TRP focuses, among other things (such as self improvement), on how to handle women. It posits that women are looking for dominant men. But what if women want to turn men into women, as a revenge for that dominance/superiority?
What if female psychology is not driven by the search for dominant men, but by penis envy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis_envy
This isn't simply about a woman wanting to have a penis, but about women wishing they were men, or about women wishing they had what men had. This in turn leads to fantasies of women being the leaders, soldiers, inventors, superheroes, etc.
You can see that in various recent movies for female audience (Wonder Woman, Ghostbusters, etc.)
What if women do not want strong male politicans or leaders, but to be the leaders themselves?
What if women do not want strong male superstars, but to be the superstars themselves?
What if women are triggered every time they see that almost all of the Nobel Laureats are men, and would want to be the Nobel Laureats themselves?
What if women do not want strong male heroes, but want to be the heroes themselves?
Now, if you look at female media and other female circles, you will notice constant triggering about having too many successful men in this area or that area. Which in turn causes inferiority complexes in women. Does the fact that almost all Nobel Laureats are men means that women are inferior?
When Lawrence H. Summers mentioned that women perform worse on average at top levels of science, something well known to be caused by the larger variability of male IQ, causing more men with higher IQ, not to mention the larger variability in math ability, this was the reaction of one female scientist:
"When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn't breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill," Dr. Hopkins said"
In other words, this female goes crazy by the thought that people are not the same, and men could be better than women at something, therefore causing an inferiority comlex in it, that could be only fixed if we somehow remove all the top male sicentists and replace them with female scientists, so that the female feels better.
This type of thought could be applied in many areas:
Why is it that most professors are men? Can't we have more female professors instead? (a case from Germany)
Why is it that most police are men? Can't we have female police instead? (you can see the feminisation of police in W. Europe as a result)
Why is it that most firefighters are men? Can't we have more women there instead? (Britain)
Why is it that most people in important business positions are men? Can't we have more women there instead (see quotas for women in company boards of directors in Europe).
Why is it that most streets have male names? Can't we have more female named streets instead? (Sweden)
Why is it that most movies are created by men? Can't society do something so that there are more female moviemakers instead? (Hollywood)
All of these are clear signs of envy.
Therefore, if we asume that women are driven by penis envy, every time men are better than women at something will cause massive triggering and demands that the situation is changed by having women instead of men in that position.
Following this line of reasoning, women do not seek male leaders (as per TRP), but they seek to be the leaders themselves. If that's right, Feminism will never stop until there are more women than men in all types of important positions, as leaders, important persons, everywhere, at which point the triggering and the inferiority complexes will stop.
In other words trying to be dominant, superior, etc. simply triggers societal female envy against men, thus TRP is self-defeating.
You can see it with Trump. Women did not like the "Alpha Man", "Bad boy" etc, but got severely triggered, and now female support for the Democratic Party is at an all time high, women running for Congress at all time high, Mee Too movements are raging, etc. Thus, women are now preparing to destroy the white male dominated Republican Party in November.
Thus the only thing that will calm down women is if men give up their power and societal dominance. I would not recommend you doing that because it isn't a manly thing to do. But what is the way to the future, under such conditions of gender warfare - i do not know.
[deleted]
punchyson 5y ago
The thing is, they can never be us. That pisses them off, because female primacy is real.
There are things that women are legitimately better at then men. Anything involving multi-tasking for example. They have a curious ability to do a task and hamster at the same time. Mythbusters did an interesting episode on that.
The natural way of men is honor, loyalty, mastery, courage, strength. Those are our values, and if you don't demonstrate them you are not a man. Look at some of our military mottos, do these sound like they fit the female primacy? Honor Courage Commitment (USN) / Semper Fortis (Always Courages, USN) , Semper Fidelis (Always Faithful, USMC), Aim High Fly-Fight-Win (USAF), This We'll Defend (USA).
The US Navy conducted an unfortunate experiment in the 90s when some top brass wanted the first female F-14 pilot, you know for brownie points. Her name was LCDR Kara Hultgreen.
Most of Naval Aviation resisted heavily because they knew that this isn't something to fuck around with for political girl power points.
People who are 1%er best of the best die when shit gets real in heavy seas on a pitching deck. She was rushed through training. She literally fired herself and her RIO into the water during a stall. I was one of the Rescue Swimmers who looked for any sign of her, the RIO or any part of the airplane for almost 3 days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIS1WNXCgq8
"Female primacy doesn't care" seems to be the motto. They are fine with a boy becoming a girl then kicking everyone's ass in state wrestling. If a dude chops off his dick, he is an overnight hero. We have way too many cat pissed stained ugly cunts in charge.
What TRP can do is rip the mask off. They are getting away with it simply because men are being raised to be simps and defer to women as authority.
kagetsuki32 5y ago
The only way to stop feminism is to make women obsolete sexualy and reproductary for men.
How we do that you ask? With technology. By creating fembots that look 100% humans and have a well developed AI, artificial wombs and ovaries created with the dna of men.
Once women are obsolete to men, feminism die.
[deleted] 5y ago
Or we could just take away their right to vote...
dulkemaru51 5y ago
Strong men build strong societies that make weak men who build weak societies that make strong men. Chaos is coming and feminism will obviously not survive that. Hopefully when strong men rebuild strong society, they will have learned from history and to shut feminism down real quick.
...that last part won't happen, of course.
[deleted] 5y ago
Of course this process will probably take well over 100 years to fully play out. I guess in the meantime we’ll all just live in this dystopian gynocracy.
johnpayne10 5y ago
TRP is about enjoying the decline. Live your life to the fullest and fuck everything else. Ensure your genes remain in the gene pool before you die. I remember a beautiful line from a top post by Whisper. Hope this will help you get over shit.
'So how should we fix this problem....?
....
....
We shouldn't, you fool. We can't. Have you forgotten where you are? You're reading TRP. We are not here to fix society, because our society eats self-sacrificing heroes for breakfast, then demands they buy it lunch.
We are here to survive the collapse.'
doorterblack 5y ago
No, you’re thinking of Jews.
JamesSkepp 5y ago
TRP's goal is not to stop feminism. It's to give power to individual men to become masculine.
That being said, the OP is certainly an interesting (if a "bit" off) theory to ponder about: feminism as an inferiority complex that leads to disdaining the envied person - the man. This happens in real world, disdain what you cant have/be, it happens to both men and women. What the theory lacks is explanation of how this individual inferiority complex turned into movement.
[deleted] 5y ago
Women are the majority of voters. They win simple as that
UnlockYourInnerAlpha 5y ago
I don't know what else to say I guess enjoy our time while we can ????????♂️
"Fuck bitches, get money" The Notorious B.I.G. August 29, 1995
SKRedPill 5y ago
Feminism as it exists today is a product of various forces - toxic shame and unhappiness of being feminine, envy of the masculine, a lust for power and herd mentality (which is what happens when a critical mass is reached) and politics (the female mind has natural talent for politicking) and above all, this burning need for inclusion - women do not like exclusion - that is the prime driver of their motive to invade any space they see as male, including gents toilets. These are all qualities associated with women. So it's ultimately AWALT on steroids - seeking that elusive something elsewhere and wondering why it didn't find what it want there.
Above all, life has become really comfortable -- women don't want to have children, and the basics of life are too easy to obtain now. So either we need Zen monks who can sit there and watch grass grow all day, or they need something to keep themselves engaged in.
However the price for including them is inevitably a conversion of the room into female space.
