for life over it.
The "rape culture" thing is vastly overstated by some and seems to exclude a lot of other fucked up rape situations which probably are larger problems.
[deleted]
[deleted]
DoesNotMatterAnymore 8y ago
This is not a TLDR, that's the title again.
david_kimba 8y ago
Torgue High Five Flexington
[deleted]
A_regular_lamp 8y ago
Watch this and feel your blood boil with the knowledge that this is happening while innocent men are being falsely accused. These people are cancer and nee to be treated as such.
https://youtu.be/-3MvinY66r0
drallcom3 8y ago
The immigrants show that there's no rape culture at all in the western culture. Everything about the bad patriarcy and rape culture was just a lie and here it's openly shown to everyone.
webleytempest 8y ago
Your thought out post reminds me of this feminist debate on rape culture, between Wendy McElroy and Jessica Valenti. Wendy speaks first if you want to watch all of it. Wendy's discussion is impeccably on point. Jessica's will probably have you smashing the screen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBsk1WzEdCA
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
jaimewarlock 8y ago
As you can see in the sentence after saying the western world is free of rape, he did cover his base.
RPMav 8y ago
Also sex trafficking which is a real thing in the west.
Cern_Stormrunner 8y ago
Sargon recently posted a clip from The Young Turks where they start off talking about the Cologne attacks and then switch to how the West has the real "Rape Culture."
Bunch of morons
Mal97 8y ago
Clementine Ford brought up the point that white men only care about rape culture when minorities do it.
What we actually care about is dealing with reality. The events in Cologne was a real world example of rape culture.
Feminists use the term "rape culture" as a means of demonising men, it's a catch word that sounds bad however has become so over used that it has lost its meaning.
Conversely Clementine Ford's statement is blatantly hypocritical regardless of which side of the fence you stand on as feminists have failed to report and bring attention to the recent events of real rape culture occuring. The hypocrisy is in fact a form or racism as they are holding Western men to a higher standard than the Muslim migrants.
The recent events portrayal by the media, or lack thereof firmly suggests that the actual victims are western men. Last year's attention to "manspreading" as a form of oppression is laughable when comparing the actions of these Muslim migrants.
If feminists were worried about real patriarchy and rape culture they would only have to look on their door step. They aren't reasonable people who can prioritise the importance of issues. They are rather petty members of society who would rather ruin western men's lives because they didn't deem their queerness attractive in high school.
HarleyWalker 8y ago
You're totally right. And it's not that we only care when it's non-white men, we care when it's white women. Even in prison rapists are treated like shit regardless of colour. The problem with non-whites raping white women is it shows our failing to protect the women of our in group.
Spot on about being held to a higher standard too. They don't realise their own racism when they do that.
miserybollocks 8y ago
When you say the western world is rape free, do you actually mean white people don't commit rape? Muslim immigrants who live in the western world are still in the western world.
Moonshineraider 8y ago
Saying what all of us here on TRP know too well. This message needs a platform to be spread amongst the masses.
exit_sandman 8y ago
The response from left-wing journalists/media and feminists in Germany is pretty interesting. Usually it's an attempt at whitewashing and deflecting and telling everyone how of course the majority of the Muslims are embarassed by this (which I actually believe - the problem is just that as a demographic they're far more likely to produce these sources of embarassment).
But some really take the cake. One (especially self-righteous and assholish) journalist wrote ad verbatim "a few groping foreigners and suddenly the thin veneer of civilization is disrupted" (commenting on the outraged reaction of the people).
Also interesting is the feminist reaction. One camp (represented by older veterans of the feminist movement) is pretty aware of the cultural component of the incident and also willing to comment on that without embellishing or whitewashing it. They're as retarded as feminists in most other matters, but I have to give it to them that they're at least consistent when it comes to combating misogyny instead of giving people of foreign descent a free pass.
The other camp... well. Let's just say it's headed by a hipocritical cunt who a few years ago spearheaded a twitter campaign named #aufschrei ("outcry") about everyday sexism in Germany, and by that they meant unsolicited clumsy compliments: the incident that kicked that campaign off was when a female journalist tried to interview an elderly high-profile politician at a bar while the latter was already tipsy; he hit on her and commented on her cleavage. However, while a stupid comment about tits from an old fart was enough to lament the perpetual triggering experiences and the objectification women were suffering from in present-day Germany for these protagonists of the 3rd wave; like a good little leftist they tried their best to deflect from the mass of actual sexual assaults that occured in Cologne, and said that this was nothing out of the ordinary and that during the Oktoberfest (where plenty of drunk people are hanging out) rapes were happening pretty much constantly, claiming that the dark figure was up to 200. A conservative newspaper called them out on that, pointed out (with quoting police sources) that there was no way in hell this could be true and aptly labeled that clumsy attempt at downplaying the incident "the mother of all Cologne relativations".
niftykettles 8y ago
I just like to know what peoples positions on the whole thing is.
Should we be fighting to protect these women? Or should we let them wallow in the mire they have created?
rickster67 8y ago
I think we let them suffer for now. Men need to lead, but women also need to DECIDE to be lead. I think they need treated like a totally rebellious teenager.
For now, we let them go on their own, and live in their own self-destructive world. Our focus should be on our personal development as masculine nationalist men. We should be there and ready to accept the women who eventually come looking for a man's leadership, just as a parent will continue with their life but be ready to accept their rebellious child if they return home ready to submit to their parent.
Don't chase the women. Don't fight to protect women who don't want it. When women want back under men's leadership (and they'll want to submit to the strongest men around), we must be SURE that the social contract is rebuilt on our terms. If we let women have major political say, major economic control, or their fantasy of strong-independent-womanhood, then we've just turned around and made the same mistakes again.
If women never return? Well, that sucks and it was our own fault for not reasserting ourselves as the strongest tribe. Women will ALWAYS submit to the strongest tribesmen. They will ALWAYS want the Alpha.
Right now, Western white men are clearly the global Beta. Shit, we're nearly a global Omega.
Just as feminism is the manifestation of women's behavior on a national scale, and cultural Marxism is the manifestation of self-hating betas on a national scale, our answer to the collapse is the manifestation of Alpha improvement on a national scale.
Jaereth 8y ago
Fuuuuuuckkkk them is how I feel. Everyone gets their comeuppance when the ideals are actually put into practice. I mean what would we even do to "protect these women?" Put boots on the ground in migrant areas?
I think we should let them suffer to be a lesson to anyone else who is thinking about welcoming a group of savages into their country under the guise of "refugees"
MooseHunt 8y ago
The whole political and media atmosphere has been so immigration friendly the last 10 years in Sweden. Only one party out of 8 supported reduced immigration. Anyone voting or supporting this party would be labeled a racist. As such most women would not support this party and instead be the ones most outspoken for massimmigration and multiculturalism. I feel sorry for them, because their ideas were not situated in reality. But this is the creation of the swedish women, media and politicians.
niftykettles 8y ago
Yes its a sad state of affairs in Sweden, what are Swedish men meant to do?
It's women who keep voting for these left parties, its women who keep holding placards for 'Welcome refugees' and when the time comes its going to have to be Men that bails them out of the situation they have created, meaning men dieing and getting hurt. and for what? So they can keep making the same mistakes?
[deleted]
[deleted]
Sawagurumi 8y ago
Yes, after spending 50 years trying to destroy men and masculinity, it is a bit much for them to turn around and say, "help me, Obi Wan Kenobie, you are our only hope!", especially for a problem they themselves brought about. May be better to leave them to the immigrants and Western men to look elsewhere for women.
MikePatton-yakyakyak 8y ago
Defending the leftist narrative is more important to them than ANYTHING ELSE. They've already demonstrated that they'll defend a pedophile if said pedophile agrees with them politically.
