Spot on post. I wrote about this topic over a year ago and the trends continue: https://alphajedi.com/2016/07/12/entitiled-victimhood/

Just don’t care what they say. Here’s a good quote from a well known Alpha.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=slYjAKzWcWQ

Being female trumps all that TBF. The only thing that may contest that position is being Muslim. Cause let's be real, Everyone is scared they are gonna get blown up. They know Muslims do not fuck around and will kill you if you piss them off. That's real power.

But anyway, I mostly agree. I just wanted to point out that you can be a Black gender fluid trans and a woman will still rape the ever living fuck out of you legally and socially if she wanted.

[deleted]

Sorry to break it to you guys, if you are a guy who likes 'trans-woman' you're gay because they still have a dick.

tl;dr version:

Own your own life. Don't expect handouts from others; that brings zero satisfaction, contentment, or success. Don't fall into the frame of others, but instead let others follow you. How? By taking ownership of your own life, your own goals, and your own fuck-ups. Carpe diem bitches.

Good post, but I'd take issue with one part.

They want validation through attention, largely sourced through the media.

I wish this is all they wanted. They don't want "validation." They want to use the power of the government to force private individuals to associate with them, to discriminate in their favor, and to transfer resources from other parts of society to them. It's not just some trifling matter. That's why these people must be resisted at every point and in the clearest possible terms. They are the public enemy number one to Western Civilization, an existential threat no different than Nazis or Communists.

It was funny watching a bunch of white women in the US, the most privileged group in the history of the universe, telling us about their "victim" status. How many 13 year old girls in sub sahara Africa would be willing to get a letter from "a man!" in exchange for a series of multimillion dollar contracts, and being a rich white woman in the US?

In any event, you'd fucking better vote or you'll find yourself as more of a slave than you already are.

Just one issue with the hierarchy. I would think Muslims would be tippy top because they murder gay people and the left don’t seem to care.

You forgot Jews at the top of the victim heirarchy. The people who ironically have vastly disproportionate control of media and finance. Really takes the noggin for a joggin

It was never about equality...it’s always been about superiority.

I always find it funny when people say "if you aren't a straight white male" news flash kiddo it's happening to any man that is straight no matter the race. We're all fucked in this the sooner people see this the sooner we tackle this together as "Men".

In the years after WW2, it became clear in the West that whatever ideas appealed to the masses would win out over ideas that required sacrifice of personal freedoms in order to have social order, as the Axis powers required of their citizens.

In order to win these conflicts both real and imagined, the West adopted its Leftward tilt from after WW1 and accelerated it. This culminated in the 1960s, after which point Western Civilization — already heavily damaged by the crass commercialism of the 1950s, the French Revolution and the individualistic fallout of The Renaissance™ — really fell apart. As such, we recognize now that we have been living under an undiagnosed regime which we might call neo-Communism.

Neo-Communism resembles the old form of Communism, but has two changes: first, it is decentralized, meaning that it is enforced by citizens to show loyalty, instead of by secret police; second, it is grafted onto capitalism, which enables it to avoid the crisis that did in Communism, namely the ability to have any kind of functional economy.

Its decentralized nature means that it works through incentives toward personal reward or social popularity, both of which require the person in question to affirm the ideological narrative in some way. The recent metoo frenzy of reporting of sexual assaults shows us this market for attention: anyone who can participate in the latest trends, affirming ideology, gets ahead.

In that provides a uniform series of incentives, such that members of all political parties behave roughly the same way, creating a “uniparty” of people who are working to affirm the narrative however they can while staying in the news as much as possible. Since ideology is what holds this society together, the media takes on far greater importance than in any other type of society.

Ideology thus provides both our motivation and a type of currency, in that those who wield ideology well will be rewarded in a society which is mobilized in the military style for perpetual war to enforce that belief system.

Neo-Communism specializes in making us appear “free” while finding ways to entrench us in the system. Simply surviving costs endless money, and jobs are the only way for most people to have that, making people dependent on their paychecks and in turn, on saying the “right” thing so that they do not get fired and end up in the poorhouse.

We can visualize Neo-Communism as a society centered around the idea of equality as enforced by a cultural revolution, as opposed to a political one, and having the following attributes:

1. Political Correctness. Thoughts are pre-emptively censored for fear of what the neighbors, friends and co-workers might think; this requires establishing an absolute good by setting up an absolute bad, for example, “Hitler was racist, therefore anti-racism is good, and anything against Neo-Communism is racist.”