The other day, the CEO of Pesicorp resigned and all the media wanted to talk about was that it's a woman being replaced by a man and not a question of performance at all, as if there's some conspiracy or something. The feminine lives in a solipsistic reality that to an extent, is detached from the objective, physical reality of the masculine. This is why sometimes we really think women are silly, focusing on the wrong things, but that's solipsism. Having said that, even Pepsicorp's CEO admitted that she doesn't have it all. No one does.
When a woman says anything, just understand it's placing feeling above logic most of the time. She's not interested in scientific data and statistics, they mean nothing to a solipsistic mind that wants to feel that it is special and exceptional. She thinks everyone else is also speaking with feelings first, so if you say that women do not perform at the top, she thinks you hate women. This is actually why more men than women are scientific geeks - even today in the scientific community, more men are in it because they're geeks, and more women are there because they want to be a part of it.
For all the women empowerment that is spoken of, it is ultimately the masculine principle that is sought and respected. The masculine has always been drawing the boundaries and the feminine has always tried to push those boundaries. So in that sense, nothing has changed. The biggest 'rape' of the feminine at a social level has been through women themselves.
There are also others who can use the benefits and who therefore like to play the feminist card.
> Thus the only thing that will calm down women is if men give up their power and societal dominance. I would not recommend you doing that because it isn't a manly thing to do. But what is the way to the future, under such conditions of gender warfare - i do not know.
Don't play Nice Guy at the social level, it's bad enough as it is at a personal level. Instead recognize that men are the gatekeepers of commitment and if they put priority on their freedom, women have no fuel to play with. The truth is that women need men (or the state, which is a proxy for men) far more than men need women (their sex drive not withstanding). You do not give spoiled children (and women) what they need. They will not like you today, but reality cannot be ignored by solipsism forever, and when it hits they'll be grateful for it, if they're still living in reality.
And besides, don't take media articles by women too seriously. They're written by some notably unfeminine women, often a lesbian. The media is a sick house at one end and aims to pander to a deviant minority at the other.
blkMGTOW07 5y ago
I could swear I read this exact comment word for word on a different post.
enterim 5y ago
There is really no point to have the goal to stop feminism. Just use it to your advantage. In the end, feminism will stop itself.
red_philosopher 5y ago
I think this really touches on the core drive of feminism. However, I am sorely disappointed in your weak abdication of male strength to women.
Give up? Just surrender control of my life to someone else? I think not. You can look at this and surrender if you want. Nobody is stopping you. But how much of a beta do you have to be to give the fuck up. Come on.
Besides, women will never succeed as well as men. Men are stronger, endure more, work harder, and are, simply put, better at dealing with (destroying) threats than women are.
If the laws of this world change to make men subject to the whims of female power, don't forget whose strength and blood let them have their moment in the spotlight. Men are the people who's resume is war, battle, and perseverance. Men will never be subjected for long, not by women. It takes strong men to subject other men.
Women don't stand a chance.
ObserverBG 5y ago
I think western men surrendered already. I'm not from the West, but i will just copy paste the comment of one western guy, complaining about western men getting owned by women.
"Good luck doing that with the current laws. In our society, women have 100% of the power, men 0%.
It’s not individual sloth, weakness, or whatever else. It’s a society that made such an airtight system of “safety” and “fairness” and “harmlessness” that it bound itself in an inescapable straitjacket, wherein the only actual dominance now possible is that of the state.
Sure, individually, a man can still occasionally be the master in his own household. But it’s on sufferance. He knows it, she knows it. She goes along because it’s pleasing to her, but she could ruin him with a word.
This is why these “wise precepts” that you’re offering are useless on a society-wide scale. You can only “lead and discipline” if you are PERMITTED to by the woman. Who, legally speaking, has you hopelessly by the balls. Some women permit you to, yes; but in terms of our social/legal climate, it’s a noble agreeing to be ordered around by a peasant. They can still end it at any time, with appalling consequences for the peasant.
It can definitely work for individual men. But you’re not going to save society with it. The straitjacket has to be peeled off and male power restored in order to create even some kind of approximate equality between the sexes (the patriarchy) rather than the one-sided gynarchy of today’s alleged “equalism.”"
"You can be arrested for yelling at a woman. for example. Physical intimidation, or verbal assault.
If you touch her at all during an argument, she could potentially have you arrested for physical assault, even if it’s just a tap on the chest with a forefinger.
Block her freedom of movement in any way, and you are, legally speaking, performing some kind of abuse/assault/criminal confinement if she interprets it that way. For example: Wench: ‘I’m going jogging through the nigger neighborhood at 3 AM.” You: grab her arm “No you’re not.” Wench: “Hello police? My husband just assaulted me and prevented me from leaving the house…” Cops: “Be right there to smash his face in, ma’am.”
There are still lots of women who will comply with reasonable dominance from a guy they like — after all, there are still families.
But to pretend all these hate-filled cat-lady leftist feminist harpies can be somehow rounded up just by the Stare of Amused Mastery is a fantasy. They will remain a massive loose cannon until their wings are clipped somehow — by time eradicating them, by the takeover of foreigners who care nothing for their feminism, or by the legal removal of their power by a patriarchal government.
They’re intractable, and they have close to unlimited power in their dealings with men.
If you keep your woman in check, it’s because she ALLOWS you to. As noted, many will allow you to. But it’s on sufferance, and it’s an individual, not a societal, solution. Because many will NOT allow you to. "
[deleted]
red_philosopher 5y ago
Legal power and real power are different concepts. Women may enforce legal atrocities upon men, but men will always have the option of razing the Earth and starting anew.
expansion101 5y ago
They only have that option on a group level and the whole group of men will not until forced to.
red_philosopher 5y ago
They have that option individually as well. We just chalk it up as men are inherently violent instead of reading underneath it all.
hearse223 5y ago
There's billionaires behind modern feminism, there are no billionaires putting money into the TRP doctrine or educating young men.
Maybe TRP should crowdfund a school?
zephyrprime 5y ago
" trying to be dominant, superior, etc. simply triggers societal female envy against men, thus TRP is self-defeating. "
Ok you are right about penis envy but you have a very low level of understanding of real world women. IE, you're just a noob and you just discovered something everyone already knew on TRP.
I don't disagree with you about how women act in the political realm where one-on-one political interactions are not possible for most people (ie, I can't just walk over to some Prime Minister and start advising him on how to run shit). However, in the personal realm, when women have their penis envy triggered by a superior acting male, it will cause her to want to fuck him. In fact, this is the primary form of attraction women feel. (Attraction due to looks is very secondary in women unlike in men where attraction is primarily due to looks.)
Lateralanouncer 5y ago
Why would a Trp man want to stop feminism. Pussy with out having to slave your life to one woman is awesome.
CainPrice 5y ago
Feminism isn't something to be "stopped" anyway. It's something to be understood.
Here's the deal: Barring a few outliers, men are stronger than women. Any given man at any given time, if he really, really wanted to, could rape, murder, rob, or beat any given woman. Obviously, 99.999999 percent of men would never even consider doing that, but any one man could.
As a result, women live with this constant...I don't want to call it fear. More like tension or awareness. Women live with this constant awareness of men. Women are always aware of the men in the room and are always screening men for potential creepiness, aggression, or other signs of danger. Because men are stronger than women, and while 99.99999 percent of men would never hurt her, it only takes one man who says fuck it and quits playing along for that day to become the worst day of that woman's life.
Deep down inside, women feel powerless. And they are. The only reason a woman can walk to the bus stop without being raped is because men choose to behave themselves. That woman is utterly dependent upon men choosing to allow her to travel safely. When a construction worker catcalls her or a guy at the bar keeps talking to her and won't take a hint, this serves as an ever-present reminder that men don't have to take her comfort into consideration if they really don't want to. She can't do anything about it, except maybe complain to other men and hope men keep each other in line.