93pfo 8y ago
Europe is so cucked, the men are so blue pilled due to feminism that it is beyond pathetic. Just depressing. Merkel is an example as to why women should not be elected to office and people should be more active in over throwing incompetent and traitorous politicians.
DoesNotMatterAnymore 8y ago
This is not about cuck, more like the fear of called to be racist. Especially if you are a German. Not every affected country reacted the same way for the immigrant crisis. Personally, i'm glad the way my country did.
thereddespair 8y ago
This. Been saying it forever. And they did it to themselves. That is what you get for being fuckin faggots. Hoping people would learn from that shit and stop buying into this progressive bullshit thats really doing nothing but ruin cultures, and lives as seen on the events that happened and continue to.
When men stop being men, others will take their place. And women, will step on them with the new guy. Thats so basic, why people are in denial about that idk.
Tharberg 8y ago
Not all of Europe. East-Europe is conservative as fuck. Poland, Hungary, Russia, Belarus are just prime examples of strong conservative leaders.
In West-Europe people are waking up very fast. Nationalist parties are gaining popularity everywhere.
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
runnerrun2 8y ago
Not the UK. Remember Rotherham? They had groups of muslims rape hundreds of vulnerable white girls for years and noone dared to do anything because it would be racist.
darkrood 8y ago
Isn't there a town of Muslims that shout "UK go to Hell! Englsih police go to hell!"
While the liberal reporter look in shock and horror as her once hometown turn into a UK hating English speaking Muslim hate pool.
iliketreeslikereally 8y ago
Merkel was a good ruler during relatively stable times(as good as it gets in the beta western world), but she cannot deal with actually stringent, controversial crises, like the Greek recession and the immigrant crisis now.
She took a tough stance against Greece but it was just political posing and economic suicide, now she's taking a tough stance against people who don't want to be overrun by random muslims (as did ALL of western Europe, especially feminized countries like Sweden) and it's the end of her and her country's credibility.
Leviticus59 8y ago
She's helping all of Europe commit demographic suicide. And the left in the U.S. is falling all over itself trying to insure it'll happen here too.
IamtherealZyzz 8y ago
Funny thing is she's the head of the right-wing party in Germany
Sdom1 8y ago
"Merkel's good at ruling when ruling is easy, but when it gets hard, she is a disaster."
Talk about damning with faint praise! Anybody can be good at something when it's easy. So basically, she just got lucky for most of her career, and when things got tough she screwed the pooch.
iliketreeslikereally 8y ago
I agree, but it is also not easy to rule at any time. Efficiently and successfully ruling a country through relatively stable times is already worthy of praise.
Sdom1 8y ago
It is easy in that it's not difficult to accomplish as long as you put in the work. For the most part, what Merkel has done hasn't required any sort of brilliance, just a work ethic.
People mistake work ethic for intelligence or wisdom all the time. Unfortunately, when her job required those qualities, she did something disastrous.
[deleted] 8y ago
With Greece she's creating the fourth Reich by buying countries after they fall to debt
iliketreeslikereally 8y ago
She's punishing Greece for disobeying. Schaeuble is known to want Greece to fail and serve as an example to countries like Italy, Spain, Portugal, who dare disobey conservative German fiscal policy (he had enough audacity to admit this to the ex-finance-minister Varoufakis). Everyone else is caught up in a misguided moral quest to punish the "lazy Greeks" as well.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
It's with great coherence then than she aims to fill germany with lazier people than the Greeks
HarleyWalker 8y ago
There's no method to that madness, it's simply guilt and self-loathing.
[deleted] 8y ago
Whatever the specifics, it seems that either way they end up controlling part of these other nations. So still the 4th Reich.
iliketreeslikereally 8y ago
Well, you could put it that way...
The point of the EU is, depending on your perspective, uniting Europe through a supranational institution, or controlling Europe through a supranational institution.
Born2Ball 8y ago
Imagine what America will be like if Hillary is voted into office. There has never been a more important election for guys like us to go out and vote.
laiyaise 8y ago
Not just America either. The choice of your President impacts the entire western world.
foldpak111 8y ago
We gotta get Trump in to get rid of all this political correctness.
[deleted]
JerkyMcDildorino 8y ago
May I have a small loan of a million dollars?
southernmost 8y ago
Yeah, a guy who's never had to work for anything, who was born into both wealth and status and yet still managed to go bankrupt several times is exactly the guy we need running the country.
HarleyWalker 8y ago
He isn't a jew that relied on nepotism to succeed like most others. He's worked hard for what he has.
Sdom1 8y ago
His father had a company, yes, but Trump didn't really have the kind of status starting out that people seem to think. The real elite in Manhattan never accepted him as he was just some kid from Queens. He responded by going the fame route and building the Trump name into a globally recognized brand. He should have been shut out, but he overcame that with an unexpected and audacious strategy. That's a rarer quality than people realize.
And a lot of great business people have had huge failures and gone bankrupt. That can happen when you take risks. Taking just their failures into account isn't really an accurate way to assess them. Read the Halo Effect for more on this, it's one of those books that will instantly boost your IQ.
Trump has a reputation as a world class negotiator and dealmaker. Also, and I know some people in the building business who have had dealings with him and his organization, they said he has an uncanny knack for getting things done one way or another.
reserved1012 8y ago
This is disproven every single time it's posted dude.
afkb39sdfb 8y ago
Lesser of two evils. Who was the last politician you respected?
kulrajiskulraj 8y ago
Even if she had a dick I would never vote for that insane closet sociopath.
cant_hold_me_down 8y ago
I am a hard-core progressive and I couldn't agree more. She's not even a closet sociopath. It's wide out in the open. She just knows people have a short memory when it comes to politicians.
Sdom1 8y ago
Well, that and the fact that the media won't do its job and remind them, like they do when a Republican sneezed one time in the 80s.
rugratsallthrowedup 8y ago
The main contributor to Clinton's campaign is Time Warner or Comcast or some other big media conglomerate. The one that owns all the papers and networks in the US? That's why Clinton's numbers are decent. They won't bomb their backed pony
AtrialSeptalPrefect 8y ago
Don't forget all the Wall St. Banks and foreign (especially Middle Eastern) governments.
Mal97 8y ago
It's doubly worse in germany where they are still deemed the oppressors. The relevance of Holocaust guilt in this tragedy is only going to lead Germany and Europe into another global conflict. Feelings are obviously more important than logic and reason.
dodgyasfuck 8y ago
Yes, this whole thing is like a political version of "Backdraft". Germany did awful shit and is now so guilt-ridden they let in a million rapists - real ones.
They will now deny there's a problem until it kills them.
I don't get it. They have seen from their nation being destroyed by partition, and the experiences of the East Germans, that there are other toxic ideologies, that the denial of rational observations of truth is what leads to terrible outcomes. They did it once themselves, had communism imposed on them and now are voluntarily doing it again with this PC bullshit.
Cern_Stormrunner 8y ago
did you see the clip where the german politician was talking about how good it is that the "Nazis" have stopped breeding?
bluedrygrass 8y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riQh4Qpvxm4
Zerwas 8y ago
As a fellow german I am so disgusted by the media output surrounding the new year events in Cologne. Even in the established newspapers and online-media there are a lot of articles that are on par with VICE's "The rape culture has not been imported, it was always here!" article, which of course is total bullshit and just twists the case towards their femnazi-propaganda in the same way the right parties (AfD&NPD) instrumentalize them for their cause.
The media derails the whole thing towards general manhate to distract from the actual problem. It is just frustrating.
TheYambag 8y ago
Did you go through school in Germany?
