The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
TheRedPill Sidebar
Welcome to The Red Pill
The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
Original Reddit Red Pill sub (quarantine bypass) that contains the full original sidebar
The Rules & Glossary
You are REQUIRED to read these before posting. Ignorance of the rules is not an excuse.
Endorsed Contributors: Respect The Tag
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms (2015)
Here to troll? Here's a Glossary of Shaming Tactics, try to be creative and avoid these. We know you won't, that's why you're easy to spot.
The Red Pill Network
Official Fail Safe Forums (Currently Locked)
New Here?
New here? Read the following threads and the Theory Reading below. Read before participating:
Confessions of a Reformed Incel
Theory Reading
Relationships, the Red Pill, and you
Women, the most responsible teenager in the house
On Value and the Value of Women
Powertalk and other Language Categories
References
Everything you need to know about Shit Tests
Comprehensive Guide to Shit Tests
Goals - A beginners guide on how to attain them
One Key Step to Not Giving a Fuck
Links to the Manosphere
Subreddit By Flair
Red Pill Subreddits
/r/TheRedPill
/r/RedPillWomen
/r/askTRP
/r/RedPillParenting
/r/thankTRP
/r/becomeaman
/r/altTRP
/r/GEOTRP
/r/TRPOffTopic
The Archives
Special Thanks
/u/CrazyHorseInvincible
/u/bsutansalt
/u/EpicLevelCheater
/u/Halitenina
/u/SlyGradient
/u/TheRedPike
/u/RedForEducation
/u/RedShifter99
/u/LegendOfTheFrontier
/u/MachiavellianRed
/u/RedSovereign
/u/OldMuckyTerrahawk
/u/Aerobus
/u/RedAsteroid
/u/CrimsonPerspective
/u/RedGoldSaint
/u/GaiusScaevolus
/u/SoftHarem
/u/-Anteros-
red_philosopher 5y ago
It may be a small sample size, but the chances of drawing significantly more "non-hetero" subjects (2-4) compared to the control group is pretty small. It warrants further study, but the results of the study would take decades to conclude, and the sample size would need to be much larger, multi-state or multi-country sampling might be needed depending on where it's being done.
Either way, we know that older women bear children with more complications, are more likely to miscarry (nature's way of saying nope, this won't work), and interestingly, a statistically much greater rate of multiple births (twins, triplets, etc.).
Any hormone that is provided unnaturally is going to affect our minds and bodies in ways that are unexpected. Hormonal birth control is known to cause psychological and physiological changes in women, none of which are attractive. Excessive consumption of plant estrogens (soy, usually) and in milk products, causes earlier maturation of women (I have seen 8-10 year olds these days sporting some impressive gear, something that was largely unheard of when I was growing up), and in men it causes cancers and makes them grow tits.
Just another reason to avoid such things. It's bad for everyone.
halfback910 5y ago
This.
I'm homosexual and high IQ (not bragging, it matters for this) and I was a very premature baby (my mom had like 8 miscarriages before me). Keeping me in the womb for 8 months was a struggle that took a stitch implanted in my mother and a lot of hormones. And keeping me alive when I came out took a lot of resources too.
There was this one particular hormone, I forget the name now, but they gave it to my mom. And when I was about twenty a study came out saying "Oh, look. The premature babies whose moms we gave this hormone treatment to are growing up super high IQ and super gay. You should give me funding!"
The more we go on and learn the more I think we're coming to the conclusion that homosexuality is biological but not genetic. It has to do with the brew of hormones in your mom at any given time. That's why, if you have a bunch of older brothers, you're more likely to be gay. It's why children born to older mothers are super annoying (I'm assuming).
JayRock379 5y ago
What is your IQ? What do you do for a living?
halfback910 5y ago
Like 148 last time I was tested by a professional, which was quite a while ago. So not a genius but more than three standard deviations above the median.
I manage global inventory operations (like 7ish headcount) for a medium-sized import/export firm and manage the Chinese sourcing team for them as well.