Feminism is women lashing out at this constant feeling of powerlessness. It's the idea that we need to teach men and boys to live a certain way and believe certain things from a very young age. It's an attempt to socially engineer society to compensate for the biological fact that men are stronger than women.
It's women's only hope. If they can't engineer society to keep men in check, they're done for. Because men are stronger, and any given man at any given time can rape or murder any woman he wants.
yesjustoh 5y ago
If feminism is equality of the sexes, I am 100% for it.
However, I’m sensing that your definition of feminism and my definition of feminism are quite different.
Your whole argument for feminism is “women need feminism so that men don’t rape and kill women. Otherwise, women are done for.”
Simply because a man has the CAPACITY for great evil does not mean that he IS that evil. Jesus christ, what an asinine justification. I could replace “woman” with “man” in almost every one of your paragraphs and it would still make sense.
“Any given woman at any given time, if she really, really wanted to, could rape, murder, shoot, or beat any given man. Obviously, 99.999999 percent of women would never even consider doing that, but any one woman could.
It only takes one woman who says fuck it and quits playing along for that day to become the worst day of that man’s life.
TRP is men lashing out at this constant feeling of powerlessness. It's the idea that we need to teach women and girls to live a certain way and believe certain things from a very young age. It's an attempt to socially engineer society.”
Until the day they invent a trigger a woman can’t pull, I do not agree that women “can’t do anything about it.”
Men want to fuck (like any normal human), but they don’t want to rape. The only thing you are teaching our young boys is that their sexuality is shameful, that their manhood is unnecessary, that they should repress themselves because their biology “rapes and murders” women. Are men not more than their basest instincts?
Let me extend an olive branch. There are some guys that come home from a long day’s work, lose it, and go absolutely apeshit on some poor woman. Those guys should be sentenced to life behind bars and buried underneath the prison. If I can admit that, can you at least admit that it’s a LITTLE preposterous to have rape at the forefront of your mind when you clearly state you KNOW that 99.99999% of men wouldn’t even dream of doing so?
All men do not want to rape you. All men are not slaves to their desires. Feminism does not prevent rape and murder any more than religion prevents sin.
CainPrice 5y ago
You're thinking rationally, like a man, instead of emotionally, like a woman.
In woman world, because any one man could rape a woman, all men are potential rapists. And men are stronger, so short of shooting people as you suggest, there's not much women can do to protect themselves. Women's sexual power - their very ability to choose who gets to talk to them at a bar and who gets to take them home tonight - is utterly dependent upon men choosing not to rape them.
This is why women go so apeshit over a loser at the bar not taking the hint and continuing to talk to them, and they act like he's practically raping a woman just by speaking. Because she's uncomfortable, and this man is reminding her that she actually has no right to be comfortable, except for the rights that men let her have. Taking her comfort away is just a lesser form of rape to a woman. Women feel that they ought to have the power to control who gets to speak to them and vie for their sexual attention tonight, and loser men who don't get it take that power away from them.
Women feel utterly powerless, because only reason they have any safety or any rights at all is because men are playing along. Men let them have rights. But men don't actually have to respect women. They can harass women all night long at the bar, and women act like all of these men are little micro-rapes about to happen because in their world, that's the case. The mere existence of men they don't like interacting with them reminds them that they don't actually have any power. Men are stronger.
Feminism is all about social engineering to try to compensate for men being stronger. A man will always have the physical power to rape a woman, but feminism genuinely believes that with enough time and social engineering, it can cow men into submission through subtle education of young boys.
yesjustoh 5y ago
No, I use both emotion and rationality. Drawing distinctions between how men and women has its uses, but it’s counterproductive to progress. Men are capable of understanding how women think, just like how women are capable of understanding how men think. Thinking has no gender.
There’s a point where a line in the sand has to be drawn. Feminism has ballooned to a point where it no longer champions equality, but instead champions inequality to fix perceived inequalities.
To suggest that women feel like they have no rights is absurd, my friend. You’re trying to make a mile of an inch.
Sure, walking down a dark alley at night may make one fear rape and murder. But that is, again, gender indiscriminate. There is a big difference between feeling “unsafe” and “without rights”.
The latter is what feminists should be fighting for. The former is an inescapable part of life that every human being, regardless of gender, endures on a daily basis.
The repercussions of “cowing” men into submission are far more drastic, and I can guarantee it won’t solve the rate of murder and rape. It may even exacerbate it.
Do not assume I don’t understand feminism, I get where it’s coming from. But every movement needs an end, and that time is now. Feminism is going too far.
CainPrice 5y ago
That's all fine and good, but there's no ending to feminism. You can't "stop" it, only understand it and learn how to get yours in the modern world.
It's not a matter of whether feminism is right or wrong. Because it's not a question of right or wrong. It's a question of how women feel and what they want.
As long as women perceive themselves as less than they want to be and as long as they want more, and as long as men want to have sex with women and are willing to put up with their shit to do so, there's no end to the modern feminine world.
There is zero chance of some male revolution against feminism. At least not one that will actually have any effect. Understanding the world we live in and how to navigate it is how you end up having sex and money and living a life you can tolerate in a world that would rather you had none of that because you have a penis.
yesjustoh 5y ago
Simply navigating chummy waters isn’t enough. Let’s agree to disagree.
-Fidelio- 5y ago
Wrong. Majority of white women voted for Trump, not democrats. Any in between polls should be taken as trustworthy as the 97% chance of clinton winning polls were.
Not to mention all the women distraughtly saying they had sexual dreams about Trump. This is a guy in his seventies and twenty-thirty year old bloggers are having sex dreams about him while they say they hate him.
Don't look at what women say, look at what they do.
ObserverBG 5y ago
1 I said women, not white women. Women as a whole are quite hostile to Trump.
2 Less white women voted for "Alpha Male" Trump than for Romney. The gender gap among whites has actually increased under Trump.
3 Among the newest generation, white women prefer Clinton, white men Trump.
4 Polls were correct in the sense that Clinton won the popular vote, so most americans did dupport Clinton, and Trump was only saved by the specifics of the US electoral system.
5 Bannon just said that the white college educated female republican is now dead, because Trump triggers them.
6 European polls show that european women, but not men, became more hostile to the US right after Trump won. Western women in general were more hostile to Trump.
[deleted] 5y ago
5 is 100% true. Every white female educated conservative I know is not supporting Trump. Because they can’t stand that he just says the truth without concern for their feelings.
RepealThe19th
-Fidelio- 5y ago
I think you're just failing to see the chasm between what women say and what they act on.
ObserverBG 5y ago
Politically they act in a hostile way. Yes, they may hate fuck the republican voter, but they will also vote for more alimony to be taken from him :)
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
First of all, penis envy is a tone-deaf ego-boosting rationalization for what is happening. It's too easy to call it penis envy, because that makes you feel good. Women are just jealous they're not us. yeahhhh
I think it can better be explained by female solipsism, coupled with how mainstream culture works.
First of all, women are absolutely clueless when it comes to understanding what attracts a mate. Women will often mimic what they find attractive in a mate because they are unaware that the traits that make up attraction are not the same for men and women. That's why you see women getting shorter hair cuts, tattoos, and cultivating rough, masculine attitudes instead of the kinder attitudes men are actually attracted to.
Of course, since men are horny and there is a finite supply of women, most women will never receive negative feedback from these choices, or if they do, it will be only from a small portion of their potential dating pool, which they can promptly ignore. Women's sexual success will come in spite of their efforts. Men's sexual success is because of his efforts. Hypoagency/Hyperagency. Passive/Active.