Zerwas 8y ago
Yes, but it was like 10 years ago... My mother is a teacher though. Why do you ask specifically?
OfficerDarrenWilson 8y ago
The fact that Germans still feel guilt about the 'holocaust' shows that they have way more of a conscience than most other groups on earth.
VirtuaSaturn 8y ago
The worst part is that by importing all these refugees, they just skyrocketed the amount of antisemitism and Holocaust denial inside their own borders. The Arab World is mired with Holocaust Denial and honestly it's just a matter of time until the PC police start making excuses for that "cultural trait" too.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
Yeah but they're wrong. They aren't guilty for something happening decades ago. Are you a nazi? No? Then you have no reason to feel guilty. Otherwise mongolians should hang themself thinking of what Gengis Khan did, and pretty much any other culture on the earth, since it's always been "kill or be killed", and any culture slaughtered and dominated some other.
A poll found out Swedes feel guilty for American's slavery. Figure that out. Swedens feel guilty for the 5 % of the american population (5%, not 100% as it's always made out to be) that had slaves sometimes in the past.
ramblemn 8y ago
They gotta move on. its like feeling guilty for native Americans for being born in the USA.
juliusstreicher 8y ago
It means that they are a bunch of saps who buy into a narrative more readily than a rational group should. or, it shows that they have some bizarre mental issues or syndromes.
Why the fuck should they feel bad about something that happened before they were born???
HappyScribe 8y ago
And it is their 'conscience' that'll destroy them. Just as 'white guilt' will destroy the west.
A Red Pill politician would not care about the past, he would get what's best for his country. We in the West have had it easy for too long and have become soft, we're obsessed with doing what's right, not what's best.
OfficerDarrenWilson 8y ago
Rather, they need to change their definition of what 'right' is.
Anything that protect, enlivens, and extends the life of civilization is 'right.' Everything else is 'wrong.'
93pfo 8y ago
There will be a civil war or revolution of some sort eventually. Multiculturalism doesn't work and is a liberal fantasy. All of the leaders in Europe should face severe consequences for what they have unleashed but "feminists" in the west say the rape culture is at college. No, the rape culture is muslims in Europe but I am a "racist" even though factual evidence backs my claims. The EU has allowed for thousands of their women to be raped and it is disgusting.
harkrank 8y ago
Isolationism doesn't work either. What works is natural migration for business, work and relationships. Given no welfare or benefits people would never migrate to a place were they cannot support themselves and by that give something useful in return.
As men we are the crown of creation and have the right to go anywhere on the planet we please. If fish and bugs and birds have that right, so should we.
Hostile migrants or refugees should be treated as an invading army would be treated.
TheYambag 8y ago
buuut thaaaats meeeaaannnn!
Grasshopper21 8y ago
I've never understood the insistence that multiculturalism is a good thing. I'm perfectly fine in my predominantly Anglo European neighborhood and don't need other cultures mixing in. The amount of cultural tip toeing and foot stompin that occurs isn't worth the ability to say, yay we're multicultural.
AtrialSeptalPrefect 8y ago
Exactly! How is it multiculturalism if our country gets turned into a place with every culture, that eventually becomes the same? What's the point of traveling to other countries? Why aren't other countries taking all these migrants? I don't see Korea or Japan or India taking them!
RedBigMan 8y ago
Multiculturalism works only when you have the right amount of assimilation and retention of former nationality identity. Both sides need to give a little. This is why you see so many north american cities with distinct cultures within them. It's when a community comes over here and remains insular and doesn't assimilate to any extent where they don't even bother to learn the language that makes it not work.
TheYambag 8y ago
I disagree, multiculturalism will work even in places that don't assimilate, such as Chinatown, as long as the remain friendly to the dominant cultures around them. The family down the street can choose not to learn the language, as long as they can support themselves. It's when victim-culture perverts one of the cultures, and the balance becomes one sided, with one group of people setting themselves up as the "takers" while another is the "givers" that problems happen.
Muslims fuel their culture with victim-hood, they preach that they are victims of whites and Jews, which is why they aren't grateful for being allowed to come to our lands.
Asians on the other hand rarely exhibit much victim culture. This is why you can feel safe travelling to Chinatown, but you don't feel safe travelling to the ghetto.
Mal97 8y ago
It does work, however not with every culture. For instance east Asians are very successful in western education systems and definitely punch above their weight. However what the left wing governments have done is observed the success of East Asians and belived muslims will be able to integrate just as well.
They don't want to look at each culture objectively, and then determine the compatibility. Instead they would rather believe they are all equally compatible. While even if there are any issues, they would rather deal with them later.
Also I forgot to mention it works when there is a moderation on the number of people arriving. Having a million people arrive who can't speak the native language and aren't skilled isn't going to work at all. Multiculturalism works when there is a give and take dynamic between both parties.
Scottysmoosh 8y ago
This is the crux of every argument in many areas... Equality doesn't equal 50-50, it equals your weight% contribution of the total. As long as no external factors, such as race, sex, religion, etc, influence how your contribution is perceived then it is fair.
Western equality is 50-50 or bust. Hired a white man? I don't care how qualified that other white guy is. or that other black guy. You must hire this black woman to make things equal. But the kicker is that it doesn't work in reverse because of this preconceived notion that "reverse racism" (or just racist) can not occur towards white people or that "reverse sexism" (or just sexism) can not occur towards men.
The same can be said for this case. It is now obvious you can't treat immigration the same for all regions. My dog can see it, and I don't even have a dog. But once you start basing a rational inequality on logic or statistics people get their panties in a twist and point out the problematic racism/sexism of the hetronormative patiarchal capitalist white cishets.
Typing that enrages and saddens me at the same time....
MoneyStatusLooks 8y ago
Yep. The problem isn't that multiculturalism doesnt work. The problem is when two incompatible cultures collide with different value sets.
It's like sticking a zoo animal in a city and not expecting it to fuck shit up.
slay_it_forward 8y ago
Lets not forget in this version of multicultalism it's 80% men coming in. That's not going to work out well regardless of the country of orgin of the migrants.
cant_hold_me_down 8y ago
That's not really true. Immigrants from Korea, Japan, and China have done well, because those cultures have a strong current of conformism. Generally, by the third generation, immigrants from those countries are completely assimilated into American culture. Contrast that with southeast Asian cultures that have a strong streak of resistance. 5 generations in and they are still clique-ing together and speaking their mother tongue. The groups that cling to their old cultures do demonstrably worse than those that quickly assimilate. The same is also true of Latino immigrants. The same is true of recent African immigrants. The same was true of white European immigrants 100-200 years ago.
Multiculturalism does not work. Assimilate or remain substandard.
phrostbyt 8y ago
bullshit dude.. east asians and jews perform well in academia and the professional world. some cultures are simply superior to others
cant_hold_me_down 8y ago
because there's no such thing as a stupid Asian or a stupid jew, amirite?
and seriously, stop pretending that Asians are some homogenous group with no variation in their cultures and ethics. ffs.
HarleyWalker 8y ago
How does thatake what he said bullshit?
phrostbyt 8y ago
i think i responded to the wrong guy.. someone else was talking shit about asians and jews. asians and jews in america deserve more respect than regular white people i think
grubek 8y ago
I honestly don't think is a problem of compatibility but on how it is done. If you accept immigration but without free lunches, without treating them as automatic victims and guilting anyone who say anything bad about them, expecting them to work hard and expecting them to be thankful for the opportunity to improve their life's, what kind of immigrant do you think is going to come and with what attitude? And if you do the opposite?
Mal97 8y ago
Its blatantly an issue of compatibility. East Asians value hard work ethic, a good education and don't come from a background of rape culture.