2. Wealth Transfer. Neo-Communism synthesizes consumerism, which beat Communism in 1991, with the idea of the socialist-style welfare state, and so it specializes in creation of taxes to perpetually shift wealth from the top to the bottom. This also continually “primes the pump” by encouraging the least affluent to spend money that was given to them by government.

3. Trend Culture. Neo-Communism specializes in using mass culture as a weapon of cultural revolution, but it must keep its weapon from being turned against it, so it generates constant distractions in the form of trends, or whatever “everyone is talking about” this news cycle, month, year or decade. These overlap and keep people chasing low-carb foods, small urban living, climate-friendly pollution, low-fat foods, collaborative working or whatever other paradoxical but consequently appealing idea they can spin to you to keep your mind fascinated, dazed and misdirected.

4. Unofficial Nature. What has enabled Neo-Communism to survive for this long is that it is invisible because it consists of social incentives and fears; whatever is popular and trending will result in personal advancement for an individual in any field, and whatever touches the taboo line will destroy that same individual. As a result, you can declare yourself an anti-Communist and still be an agent of Neo-Communism.

5. Replacement Culture. Like the Cymothoa exigua parasite, which sneaks into a fish through the gills and then replaces its tongue, Neo-Communism uses its cultural revolution to re-define what is “good,” and in doing so, replaces both culture and religion. Soon even all art and media products revolve around the ideas of Neo-Communism.

6. Individualism. At its core, Neo-Communism appeals to the individualism of others in the form of, “Why do things the right way? You can get ahead by doing things our way,” which creates an attraction for those who do not fit in, uniting them. It also creates a “race to the bottom” as others then compete with this new and trendy mediocrity.

The rise of Neo-Communism came from attempts by the need to reconcile their Socialist leanings with the horrors of Communism, causing them to embrace market-driven communism:

But as evidence of communism’s horrors emerged over the decades, it rightly shocked liberals and leftists in the West, who shared many of the egalitarian aims of the revolutionaries.

But if we’ve learned one lesson from the communist century, it is this: That to implement Marxist ideals is to betray them. Marx’s demand to “abolish private property” was a clarion call to action—and an inexorable path to the creation of an oppressive, unchecked state.

A few socialists began to recognize that there could be no freedom without markets and private property. When they made their peace with the existence of capitalism, hoping to regulate rather than to abolish it, they initially elicited denunciations as apostates. Over time, more socialists embraced the welfare state, or the market economy with redistribution.

Since then, we have learned that to adopt egalitarian ideals at all leads to the creation of a crowd, or a herd of people dedicated to the type of behavior we see at carnivals, sporting events and Black Friday sales at Wal-mart. The problem is not Communism; it is egalitarianism.

Neo-Communism was created to conceal that learning. The ideal of the Neo-Communist is to befuddle the population with consumerism while simultaneously indoctrinating them in egalitarian ideological dogma. The thinking is that, like political correctness, this will reprogram them so fundamentally that it fundamentally over-rides “human nature” and makes a working form of socialism. The problem it faces is that human behavior is not so much “human nature” as it is a reflection of the mathematics of survival. People left unchecked will create a tragedy of the commons by which they exploit whatever they can; individualism is the rule of individuals except for the exceptional. It is why in nature, species tend to consume all resources and then die out. Nature imposes a test to see who can transcend raw individualism.

However, creating a perverse incentive by declaring reward-before-performance, or subsidy for simply being human and “equal” as egalitarian philosophies like classical liberalism and Communism demand, ensures that individualism will be rewarded. That in turn forces others to descend to that level, and herd behavior results, with the herd consuming everything it can and then running over cliffs like lemmings, which is how human societies throughout history have self-destructed.

As a result, Neo-Communism is failing just like Communism, democracy, and European Socialism are: it mutates people into selfish, morally nullified, anti-conscientious beings who are oblivious to everything around them because all of it is based on a lie. Democracy killed ancient Greece and Rome, and now it is killing the West because (apparently) people were so oblivious they were willing to try it again. Socialism, or “economic equality,” is a parallel to democracy, or “political equality,” and both lead to Communism and through it, Neo-Communism as the virus evolves.

If we look at the human condition, we see that in individuals, individualism — a denial of the reality of the inevitable consequences of our actions in preference for individual desires — causes lives to become self-destructive, and that in groups, individualism becomes herd behavior.