Finally, women are herd animals. They need to follow in order to fit in. Their survival has always been dependent on not rocking the boat. So when pop culture says shoulder pads are in, most will blindly follow. Not because they wish they were men, but because they saw it on Oprah.
[deleted]
[deleted] 5y ago
Wtf is this garbage? I think you got lost on the way to XX
Blackhawk2479 5y ago
Ultimately, feminism will destroy feminism, we just need to keep handling it like the giant shit test that it is until that happens.
UnlockYourInnerAlpha 5y ago
How if you don't mind me asking?
Blackhawk2479 5y ago
You’ve already had some great responses, but I’ll add my thoughts.
At the micro-level, feminism teaches women that it’s desirable to do what men do - to have the same goals and ambitions. So they go to university, they get a job. They work 9-5 building a career at the expense of creating a family, then they reach their mid-to-late thirties with nothing to show for their efforts. If they’re wealthy and smart they may have frozen some eggs, but most of them will be without a partner and fast approaching - if not already at - the wall, having denied themselves the chance to fulfil their one true biological imperative. Feminism fails these women.
At the macro-level, fourth-wave feminism has brought with it the concept of “rape culture” and movements such as #metoo. The problem is that if you give a woman an inch, she will take a mile. We’re already seeing these things being taken to absurdity; girls tweeting “omg an ugly guy just said hi to me in the street! #metoo” and corporate environments where it’s increasingly difficult for men and women to work together for fear of false sexual harassment allegations. Feminism is failing these women because society as a whole will grow increasingly disinterested with the noise that is drowning out genuine concerns. It’s the boy who cried wolf.
At the top-level, corporations will cede more and more power to women - pressure to hire based on gender will increase, big business will increasingly be judged on the number of women it employs in the top roles, hiring because of who you are, not what you offer. Companies will lose their edge, profits will drop and companies that don’t play along will vastly outperform those run by women. You can apply this to countries as well; women will get to the very top and they won’t know what to do once they are there. With nobody to lead, society will decline, feminism will fail us at the global scale.
What happens then is the “patriarchy” will step in to begin the rebuild. We’ll return to a state not dissimilar to how things were a couple of hundred years ago, and the cycle begins again.
JamesSkepp 5y ago
By moving the goalpost all the time. If we compare feminism to revolutions there's one thing in common for sure, the witch hunts for the "enemies of the revolution". They both have to find another and another way to blame others for their bad situation. At some point you will start run out of real enemies and will have to begin to look for them amidst your own, which ALWAYS happened so far.
On top of that you have to add saturation of media and people's minds with the subject and 24h news cycle. When 9/11 happened people were in shock. Today nobody gives a fuck if 100 people die in car bombing. Columbine was a shock, today school shooting is basically a monthly TV series, nobody cares. Same thing with feminism: they have to move the goalpost b/c once the previous goal was fulfilled, their movement becomes pointless. As with any revolution, if it fulfils it's goals the people who lead it are no longer needed. Nobody wants to give up the power. In feminism's case power is substituted with attention (from women, men, media, social media) - they don't want the attention to stop flowing, so they have to come up with more enemies and more hardcore ideas. Thus while it started with "we want the right to vote" went through "kill all men" and we now end up with "lesbians are oppressed by trannies fake penises and want the L removed from LGBT name"
[deleted] 5y ago
In the meantime... old white males have become the new Kulaks...
iLLprincipLeS 5y ago
Currently, there is a very high birth rate in Africa and in Muslim countries, the average total fertility rate is 4 in Africa and 3,1 in Muslim countries. Africa is projected to have 4 billion people, and MENA 1 billion people. Nigeria alone is projected to have 400 million people in 2050. In most Latino countries, there is a positive birth rate, with the exception of Brasil. Birth rate is positive in India as well. On the other hand, white female TFR in the US is 1.75, in Europe 1.5, in Canada 1.5. The replacement rate is 2.1, and in the event of race mixing, you will need more than 2.1 in order to simply sustain the white population at one level. Even in western countries with relatively high birth rates, the people who are having kids are usually non-white women, as more than 50 percent of US newborn and more than 38 percent of French newborn are already non-white. White female TFR is negative in all western countries. Therefore white people will disappear if they do not change their behavior.
In all feminist countries, you have negative birth rates that could lead to the disappearance of the native population if birth rates are not raised. Whites in the US are projected to disappear in 300 years. In all feminist societies you have massive third-worldization, lowering of IQ, race mixing with blacks, conversions to Islam, etc. The most feminist country in the world – Sweden, is dying right now due to third world/Muslim immigration. Muslims are outbreeding Europeans in almost all European countries.
Barbarism, to paraphrase Lenin, is the last stage of feminism. Sparta, where women became very influential, died due to low birth rate. In decadent Rome, they were ultimately forced to tax single people in order to get them to marry and have kids. Remember what happened to the late Roman Empire - low birth rates, people did not want to get married, men thought that women became unmarriable, infanticide, depopulation, extreme promiscuity, easy divorce, repeal of anti-luxury laws, etc.. Those masses of low IQ people swarming the Europeans are merely the symptom, not the cause. They are just like the opportunistic infection that takes advantage of an already weakened organism. The real cause though, is the weak immune system of the organism.
Luxury corrupts. Feminism is decadent behavior that can only occur in rich and powerful countries, who feel that they are not threatened by anything, and can therefore engage in various types of decadent behaviors that are actually weakening them. J. D. Unwin found that after a nation becomes prosperous, it becomes increasingly liberal with regard to sexual morality and as a result loses it cohesion, its impetus and its purpose. The effect, he says, could be irrevocable. The British historian Sir John Glubb noticed that proto-feminism emerged in the later stages of various civilizations, before they collapsed. These are the stages of civilizations:
The age of outburst (or pioneers).
The age of conquests.
The age of commerce.
The age of affluence.
The age of intellect.
The age of decadence. (We are here. Decline could also be observed, as the western share of the world's economy and population is constantly declining, while at the same time the West has become the most indebted region of the world). The age of Decadence is marked by: Defensiveness (for example by building border walls), pessimism, materialism, frivolity, an influx of foreigners, feminisation, the welfare state, a weakening of religion. Decadence is due to: too long a period of wealth and power. Selfishness, love of money, the loss of a sense of duty.
This is how feminism destroys itself:
It destroys itself due to its low, negative birth rates, leading to population decline of the feminised group. (You could clearly observe this in Europe, where there is Islamization going on and European cultures and peoples are dying). In the US, liberal white women are the group with the lowest birth rate and republican states have higher birth rate than liberal states. Coincidentally or not, the white women with the highest birth rate are from countries that banned abortion (Argentine and Ireland). One of the reasons why German women do not want to vote for their anti-immigration party (who wants to increase the german birth rate), is because they don't want to be mothers or to have more than one kid.
It destroys itself because it is dysgenic (dumb women have more kids, while smart and career women are often childless). For example 40 percent of German college educated women are childless. This leads to IQ drop. Right now the IQ of western populations is dropping, and east Asian students are now outperforming western students according to PISA surveys, with some eastern european countries now outperforming western countries as well.
When low IQ people move to more feminised countries, they find an already existing parasitic environment (created by women) that is particularly well suited for people like them. Women there already complain that they are victims, that they are oppressed, that men are privileged, that they deserve special quotas and affirmative action, that they should be given stuff via the welfare system, via special (without competitive bidding) government contracts and loans, via special grants and scholarships for women and minorities, or via alimony and divorce. Obviously that environment will be great for low IQ "Give me, Give me, I'm Victim" people as well and they too will join the party and start behaving that way (until there are too many takers and the whole redistribution system collapses). In contrast, low IQ migrants won't find a parasitic environment like that in Turkey, Israel or Japan. No one there feels guilty, could be made to feel guilty, or is going to give them anything.