Compare them to muslims who don't value education, come from a culture that murders homosexuals, rapes women and celebrates barbarian conquests.
Now please proceed to tell me which culture is more likely to integrate into Western society.
grubek 8y ago
Hard working Chinese immigrants were also treated like shirt, formed mafias, etc... in the past. It is is true that Chinese are more low key both for the good and for the bad but if you don't command yourself with respect and dignity others are going to take advantage of you, no matter if Chinese or Muslims.
HarleyWalker 8y ago
They formed organised crime gangs, not rape gangs
rpthrow1 8y ago
The first restriction on immigration was the Chinese exclusion act.
Even now it's near impossible for someone without any money or education to come from China or another East Asian nation . What we get in the states is the cream of the crop of many nations. We absolutely don't get the Indian guy who shits in the streets, we get one from the upper class who had the means to migrate .
Likewise, the poor immigrants we have now, primarily Hispanics aren't the cream of the crop. This doesn't mean most aren't hard working folks, but you get a fair share of douchbags. Likewise I'm sure most migrants in Europe are decent people who don't want to die in a meaningless war( let's remember that the lives of men aren't valued by society). But again since it isn't restricted to the upper class with means, you get your fair share of douchbags.
Overkillengine 8y ago
Conclusion: If we just had more objective behavior and conduct filters for immigration, we'd be having less issues with the current generation of immigrants, regardless of the culture of origin.
But, our leaders don't want that.
They don't want people coming here that want to integrate with the system and be a net benefit.
They want the troublemakers they can rely on both to vote for them, and to serve as a external threat to keep the naturalized citizens too divided and bickering over dumb shit to see what is happening.
rpthrow1 8y ago
You have to keep in mind businesses need a never ending supply of cheap labor.
If you want to know why immigration will never be 'controlled' , nether party wants that
LaRedPill 8y ago
It works, but they all need to adapt to a new culture that becomes a mix of every culture in the mix. Here in Argentina we have a whole neighborhood with jews, muslims and chinese, they even work together:
harkrank 8y ago
Europe and the entire Western world is in desperate need of a new culture after the failed 20th century. Hitler lost the war, but most European countries have national socialistic economies. European cultures are feminized and dying of infertility and wasting all wealth on old people, women and scammers.
Arab immigrants are being let in by the rulers and given incentives to not integrate with society, this is to create an enemy for the population as to distract them from who the real enemy is (the rulers). It fortifies the Europeans' faith in their failed culture and is just the right conflict needed to keep the people from creating a new culture.
HarleyWalker 8y ago
European culture only failed when jews were allowed to take over media and control it. There is a reason they have been exiled from every european country they have inhabited, they are subversive. European culture, real European culture, is exactly what europe needs right now.
laiyaise 8y ago
What you're describing is assimilation though. Various cultures mixing into one culture rather than segregating themselves from each other. They live together and trade with each other. Economic participation is huge part of assimilation because it provides an incentive to interact with people, learn the language, etc which seems to be what has happened here. It's also why trade is the best way to create peace because it's a voluntary form of interaction which is win/win instead of win/lose.
If this were a multicultural neighborhood you would have all the Jews in one street, the Chinese in Chinatown, the Muslims inside your wife.
LaRedPill 8y ago
We do have them living like that, segregated, they just work together and do other social stuff together (bars, clubs, etc, but some more than others). There is a spill where the orthodox of course won't go clubbing, but everyone not extreme can interact with each other at school (you cannot segregate there), plazas, even the bakery.
wont_tell_i_refuse 8y ago
Muslims are in charge of the rapes.
LaRedPill 8y ago
No, we don't have those here, we even host a simposium where all three religions talk and pray, the current pope was a participant of that several times if my memory serves me right.
Muslims have integrated very well here, even orthodox jews and orthodox christian get along.
darkrood 8y ago
The tolerance is not organic. It is likely the secular laws that will fuck you upside down if you dare to start persecuting in the name of (Insert religion).
LaRedPill 8y ago
Of course not, silly, you persecute in the name of something else that just happens to serve your purposes
cant_hold_me_down 8y ago
Yeah because their is waaaay less tolerance for fringe elements in Argentina than in the US. I don't know how it is in the rest of the country, since I spent all of my two years living in Bs. As. and close in suburbs, but I never once heard someone counter a public shaming with the standard American line of "Respect their culture." or anything similar.
LaRedPill 8y ago
Of course not, you live here, you adapt to our culture, the same way you have to respect when the semaphore is red, you have to respect our culture. Of course over the course of one or two generations several things from your culture will be assimilated and then you are all set.
Sdom1 8y ago
Yep. My wife is Argentine, and they have a complete and total lack of white guilt. There are some liberals there, but a lot of the nonsense they spout here would never be tolerated.
VirtuaSaturn 8y ago
Would you recommend moving there as an alternative to the unbearable future that North America appears to be following Europe into?
Sdom1 8y ago
Yuri Bezmenov put it best when he basically said that he had to say something about Cultural Marxism because there's nowhere else to defect to. The rest of the world is Socialist in one form or another.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
Yeah it's funny when they see a ligh skinned south american and think they can have their way with him/her, only to see impressive amounts of shit stirred up. South Americans may even look white, but generally aren't brainwashed and more likely than not, reasons and reacts like third world immigrants do.
redestofthereds 8y ago
I live in a city where we are 80% "Mexican" and while most of us have taken the blue pill, we throw it back up once we're confronted with the reality of things.I think it's because we're naturally SJW resistant.
There's people here who only speak Spanish and that are voting for Trump because he is "business man".
Sdom1 8y ago
A lot of Argentines look like Europeans due to how they dress, and because they are the descendents of Italian, Spanish, and German immigrants who came in post WW2. So, not only do they look white, they are white.
LaRedPill 8y ago
We live in crisis, so no time for bullshit, that is good and bad.
Sdom1 8y ago
Racism also doesn't seem to be as stigmatized there. If they think another group commits more crimes, etc, they will just say it.
Mal97 8y ago
Muslims probably have a kebab shop
killxorxbexkilled 8y ago
"The Holocaust" is a lie, my friend.
Mal97 8y ago
Yes that 1 idiot in every thread.
killxorxbexkilled 8y ago
And that idiot is you, my friend, for being so fucking easily manipulated and stupid. Fuck your reply, cocksucker.
BradPill 8y ago
Also (and at least equally relevant): the SJW's call anyone opposing (muslim)-immigration a racist - which is the worst slur possible. Apart from the fact that there is no muslim-race, as it is a religion - but it's not about logic or reason.... So, being very vocal and pro-immigration, they now can't oppose immigration, even when facts emerge it perhaps is not so smart and rosy to allow hordes of young men with different cultural norms in your streets... It would be ultimate justice if those SJW's were raped (though I figure even Muslims have some standards...) and not random women, but alas, as SJW's scream, whine and cry for years now: there is no justice!
They can't oppose those raping Muslim immigrants now, as Muslims are victims and inherently good -plus, it would make SJW's make look racist... hamstering: "It takes time adjusting after all the trauma and shock. Also, they lost or left their lovers, so young men feel lost and lonely. Plus, those white bitches were just provoking them, as they should have be cautious going out in public, knowing there are wild Muslims roaming the streets. We invited them, so we should respect their cultural beliefs. They are good people, it just takes time to adjust."
bluedrygrass 8y ago
I've read a newspaper article about something like that happening, a professor or something like that got two or three arabs breaking into his house and raping his daughter and wife in front of him, he went on blaming society and claiming they didn't have fault.
Leftism is a mental disorder.