The herd ruins everything. Any time we have structure, purpose and principle, we succeed; when we descend into herd behavior, we fail.

Just start telling everyone you're Jewish. Dave Chappel mentions this in his netflix standup when he has a victim off with a Jewish guy who goes all the way back to Egypt.

What a fucking joke. Saying MLK was nonviolent is a straight up lie. The dude was literally a revolutionary socialist.

How about you stop trying to use trp as your own personal soapbox and eat a dick

Yawn. Windbag useless rant

Can we go back to mods post only

Victimhood is a fetish in our society, a fetish for the miserable and the weak. I would never strive to be a victim of anything but these people are lining up and playing poker deciding who has a better victim hand.

This is bull shit i see and hear so many stright men playing the victim card eg , " the immigrants are taking our jobs"

Its not about victimhood, its not about feminism. You are witnessing a 2nd resurgence in Communism in the United States, which has been percolating across college campuses for decades.

Don't blame women, blame a bunch of jewish intellecutals who wrote all sorts of bizarre social tomes like "Critical Theory" which became the darling of the 60's hippy set and now its all coming to a head.

You missed the single most important victim group, that created victimhood and reparations themselves. Anyway.

The problem of the sub lately is that any wanker with an internet connection became a social and cultural pundit enlightening us with their analysis. You're no different from obese feminists on Twitter who talk about changing the culture. You sound ridiculous.

Don't be a victim. Don't hold them up as anything but for detached pity. They aren't inherently saints, morally superior, or anything else, they're just too weak to defy circumstances.

Culture and Society was not built by victims nor was history ever written by them although the victor can certainly adopt them for their own agenda.

Life for these women is too good so they need to make problems. Women NEED something to bitch about and be upset about.

For any who haven't seen it I highly recommend you got watch the mouse utopia experiment on YouTube. It's the best explanation for this bullshit IMO.

Late to the party but your victim stack is all fucked up. A mistake a straight white male would make. Check your privilege.

Illegal aliens are #1 in the victim hierarchy. They are especially victimized when they murder American citizens.

Also you need to realize the victim hierarchy is genderfluid and even the leftists will tweak the victim status to further their goals (use useful idiots).

Which brings the next point. If you weren't convinced that women as a whole (especially white women) aren't mindless tools just check out their signs. The "women's March" is just like the "march for climate". A bunch of leftist faggots marching for leftist victimhood but the topic is not what it is about. It's about consolidating power and using people.

Ah yes. The euphemism they use for this hierarchy is "intersectional feminism".

Not to discount your post- which is detailed and generally accurate. But the reason people claim victimhood (which isn't to be conflated with them being actual "victims") is plainly political reality. It is a way to advance through society, and it's effect in advancement is twofold: (i) it automatically demotes the white straight male; and (ii) it elevates the "victim" based on his or her redeemable "victimhood points" (which, as you mention, is racial, gender, etc etc.)

My main point is simply that it is a power grab, and needs no explanation beyond that. White males let themselves be enervated of their power, and those who aren't generally as successful as white men took the vacant space, with no qualms or questions as to the morality of it.

The victimhood hierarchy is a real thing. I once came across a WW2 study after which the authors had problems due to the Jewish community raising claims of racism and antisemitism. The reason? They dared say that 12 million Slavs were killed during WW2. Apparently it ain't fair to acknowledge a human life as a human life.

What victims truly want? They want privileges and they will fight one another after white straight men will abdicate. They. Just. Want. Power. And. Money.

I have no idea what point it is you think you’ve made here. Firstly, what do you mean by the assertion that the marginalised groups you mentioned should ‘work’ to get what they want? Work how? And how exactly do you suggest they effect change without raising awareness of what the issues are in the first place? And when did trans people as a whole ever say that as long as they were referred to using correct pronouns all of the issues would go away? These things are normally the result of gradual change, just like the American civil rights movement. I would have thought that was obvious even to someone like you.

You left out group #1 in the victimhood category. Being a part of this chosen group trumps the suffering any other group has endured.

Read Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Victim morality (slave morality as he would call it) is a byproduct of Judeo-Christian culture but has been adopted by progressives who are now using it to great effect in the way that Christians/Jews used it against Roman patricians.

Ultimately this post is 70% whining and I think the sub is best when it's primarily focused on game.