Men evolved to protect the perimeter against males from other (mainly patriarchal) tribes (chimps do the same). Having women involved in decisions about the perimeter (think of Merkel or Swedish feminists) results in what we see – open borders, multiculture, diversity, “tolerance”, border chaos.
In nature, when you weaken the local males, then other males move in and replace them. You can observe this among lions, among primates, or among europeans. After feminist women (with the encouragement of jews) weakened their own men, then other men (muslims) started moving in. Males are the immune system of society. The nationalism that they create is the wall. Without them, there is no nationalism or resistance to foreigners. Weaken them, and then other foreigners, often males, start moving in.
Thus, we can expect any ethnic group with large female influence and female leadership to self destroy, as the female leadership will not care about preserving their own ethnicity or group cohesion, leading to the feminised group opening their borders, trying to help anyone in need, accepting anyone in, and eventually becoming a minority in their own country.
Women, for the most part, care about resources and smoothing conflict over. They evolved to fill that role. Women are less likely to support military action even against ISIS, a group known for enslaving women and using them as sex slaves, and are less likely to support ban on muslim immigration. Stockholm Syndrome is more pronounced in females . Women were frequently taken captive by (or in some cases traded to) other groups, and so they evolved to smooth things over with distant groups (whereas their male kinfolk were simply killed). The survival of their genes, unless they were exceptionally ugly, was more or less guaranteed – whichever tribe they end up being with. That is why they are more accepting of foreigners and foreign rule. Men form tribes. Women join tribes. So, women tend to vote for resource redistribution (from men) and being nice to everybody (including those who aren’t in their group), and for helping anyone in need, regardless of their group.
Theory is that if you want to destroy an ethnic group, simply increase female influence in that group. Increase it a lot. And voila. Since females don’t care about ethnicity that much, and are less xenophobic, the country will open it’s borders, will try to help anyone in need, and will welcome everyone. As a bonus, you will also get a negative birth rate for the feminized host group.
All kinds of other ethnic, religious and racial groups will move in, and will start vying for dominance; as for the feminized host group, its fate is to become a minority in its own country, to mix with the foreigners, and then to ultimately disappear.
Rick_OShay1 5y ago
Whenever you ask them how "strength through diversity" works, they either jump the gun and go apeshit, or they try to act like skin color or sexual preference goes hand-in-hand with skill.
SirKromsu 5y ago
I cannot believe a single comment could change so many things in my mind. Damn. Where can I find more reading like this?
johnpayne10 5y ago
Amazing post man. 'Men form tribes. Women join tribes.' Absolute truth. The way things are moving it makes me wonder if Islam would rule the world in another 500-800 years. The satisfying part of it would be utter destruct of feminist ideology. The not-so-satisfying part of it would be a possible destruction of our genes from the gene pool or conversion of our future generations to Islam.
dulkemaru51 5y ago
Good comment.
Moly said something catchy af (paraphrasing): "White people are extremely accommodating and tolerant... until they are not". Meaning that Europeans will take it on the chin repeatedly, for a long time, until they decide to fucking slaughter everybody. Not saying that it's what will inevitably happen but it's a fun observation.
Scandinavia is a truly repulsive Gomorrahn circus. There is definitely a lot of interracial breeding occurring, but it's actually less common than one'd think for the most primitive groups such as Afghanis and Somalis to breed with Nordic women. But yeah, the nature of aggressive broads and weak men who follow them in hopes of getting pussy is to shame and publicly lynch everyone who's against paying (and forcing their unborn children to pay) for cavemen to invade their lands and establish their own states in the ghettos of the actual state. The declining birthrates of the locals, the overall IQ drop, the astronomical debt that is ever growing because of the money invested in private jets flown to Afghanistan to import young, primitive men into a country will keep skyrocketing violent crime, rape, ideological polarization and taxes.
We could likely name most of the possible outcomes of this development, but what makes it so difficult to safely bet on any single one of them and to have consensus, is the fact that the world has never experienced this exact phenomenon. Soft men have always been punked by hard men, whether in school or by immigration. Entitled bitches who claim to want equality have always gained supremacy. Culture clashes have seldom entailed 'enrichment' for either or any of the sides. But, the thing is that the number of immigrants, the number of people on earth in total, the complete polar opposite nature of the tribes involved, the abundance in resources, the incredible power of the state, mass media's ability to influence absolutely everyone to some degree and all of that permeated by a technological level with no prior comparison, even if there exist numerous parallels, the amount and the potency of the ingredients in this pot are on such a trippy level that there is guaranteed to be some universe-bending shit happening.
This might seem very distant and therefore unreal to guys who have barely had one street fight, but unless you are over 75 years of age (or something), you will see some Sci-fi type Game of Thrones shit go down.
[deleted]
BostonPillParty 5y ago
Holy shit this needs to be a separate post. High value content right here.
SKRedPill 5y ago
This should be a separate post in itself - a lot of effort and points here. Please make it into one.
UnlockYourInnerAlpha 5y ago
Before i read this thank you for the time and effort you went through shakes hands
Quo210 5y ago
Education like this shouldn't be free. Thank you
saibot83 5y ago
TLDR: Women are the useful idiots of the elite.
Suzyinthecity 5y ago
You make a number of valid points, unfortunately when you start referring to non whites as less intelligent it becomes pretty clear that your are positing racist views under the guise of trp. I don't believe we as a community should be subscribing to the whites are better jews are bad blacks are dumb type of drivel. I wouldn't be surprised to find out you are a well edu cated troll who is in fact trying to get trp banned or filled with vile stormfront members.
Rick_OShay1 5y ago
It's all about TRUE education, rather than the indoctrination we receive posing as education. How does one explain the likes of Thomas Sowell?
pussykiller009 5y ago
THIS !! And many people are here congratulating him. This guy is clearly the guy with a low IQ here. Some people still think that race can affect someone ´s IQ This guy should be banned.
187oddfuture 5y ago
Repeal the 19th and we can prevent the worst of this, and start making positive change
Cantloginhere 5y ago
It is inevitable that everyone will be mixed race one day, all societies will go through westernisation, feminism, shrinking population, and probably become one country.
You'll be dead by then anyway so stop worrying about it.
[deleted]
[deleted] 5y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
WWOOF 5y ago
"After feminist women (with the encouragement of jews)" What encouragement did they specifically receive?
ayeayecaptn123 5y ago
Other than financing (from the likes of Soros), the Jews were the ones that created communism from which PC and feminism come from.
Political correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour on all Europeans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution. Social revolution has a long history, conceivably going as far back as Plato’s Republic. But it was the French Revolution of 1789 that inspired Karl Marx to develop his theories in the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, the success of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in Russia (which was over 70% Jewish. I possess the list of names, ethnicities and functions of those higher ranking revolutioners, but I don't have it on my mobile phone here) set off a wave of optimistic expectation among the Marxist forces in Europe and America that the new proletarian world of equality was finally coming into being. Russia, as the first communist nation in the world, would lead the revolutionary forces to victory. The Marxist revolutionary forces in Europe leaped at this opportunity. Following the end of World War I, there was a Communist “Spartacist” uprising in Berlin, Germany led by Rosa Luxemburg (a Polish Jew); the creation of a “Soviet” in Bavaria led by Kurt Eisner (the German communist revolution's leaders were 10 out of 15 Jewish) and a Hungarian communist republic established by Bela Kun (his father was a Jew) in 1919. At the time, there was great concern that all of Europe might fall under the banner of Bolshevism. This sense of impending doom was given vivid life by Trotsky’s Red Army invasion of Poland in 1919. However, the Red Army was defeated by Polish forces at the battle of the Vistula in 1920. The Spartacist, Bavarian Soviet and Bela Kun governments all failed to gain widespread support from the workers and after a brief time they were all overthrown...