BradPill 8y ago
That will make some good family-discussions from now on - the guy doesn't stand up for his family, and then defends the rapists. Like you say, they should be treated in an asylum - or rather, send them to North Korea or Zimbabwe - that might cure them fastest.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
The "Muslim Immigrants" phrase grinds my ears. I live in a Muslim/secular country. When some girl gets raped here, it makes it to newspapers. It's not common. People would lynch rapists if it weren't for the police. Rapists get raped in jails. It's not about being muslim. Islam even forbids looking lustfully to women who are not your wife(s). Similar to Jesus' teaching about "gouging out your right eye". It's just that most of the immigrants are just daesh sympathising horny goat-fuckers. My country accepts shitloads of immigrants. Most can't do anything because they know if they were to rape someone's daughter/sister, they'll got killed, raped back, tortured, and I can easily say people who'd punish rapists would get away with it, 99%. Again, thank God for not living in a cuckland shithole. Ours is a conservative and tough shithole.
Edit: Also, good point about feminists and SJWs. If they were to acknowledge immigrant rape incidents, they'd need to accept that masculine men's protection is needed. That's why they shut up. Because they know if real men does not stand for them, they'll just got raped, goat gangbang style.
exit_sandman 8y ago
That and the fact that the guys are more comfortable sexually assaulting or raping "non-virtuous" girls which can mean anything (and who are more likely to be found in Western countries).
The Rotherham scandal is such an example (which targeted British white trash), Stockholm is such an example (which targeted the "sexually liberated" Swedish women), the rapes on the Tahrir place are such an example (which targeted politically active and therefore uppity women), and the "tournantes" (gang rapes) in french suburbs are such an example (which targeted Muslim girls who made the mistakes of having had boyfriends and not staying under the radar; and as a consequent were labeled as sluts and as such fair game for everyone).
[deleted]
Trail_of_Jeers 8y ago
See, all I can say, and I mean this with the utmost respect, is Taqiyya.
Once you solve that little problem, we can talk.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
Hundreds of years of hamstering wouldn't end in a few days. But we are trying.
darkrood 8y ago
uhm...I am completely moron when it comes to Islam.
Does that mean the practice of lying to your enemy as a strategy?
Then which practicing Islam should I believe as a non-believer?
Trail_of_Jeers 8y ago
You got it, you are not so much a moron as you think.
Islam has to account for the practice before I believe a word out of a Muslim's mouth, but they can't because it's a religious command. It's not like Leviticus which was ignored and dismissed by Christ.
Sawagurumi 8y ago
I agree with most of what you say, with two caveats. First, in the country you live in, the women would be Muslim women, not infidels, and I'm sure that makes big difference in the attitude. Second, the kind of mass harassment of women we saw is something known in Egypt, but new to Europe.
However, I think your main point is that Western men have become so feminised that they will not take mass retribution in response, and I agree. Also, it isn't just that they see these women as infidels, but as sluts, which is a point hard to argue strongly against. Of course, they would not be if men had not allowed it.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
I knew Christian girls from Egypt. Egyptian guys just treated them how they'd treat a Muslim girl. They were sexually aggressive to other women, but not to the point of harrassement. What you say is, the "infidel" label makes rapists' hamsters run, convincing them it's okay. It reminds me of Jewish culture since goys are considered inhuman and doing all kinds of evil on them is allowed. Also, it has something to do with the Western culture which encourages women to seem and act slutty. After seeing women only in burkas, of course that's just too much for them. Yet doesn't justify rape. Go and rub one out if you're that horny.
Sawagurumi 8y ago
Yes, it is just an excuse to make their behaviour ok, but an excuse likely to figure. The mob harassment is something copied from Egypt though, I'll look up the name if you wish. As you say, they should just rub one out.
darkrood 8y ago
So do you think this message will be translated to their latest brochure to the refugee? And how many would actually follow?
[deleted] 8y ago
I live in a Muslim country too, you're forgetting or ignoring the fact that most rape cases in Muslim countries do not get reported because, even if everyone knows the girl is a real victim, it still brings shame to her entire family and in many cases, she gets locked up for her own protection from 'honor' killings.
Any girl who has tried walking in the streets of a Muslim majority country will tell you how uncomfortable it is, many Muslim men are sex-deprived and they don't try to hide it.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
Honor killings happen but it does not apply to the every level of the society. Or at least it's like that in where I live. In few cases, women get raped and don't report it. It usually goes like; girl fucks with a guy, her family finds out, she cries rape to save her unicorn reputation. In more rural/ignorant parts of the society, she cries rape to save her life. In muslim countries men are sex-deprived, yes. It's because Islam restricts sexuality, not encourages men to gangrape foreigner women.
[deleted] 8y ago
Islam doesn't order Muslims to rape, but..
There is nothing in the Quran or Sunna that forbids rape, they do forbid consensual adultery (Zina), but no mention of rape at all. Some Muslims try to justify this by listing rape under adultery.
The general tone of the Quran portrays women as property of their men.
During war with Kuffar (infidels), Muslims are allowed to 'own' captives and have sex with them. The Quran specifically tells Muhammad he's free to have sex with his slaves in verse 50 of Al Ahzab.
A very popular Hadith by Mohammad says angels will curse women who refuse sex with their husbands.
Generally speaking, Islam did not do a good job at forbidding rape, and it allows Muslims to own war captives and rape them during war. Many Muslims believe that "The West" is waging a war on Islam, and therefor Islamic war teachings apply, including sexual slavery.
eddiae 8y ago
absolutely wrong, muzzies must stay virgin, never look at women except their wife sexually and only have sex with women they marry. you're just spouting low iq trash talk.
[deleted] 8y ago
I can prove my point, easily. Open the Quran, search for "Your right hand possesses".
It is mentioned several times in the Quran. Learn your religion.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
From 1 to 5 respectively;
It's just about your point of view. Let's say, you're going to a mall and it's forbidden to go inside with a swimsuit. "Okay", you think, and you get in there butt naked. How much sense that would make? Quran tells you to do not commit adultery. How would rape be different/better than that? Obviously, some Muslims are trying to justify rape according to Quran, are generally Wahhabis. "But they are Muslims too hurr durr". Yeah, Muslims who'd see Qaba' as unholy and make their purpose to tear it down (See: Daesh). Wahhabis take Quran only literally and they do not accept any other source than that. Whether they are sincerely deluded into this, or they have a goal in mind and are manipulating people.
Quran speaks to men and women, as opposed to classic Biblical writings. Not to diss them, of course. But if it's saying "O men!" it's referring to men, and if it's saying "O people", it refers to both genders. There are many verses that'd example this, if you're not only looking on atheist sites.
Captives were servants. And it was okay to have sex with them. Also all men are allowed to have sex with their servants/slaves. That's not exclusive to Muhammad. And in TRP, we always say being higher status to a woman gets her gears going. So I'd say, for many cases, that wouldn't be rape. Of course there were men who abused this rule but, how would that justify taking a woman who's not yours? It wouldn't.
What we call women who use their husbands for material adventage and don't have sex with them? Probably not pretty things. Also in many hadiths, it's said, be gentle with your women, kiss and play before the intercourse and don't dive in like an animal, and etcetera. Of course those hadiths wouldn't be mentioned in Facebook atheist meme pages. You'd need to look 'em up.
As for your last paragraph, some people have hell of a hamster. That's just it.
[deleted] 8y ago
That doesn't change the fact that Islam does not explicitly forbid rape, you just kind of have to use common sense and not rely on the Quran on this one. The Quran remembers to mention silly things like allowing you to eat in your own house, but ignores rape.
Rape is a much more horrible crime than adultery, yet the Quran fails to mention the proper punishment for it, Muslim Muftis are forced to make one up.
2:223: Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like.
4:34: Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.