JayRock379 5y ago
Why were you tested by a professional?
halfback910 5y ago
I participated in an unrelated study on people identifying as homosexual because a friend from college who was conducting the study asked me to. And he was very, very sexy.
The perk was you got to see your IQ results. And I think there may have been a gift card or something...? I didn't use it, whatever it was.
Proto_Sigma 5y ago
I’ve taken to avoiding soy like the plague. What kinds of milks are you talking about specifically?
TRParchivist 5y ago
Industrially-farmed cows are often fed corn and soybeans. Even "organic" cows can be fed organic corn and soy. Those feeds end up in cow's milk. Only way to get around this is Grass-Fed, Grass-Finished, Pasture-Raised.
Same goes for beef. If your hamburger was fed soybeans, you're also eating soybeans.
Also applies to pigs, chickens, and other farm stocks.
Proto_Sigma 5y ago
Grass fed beef is labelled but I've never seen grass fed pigs, chickens etc ( I don't think those species eat grass even).
TRParchivist 5y ago
More, you want to pay attention to what the meat you eat was fed. Chickens and eggs, you want "pasture-raised", I imagine the labeling for pork would be similar but I since I source from local farmers, I don't know what the 'correct' supermarket terms would be for that. Hell, even "Pasture-raised" is losing credibility more and more each year as the requirements for certain certifications are chipped away at and deregulated. A few years ago, "pasture-raised" meant they spent the majority (90%+) of their life actually in pasture, with regulations on how much land area they had to travel around and be chicken-y on. Now, in some cases, those regulations have been whittled down to "must have access to non-penned dirt and sunlight for a few hours".
Point being, whatever the animals eat, you end up eating also. And most industrial meat that you buy in a supermarket or from a restaurant or fast-food joints, they all are fed soy and corn and shit (sometimes literally).
Best way to bypass all these marketing terms is to simply find local farms where you can talk to the farmers, ask questions about how the animals are raised and what they're fed, and actually meet your meat. This is just the Red Pilling of food.
Proto_Sigma 5y ago
I unfortunately am not in a position in my life where I'm able to make such inquiries. As a college student on a meal plan I need to discriminate among the options presented to me by university cafeterias. Whenever I get to a stage where I can purchase my own food directly and have enough time to scout out farms I will take your advice, which is sound. In the meantime I will do the best I can.
tempolaca 5y ago
Lol pigs and chickens don't eat grass, WTF do they teach you in school.
Proto_Sigma 5y ago
-u/Proto_Sigma
Do you not read? WTF do they teach you in school?
Jabroni421 5y ago
Look for “pastured pigs” and “pastured eggs”. I buy my cows and pigs from a local farm I found on eatwild: http://www.eatwild.com/products/index.html
See Graphic on this link for why pastured eggs are the only worthwhile label to pay a premium for: http://www.ebnutritionconsulting.com/blog/2016/5/13/with-so-many-claims-what-eggs-should-i-buy-at-the-grocery-store
Also look for “non vegetarian fed” on egg labels.
turtle__bot 5y ago
Bleep bloop, I am a bot.
I like turtles and am here to collect some metrics.
I will only comment once in every sub, so do not be worried about me spamming your precious subreddit!
Goodbye, and have a nice day.
[deleted]
AutoModerator 5y ago
Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
This is very preliminary stuff, and a very small sample group. But the implications are very wide-reaching if this is found to have any truth to it.
Women are waiting longer to have children, and this may actually increase the likelihood of homosexual children.
Consider if the SJW mainstream would ever let this study or its results become public (they probably wouldn't).
hearse223 5y ago
Wouldn't more homosexuals in the sexual marketplace make things easier for straight men, less competition?
KrustyKrabReject 5y ago
Yes, but it's bad in other ways. Depopulation agenda, feminizing men, breakdown of the family structure. It's good for (((them))).
[deleted]
[deleted]
AriesAsF 5y ago
I will literally never understand why any redpill man would give two shits about more homos in the population. It literally has no impact on the straight population whatsoever, other than decreasing competition as you said. For every two dudes who decide to fuck each other up the ass, that basically leaves two pussies free for the taking for the rest of us. No brainer.
max_peenor 5y ago
We don't. We do care what is happening to our children.