I need not remind you of which ethnicity were the creators of the Communist manifesto; Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society’s cultural “superstructure”, rather than on the economic substructures as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.
Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media.
As for the Jew Lukacs, he believed that for a new Marxist culture to emerge, the existing culture must be destroyed. He said: “I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch,” and, “Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.” In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University (known as the Frankfurt school).
The Frankfurt School’s studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to criticise the bases of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism. These criticisms, known collectively as Critical Theory, were reflected in such works of the Frankfurt School as Erich Fromm’s Escape from Freedom and The Dogma of Christ, Wilhelm’s Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism and Theodor Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality. For example, The Authoritarian Personality became a handbook for a national campaign against any kind of prejudice or discrimination on the theory that if these evils were not eradicated, another Holocaust might occur on the European continent. This campaign, in turn, provided a basis for political correctness.
Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School (Georg Lukacs(Jew), Antonio Gramsci, Wilhelm Reich(Jew), Erich Fromm(Jew), Herbert Marcuse(Jew), Theodor Adorno(his father a Jew), ...) recognised that traditional beliefs and the existing social structure would haveto be destroyed and then replaced. The patriarchal social structure would be replaced with matriarchy; the belief that men and women are different and properly have different roles would be replaced with androgyny; and the belief that heterosexuality is normal would be replaced with the belief that homosexuality is equally “normal.”
They believed that oppressed Muslims, non European minorities and others like Feminists and Homosexuals could be the vanguard of a revolution in Europe, which proved to be true in the following century.
So, they did not only get encouragement from the Jews. The Jews created them (PC, SJW, Feminists) through decades of social engineering in the Jewish-Marxist ideals.
To conclude, whenever such a dire problem arises explore its roots, its cause. More often than not will you find a Jew somewhere in there. Keep in mind that this is but a scratch of the JQ.
Rick_OShay1 5y ago
A tiny band of Ex-Jews loyal to the Vatican did it give their devout, former brethren a bad name. People like you prove that that particular Jesuit conspiracy was a complete success.
TheBasedLibertarian 5y ago
Could you emphasise more on the reason why the Jewish identities of said individuals was relevant? Genuinely curious. From what I’ve heard, Jews have higher IQ, and thus are overrepresented at the top of political movements, hence why people like Murray Rothbard (an Anarcho-Capitalist) is also a Jew.
ayeayecaptn123 5y ago
Jews are overrepresented partly due to nepotism even though your IQ claim is correct. How else do you explain that US has 0.2% of Jews in their population yet 48% of US billionares are Jews? Doesn't smell like corruption to you? Don't even get me started on the amount of them in the US politics and media worldwide.
It is relevant because they are the founders of communism, thus also of both political correctness and 3rd wave feminism which stem from it and have together brought West on its knees in terms of morality and security. From denying biology with there being multiple genders, transgenderism, socialism, white privilege, toxic masculinity, borders being imaginary lines, proclaiming unequal things equal etc. all masked behind social justice, tolerance and love.
TheBasedLibertarian 5y ago
For the same reason why black people make up most basketball players or men make up most positions as CEOs for companies. Slight average differences between populations creates extreme over-representation in certain fields. EDIT: Don’t know if you’re already aware, but the over representation argument is identical to the argument made by modern feminists and the left in general. Although I definitely agree with you that Jews are more nepotistic, which also contributes to over representation to some degree. I’m just not seeing the big conspiracy in all this.
Rick_OShay1 5y ago
It's a Jesuit conspiracy to make Jews look bad. Convert a tiny number to Catholicism, keep their conversion secret, and then order them to do various tasks to give their devout, peaceful, law-abiding former brethren a bad name.
Truly, the Vatican pulled it off.
poohead3 5y ago
Mods please don't shoah this post.
[deleted]
chazthundergut 5y ago
Stop feminism from what exactly?
Why would a high value man care what some penis-jealous knitting circle is doing?
Y'all are some pussies if you're afraid of feminists (and chicks in general). Your ancestors had armies of screaming mongols to deal with. What are you so fucking scared of? A rape accusation from some goofy bitch? A biased education system? Feminists are just a bunch of bitter broads who are dying for a real man to dick them down. If you are worried about feminists, just wait till you've got real enemies gunning for you.
Jesus we are getting soft.
Celicni 5y ago
I dunno about you, but for some reason I'd love this world to be a better place. I'd like my race to not go fucking extinct. I want victory over the enemy(descendants of the screaming mongols you're talking about, that my country is bordering). We're losing the battle right now.
chazthundergut 5y ago
We are losing the battle.
Because the screaming mongols aren't sitting around scared of false rape accusations and feminist knitting circles.
They are riding into town and fucking your women because you're too pussy to dick then down the way they need to be. Too frightened by internet horror stories.
False rape accusations are like AIDS
Be aware. Be smart. But dont let the circlejerk of panic prevent you from getting your dick sucked because you're worried about what the knitting circle is up to. Fuck all that.
Go forth and conquer. Starting with this fear so many of you have of your own women. Your race depends on it.
blkMGTOW07 5y ago
I agree with you 100% but keep in mind what these so called "goofy bitches" are capable of doing to men using the state or white knights/beta cucks to do their dirty work.
With the change of how society works, we nave little reason to fear death the way our ancestors did. With that came new dangers to be aware of (false rape allegations, divorce rape, child manipulation against fathers, etc.).
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
I'm not afraid of women. I'm afraid of the men who take orders from the women. You know, the guys with guns called the government.
chazthundergut 5y ago
I would cut off my own nuts before I stopped fucking women out of fear of what the government might do about it.
But that's just me. I recommend you take the safe route, and stay way from chicks altogether. It's too dangerous, and like you said there are guys with guns who take orders from women. Better not risk it.
Good luck out there guys.
[deleted] 5y ago
You're a bit simple
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
Well said.
chazthundergut 5y ago
I am very simple.
For example, I simply am not afraid of chicks. I'm not afraid of pissing them off, not afraid of flirting with them, and not afraid of fucking them.
And to be honest, I'm a little disappointed by how terrified of chicks TRP has turned out to be. Especially considering how obsessed with alpha we are.
Arthas93 5y ago
I believe that you are a muscular, rich, handsome man. If you are a handsome man or a rich guy all woman accept you easily, they approach you and often show in public, crystal clear signs of interest in you. To the point that they will touch you, play with your hair, laugh at anything you say, bit their bottom lip and literally "ask for it". I see it happen every day.
If you are a handsome men, or a rich guy, you don't understand why other men have so much difficulty and are afraid of what females can do. If you are a handsome or rich guy, you don't understand how females can easily destroy a men's life.
Because, all your life, all females, always liked you, talked with you, showed easy sexual interest in you, you didn't even need to saying or do anything. They just spontaneously sucked you dick.
So when you talk from a privileged point. Ridiculing others by saying "And to be honest, I'm a little disappointed by how terrified of chicks TRP has turned out to be. Especially considering how obsessed with alpha we are." Many men today are afraid because those woman destroyed their lives. Divorce raped them, false rape allegations, etc.
You sound like a rich man ridiculing a poor people.
"How can those poor men be afraid of starvation? Just go and eat. I am not afraid of hunger. I just park my Lamborghini in any restaurant and eat whatever I want."
"How can those ugly men be afraid of chicks? I am so simple, things are so simple for me. Just go ahead and fuck the chicks, disrespect them, etc."
Perhaps you are saying those ignorant things because your reality is different than that of others. But don't fool yourself, for the majority of us men, females will not think twice before using the government and the full force of the law to fuck us permanently.