If you want more examples, open any Quran search engine and search for 'women' or 'wives'. Don't take my word for it, and don't go to atheist websites, the Quran alone is enough.
That just further supports my argument.
Are you saying that owning a woman after killing her family will make her horny for you, and that makes everything okay?
Trust me, I know every single one of them. The existence of reasonable ones doesn't magically make the terrible ones disappear.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
You're struggling to not see it. If the action X is a worse version of the action Y in terms of Quranic laws, and if the action Y is forbidden, that automatically makes action X forbidden. Because rape includes hurting others and it's forbidden also, not in the Buddhist sense but it's forbidden and to be avoided as much as possible.
Isn't it a little hypocrite to be in TRP and to stand against 4:34? Of course, beating women is not okay. And it's only been as a last resort if former options do not work. Yet, being on TRP and claiming women are inferior, then crying about this verse is funny.
As I said before, men forcing themselves on women would be considered as "zulm". Search it, it's not encouraged. It's just to say that having sex with your servants is okay, if that happens.
And you're assuming Muhammad would just take a woman who's family is killed and then would exploit her sexually, because that's what's in your mind and wherever you look, you see it. Because that was your prejudice. Every religion is subject to corruption. Doesn't mean they were untruthful. Doesn't mean all hadith are true. And so on. Also people who have little to no knowledge about Quran and hadith has an inclination to state otherwise.
[deleted] 8y ago
Careful now, you're starting to sound like one of the SJWs the OP is talking about.
The Quran does not explicitly prohibit rape. It prohibits adultery and you have to guess on your own or take it from Sheikhs that it also prohibits rape, you have to use common sense which many people lack.
No, TRP does not advocate beating women up.
Zulm means injustice and is a vague term that can apply to anything, careful now, the screw on your hamster wheel is about to fly off.
I'd say beating women up is Zulm, yet there it is, in the Quran.
I never said that. The well-documented Hadith says he chose the ones he liked, and the Quran tells him he can, if he wants to.
Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
DforDeadpool 8y ago
The Quran does not need to explicitly prohibit it; because firstly it encourages for you to use your common sense, and secondly I've explained it as I'd explain to a 5 yo, raping is prohibited. It is, if even looking to a woman with lust is forbidden. If you really want to see, cut back on your hamster's food, seems it's getting too much if it's able to spin this fast.
As I've said after that it's not okay and it's only the last of last measures. Cherry picking. And also straw-maning.
Anything is vague if you want to make them vague. It means cruelty and opression. It doesn't have a single meaning would make raping women is okay. And point me out one culture that prohibits taking war prisoners. Just a single one.
You implied it, and now you're falling back because you didn't actually said it. Nice technique.
Edit: Only Saudi/Wahhabi style of Islam would take Quran as the one and only source. Anyone who wants can look it up.
Dr_Killpatient 8y ago
What you fail to understand is that your view of Quran does not necessarily coincide with the view of other Muslims. You can preach your view of Quran as long as you're blue in the face - it makes no difference to those Muslims who sexually assaulted more than 500 women in Cologne.
https://www.rt.com/news/328465-police-500-assaults-cologne/
Also, when Quran talks about the treatment of women, it only applies to Muslim women - not all women. Women of Cologne are not Muslim and therefore they were a fair game to Muslim degenerates that carried out these attacks.
So save your breath and next time pick a better religion - preferably the one whose prophet doesn't spend his time lopping off the heads of non-believers, having multiple child-brides, and using non-Muslim women as sex slaves.
[deleted] 8y ago
I can play that game too. "If even looking at a woman with lust is forbidden, then sexual slavery is definitely forbidden too." Yet, it's not.
Regarding your point about injustice, sexual slavery is not considered injustice in Islam.
MooseHunt 8y ago
I don't think this is the reason at all. It is to fit the patriarchy narrative and the white men are the enemy. If feminists suddenly were to find out that 77,6% of rapes are commited by immigrants in Sweden then their narrative falls apart.
The question about costs of immigration has also been quieted down in Sweden, for the same reason as why the rapes have been quieted down. It is because if the information gets out it proves that the feminists and leftists do not live in a real world where white men ruin the society. If this would happen it would lead to more votes towards the rightwing parties and in particular Swedish Democrats who are anti-immigration.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
Only 77%? I doubt it. Lately police doesn't even accept to register a crime based on race, i doubt those datas aren't twisted in any way.
Archange_ 8y ago
The graph is made with data from a survey in 1996. Given the high number of rapes in Sweden relative to the population there are regular enquiries on a large scale to understand the phenomenon. However only the survey from 1996 broke down the numbers by country of origin.
IMO the results were so shocking that all subsequent enquiries carefully avoided this aspect.
EDIT: spelling
rognos 8y ago
One thing that can get lost in this picture is that there are a number of women who are much more submissive by nature. Confronted with a sexually aggressive larger male, they may just shut down and not say anything, or even say something consent-ish. I typically am twice the size of the women I date. Making them feel safe with me is incredibly important. With enough size difference it is easy to hurt someone accidentally if you're not careful. Emotionally, there will always be that size difference.
Sometimes the guy will have no idea anything was wrong, but that doesn't mean the woman will not feel extreme, devastating, emotional consequences. Those emotional consequences are the "rape" in their mind.
If part of TRP is accepting that women are the "oldest kid in the house", part of TRP is also acknowledging responsible men need to pay attention to and manage her emotional state.
That said, poor communication shouldn't ruin a Man's life. Women are loaded guns. Handle with care.
agustinsz 8y ago
Damn this was a great read well done man
[deleted]
Obio1 8y ago
This is what I consider to be the best explanation for feminism's inability to oppose Islam:
http://judgybitch.com/2015/06/09/feminists-dont-challenge-radical-islam-because-real-misogynists-are-terrifying/
... And it's written by a woman. A very astute one at that.
Casanova-Quinn 8y ago
Good article. Reminds me of the phrase "There are no feminists on a sinking ship". For the new guys here, it basically means that feminists will happily accept any female privilege if it improves their survival odds. Equality goes out the door when shit gets real.
max_peenor 8y ago
The primary survival technique for a female is fear.
The primary survival technique as an alpha trait in men is aggression.
The primary survival technique as a beta trait in men is fear.
Fear has taken over the western civilizations. It should be no surprise to anyone that we are in decline.
RemyPrice 8y ago
I love that the blog's sub-headline is...
It reminds me of an alcoholic going around telling everyone how much they aren't an alcoholic.
nodoxsavefreespeech 8y ago
Damn, they straight up had her removed from twitter because they disagreed with something she said. That's fucking low and a clear indication of who we're dealing with.
BRENDORVEGAS 8y ago
Sidebar that article please. 10/10
ho-li-fuk 8y ago
This article is an excellent synopsis.
forgeror 8y ago
she seems to be on my frequency. great read.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Samantha_Cruz 8y ago
excellent read and spot on.
Feminists have gone to some pretty absurd lengths to redefine "rape" so they can use a rather absurd "rape culture" claim as a weapon against men and it seems that they've got no concept what actual rape looks like.
Liberals save their outrage and anger for targets that aren't likely to kill them because it's safer than confronting actual evil.
I also think that they have a hard time processing it; It is contrary to the delusion that they have created for themselves that falsely states that 'all cultures are equally good' (except of course for western white males who are the epitome of all things evil). The very notion that there are people that truly are evil would shatter their delusion and I think they just can't bring themselves to accept it because it illustrates just how flawed their belief system is.
nzgs 8y ago
They don't have difficulty because they don't process anything. They don't see the world rationally or process information through any prism of scepticism like a normal intelligent person. That's the difference between someone driven by ideology and someone driven by reason. People wonder why leftists are so often atheists - it's because their ideology is itself a religious force, there is no room for any other (note I am an atheist myself).