MLK Jr., Susan B. Anthony and others didn’t achieve the goals of their groups through ANTIFA-esque violence

First of all that's a strawman. One, because "ANTIFA" isn't an actual group, and two, because anti-fascists (of which there are many groups) aren't civil rights activists. They're anti-fascists. Like the United States Military. Sometimes the goals overlaps, because fascists happen to be against civil rights, but anti-fascists aren't going to come out over your routine workplace discrimination case. They come out when neo-nazis/white supremacists are in town.

Second, MLK is noted for saying "a riot is the language of the unheard". King and Susan B. Anthony would've be called "sjws" and "people on the victim hierarchy" by the reactionaries of today, if they were around.

While focusing on your topic of political and social victimhood, you are correct in saying it stems from the left. But victimhood is a personality trait that has been around much longer than what we think of as the "political left."

It stems more from low self esteem, low discipline, and low accountability. These are traits that many left voters innately have.

Bitches just need a good spanking is all.

The victim culture is a good focus for conversation on here, but I don't like this article. There's way more than the three categories you described, you completely ignored the disability craze (e.g White males especially are desperate to get a diagnosis to join the victim crowd). This is why you get people on disability for shit like ADHD and mild anxiety. Instead, write about the sociological data coming out on the victim culture, and how it has been found to be the biggest predictor of being a failure (even more so than parental income and education, which has historically been the greatest predictor). Those 18 year old victims will for sure never be a functioning member of society; they've formed the identity of the victim, and actively seek more victimhood status points.

Talk about the victim olympics, and the cannabalizing of various victim groups on the far left trying to 'out victimize' each other. Eg BLM taking over the womens march, trans turning on women, etc.

Anyone ever notice that 95% of trans people are white men? I mean, this is the shit we should talk about.

The cultural revolution that happened at the end of last century still needs to target the hidden enemy, just like in any revolutionary order. Before it was feudal lords (French revolution), then bourgeoisie (Marxist revolution), the Jews (3rd Reich), finally fascists and capitalists (Soviet revolution) and so on. Every time they needed to point out "inner" enemy that has to be eliminated to achieve final state of happiness and harmony. It was also the group you would put the blame on for ideal system and it's new noble elite rulers still failing to fulfill the "ideal state project". Now it's a straight white privileged male that stands on the way to peace and happiness on earth promised by liberal world order. That way elites can keep frustrated gibmidats crowd in check pointing every time at this mythical "white male" as the public enemy. Does not matter that all these university elites and their Wall Street sponsors are white men themselves. That way they can avoid an open revolution against their order and "simulate" a pseudo-revolution against a vile white male living among the crowd. This basically results in low status white betas getting shit for white elite alpha men puling the strings. This time the kind of "Jacobinism" terror control took a very tame and symbolic form, but nothing guarantees that it can not escalate.

Before anybody is allowed to sit, they should have to make a chair.

First of all it teaches you not to take things for granted by revealing the work and effort that go into the things we take for granted. Second, you learn to appreciate the value of your own hard work. If you make a shitty chair, you might as well have just stayed standing instead of wasting all that effort making a shitty chair. Make a good one and you'll sit comfortably and reflect on the effort it took. A sense of wholeness and fulfillment wells up in you for just a moment.

Too many men sit on chairs they think themselves entitled to, that were made by men, who, at one time or another, knew full well what it was like not to have a chair at all.

I don't agree with this post, there is a race that should be in the first place by far and they are all white, i don't wanna name it but I think it is pretty obvious to figure out which one i am talking about.

Missing both East-asian and Indian in your "race" ranking, which would most likely be 5th and 6th respectively.

Chinese people only get victim points if referring to stuff from 50+ years ago (i.e. Chinese Exclusion Act) but the left generally avoids talking about them because they contradict all their regular talking points about "white supremacy" Filipino and other "dark skinned" Asians get some points but its never sustained or long term.

The only victim points Indians get is if they happen to be muslim (Aziz Ansari) or someone mistakes them for being muslim (convenience store owners being yelled at over 9/11)

You tried to draw a comprehensive picture of what a victim is, but a more general definition would suit the topic much better.

Ironically, by trying to be comprehensive, you were extremely limited to only certain groups.

Sometimes less is more.

I surf Reddit on occasion for some lolz and a tickle of left-leaning news. And I have to be completely honest, I was about to lose it and punch a wall. And then I came across your post. Thank you so much for making my day and typing out what I want to shout at others people on the daily.

It's always funny how certain groups can be more succesful like asians or jews, but they are still considered more victimised than white people.