"I am very simple." Life is easy for you, good. Take it all. But don't go around belittling other peoples fears.
IF you are a handsome man, the "chicks" will tolerate that behavior and often than not, let you off the hook. IF you aren't handsome however, get ready for some lawyer action. She will sue you for rape, win, and ruin your life.
Only handsome men, ignorant of their advantages, belittle the fears and difficulties that ugly men have. Females give you security, validation, satisfaction, confidence, pussy. Don't think that they give those things for all men.
The woman want to stay with you because you are handsome and photos/relationship with you will generate a lot of attention and validation from other females in her Facebook/Instagram.
Woman love validation, and attention from the hundreds of people in their social media. And they love to make other woman jealous/envious of what they have and the man they fuck. There are few things in the world that gives more pleasure to a woman than to make another woman jealous of her.
chazthundergut 5y ago
Thanks for the thoughtful response let me address some of your points:
I am short (5'9") fat (280 lbs) and bald. I am muscular because I follow TRP advice and lift like a madman. I shaved my bald head down to zero and grew out a big bushy beard. I have done well financially, but chicks rarely know that until they've come back to my place (I never flaunt money because it attracts the wrong type). I do dress nicely though (as nice as a fat guy can dress). Yea, some women find me attractive. But no, I am not some handsome tall stud.
Yes I have had chicks "touch you, play with your hair, laugh at anything you say, bit their bottom lip and literally "ask for it". I see it happen every day." ... this is not because I am so good looking. It's because I have the right mindset around women. I am the man. I am relaxed and confident and comfortable in my body. I have strong frame and I am grounded in my own reality. Chicks do not intimidate me. I don't need validation from her, I dont need attention from her, I don't need anything from her. Chicks find this attractive. I am not afraid of her.
So what are you boys so frightened of. So far there have been two overwhelming points which are completely valid
Divorce rape. Terrible. The court systems are stacked against us. Alimony, child support, garnished wages, etc. I get it. The thing is I'm a dude so instead of sitting around like a couple chicks complaining about it, I look for a solution. Do not get married ... can a chick force you to get married to her? Fuck no. So don't do it you stupid bastards. That doesn't mean don't talk to them or flirt or tease or fuck. It doesn't mean hide from women the rest of your life because some other guy got divorce raped. It means don't marry them. Do not get married ... you see how that works? I just sidestepped half of what you guys are so scared of. Afraid of getting her pregnant? Wear a condom. Get your tubes tied. Whatever. It isn't rocket science.
^ but look you already know all this. You already know that by being responsible and keeping your wits about you, you can all but eliminate false rape accusations. I've fucked almost 20 chicks and none of them have even hinted at rape. And again I'm not some handsome stud I'm a regular fat guy.
What is the real issue?
The real issue is that you and many other men on these forums are intimidated by women. I get it. Especially when you haven't had much success, chicks can be very intimidating.
But you must get over it. She is a lioness and dangerous, yes. But you are the fucking lion
Start acting like it.
Arthas93 5y ago
I see. Somethings you wrote don't really add up to me. But that is my opinion. I am a very skeptical guy, So I often think that others are lying to me. What you say sounds somewhat nice, but it also screams trap.
I don't want to help inflate the females already gigantic egos. Treating them nice is not really a solution, it is just pandering and woman worshiping. It is what they want. They want men to treat them nice without they themselves having to treat men nice in return.
They want the guy to pay for her, to take them to a nice place, to keep showing interest in them, to protect, to provide, to do literally everything like a slave. But they also have the security to just get his things with a divorce or destroy him with a FRA (false rape allegation).
Power corrupts. And females today are more powerful than ever before. They are absolutely drunk with power, they have so many rights and privileges that they don't even know what to do with it all.
They all are corrupt, never forget that, there are no unicorns. There are no exceptions, AWALT.
So you say you are an ugly guy that is successful with females because of your "personality" and "Confidence™". Let's be honest, females only care about money and looks. No amount of personality or confidence™ can get you pussy if you are ugly.
Either you are handsome and truthfully get pussy but lied about being ugly/bald/fat or you are ugly and lied about getting pussy.
HumanSockPuppet 5y ago
Newsflash: TRP's goal never was, nor ever will be, to stop feminism.
TRP is just a tool box.
What is the goal of a box of tools? Nothing. It's an inanimate object.
Craftsmen have goals. Toolboxes help them achieve those goals.
You are the craftsman. What do you want to build?
Rick_OShay1 5y ago
Is it because Feminism is too big to defeat outside of a miracle?
HumanSockPuppet 5y ago
No. Feminism will defeat itself.
It will eat itself from the inside as members engage in increasingly pitched battles over who is more oppressed, and throw each other under buses trying to get the most attention from a steadily dwindling population of men who still give a shit.
[deleted]
GodOfDinosaurs 5y ago
Why isn't this the top comment. This isn't a fucking political movement.
justtenofusinhere 5y ago
Women saw how happy men were and decided they couldn't be happy unless they had the same opportunities to pursue the same goals, for surely it was the opportunity that made men so happy.
Women obtained the freedom of opportunity and saw that men were still happier, so they demanded the same outcomes as men, because surely it was the outcomes that were making men so happy.
Women obtained those outcomes and saw that men were still happier so they demanded to have the larger share of those outcomes. becuase that was surely why the men were so happy.
Women obtained the larger share of the pie and saw that men were still happier, so demanded the right to be men because surely that was why men were so happy.
Women realized that they cannot be men, so demanded that men be prohibted from being men, because women could not be happy knowing that men had a happiness they were denied.
Now women are looking upon all the men trapped in misery because they do not know themselves. Women are very happy about men's misery, but are finding that that happiness isn't enough to make them happy.
SKRedPill 5y ago
Bravo...and there lay the world's biggest illusion.
The truth is men are seemingly happier only because the grass is green from the other side. This is female naivety at its best.
> Women are very happy about men's misery, but are finding that that happiness isn't enough to make them happy.
LOL this. It's time they realized their misery was self created the whole time.
[deleted]
zyqkvx 5y ago
That's brilliant but I'm having cognitive dissonance. Its the women who are walking around in leisure like millionaires even if they are upper lower class. It's the men that are slaving away and miserable from being divorce raped. It's the men that are supplicating 'Stewart' types and women that are walking around doing whatever the fuck they want like a sexist male CEO did in the past.
I don't know if what you said and I said contradict each other. It's certainly ironic. One thing for sure is women are not nice people (as a fair generalization).
justtenofusinhere 5y ago
In very broad strokes...
Men tend to be happy because they find ways to be happy with themselves which gives them the strength to do all they have always done no matter how gruling. Denying men self knowledge has been extremely destructive to them.
Women are so unhappy because they simply want more but never consider what it means to be more. No matter how much they have their lack of introspection and responsibility means they are always going to be unhappy, which creates a dynamic where much of their joy comes from other's unhappiness, since misery LOVES company.
SKRedPill 5y ago
If I told you that most people are indeed dumb, will you agree with it?
zyqkvx 5y ago
As much as I'd like to agree I get a less then zero error. I know I don't understand people. I have fixed beliefs I consider superior but it's not that simple. I can not escape my own filters. I could look at the faces of people on this earth 1 a second each for 100 years without sleep and I would not see them all. For every 'dumb' person I've met in my life there's a guy that invented a radio telescope or simply blasted dynamite to make roads on mountains. Also, seeing people as dumb is a trap that will leave you a worse person.
With all that said, I'm irritated by people a lot because of expectations and they get in the way of my interests.
zyqkvx 5y ago
Yeah, that's the answer. What a shit way to end your post.