They start with an ideology - that all people are born completely equal, all races and both genders. Of course when you start with such a flawed assumption and project it to the real world where people are completely different, a factor must be invented to explain this. That factor is always an illusory "oppression" whether it's Hitler's Jews, the marxist's capitalists, or the feminist's patriarchy. Since collectivists always view people as part of a collective rather than as individuals, the individual must be punished for the amount of privlege their collective enjoys or benefit from the supposed oppression of their collective.
This pattern of irrational bigotry is common to all leftist ideologies, and the moral authority that metes out this "social justice" is always the leftist in question, such is their ego.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
On a side note, following a link from that article:
"Bloomfield took issue with an article penned by Jessica Valenti, who argued on the Guardian website’s Comment Is Free section that women are oppressed at Christmas time because they are burdened with all the chores that come with the festive season, such as wrapping up presents.
Yes, that’s right, Valenti seriously argues that wrapping presents, a practice that is joyous and pleasing to the vast majority, is oppressive to women.
“And it’s not enough that women actually manage to finish all of these chores – we’re also expected to plaster Christmas grins on our faces the whole time, lest the masses think we’re not thrilled with all the wrapping-paper-inflicted paper cuts.” Valenti miserably scrawls."
Is this real world?
skoobled 8y ago
It's either Poe's law, or someone who really has never ever in their entire life got within a millions miles of the slightest hint of inconvenience.
So, in other words, a spoilt brat of unbelievable proportions. Take heed, fathers of daughters.
(More likely, knowing and shameless media whore)
Leviticus59 8y ago
Exactly right. Feminism = Liberalism = Cowardice.
Ever wonder why Serrano never created a "work of art" called "Piss Mohammed?" Because if he did, he'd be hunted down and beheaded.
JDiculous 8y ago
What the hell does liberalism have to do with feminism? They're totally different things.
I can be liberal in the sense of supporting same-sex marriage, universal healthcare, gun control, abortion, and legalized drugs - what the hell does that have to do with feminism?
There's no need to needlessly polarize people.
nicethingyoucanthave 8y ago
Same reason that animal rights activists throw paint on hollywood actresses who wear fur instead of biker gangs that wear leather.
PanzerBatallion 8y ago
While funny, it's not quite the same.
People only give a shit about animals if they're cute. Fur comes from cute animals, and leather comes from your dinner last night.
It's like Drew Carey said in the 90's about Dolphin Safe Tuna - that's great if you're a dolphin, but what if you're a fucking tuna?
Wambo45 8y ago
That had never occurred to me, actually. That's a hilarious observation.
the_dwarfee 8y ago
I don't think it is the same case. Cows are killed for meat, leather is a leftover, they would be killed anyways. Besides, fur animals are many times skinned alive.
Mr_Donnerhuhn 8y ago
Can we take back the word Liberal to it's classical meaning, ever?
I think we should more accurately call feminism what it is, marxism
Leviticus59 8y ago
Naw, I think it's gone. Same for the classic definitions of "gay" and "marriage," highjacked, corrupted and destroyed by the left.
FugginBenis 8y ago
Marxism would also be against the capitalists too, but feminism only blames men, not capitalism.
Better to call them Regressives.
Wambo45 8y ago
Liberalism is not necessarily cowardice. Liberalism for instance, can answer the question as to whether you think a particular freedom should be upheld for people, but what it can't answer is whether or not you're willing to rock and roll to protect that. Being liberal is not synonymous with being a pacifist or a moral relativist. I think people often tend to look at it that way, because the regressive left has hijacked the title.
momomotorboat 8y ago
Liberalism isn't cowardice. Cowardice is cowardice. There are conservative cowards too, people trolling for war but not willing to ante up and volunteer for service themselves.
But not much thought should be expected in today's world. It's all extremes now. You're either Chuck Norris or RuPaul. Nothing in between.
I agree that we can't tolerate senseless violence. I agree that the western world should vet the people they allow in, and boot anyone who doesn't respect the rule of law. But I also don't see anyone talking about the backstory of the middle east either. How outside interference shaped what happened there then and now.
But I know why. It's cus no one gives a fuck about that.
aherne18 8y ago
First of all, who incited mass immigration into Europe (and accuses non-conformers of being "Nazis") but keeps on refusing to allow a single RAPEugee in their country? You got it;) They are the key to understand the current problem...
Sdom1 8y ago
The problem with that reasoning is this - what possible good does this do for Jews or Israelis? Giving Muslims control of Europe's power, technology and infrastructure would be horrible for Israel and the Jewish diaspora.
aherne18 8y ago
They just want more diversity for Europe: not just their organizations continue to be die-hard supporters for "tolerance" (in Europe, not in Israel), but Israel itself "recommended" for EU to take the diversity path even further and accomodate more immigrants (found an article in Haaretz about this).
What they are after is a planned orderly destruction of what used to be Europe and sexual revolution (which is ENTIRELY their work) helped create a society too entrenched in vice that nobody is going to amount any resistance.
Changing the subject: TRP would not exist without the sexual revolution (and sexual revolution or "human rights activism" would not exist without Jews). Prior to that there were GOOD mothers (in general), GOOD families (in general) and countries that fought wars for themselves rather than for Israel. Everyone (or almost) would have been married with women that had ZERO sexual partners before, have children and be IMMENSELY happier (if you believe modern WHORES are happy, you don't know them enough).
Sdom1 8y ago
One article doesn't necessarily mean a broader policy. Also, Israelis have zero illusions about Muslims and what they are capable of, and what they want to do to them. It's incredibly long-term stupid, which is not a term one would normally associate with the Jews.
Now, it could be a simple matter of overconfidence, or maybe there's some information that I don't know that would be game changing, but as it stands, it would be really stupid.
That being said, Bibi did criticize Trump for wanting a temporary halt in Muslim immigration. The density of that hypocrisy approaches neutronium.
aherne18 8y ago
I think their hatred for European goyim is higher than their desire to survive. They bathe in Holocaust scripture every minute to maintain that hatred alive...
Betterthanuatlife 8y ago
Most women both pushed to have ''rape'' (aka the males engaging in drunken sex) made illegal and most women have also pushed to have rapefugees imported... I have it extremely hard to empathize with these people.
RUoffended 8y ago
The recent trend of women getting gang-raped in Europe wouldn't even be happening if their countries hadn't already made the nonsensical decision to allow hordes of violent, young, Muslim males into their cities. But now that the damage is done, women don't want to admit that they need the help of men to combat this seemingly new enemy.
On the other hand, this is something that I've discussed on here before, and I've definitely had negative feedback elsewhere; but being exposed to a lot of content coming out of this feminist movement has made me realize that a lot of these women (especially the leaders and figureheads, the most outspoken) actually want to be "raped" (notice the quotations). They don't necessarily want to experience rape, but they want to be able to call themselves "survivors" because it enhances their rhetoric and helps push their cause in ways that not calling yourself a victim of rape would. These women are the worst because they bastardize and trivialize real rape, and force themselves on the same level as actual rape victims merely for political and social gain. (Feminist) Women these days have a wildly skewed perception of rape vs. "rape", and most will ridiculously argue that "rape is rape". Even though our society could do without these Muslim migrants, they are doing a good job putting these radicalized women in their place, and at least making them realize that they can't fight these bastards alone, because the situation is only getting worse and they can't ignore the severity for much longer.
[deleted] 8y ago
This is insane and completely true.