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
This... and...
The sub is about sexual strategy. And one counter-strategy happening now is trying to convince women to wait until later in their lives to have kids. That increases cock-carousel time. And the gays apparently.
AriesAsF 5y ago
There's a lot of advantages to women being a bit older when they have children, from maturity issues to financial to the simple fact that they often want them more, instead of seeing them as a giant life-crushing inconvenience the way many women in their teens and early twenties do. I would say the benefits of women waiting to have children likely far outweigh the negatives. Also many ancient cultures had far more homosexuals than we do today (Greece), so I think it would be pretty faulty reasoning to take a study based on 34 people and start hand-wringing over modern progesterone pills causing homosexuality irmagerb.
WarriorMonkMode 5y ago
There are a few but not many. Let's not get carried away.
Women never mature, they simply get better at camouflaging their immaturity. They often "want them more" meaning their biology is starting to pull out the stops and giving them "baby rabies" because they've waited too long.
Women seem to never be satisfied with anything. For every woman loudly complaining about what a "life ending mistake" early pregnancy is, there are hundreds quietly enjoying their new role at a young age. Let's not start deferring to the whims of a vocal minority. Women were very much designed to have kids at an early age, and keep having kids. Hell, I think /u/redpillschool even linked an article not too long ago that showed that women stave off depression by having more kids.
In the end, women have the choice of either wasting their life at a shitty job or raising a family. More often than not women put themselves into a position where they're single mothers so of course early pregnancy would be looked at as a burden in that context.
AriesAsF 5y ago
Well said, my views are likely a bit skewed because my personal preferences do tend to lean towards the slightly older 25 to 35 age bracket because the under 25 age group is so obnoxious they set my teeth on edge just being around them. And I do feel that the 25- 35 group tends to have a slightly more even keel, and make better mothers. But yes, women are designed to have children from a very young age, and that's an indisputable fact of nature. I just can't imagine putting a baby in an 18 year old. Nope nope nope, not for me.
max_peenor 5y ago
Largely a myth. And even the myth would be that they were polysexuals, not homosexuals (once you start breeding your daughters with bulls, shit starts to get weird).
Don't go away. I don't have a huge problem with a late 30s woman having a child, but when it becomes and industry for a to help mid-40s women push out little derp-derps, it's definably becoming a problem. Forty was my hard cut-off (and lucky so far holding.) I wouldn't want my 10 year old watch me die of old age because I couldn't be bothered to put down the bottle long enough in my 20s to do something about kids.
Or don't have kids. That's fine too.
AriesAsF 5y ago
Agreed, you don't want a 40 plus woman to have your baby, don't put your dick in a 40 plus woman. Problem solved.
Imperator_Red 5y ago
Horrifying
MoDuReddit 5y ago
> significantly less likely to describe themselves as heterosexual
​
Meh, it all comes down to feelings, nothing measurable. The fact that the subjects are already treatment seeking completely biases the small sample size.
max_peenor 5y ago
Do you think guys would admit to any level of gayness if they weren't actually thinking about sucking a cock? Women, sure, nothing measurable. Guys? They don't sit around a campfire and say, "So, hey, what's your opinion on sucking dick?" Unless they are fishing for some Brokeback action and had way too much to drink.
tempolaca 5y ago
Obviously. Is one of the most effective tool to fuck a girl that see you as her "gay friend".
halfback910 5y ago
As someone who is gay and male I can confirm this. There's this weird homosexual fantasy about straight guys who will let gay guys suck their dicks because blowjobs.
I always turn around and ask them "Would you let a girl suck your dick because blowjobs?"
"Uhh uhh uhhh well that's different!"
Yeah, ok. I'm not attracted to women so I don't want them near my dick. I could only imagine it's the same for straight guys. If they're straight, they won't let you suck their dick (at least not for sexual reasons, maybe for money or something) and if they let you suck their dick, they're not straight. I think it's why the Kinsey scale is bullshit.
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
Exactly. Even 1% is 100% gay.