ObserverBG 5y ago
I said that this will calm them down, but i did not said that you should do that.
Anyway, then, why haven't you done something? Check my other post in this thread, it seems like women have western men by the balls.
unipos 5y ago
I was born female and I can admit to having penis envy. I admit I wish I had the drive and ambition that many men naturally have. I admit I envy the physical size and muscle potential of men. I admit I'd prefer to be the hero, the one women drool after. I admit I have a lust for power but fail to achieve it. Whether that is due to my sex or me just being a failed human being, I don't know.
I'm not trying to make women look bad. It is just my individual experience.
SKRedPill 5y ago
Your real problem is self poisoning and looking at others. Get over that. Only you live your life here and now.
unipos 5y ago
That's what I do every day - living here and now without sticking to any of the countless plans I've made. You're right though. I am self poisoning. You're wrong in me looking at others though. My problem is I don't. I don't look at their problems. I don't feel their feelings. All I see and feel are my problems and feelings. I suppose that's called 'lacking empathy'.
red_philosopher 5y ago
Imagine if you fulfilled your lust for power by finding and sticking by a powerful man who would move worlds for you in exchange for nothing but your loyalty.
Fuck, you might even be happy.
zyqkvx 5y ago
That's a common fantasy of man, but bitches aint loyal.
justtenofusinhere 5y ago
Second
unipos 5y ago
Yup. They definitely weren't loyal back in my high school days.
zyqkvx 5y ago
I read a dozen of your replies. You seem so couped up at home. Break away and take a drive up to local mountains for no reason at all. I know that kinda cooped up. Use randomness to get out of the house, and go someplace you don't ordinarily go, and have no reason to go there.
The first 'thoughts' that chatter through our minds aren't really thoughts. You're mind's ability to sort and judge the incoming 'thoughts' is real thinking.
This Guy is the shit. Watch some of his long form videos, they are even better, less racy, more thoughtful.
unipos 5y ago
I did take a break a couple of weeks ago with some friends to go for a day trip to a national park. We took some LSD. It was incredible how much it amplified the beauty of nature. Just floating in a lake staring at the sky was super awesome. Thanks for the advice though. Driving to some mountains to just enjoy the view would be really cool. There aren't any here where I live but at least we have some cliffs and forests :) .
> The first 'thoughts' that chatter through our minds aren't really thoughts.
True but they're the first ones we usually act on. Well, I act on.
> You're mind's ability to sort and judge the incoming 'thoughts' is real thinking.
This usually happens in hindsight for me xD.
> This Guy is the shit. Watch some of his long form videos, they are even better, less racy, more thoughtful.
Admirable guy. He does have a point about being a prisoner in your own mind... It's too easy to get stuck in the same old thought loops. I guess the best we can do is educate ourselves and little by little try to change those loops by bringing in something new and novel.
[deleted]
unipos 5y ago
Yeah. I tried that once but it didn't make me or him happy. Couldn't love. Still can't. That's why I figure it'd be better to be a man and try to get that power by myself.
red_philosopher 5y ago
So you tried something once, failed, and then never tried again. Maybe your lack of success is because you're a f'king quitter.
unipos 5y ago
I tried a second time with a man and it failed too. Since then I've learnt that the usual heterosexual relationships aren't for me. So yeah I am quitting when it comes to those. I do hope I could still love romantically and sexually, if not men then at least women.
Anyway you seem really angry? I suppose you have deep detestation for some of the qualities I'm exhibiting.
red_philosopher 5y ago
Which is it, once or twice?
Qualities? Qualities imply good traits, like, integrity and self-reflectability.
If it seems like I detest things about you, I can assure you that it is only my bullshit detector going off.
unipos 5y ago
One long term for four years. The second one was very on/off. Hence I'm not sure if it can be counted. It did make me realise I just can't form proper stable relationships with men.
Fair enough. My choice of wording can be poor sometimes.
Ok. I'm not sure what you think I'm bullshitting about though. Judging by your post history you don't trust many women. No wonder you think I'm bullshitting you. I just don't understand why it seems like you're almost resentful towards women. Sorry if that isn't the case. Just seems like so.
Well, at least I figured out how to do quoting properly.
red_philosopher 5y ago
Without asking for details, frankly, this sounds like a cop out. I'm not sure what your past is like, but saying you just can't do it after 1.5 attempts? If everyone quit everything after 1.5 tries we'd all be fucking dead by now.
Your solution (after only 1.5 tries and (I can only imagine) the concurrent lack of self-reflection (because you say you don't know why you fail)) to become (and motivation for becoming) a man in order to obtain power is horrifying. Think about it. You sacrificed your biological imperative in order to become the thing you wanted most: a powerful man. Gross. What's to trust about someone who sacrifices what they are in the name of power?
I trust people who deserve trust. Women have reproductive goals that are not in my best interests. I should naturally be wary- my well-being is put at risk. It's not resentment, it's prudent.
unipos 5y ago
It's not the only reason. I never fantasize about men sexually. Women yes, men never. I've tried but it doesn't arouse me. I hate having to introduce details afterwards but sometimes it's necessary since 1.5 attempts does sound very little without further context. It's not so much the attempts either but rather the number of years I tried to conform to something I clearly am not.
I don't think I said "I don't know why I fail". Power isn't the only motivation I have for becoming a man. Power over others is easier to achieve as a man. It's a very attractive perk of manhood. However first and foremost I want power over myself and my actions. I recognize I can and should be able to achieve this as a woman just as well.
So we should surrender to our biology and let it determine us? I never said being a powerful man is what I want the most.
This is a bit vague. I'm not sure what you mean by "what they are". I'm assuming you mean that gender is the top defining characteristic of a person that should not be sacrificed?
Ok. Women in general don't deserve trust because they are carrying out their biological imperative?
red_philosopher 5y ago
This explains everything. Nothing else needs to be said.
Broadly speaking, women can and should be trusted just like any other person. When the scope is narrowed to procreation, in combination with our current societal context, no I do not trust women to have my best interests at heart.
WholesomeAwesome 5y ago
this was from a bullshit study on teenagers, not adults.
Cantloginhere 5y ago
I don't think so, the studies I've see show little difference in teens. Ones for adults vary, either no difference or with the flatter wider bell for men, at least in mathematics.
[deleted]
PhantomCowboy 5y ago
now you're starting to get it.
[deleted] 5y ago
[deleted]
ObserverBG 5y ago
TRP has zero influence on laws or governments. Feminism up to now is far more effective.
doorterblack 5y ago
This is ridiculous. If this is the goal of women, why has it not happened before? Why are we not under a matriarchy?
Incel9876 5y ago
We're aleady under a matriarchy, I'd date the flip to as soon as divorce/custody laws began to favor women rather than female voting, employment, etc. Once women are seen as free agents, rather than belonging to father/husband/male-guardian then men become disposable and enslaved, just as various ancient philosophers said would happen the moment women were given any type of equality. Why has it not happened before? It has, repeatedly, Rome, various Chinese dynasties, etc.
NormalAndy 5y ago
I don't think there's any point trying to stop feminism. I think there is a great deal to be had from learning to thrive regardless.
Cantloginhere 5y ago
'Some' women. Most are not feminist at all, 40% of women voted for Trump. Just like men they vary, aptitudes and attitudes overlap between genders too. Wanting equal opportunities is not penis envy, it's just being fair.
Having said that feminists wanting quotas and unfair advantage is wrong, but that's just an inevitable minority of people looking to gain advantage, not 'women'.
[deleted]
blkMGTOW07 5y ago
Your comment gives no substance to the topic at hand. If you're gonna troll, do so with some reference to the post. Otherwise, as Deadpool said, "That's just lazy writing".
[deleted]