In their search for more and more liberation, more and more excitement and stimulation, women have come up with this notion that it's exciting to be "raped." They think about it, fantasize about the social implications on the level of winning the lottery. Hence the Rolling Stone article crying wolf girl fiasco. She wanted to cash in her attention chips by ruining men's lives.
Women do not want to be raped.
But many many women fantasize and actively try to get "raped."
jasongraham503 8y ago
Someone else said it better than me about this subject. "Rape" is used to extract resources from those who have them, i.e. White middle class. Where as rape by poor "migrants" gains the demise nothing. If there's nothing to be gained than they look the other way. "Rape" is just a giant shit test.
[deleted]
zephyrprime 8y ago
Absolutely. Women are compelled to play the GAME even on a national level and even when real crimes are being committed. That's why the focus on rape is on the highest status guys on campus - white frat dudes. It's not on social outcasts, loners, and nerds. When rape is committed by a low status person, then it is merely a regular crime like auto theft or mugging and completely ignored.
[deleted] 8y ago
Women have something to win into this: See men kill each other for them, nothing is better to boost the female ego.
forgeror 8y ago
yep. not only is there nothing to gain, but speaking out against the immigrants might cause them to LOSE their reputation and social standing.
rebuildingMyself 8y ago
And don't forget the narrative that we NEED a constant influx of Muslim immigrants and that it's good for everyone. Gang-rapes tend to muddy that claim
Dr_Shakalu22 8y ago
This is the main reason why it's not being discussed
antariusz 8y ago
Or the narrative that the earth's population is still growing at too fast of a pace, and that another world war or at least several large regional conflicts would help make things better. Things that could help foment that are seen as beneficial to those in power. Including making a populace grow to hate other ethnic groups.
spacecowboyreturns 8y ago
Within this narrative though, white men had no word in being domesticated, emasculated, and subsequently exterminated and replaced. Which is a damned shame.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
It's not just a damned shame. It's the end of the civilization as we know and want it to be. There will be no white society, without white men. Just dictatorships over a sea of light brown poors, ruled by few grossly rich and powerful light brown tyrants. End of the story.
dr_warlock 8y ago
White men did have words, they were "yes, please."
[deleted] 8y ago
I'm not sure if there's nothing to be gained. We established their (feeling of) security comes from men who act boldly to defend against the violence of other men.
thereddespair 8y ago
I take it more as people who fund these feminist groups are served better by these events and their agenda in the western world. Women are just too dumb sometimes to see what is really going on in the bigger picture. They buy the shit thats fed to them coz they only look at how it serves their immediate nonsense.
randarrow 8y ago
I agree with most of what is here, but let me provide additional views. The news media is not discussing for two reasons: they can't feel good by broadcasting it, a good chance broadcasting it would make things worse.
Mass rapes are reported when occurring within a set group of people because others get a righteous better than them feeling, ie that gang rape on the Indian bus a few years ago. If that had happened in Syria/by Syrians, it would be reported. If this had happened in Germany by Germans, it would be reported simply because of a working us vs them dichotomy. Fact that this is an us and them, can't feel bad or good about it.
Secondly, reporting on mass rapes would likely not only cause more mass rapes (like suicide reporting being rare for a reason), the reporting would cause massive amounts of vigilantiism. By not reporting on this, the reporters are literally trying to avoid killing people. They put one picture of one wanted migrant on the news, and dozens of people who look merely like them will be harassed if not killed. Remember the Atlanta and Boston bombing fiascoes?
Then there are of course other angles mentioned here like trying to avoid government turnover, failure of multiculturism, and feminist blinders.... Need to find a constructive way to solve all of these issues.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
What you said is certainly true, but... there's not only that. Many females have an hidden desire to be raped, and feminists are particularly twisted females, and usually ugly and out of shape.
Result, they have nothing against REAL rape cultured men because they wish to be raped by them. And be kept in check, and forced to wear covering clothes. Endless drama, strong feelz, finally feeling like a woman between masculine men, instead of being surrounded by androginous betas.
ghebert001 8y ago
The entire feminist narrative regarding "rape" and "rape culture" revolves around demonizing men and masculinity. Throughout history, women have always found ways to ruin anything that makes men happy.
Bill Burr explains this excellently here
In comes the sexual revolution. Women want to have casual sex, they (men that is) invent birth control, plan B, legalize abortions...all things to make sex as consequence free as possible. The minute men start enjoying the benefits of women's sexual liberation, is the minute women started making sure men suffered consequences for it. First it was "forgetting" their pill that trapped a guy in for 18+ years, today it's "regret rape" which basically ruins a guy's life and career. You see, men can't just go around thinking they can have no-strings-attached sex. Sexual liberation was meant for women...there is no liberation for men and feminazis aim to make damn sure of it.
bluedrygrass 8y ago
This is a point that should be reiterated more: sexual liberation means females will be freerer to fuck with alphas, not with betas. Sex is not for betas.
It's important to point out because so many guys and intellectuals (natural blues) seem to think more sex = more sex for everyone. No. More sex= more sex for alphas, and conversely, less for betas. And it is, indeed, what happened since '68
skoobled 8y ago
Women need men to have no other source of happiness but themselves; their survival depends on it
mjdavi111 8y ago
Fuck SJW's can't wait until they die out
ConfessionsofaLurker 8y ago
They'll eventually breed themselves out of existence, nature has a way of correcting things like them.
mjdavi111 8y ago
SJW's have this whole thing where they see things in only black or white, no room for nuance. It's bs
balancespec2 8y ago
No I don't think that's it, it's just they'd have to admit that Muslims are more likely to rape and in doing so they'd violate a core tenet of SJWism which avoids stereotyping, so they just hamster it away.
There are feminists that are anti Muslim but the SJWs are a hybrid feminist that defends one minority except when it comes at the expense of another. In this case it's Muslim vs woman and theyou can't tolerate infighting so they hamster a way, no matter how obscure, to blame straight cis white males.
Everything to the SJW is an us vs them mentality. Except the them to them is straight cis white males
OrionSC2 8y ago
"A look into why Women and SJW are trying to censor the Immigrant Rape Crisis" This is not a tl;dr
"It's easier to hide weakness than to accept it" THIS is a tl;dr
forgeror 8y ago
yeah lol... new posting rules .. i wrote the last line without thinking of it as the TLDR.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
destinypallooker 8y ago
There are very rapey segments of the population in America. Good luck talking about it though.
Sdom1 8y ago
Rapey? That's not a word. Try again, and while you're at it, actually name the segments that you claim commit rape at a higher rate than the American baseline.
destinypallooker 8y ago
Certain segments of the American population drag it down
[deleted]
waldo888 8y ago
War is always avoided until in cannot be avoided anymore, except by the warmonger. That is either the strong power hungry nation, or the desperate group, usually made desperate by said powerful group. The powerful get confident and this leads to an almost temptation to attack weaker people. When you give woman or any other group the illusion of power/confidence (as in weaknesses to exploit in the other) you give them temptation to attack. If the minor attacks succeed there will be an escalation. Women will escalate until the obvious power structure is returned....or not. Same with terrorism. They will escalate as long as the repercussions are minimal, and the confidence in their attacks, hence their enemies weakness, is maintained. This is the best strategy to maintain the good guy image by self victimization....you bait the enemy into attacking with illusions of confidence, by showing weaknesses. When they ultimately do attack you crush them as you have hid your true force. How often has a woman provoked a man to the point of attack and when he does....boom arrest etc etc.....
Sawagurumi 8y ago
33 strategies of war. The result is likely to be bloody, but can be effective. Also inevitable, see Harrington, The Clash of Civilizations.
[deleted]
obama_loves_nsa 8y ago
What an extremely insightful response. You definitely have me sold with your intellectual ability to refute the premise laid bare before us.